Not a Monkeys Uncle
Diamond Member
- Jan 25, 2022
- 3,092
- 2,883
- 1,893
- Banned
- #41
Agreed....as to which the current Democrat Party shares closer kinship, evidence of these last two years makes clear which it is.
Nazis.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Agreed....as to which the current Democrat Party shares closer kinship, evidence of these last two years makes clear which it is.
Nazis.
....as to which the current Democrat Party shares closer kinship, evidence of these last two years makes clear which it is.
Nazis.
1. Those who have studied the Democrat Socialist Party have concluded that it is now closer to the National Workers Socialist model than the Soviet Socialist model. This based on their being wedded to many industries as allies rather than taking them over outright, as the Bolsheviks did.
2. The more things change, the more they remain the same. The quibble is what is meant by 'control of industries.' The Nazis controlled industries rather than owned them.
What Mises identified was that private ownership of the means of production existed in name only under the Nazis …The position of the alleged private owners, Mises showed, was reduced essentially to that of government pensioners."
"Why Nazism Was Socialism and Why Socialism Is Totalitarian
Why Nazism Was Socialism and Why Socialism Is Totalitarian | George Reisman
3. But it was mainly steel production, locomotives, airplanes, etc. that were the interest of the Nazis.
That was then, 20th century.
In the 21st century, information is more, most, essential, its control and dissemination.
And it is newpapers, social media, cable news that are under the Democrat Socialist Party control
4. The Democrat regime need not outright 'own' the information highway, as long as those who do bend the neck and the knee to the regime. The allies determine what views are sold to the populace, and what is to be censored.
Anne Applebaum, who observes about Soviet-era suppression: “Actual censors were not always needed. Instead, a form of pervasive peer pressure convinced writers, journalists and everyone else to toe the party line; if they did not, they knew they risked being ejected from their jobs and shunned by their friends.”
5. JONATHAN TURLEY: I want to emphasize that a lot of people on the left that have said if it's not prohibited on the First Amendment, it's not a free speech issue. That's not true. The First Amendment is not the exclusive domain of free speech. What they are doing is shutting down free speech. The left has come on to a winning strategy. …. they've discovered that if they use corporations to control speech, it falls outside the First Amendment. But it's not true that what they're doing is not a free speech attack. It is. They're trying to stop people from speaking on these platforms….
Soo......Sieg Heil, Democrat voters.
Look at what you have become.
Its hard to tell which one Democrats are most like. Nazis or Marxists
Its hard to tell which one Democrats are most like. Nazis or Marxists
The two are so close as to make no difference.
Nothing surprising.Who could have imagined that the doctrines that we defeated in WWII would now predominate in America.
Nothing surprising.
Financial capitalism tends to turn into fascism, if the power of the capitalists is threatened.
The government resorts to a direct military dictatorship, undisguised by the flair of democratic elections, and so that the lower classes do not oppose, their brains are intensively processed with ideas about the "unity of the nation" regardless of property status and ideas about an external and internal enemy.
Both fascists and nazis see their enemy, of course, in the Ccmmunists, and the nazis also find a nation or race to hate.
The main thing is that the means of private ownership of the means of production continue to be in their hands. For the sake of this, the reptiles of financial capital will agree to cannibalism as an ideology, if it suddenly seems profitable to them.