Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Then why have them shitbird?
What purpose do they serve fool?
Alec Baldwin is an actor. Try reality.
Yeah, I like the challenge of hitting the target center mass consistently. And it is relaxing.I derive great pleasure in looking at them. Some are works of art. Some are mechanical masterpieces, some are historically significant.
Those that I shoot provide hours of quality entertainment, both as a form of meditation, and honing my accuracy.
Unlike you, I actually DO things.
There is piece of mind knowing that if you ever have to use a fire arms for a serious purpose you can do it competently.Yeah, I like the challenge of hitting the target center mass consistently. And it is relaxing.
The media say he was an idealistic activist.What kind of an idiot thinks that he can talk sense to some subhuman destroying scooters at 4AM in Brooklyn?
"Idealistic activists" got his ass killed, didn't he? Stupid sonofabitch.The media say he was an idealistic activist.
Sadly, he did not realize that you simply cannot reason with certain folks.
Tiny piss-tools have that effect.The OP and the INCEL boi are dancing with glee over this death.
Linked thousands of times to the same response.And yet you fail to link to them.......so, asshole, we will wait to see your link so we can, once again, show you how full of crap your "stats," are.
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
www.newscientist.com
www.theguardian.com
www.hsph.harvard.edu
www.thetrace.org
Selected studies using selected data is invalid.Shit stain.....I listed a whole bunch of people who used their guns to save their lives.....and that happens about 1.1 million times a year......those people would tell you you have no idea what the Fuck you are talking about....
A quick guide to the studies and the numbers.....the full lay out of what was studied by each study is in the links....
The name of the group doing the study, the year of the study, the number of defensive gun uses and if police and military defensive gun uses are included.....notice the bill clinton and obama defensive gun use research is highlighted.....
GunCite-Gun Control-How Often Are Guns Used in Self-Defense
GunCite Frequency of Defensive Gun Use in Previous Surveys
Field...1976....3,052,717 ( no cops, no military)
DMIa 1978...2,141,512 ( no cops, no military)
L.A. TIMES...1994...3,609,68 ( no cops, no military)
Kleck......1994...2.5 million ( no cops, no military)
2021 national firearm survey, Prof. William English, PhD. designed by Deborah Azrael of Harvard T. Chan School of public policy, and Mathew Miller, Northeastern university.......1.67 million defensive uses annually.
CDC...1996-1998... 1.1 million averaged over those years.( no cops, no military)
Obama's CDC....2013....500,000--3million
--------------------
Bordua...1977...1,414,544
DMIb...1978...1,098,409 ( no cops, no military)
Hart...1981...1.797,461 ( no cops, no military)
Mauser...1990...1,487,342 ( no cops,no military)
Gallup...1993...1,621,377 ( no cops, no military)
DEPT. OF JUSTICE...1994...1.5 million ( the bill clinton study)
Journal of Quantitative Criminology--- 989,883 times per year."
(Based on survey data from a 2000 study published in the Journal of Quantitative Criminology,[17] U.S. civilians use guns to defend themselves and others from crime at least 989,883 times per year.[18])
Paper: "Measuring Civilian Defensive Firearm Use: A Methodological Experiment." By David McDowall and others. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, March 2000. Measuring Civilian Defensive Firearm Use: A Methodological Experiment - Springer
-------------------------------------------
Ohio...1982...771,043
Gallup...1991...777,152
Tarrance... 1994... 764,036 (no cops, no military)
Lawerence Southwich Jr. 400,000 fewer violent crimes and at least 800,000 violent crimes deterred..
2021 national firearms survey..
The survey was designed by Deborah Azrael of the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, and Matthew Miller of Northeastern University,
----
The survey further finds that approximately a third of gun owners (31.1%) have used a firearm to defend themselves or their property, often on more than one occasion, and it estimates that guns are used defensively by firearms owners in approximately 1.67 million incidents per year. Handguns are the most common firearm employed for self-defense (used in 65.9% of defensive incidents), and in most defensive incidents (81.9%) no shot was fired. Approximately a quarter (25.2%) of defensive incidents occurred within the gun owner's home, and approximately half (53.9%) occurred outside their home, but on their property. About one out of ten (9.1%) defensive gun uses occurred in public, and about one out of twenty (4.8%) occurred at work.
2021 National Firearms Survey
Clinton's study by the DOJ....
https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles/165476.pdf
Applying those restrictions leaves 19 NSPOF respondents (0.8 percent of the sample), representing 1.5 million defensive users. This estimate is directly comparable to the well-known estimate of Kleck and Gertz, shown in the last column of exhibit 7. While the NSPOF estimate is smaller, it is statistically plausible that the difference is due to sampling error. Inclusion of multiple DGUs reported by half of the 19 NSPOF respondents increases the estimate to 4.7 million DGUs.
n the third column of Table 6.2, we apply the Kleck and Gertz (1995) criteria for "genuine" DGUs (type A), leaving us with just 19 respondents. They represent 1.5 million defensive users. This estimate is directly comparable to the well-known Kleck and Gertz estimate of 2.5 million, shown in the last
While ours is smaller, it is staistically plausible that the difference is due to sampling error. to the when we include the multiple DGUs victim. defensive reported by half our 19 respondents, our estimate increases to 4.7 milli
While ours is smaller, it is statistically plausible that the difference petrator; in most cases (69 percent), the is due to sampling error. Note that when we include the multiple DGUs reported by half our 19 respondents, our estimate increases to 4.7 million DGUs.
----
As shown in Table 6.6, the defender fired his or her gun in 27 percent of these incidents (combined "fire warning shots" and "fire at perpetrator" percentages, though some respondents reported firing both warning shots and airning at the perpetrator). Forty percent of these were "warning shots," and about a third were aimed at the perpetrator but missed. The perpetrator was wounded by the crime victim in eight percent of all DGUs. In nine percent of DGUs the victim captured and held the perpetrator at gunpoint until the police could arrive.
Obama's study...
Defensive Use of Guns
Defensive use of guns by crime victims is a common occurrence, although the exact number remains disputed (Cook and Ludwig, 1996; Kleck, 2001a). Almost all national survey estimates indicate that defensive gun uses by victims are at least as common as offensive uses by criminals, with estimates of annual uses ranging from about 500,000 to more than 3 million (Kleck, 2001a), in the context of about 300,000 violent crimes involving firearms in 2008 (BJS, 2010).
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2013. Priorities for Research to Reduce the Threat of Firearm-Related Violence. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Priorities for Research to Reduce the Threat of Firearm-Related Violence | The National Academies Press.
Priorities for Research to Reduce the Threat of Firearm-Related Violence | Priorities for Research to Reduce the Threat of Firearm-Related Violence | The National Academies Press
What a load of crap.I derive great pleasure in looking at them. Some are works of art. Some are mechanical masterpieces, some are historically significant.
Those that I shoot provide hours of quality entertainment, both as a form of meditation, and honing my accuracy.
Unlike you, I actually DO things.
Linked thousands of times to the same response.
Stupidity.
But to feed your stupidity...
Investigating the Link Between Gun Possession and Gun Assault
Objectives. We investigated the possible relationship between being shot in an assault and possession of a gun at the time.Methods. We enrolled 677 case participants that had been shot in an assault and 684 population-based control participants within ...Owning Guns Puts People in Your Home at Greater Risk of Being Killed, New Study Shows
A new study shows that people living in homes with guns face substantially higher risks of being fatally assaulted.time.com
Carrying a gun increases risk of getting shot and killed
People who carry firearms are far likelier to get shot – and killed – than unarmed people, finds a new study of hundreds of shooting victims in PhiladelphiaPeople in homes with handguns more likely to be shot dead, major study finds
Researchers find ‘zero evidence of any kind of protective effects’, with women at particular riskGun Threats and Self-Defense Gun Use
1-3. Guns are not used millions of times each year in self-defense We use epidemiological theory to explain why the “false positive” problem for rare events can lead to large overestimates of the i…Will a Gun Keep Your Family Safe? Here’s What the Evidence Says
Research shows that having a firearm in the house won’t necessarily help in a dangerous moment — and it will heighten other risks.Living with a gun owner significantly increases your risk of getting killed
A new study suggests that two-thirds of these victims are women.www.mic.com
Since I've done your work I expect a specific quote and reference to ALL of these links.
Linked thousands of times to the same response.
Stupidity.
But to feed your stupidity...
Investigating the Link Between Gun Possession and Gun Assault
Objectives. We investigated the possible relationship between being shot in an assault and possession of a gun at the time.Methods. We enrolled 677 case participants that had been shot in an assault and 684 population-based control participants within ...Owning Guns Puts People in Your Home at Greater Risk of Being Killed, New Study Shows
A new study shows that people living in homes with guns face substantially higher risks of being fatally assaulted.Carrying a gun increases risk of getting shot and killed
People who carry firearms are far likelier to get shot – and killed – than unarmed people, finds a new study of hundreds of shooting victims in PhiladelphiaPeople in homes with handguns more likely to be shot dead, major study finds
Researchers find ‘zero evidence of any kind of protective effects’, with women at particular riskGun Threats and Self-Defense Gun Use
1-3. Guns are not used millions of times each year in self-defense We use epidemiological theory to explain why the “false positive” problem for rare events can lead to large overestimates of the i…Will a Gun Keep Your Family Safe? Here’s What the Evidence Says
Research shows that having a firearm in the house won’t necessarily help in a dangerous moment — and it will heighten other risks.Living with a gun owner significantly increases your risk of getting killed
A new study suggests that two-thirds of these victims are women.
Since I've done your work I expect a specific quote and reference to ALL of these links.
Linked thousands of times to the same response.
Stupidity.
But to feed your stupidity...
Investigating the Link Between Gun Possession and Gun Assault
Objectives. We investigated the possible relationship between being shot in an assault and possession of a gun at the time.Methods. We enrolled 677 case participants that had been shot in an assault and 684 population-based control participants within ...Owning Guns Puts People in Your Home at Greater Risk of Being Killed, New Study Shows
A new study shows that people living in homes with guns face substantially higher risks of being fatally assaulted.Carrying a gun increases risk of getting shot and killed
People who carry firearms are far likelier to get shot – and killed – than unarmed people, finds a new study of hundreds of shooting victims in PhiladelphiaPeople in homes with handguns more likely to be shot dead, major study finds
Researchers find ‘zero evidence of any kind of protective effects’, with women at particular riskGun Threats and Self-Defense Gun Use
1-3. Guns are not used millions of times each year in self-defense We use epidemiological theory to explain why the “false positive” problem for rare events can lead to large overestimates of the i…Will a Gun Keep Your Family Safe? Here’s What the Evidence Says
Research shows that having a firearm in the house won’t necessarily help in a dangerous moment — and it will heighten other risks.Living with a gun owner significantly increases your risk of getting killed
A new study suggests that two-thirds of these victims are women.
Since I've done your work I expect a specific quote and reference to ALL of these links.
Linked thousands of times to the same response.
Stupidity.
But to feed your stupidity...
Investigating the Link Between Gun Possession and Gun Assault
Objectives. We investigated the possible relationship between being shot in an assault and possession of a gun at the time.Methods. We enrolled 677 case participants that had been shot in an assault and 684 population-based control participants within ...Owning Guns Puts People in Your Home at Greater Risk of Being Killed, New Study Shows
A new study shows that people living in homes with guns face substantially higher risks of being fatally assaulted.Carrying a gun increases risk of getting shot and killed
People who carry firearms are far likelier to get shot – and killed – than unarmed people, finds a new study of hundreds of shooting victims in PhiladelphiaPeople in homes with handguns more likely to be shot dead, major study finds
Researchers find ‘zero evidence of any kind of protective effects’, with women at particular riskGun Threats and Self-Defense Gun Use
1-3. Guns are not used millions of times each year in self-defense We use epidemiological theory to explain why the “false positive” problem for rare events can lead to large overestimates of the i…Will a Gun Keep Your Family Safe? Here’s What the Evidence Says
Research shows that having a firearm in the house won’t necessarily help in a dangerous moment — and it will heighten other risks.Living with a gun owner significantly increases your risk of getting killed
A new study suggests that two-thirds of these victims are women.
Since I've done your work I expect a specific quote and reference to ALL of these links.
You were supposed to provide direct response to the actual contents of each.And they are all bullshit...but thanks for giving us the fake crap so we can rebutt it.......
Figures don't lie but liars do figure.Your very first link....criminals in possession of guns getting shot by other criminals.....during the commision of crime or living the criminal life....
From that link....the big clue how they came by their stats....
Our control participants were, however, significantly more unemployed than the general population.
Good for you....
Linked thousands of times to the same response.
Stupidity.
But to feed your stupidity...
Investigating the Link Between Gun Possession and Gun Assault
Objectives. We investigated the possible relationship between being shot in an assault and possession of a gun at the time.Methods. We enrolled 677 case participants that had been shot in an assault and 684 population-based control participants within ...Owning Guns Puts People in Your Home at Greater Risk of Being Killed, New Study Shows
A new study shows that people living in homes with guns face substantially higher risks of being fatally assaulted.Carrying a gun increases risk of getting shot and killed
People who carry firearms are far likelier to get shot – and killed – than unarmed people, finds a new study of hundreds of shooting victims in PhiladelphiaPeople in homes with handguns more likely to be shot dead, major study finds
Researchers find ‘zero evidence of any kind of protective effects’, with women at particular riskGun Threats and Self-Defense Gun Use
1-3. Guns are not used millions of times each year in self-defense We use epidemiological theory to explain why the “false positive” problem for rare events can lead to large overestimates of the i…Will a Gun Keep Your Family Safe? Here’s What the Evidence Says
Research shows that having a firearm in the house won’t necessarily help in a dangerous moment — and it will heighten other risks.Living with a gun owner significantly increases your risk of getting killed
A new study suggests that two-thirds of these victims are women.
Since I've done your work I expect a specific quote and reference to ALL of these links.
Figures don't lie but liars do figure.Second study....women living with criminals.....and drug addicts, and alcoholics....
But......for some reason they did not specify the criminal status of any of their cohort, or their drug or alcohol abuse status...
That's kinda important information....but it would have wrecked their study.....
You were supposed to provide direct response to the actual contents of each.
Obviously the facts mean nothing when your substituting a Glock for your cock.
You think you're safer carrying? Great, do it, fool.
Let Darwin sort out the mess.
Figures don't lie but liars do figure.
Strap on that Glock to aid your tiny cock.
Let Darwin sort out the mess.
Figures don't lie but liars do figure.
Strap on that Glock to aid your tiny cock.
Let Darwin sort out the mess.
