If Trump Actually Shoots Someone On 5th Avenue....

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Oct 6, 2008
124,904
60,285
2,300
Brooklyn, NY
....before that buffoon Mueller let all the Liberals down, there was hope on the Left that was presented as the question...."Can a sitting President be indicted."

1. Here's Vox hoping against hope.....

"Trumpā€™s lawyer says he canā€™t be prosecuted. I asked 16 legal experts if thatā€™s true.

President Trumpā€™s lawyer argued in a federal court on Wednesday morning that he could not be prosecuted for a crime even if he shot someone in broad daylight on Fifth Avenue.

Attorneys for Trump made the argument during an appeals court case against Manhattan District Attorney Cy Vance, who is seeking Trumpā€™s tax returns as part of an ongoing criminal investigation.

The doctrine that a sitting president is immune from criminal indictment or prosecution is not new. The Department of Justice has a longstanding policy, outlined by the Office of Legal Counsel, that a sitting president cannot be charged with a federal crime."Trumpā€™s lawyer says he canā€™t be prosecuted. We asked 16 legal experts if thatā€™s true.


2. Here's vox lying about Mueller's report:
"Special counsel Robert Mueller famously invoked this policy (to be clear, itā€™s a policy, not law) when he summarized the results of his Russia investigation. ā€œThe special counselā€™s office is part of the Department of Justice,ā€ Mueller said, ā€œand by regulation it was bound by that department policy. Charging the president with a crime was, therefore, not an option we could consider.ā€ Ibid.


3. Here's what Mueller actually said, when asked if that was why he didn't indict"
.... when Barr first released the Mueller Report, he said the very opposite.

"For what it's worth, Attorney General William Barr said that Mueller had told him expressly he was not saying that the OLC decision prevented him from finding a crime. At a press conference on April 18, Barr said,

We specifically asked [Mueller] about the OLC opinion and whether or not he was taking the position that he would have found a crime, but for the existence of the OLC opinion. And he made it very clear several times that that was not his position. He was not saying that but for the OLC opinion he would have found a crime. He made it very clear that he had not made the determination that there was a crime."



4. Of course the Left basked in the chance to indict Trump when he wasn't President any longer.

Am I correct that Obama isn't in office any longer???









5. Guess who ain't smilin' right now.......

1589223403573.png
 
Now that the facts about the Flynn perjury trap are no longer deniable, let's get to the head of the problem.





a. ā€œSenate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley on Wednesday pushed the Justice Department to release unredacted copies of text messages between FBI employees that displayed a bias against President Trump.

Specifically, the Iowa Republican drew attention to one text that says former President Barack Obama's "White House is running this."








b. ā€œIn a Sept. 2, 2016, text exchange, Page writes that she was preparing the talking points because "potus wants to know everything weā€™re doing." Potus is an acronym for president of the United States.ā€ FBI texts: Obama 'wants to know everything we're doing'







c. "Uh Oh: New Texts Suggest Obama WH, CIA, FBI, And Harry Reid Colluded At Outset Of Russia Probe

There are new texts allegedly showing that the Obama White House, the CIA, the FBI, and top Democrats colluded at the outset of the Russia probe.



...coordination between former President Barack Obamaā€™s Chief of Staff Denis McDonough, then-Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid, and CIA Director John Brennan ā€”which they say would ā€œcontradictā€ the Obama administrationā€™s public stance about its hand in the process."


Uh Oh: New Texts Suggest Obama WH, CIA, FBI, And Harry Reid Colluded At Outset Of Russia Probe



and



d. "Clapper: Obama Ordered The Intelligence Assessment That Resulted In Mueller Investigation"

Clapper: Obama Ordered The Intelligence Assessment That Resulted In Mueller Investigation



Since we now have proof that Hussein was in on it from the start, the only real question is whether ā€˜the messiahā€™ was the instigator or simply went along with the attack on Trump and Flynn.



1589224572016.png





Question: What do you call an ex-President in a three piece suit?




Answer: the defendant.
 
....before that buffoon Mueller let all the Liberals down, there was hope on the Left that was presented as the question...."Can a sitting President be indicted."

1. Here's Vox hoping against hope.....

"Trumpā€™s lawyer says he canā€™t be prosecuted. I asked 16 legal experts if thatā€™s true.

President Trumpā€™s lawyer argued in a federal court on Wednesday morning that he could not be prosecuted for a crime even if he shot someone in broad daylight on Fifth Avenue.

Attorneys for Trump made the argument during an appeals court case against Manhattan District Attorney Cy Vance, who is seeking Trumpā€™s tax returns as part of an ongoing criminal investigation.

The doctrine that a sitting president is immune from criminal indictment or prosecution is not new. The Department of Justice has a longstanding policy, outlined by the Office of Legal Counsel, that a sitting president cannot be charged with a federal crime."Trumpā€™s lawyer says he canā€™t be prosecuted. We asked 16 legal experts if thatā€™s true.


2. Here's vox lying about Mueller's report:
"Special counsel Robert Mueller famously invoked this policy (to be clear, itā€™s a policy, not law) when he summarized the results of his Russia investigation. ā€œThe special counselā€™s office is part of the Department of Justice,ā€ Mueller said, ā€œand by regulation it was bound by that department policy. Charging the president with a crime was, therefore, not an option we could consider.ā€ Ibid.


3. Here's what Mueller actually said, when asked if that was why he didn't indict"
.... when Barr first released the Mueller Report, he said the very opposite.

"For what it's worth, Attorney General William Barr said that Mueller had told him expressly he was not saying that the OLC decision prevented him from finding a crime. At a press conference on April 18, Barr said,

We specifically asked [Mueller] about the OLC opinion and whether or not he was taking the position that he would have found a crime, but for the existence of the OLC opinion. And he made it very clear several times that that was not his position. He was not saying that but for the OLC opinion he would have found a crime. He made it very clear that he had not made the determination that there was a crime."



4. Of course the Left basked in the chance to indict Trump when he wasn't President any longer.

Am I correct that Obama isn't in office any longer???









5. Guess who ain't smilin' right now.......

View attachment 334803
a
....before that buffoon Mueller let all the Liberals down, there was hope on the Left that was presented as the question...."Can a sitting President be indicted."

1. Here's Vox hoping against hope.....

"Trumpā€™s lawyer says he canā€™t be prosecuted. I asked 16 legal experts if thatā€™s true.

President Trumpā€™s lawyer argued in a federal court on Wednesday morning that he could not be prosecuted for a crime even if he shot someone in broad daylight on Fifth Avenue.

Attorneys for Trump made the argument during an appeals court case against Manhattan District Attorney Cy Vance, who is seeking Trumpā€™s tax returns as part of an ongoing criminal investigation.

The doctrine that a sitting president is immune from criminal indictment or prosecution is not new. The Department of Justice has a longstanding policy, outlined by the Office of Legal Counsel, that a sitting president cannot be charged with a federal crime."Trumpā€™s lawyer says he canā€™t be prosecuted. We asked 16 legal experts if thatā€™s true.


2. Here's vox lying about Mueller's report:
"Special counsel Robert Mueller famously invoked this policy (to be clear, itā€™s a policy, not law) when he summarized the results of his Russia investigation. ā€œThe special counselā€™s office is part of the Department of Justice,ā€ Mueller said, ā€œand by regulation it was bound by that department policy. Charging the president with a crime was, therefore, not an option we could consider.ā€ Ibid.


3. Here's what Mueller actually said, when asked if that was why he didn't indict"
.... when Barr first released the Mueller Report, he said the very opposite.

"For what it's worth, Attorney General William Barr said that Mueller had told him expressly he was not saying that the OLC decision prevented him from finding a crime. At a press conference on April 18, Barr said,

We specifically asked [Mueller] about the OLC opinion and whether or not he was taking the position that he would have found a crime, but for the existence of the OLC opinion. And he made it very clear several times that that was not his position. He was not saying that but for the OLC opinion he would have found a crime. He made it very clear that he had not made the determination that there was a crime."



4. Of course the Left basked in the chance to indict Trump when he wasn't President any longer.

Am I correct that Obama isn't in office any longer???









5. Guess who ain't smilin' right now.......

View attachment 334803
Thanks for another fine post, PC. And yes, liberals really ARE that dumb........
 
As long as the person Trump shoots is a Democrat. I don't think he should be prosecuted.
Should there be a penalty if he only wounds?????
Hopefully, one of Trump's bodyguards will finish the job of putting the wounded Democrat out of his misery.
Which would be the humanitarian thing to do. ... :thup:
 
1589230040100.png




And now we know about the attempt to destroy the Trump administration.


Spying was a way of life, pro form, for Obama and his thugs.

Jake Tapper

stated on January 2, 2014 in a broadcast of CNN's "The Lead with Jake Tapper":

"The Obama administration has used the Espionage Act to go after whistleblowers who leaked to journalists ... more than all previous administrations combined."





1589230280420.png
 
"What did President Obama know and when did he know it? That famous formulation is emerging as the question in the wake of new disclosures in respect of a meeting that took place inside the Oval Office in the closing days of Mr. Obamaā€™s presidency. The meeting included not only his national security adviser, Susan Rice, and the head of the FBI, James Comey, but also Vice President Biden, now the prospective Democratic nominee.

This is laid out in, among other places, a dispatch by Mollie Hemingway in the Federalist. Ms. Hemingway reckons the meeting is turning out to be, as her headline puts it, ā€œkeyā€ to the ā€œentire anti-Trump operationā€ launched two weeks before the end of the Obama administration. Sheā€™s not the only one laying this out; a veteran of the Sun, Eli Lake, now of Bloomberg, has been all over the story; the Wall Street Journal, as well."



One would normally apply the Democrat worship.....they called him god, Jesus, and the messiah......to the story of the 'golden calf' in Genesis.......

....but a better allusion would be this, from Daniel, an idol with 'feet of clay.'


41 Just as you saw that the feet and toes were partly of baked clay and partly of iron, so this will be a divided kingdom; yet it will have some of the strength of iron in it, even as you saw iron mixed with clay. 42 As the toes were partly iron and partly clay, so this kingdom will be partly strong and partly brittle. 43 And just as you saw the iron mixed with baked clay, so the people will be a mixture and will not remain united, any more than iron mixes with clay.
 
Now that the facts about the Flynn perjury trap are no longer deniable, let's get to the head of the problem.





a. ā€œSenate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley on Wednesday pushed the Justice Department to release unredacted copies of text messages between FBI employees that displayed a bias against President Trump.

Specifically, the Iowa Republican drew attention to one text that says former President Barack Obama's "White House is running this."








b. ā€œIn a Sept. 2, 2016, text exchange, Page writes that she was preparing the talking points because "potus wants to know everything weā€™re doing." Potus is an acronym for president of the United States.ā€ FBI texts: Obama 'wants to know everything we're doing'







c. "Uh Oh: New Texts Suggest Obama WH, CIA, FBI, And Harry Reid Colluded At Outset Of Russia Probe

There are new texts allegedly showing that the Obama White House, the CIA, the FBI, and top Democrats colluded at the outset of the Russia probe.



...coordination between former President Barack Obamaā€™s Chief of Staff Denis McDonough, then-Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid, and CIA Director John Brennan ā€”which they say would ā€œcontradictā€ the Obama administrationā€™s public stance about its hand in the process."


Uh Oh: New Texts Suggest Obama WH, CIA, FBI, And Harry Reid Colluded At Outset Of Russia Probe



and



d. "Clapper: Obama Ordered The Intelligence Assessment That Resulted In Mueller Investigation"

Clapper: Obama Ordered The Intelligence Assessment That Resulted In Mueller Investigation



Since we now have proof that Hussein was in on it from the start, the only real question is whether ā€˜the messiahā€™ was the instigator or simply went along with the attack on Trump and Flynn.



View attachment 334812




Question: What do you call an ex-President in a three piece suit?




Answer: the defendant.
"perjury trap"........in other words, con-servatives can't help but lie....it's the other guy's fault for making them lie. Such victims.
 
Now that the facts about the Flynn perjury trap are no longer deniable, let's get to the head of the problem.





a. ā€œSenate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley on Wednesday pushed the Justice Department to release unredacted copies of text messages between FBI employees that displayed a bias against President Trump.

Specifically, the Iowa Republican drew attention to one text that says former President Barack Obama's "White House is running this."








b. ā€œIn a Sept. 2, 2016, text exchange, Page writes that she was preparing the talking points because "potus wants to know everything weā€™re doing." Potus is an acronym for president of the United States.ā€ FBI texts: Obama 'wants to know everything we're doing'







c. "Uh Oh: New Texts Suggest Obama WH, CIA, FBI, And Harry Reid Colluded At Outset Of Russia Probe

There are new texts allegedly showing that the Obama White House, the CIA, the FBI, and top Democrats colluded at the outset of the Russia probe.



...coordination between former President Barack Obamaā€™s Chief of Staff Denis McDonough, then-Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid, and CIA Director John Brennan ā€”which they say would ā€œcontradictā€ the Obama administrationā€™s public stance about its hand in the process."


Uh Oh: New Texts Suggest Obama WH, CIA, FBI, And Harry Reid Colluded At Outset Of Russia Probe



and



d. "Clapper: Obama Ordered The Intelligence Assessment That Resulted In Mueller Investigation"

Clapper: Obama Ordered The Intelligence Assessment That Resulted In Mueller Investigation



Since we now have proof that Hussein was in on it from the start, the only real question is whether ā€˜the messiahā€™ was the instigator or simply went along with the attack on Trump and Flynn.



View attachment 334812




Question: What do you call an ex-President in a three piece suit?




Answer: the defendant.
"perjury trap"........in other words, con-servatives can't help but lie....it's the other guy's fault for making them lie. Such victims.


There was no lie.

Obama's Deep State FBI made Flynn too hot to keep on payroll.

You know that, don't you?


"Strzok later would intervene and push to keep the Flynn probe open in January 2017, even after the FBI's Washington office signaled it wanted to close it because no "derogatory" information had been unearthed after consulting with other intelligence agencies in an exhaustive searchā€¦.The stunning development came after internal memos were released raising serious questions about the nature of the investigation that led to Flynnā€™s late 2017 guilty plea of lying to the FBI as his legal fees mounted.



Both during and before the January 24, 2017 White House interview that led to Flynn's prosecution for one count of lying to the FBI, the bureau acknowledged having those full transcripts, raising the question of why agents would need to ask Flynn about what he said during the calls with Kislyak, except potentially as a pretext to obtain a false statements charge.

The FBI possessed word-for-word transcripts of Flynn's December 2016 conversations with Kislyak, and publicly admitted to reviewing those transcripts and clearing Flynn of any wrongdoing.ā€ Obama knew details of wiretapped Flynn phone calls, surprising top DOJ official in meeting with Biden, declassified docs show."




Now that you are aware of Obama's role in this attack on a political foe, what do you suggest be done?
 
Oh......No

Trump is threatening to indict Obama
What will we do?
Any day now, I've heard. :abgg2q.jpg:
Trump is afraid to indict Obama

Imagine the consequences
Justice being served?

Obama should hang for being a traitor. He gave aid and comfort to 5 enemies of the state..

More than that, but those are glaringly obvious.

That's more than enough to warrant a charge of treason and a hanging.
Wasnā€™t Obama who traded military aid for personal favors
 
Oh......No

Trump is threatening to indict Obama
What will we do?
Any day now, I've heard. :abgg2q.jpg:
Trump is afraid to indict Obama

Imagine the consequences
Justice being served?

Obama should hang for being a traitor. He gave aid and comfort to 5 enemies of the state..

More than that, but those are glaringly obvious.

That's more than enough to warrant a charge of treason and a hanging.


Well......'treason' is defined in the Constitution....and we may not be able to get him on that.

I'd be satisfied with exile to Elba......



Then he can practice the palindrome "able was I ere I saw elba."
 
Oh......No

Trump is threatening to indict Obama
What will we do?
Any day now, I've heard. :abgg2q.jpg:
Trump is afraid to indict Obama

Imagine the consequences
Justice being served?

Obama should hang for being a traitor. He gave aid and comfort to 5 enemies of the state..

More than that, but those are glaringly obvious.

That's more than enough to warrant a charge of treason and a hanging.
Wasnā€™t Obama who traded military aid for personal favors
It was Obama having a dozen Muslim Brotherhood for sleepovers in the White House.
Most likely showing them things that could jeopardize National Security.
 

Forum List

Back
Top