I'm Finally Giving In and Declaring All Election Fraud Discussion Should Be Moved Into Conspiracy Theories

Filing legal challenges is not fraud. Please tell us how it is, hack.
Alternative electors are not against the law if chosen by Dec.14th. They were chosen before that.
Pressuring people is not illegal.
Actually it is, when those legal challenges has no facts to support the allegations. Why do you think so many of Trumps lawyers either lost, or are losing their license to practice law.
 
No it is not and that excuse goes upo against 75% of voters who say the 2020 election was stolen. The mentally ill aere you and your cult that believes might makes right. You are a pathetic little turd.
facts: no link to 75%

Republicans Increasingly Realize There’s No Evidence Of Election Fraud—But Most Still Think 2020 Election Was Stolen Anyway, Poll Finds​



In some ways, the 2022 election seemed set up for a repeat of the aftermath of the 2020 election. A flood of GOP-aligned but lower-quality polls suggested the party was in line for big gains, shaping the right’s expectations of a red wave. It was somewhat reminiscent of the “red mirage” that showed Donald Trump ahead early on election night 2020, and which he later baselessly exploited to claim a stolen election.

Then the red wave proved itself to be a mirage, leaving Republicans to search for explanations for another disappointing election.

Thus far, though, the reaction hasn’t been anything on the order of the 2020 “stolen election” fever that gripped the GOP. And given what transpired after 2020, it’s worth asking why.

 
Alternative electors are not against the law if chosen by Dec.14th. They were chosen before that.

How were presidential electors chosen?

Who selects the electors? Choosing each State's electors is a two-part process. First, the political parties in each State choose slates of potential electors sometime before the general election. Second, during the general election, the voters in each State select their State's electors by casting their ballots.

The alternate-electors were not chosen by either political party. Through extea-legal means.
 
facts: no link to 75%

Republicans Increasingly Realize There’s No Evidence Of Election Fraud—But Most Still Think 2020 Election Was Stolen Anyway, Poll Finds​



In some ways, the 2022 election seemed set up for a repeat of the aftermath of the 2020 election. A flood of GOP-aligned but lower-quality polls suggested the party was in line for big gains, shaping the right’s expectations of a red wave. It was somewhat reminiscent of the “red mirage” that showed Donald Trump ahead early on election night 2020, and which he later baselessly exploited to claim a stolen election.

Then the red wave proved itself to be a mirage, leaving Republicans to search for explanations for another disappointing election.

Thus far, though, the reaction hasn’t been anything on the order of the 2020 “stolen election” fever that gripped the GOP. And given what transpired after 2020, it’s worth asking why.

Your article is from Dec.2022. It means less than you do. FAIL troll.
 
Denying evidentuary hearings was an order and the judges we have follow orders. Massive fraud took place, The voter rolls are loaded with fake voters. The people do not exist only the registration form exists making the vote legal. Those votes are used to elect the losers.
Were these registrations on "flash paper" because they've audited the voter rolls and didn't find any such evidence. Not even that the ballots were printed on "bamboo" paper, with watermarks.
 
Lastamender

can't and won't answer with honesty
That is an honest answer. Trump's lawyers are being persecuted for doing their jobs which is simply defending their client. There should be 0 punishment for that. here is what you assholes are up to. This is lawfare. Using our own laws to destroy this country.

A new dark money group with ties to Democrats known as the 65 Project is attempting to disbar more than 100 lawyers who worked on former President Donald Trump's post-election lawsuits.

The 65 Project describes itself as "a bipartisan effort to protect democracy from abuse of the legal system by holding accountable lawyers who engage in fraudulent and malicious lawsuits," according to its website, which said it was given its name after an "army of Big Lie Lawyers filed 65 lawsuits based on lies to overturn the election."


The group has already filed 10 ethics complaints against lawyers who are or have previously worked for Trump, including attorney Jenna Ellis, one of the most prominent faces of post-Election Day 2020 legal efforts to reverse President Joe Biden's win. The complaint mentioning Ellis lists several other attorneys she worked alongside, including Rudy Giuliani, John Eastman, and Sidney Powell, who recently received a complaint from a standing committee of the State Bar of Texas over her election-related challenges in Michigan.

 
Were these registrations on "flash paper" because they've audited the voter rolls and didn't find any such evidence. Not even that the ballots were printed on "bamboo" paper, with watermarks.
Not in NY. Cloned voters have been proven to exist with NY's data from FIOA requests backing it up.
 
Your article is from Dec.2022. It means less than you do. FAIL troll.


So now it's bamboo in the ballots? Are there are any limits to the Senate's audit lunacy?​

Opinion: The Arizona Senate's auditors are now looking for signs of bamboo in the ballots, proving there is no level of lunacy to which they will not climb.​

 
All kinds of evidence turning up and where is your source? Lousy troll.

So now it's bamboo in the ballots? Are there are any limits to the Senate's audit lunacy?​

Opinion: The Arizona Senate's auditors are now looking for signs of bamboo in the ballots, proving there is no level of lunacy to which they will not climb.​

 


So now it's bamboo in the ballots? Are there are any limits to the Senate's audit lunacy?​

Opinion: The Arizona Senate's auditors are now looking for signs of bamboo in the ballots, proving there is no level of lunacy to which they will not climb.​

Why didn't one swing allow an independent forensic audit?
 

Republicans Increasingly Realize There’s No Evidence Of Election Fraud—But Most Still Think 2020 Election Was Stolen Anyway, Poll Finds​

This is no different than believing in bigfoot, or that Elvis is still alive. You will always find people who will believe anything.
 

So now it's bamboo in the ballots? Are there are any limits to the Senate's audit lunacy?​

Opinion: The Arizona Senate's auditors are now looking for signs of bamboo in the ballots, proving there is no level of lunacy to which they will not climb.​

They are now? Source that troll or STFU.
 
This is no different than believing in bigfoot, or that Elvis is still alive. You will always find people who will believe anything.
You are stupid enough to believe in the climate hoax and most likely are in the Covid cult too. You have no room to talk.
 
They are now? Source that troll or STFU.


Get the Facts: A poll shows more voters believe the 2020 election was stolen. Is there proof?​


Get the Facts: A poll shows more voters believe the 2020 election was stolen. Is there proof?​


---------------


Almost a third of Americans still believe the 2020 election result was fraudulent​

There's no evidence widespread fraud affected the outcome of the 2020 election, but Trump and allies have spent years undercutting the election's legitimacy.


mtp_head_shot_kamisar_2.jpeg

June 20, 2023, 8:50 AM PDT
By Ben Kamisar
Three-in-10 Americans still believe President Joe Biden won his 2020 election only due to voter fraud, a new poll shows — a durable number that highlights the disconnect on one of the foundational issues facing American democracy.

 

Forum List

Back
Top