If the elections as the Democrats/MSM/Soros/et.al. were 100% legitimate, why are they withholding evidence?

[my2¢]

If the Democrats had ability to fix the election their way, then why did they nominate Biden of all people?

And why did they lose so many down ballot races?????

Hey, settle down. Let's not get carried away with logical thinking.

 

[The Original Tree]

Call us when you have evidence of widespread voter fraud.

Give an example of the kind of evidence you will accept / respect.

Just one.

Proof of machines being programmed into changing votes from one candidate to another in numbers large enough to swing a state election.

Large numbers of people voting more than one time...specific persons...not just allegations.

That sort of thing.

I'm surprised to find out that I am only 7/10ths of a person, according to Democrat Fraud Machines used in The 6 states that cheated.

Dr Shiva from MIT just proved Vote Swapping Live on TV at The Arizona Hearing.

130% of Democrats voted for Biden vs. -30% voted for Trump.

If you are a Republican, you are only 7/10ths of a person.

Based on the revelation from MIT Scientist Dr. Shiva, that Dominion Machines swapped votes counting Trump votes at 7/10ths of a vote, and Biden votes as 1.3 votes, here are the actual legal vote totals for the 2020 Election

President Trump 98,028,452 votes
Joe Biden 56,161,000

 

[healthmyths]

If they have nothing to hide as the MSM attests, there was no fraud, then why are they resisting?
And this world renowned expert wants to know the following:
Although he had no access to the machines, Dr. Kershavarz who's credentials are:
include a B.A., M.A., and Ph.D. in various areas of electrical and computer engineering.
In addition, "I have advanced trained from the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), National Security Agency (NSA),
DHS office of Intelligence & Analysis (I&A) and Massachusetts Institution of Technology (MIT)."
Is that enough credentials for him to conclude:
And with the New York Times touting Dr. Keshavarz-Nia's brilliance and his ability to sniff out fraud, they'll struggle to that he's not a reliable expert.
Things are getting fun.has looked at available data about the election and the vote results. Based on that information, he concluded

1. The counts in the disputed states (Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan, Arizona, Nevada, and Georgia) show electronic manipulation.
2. The simultaneous decision in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Arizona, Nevada, and Georgia to pretend to halt counting votes was unprecedented and demonstrated a coordinated effort to collude toward desired results.
3. One to two percent of votes were forged in Biden's favor.
4. Optical scanners were set to accept unverified, un-validated ballots.
5. The scanners failed to keep records for audits, an outcome that must have been deliberately programmed.
6. The stolen cryptographic key, which applied to all voting systems, was used to alter vote counts.
7. The favorable votes pouring in after hours for Biden could not be accounted for by a Democrat preference for mailed in ballots. They demonstrated manipulation.
For example, in Pennsylvania, it was physically impossible to feed 400,000 ballots into the machines within 2–3 hours.
8. Dominion used Chinese parts, and there's reason to believe that China, Venezuela, Cuba interfered in the election.
9. There was a Hammer and Scorecard cyber-attack that altered votes in the battleground states, and then forwarded the results to Scytl servers
in Frankfurt, Germany, to avoid detection.
10. The systems failed to produce any auditable results.

Based on the above findings, Dr. Keshavarz-Nia concluded with "high confidence that the election 2020 data were altered in all battleground states resulting in a [sic] hundreds of thousands of votes that were cast for President Trump to be transferred [sic] to Vice President Biden."

The 'smartest man in the room' has joined Sidney Powell's team

In her Georgia complaint, Sidney Powell included the declaration of Navid Keshavarz-Nia, an expert witness who stated under oath that there was massive computer fraud in the 2020 election, all of it intended to secure a victory for Joe Biden. &n...

www.americanthinker.com

So remember my last post...
Why did Dominion voting machines weigh each vote @ 1.25 for Biden while weighing Trump at .75...means for example.. out of 20,000 Biden votes.
Maybe the above expert with his world renowned cybersecurity expertise(see above credentials)
His qualifications include a B.A., M.A., and Ph.D. in various areas of electrical and computer engineering.
In addition, "I have advanced trained from the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), National Security Agency (NSA),
DHS office of Intelligence & Analysis (I&A) and Massachusetts Institution of Technology (MIT)."
Is that enough credentials for him to conclude:
And with the New York Times touting Dr. Keshavarz-Nia's brilliance and his ability to sniff out fraud, they'll struggle to that he's not a reliable expert. Things are getting fun.

The 'smartest man in the room' has joined Sidney Powell's team

In her Georgia complaint, Sidney Powell included the declaration of Navid Keshavarz-Nia, an expert witness who stated under oath that there was massive computer fraud in the 2020 election, all of it intended to secure a victory for Joe Biden. &n...

www.americanthinker.com

All pure BULLSHIT from the American STINKER!

Says who? What are your credentials? Do you have B.A., M.A., and Ph.D. in various areas of electrical and computer engineering? Do you even have
a degree? Because your lack of discussion precludes your lack of scholarship which depends on a certain level of intelligence...which you've yet to prove!

 

[Mac1958]

Let's see what the courts say.

Oh wait, they're throwing the shit out.

Oh wait, the courts are all deep state commies.

The Trumpsters have all their bases covered.

 

[healthmyths]

Better yet how can you believe the dumbfucks claims that it was illegitimate while still withholding all the evidence from the courts that could actually do something about it?

Are you saying these are not happening?

 

[healthmyths]

Let's see what the courts say.

Oh wait, they're throwing the shit out.

Oh wait, the courts are all deep state commies.

The Trumpsters have all their bases covered.

YOU wrote..", they're throwing the shit out."
Does this look like it's being thrown out?

 

[Mac1958]

Let's see what the courts say.

Oh wait, they're throwing the shit out.

Oh wait, the courts are all deep state commies.

The Trumpsters have all their bases covered.

YOU wrote..", they're throwing the shit out."
Does this look like it's being thrown out?
View attachment 423609

We'll see how it plays out. I'm patient.

You can enjoy your partisan masturbation.

 

[JimBowie1958]

If the Democrats had ability to fix the election their way, then why did they nominate Biden of all people?

Because they were going to cheat so bad who was nominated would not matter one whit.

 

[JimBowie1958]

Let's see what the courts say.

Oh wait, they're throwing the shit out.

Oh wait, the courts are all deep state commies.

The Trumpsters have all their bases covered.

YOU wrote..", they're throwing the shit out."
Does this look like it's being thrown out?
View attachment 423609

What is the first state of responses above Pennsylvania's?

 

[Christ_on_a_croissant]

If the Dems really, really, really believed that there was no election fraud, they would be the first ones to demand an investigation to prove that Mr. Biden actually won the election.

If Dems really believe that Biden won, then why didn’t they demand an investigation into voter fraud like we did?!

 

[Borillar]

Call us when you have evidence of widespread voter fraud.

Give an example of the kind of evidence you will accept / respect.

Just one.

Nevermind us, what kind of evidence will the courts accept and why hasn't anything been presented that is acceptable? Any fool can babble about alleged fraud or say his cousin's sister's gardener's hairdresser saw someone use a sharpie. What actual concrete evidence is there of widespread voter fraud? Just saying so doesn't make it true.

 

[BlindBoo]

Better yet how can you believe the dumbfucks claims that it was illegitimate while still withholding all the evidence from the courts that could actually do something about it?

Are you saying these are not happening?
View attachment 423608

Tic Toc.

Election 2020: A look at Trump campaign election lawsuits and where they stand

Here's a look at the latest on the election lawsuits filed by the Trump campaign following the 2020 election.

abcnews.go.com

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

If they have nothing to hide as the MSM attests, there was no fraud, then why are they resisting?
And this world renowned expert wants to know the following:
Although he had no access to the machines, Dr. Kershavarz who's credentials are:
include a B.A., M.A., and Ph.D. in various areas of electrical and computer engineering.
In addition, "I have advanced trained from the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), National Security Agency (NSA),
DHS office of Intelligence & Analysis (I&A) and Massachusetts Institution of Technology (MIT)."
Is that enough credentials for him to conclude:
And with the New York Times touting Dr. Keshavarz-Nia's brilliance and his ability to sniff out fraud, they'll struggle to that he's not a reliable expert.
Things are getting fun.has looked at available data about the election and the vote results. Based on that information, he concluded

1. The counts in the disputed states (Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan, Arizona, Nevada, and Georgia) show electronic manipulation.
2. The simultaneous decision in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Arizona, Nevada, and Georgia to pretend to halt counting votes was unprecedented and demonstrated a coordinated effort to collude toward desired results.
3. One to two percent of votes were forged in Biden's favor.
4. Optical scanners were set to accept unverified, un-validated ballots.
5. The scanners failed to keep records for audits, an outcome that must have been deliberately programmed.
6. The stolen cryptographic key, which applied to all voting systems, was used to alter vote counts.
7. The favorable votes pouring in after hours for Biden could not be accounted for by a Democrat preference for mailed in ballots. They demonstrated manipulation.
For example, in Pennsylvania, it was physically impossible to feed 400,000 ballots into the machines within 2–3 hours.
8. Dominion used Chinese parts, and there's reason to believe that China, Venezuela, Cuba interfered in the election.
9. There was a Hammer and Scorecard cyber-attack that altered votes in the battleground states, and then forwarded the results to Scytl servers
in Frankfurt, Germany, to avoid detection.
10. The systems failed to produce any auditable results.

Based on the above findings, Dr. Keshavarz-Nia concluded with "high confidence that the election 2020 data were altered in all battleground states resulting in a [sic] hundreds of thousands of votes that were cast for President Trump to be transferred [sic] to Vice President Biden."

The 'smartest man in the room' has joined Sidney Powell's team

In her Georgia complaint, Sidney Powell included the declaration of Navid Keshavarz-Nia, an expert witness who stated under oath that there was massive computer fraud in the 2020 election, all of it intended to secure a victory for Joe Biden. &n...

www.americanthinker.com

So remember my last post...
Why did Dominion voting machines weigh each vote @ 1.25 for Biden while weighing Trump at .75...means for example.. out of 20,000 Biden votes.
Maybe the above expert with his world renowned cybersecurity expertise(see above credentials)
His qualifications include a B.A., M.A., and Ph.D. in various areas of electrical and computer engineering.
In addition, "I have advanced trained from the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), National Security Agency (NSA),
DHS office of Intelligence & Analysis (I&A) and Massachusetts Institution of Technology (MIT)."
Is that enough credentials for him to conclude:
And with the New York Times touting Dr. Keshavarz-Nia's brilliance and his ability to sniff out fraud, they'll struggle to that he's not a reliable expert. Things are getting fun.

The 'smartest man in the room' has joined Sidney Powell's team

In her Georgia complaint, Sidney Powell included the declaration of Navid Keshavarz-Nia, an expert witness who stated under oath that there was massive computer fraud in the 2020 election, all of it intended to secure a victory for Joe Biden. &n...

www.americanthinker.com

Call us when you have evidence of widespread voter fraud.

You asked u s to call you when there was 1 single case of fraud....so we did.

Then you asked us to call you when there were more than one.....so we did.

Now you want us to call you when the fraud is widespread. Stay close to the phone while your deciding how to change the goalposts again.

 

[Chuz Life]

Call us when you have evidence of widespread voter fraud.

Give an example of the kind of evidence you will accept / respect.

Just one.

Nevermind us, what kind of evidence will the courts accept and why hasn't anything been presented that is acceptable? Any fool can babble about alleged fraud or say his cousin's sister's gardener's hairdresser saw someone use a sharpie. What actual concrete evidence is there of widespread voter fraud? Just saying so doesn't make it true.

Seriously.

How do YOU know that the evidence presented was not valid, significant or otherwise acceptable.

Note the absence of a question mark.

 

[JimBowie1958]

If the Democrats had ability to fix the election their way, then why did they nominate Biden of all people?

And why did they lose so many down ballot races?????

Hey, settle down. Let's not get carried away with logical thinking.

You cant spend time doing down ballot circles when you have to fake 120k+ ballots for Biden, sheesh!

 

[JimBowie1958]

Nevermind us, what kind of evidence will the courts accept and why hasn't anything been presented that is acceptable? Any fool can babble about alleged fraud or say his cousin's sister's gardener's hairdresser saw someone use a sharpie. What actual concrete evidence is there of widespread voter fraud? Just saying so doesn't make it true.

It depends on the court, obviously.

First the courts would have to actually let the trump team PRESENT evidence and then listen to it and give it open-minded consideration.

But that wont happen most of the time when you have Dimbocrap hacktards as judges.

This will probably have to go to SCOTUS where they will probably rule on:
1) whether governors can use emergency COVID Pandemic emergency powers to change mail-in ballot laws, and
2) does treatment of the mail-in vote differences between red and blue counties violate equal protection.

The evidence for that is as plain as your face.

 

[JimBowie1958]

If the Dems really, really, really believed that there was no election fraud, they would be the first ones to demand an investigation to prove that Mr. Biden actually won the election.

If Dems really believe that Biden won, then why didn’t they demand an investigation into voter fraud like we did?!

Because the Dimbocraps ARE the fraudsters.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

If they have nothing to hide as the MSM attests, there was no fraud, then why are they resisting?
And this world renowned expert wants to know the following:
Although he had no access to the machines, Dr. Kershavarz who's credentials are:
include a B.A., M.A., and Ph.D. in various areas of electrical and computer engineering.
In addition, "I have advanced trained from the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), National Security Agency (NSA),
DHS office of Intelligence & Analysis (I&A) and Massachusetts Institution of Technology (MIT)."
Is that enough credentials for him to conclude:
And with the New York Times touting Dr. Keshavarz-Nia's brilliance and his ability to sniff out fraud, they'll struggle to that he's not a reliable expert.
Things are getting fun.has looked at available data about the election and the vote results. Based on that information, he concluded

1. The counts in the disputed states (Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan, Arizona, Nevada, and Georgia) show electronic manipulation.
2. The simultaneous decision in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Arizona, Nevada, and Georgia to pretend to halt counting votes was unprecedented and demonstrated a coordinated effort to collude toward desired results.
3. One to two percent of votes were forged in Biden's favor.
4. Optical scanners were set to accept unverified, un-validated ballots.
5. The scanners failed to keep records for audits, an outcome that must have been deliberately programmed.
6. The stolen cryptographic key, which applied to all voting systems, was used to alter vote counts.
7. The favorable votes pouring in after hours for Biden could not be accounted for by a Democrat preference for mailed in ballots. They demonstrated manipulation.
For example, in Pennsylvania, it was physically impossible to feed 400,000 ballots into the machines within 2–3 hours.
8. Dominion used Chinese parts, and there's reason to believe that China, Venezuela, Cuba interfered in the election.
9. There was a Hammer and Scorecard cyber-attack that altered votes in the battleground states, and then forwarded the results to Scytl servers
in Frankfurt, Germany, to avoid detection.
10. The systems failed to produce any auditable results.

Based on the above findings, Dr. Keshavarz-Nia concluded with "high confidence that the election 2020 data were altered in all battleground states resulting in a [sic] hundreds of thousands of votes that were cast for President Trump to be transferred [sic] to Vice President Biden."

The 'smartest man in the room' has joined Sidney Powell's team

In her Georgia complaint, Sidney Powell included the declaration of Navid Keshavarz-Nia, an expert witness who stated under oath that there was massive computer fraud in the 2020 election, all of it intended to secure a victory for Joe Biden. &n...

www.americanthinker.com

So remember my last post...
Why did Dominion voting machines weigh each vote @ 1.25 for Biden while weighing Trump at .75...means for example.. out of 20,000 Biden votes.
Maybe the above expert with his world renowned cybersecurity expertise(see above credentials)
His qualifications include a B.A., M.A., and Ph.D. in various areas of electrical and computer engineering.
In addition, "I have advanced trained from the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), National Security Agency (NSA),
DHS office of Intelligence & Analysis (I&A) and Massachusetts Institution of Technology (MIT)."
Is that enough credentials for him to conclude:
And with the New York Times touting Dr. Keshavarz-Nia's brilliance and his ability to sniff out fraud, they'll struggle to that he's not a reliable expert. Things are getting fun.

The 'smartest man in the room' has joined Sidney Powell's team

In her Georgia complaint, Sidney Powell included the declaration of Navid Keshavarz-Nia, an expert witness who stated under oath that there was massive computer fraud in the 2020 election, all of it intended to secure a victory for Joe Biden. &n...

www.americanthinker.com

Call us when you have evidence of widespread voter fraud.

You asked u s to call you when there was 1 single case of fraud....so we did.

Then you asked us to call you when there were more than one.....so we did.

Now you want us to call you when the fraud is widespread. Stay close to the phone while your deciding how to change the goalposts again.

Not a case of ‘fraud,’ evidence of ‘fraud’ – you’ve failed to provide any evidence.

No goalposts are being moved, you’ve simply failed to provide objective, documented evidence of ‘fraud.’

 

[Zorro!]

If the Democrats had ability to fix the election their way, then why did they nominate Biden of all people?

They were fixing the Primaries to prevent a Sanders victory. They are more crooked than talented.

EVOLUTION OF AN ARGUMENT:

“There is no evidence of election fraud!”
“There is no evidence of widespread election fraud!”
“There is no evidence that any fraud would have changed the results!”

Next: “Any evidence that might have existed was lost in our totally accidental server outage / flood / fire / dragon attack / interdimensional rift opening.”

 

[Borillar]

Call us when you have evidence of widespread voter fraud.

Give an example of the kind of evidence you will accept / respect.

Just one.

Nevermind us, what kind of evidence will the courts accept and why hasn't anything been presented that is acceptable? Any fool can babble about alleged fraud or say his cousin's sister's gardener's hairdresser saw someone use a sharpie. What actual concrete evidence is there of widespread voter fraud? Just saying so doesn't make it true.

Seriously.

How do YOU know that the evidence presented was not valid, significant or otherwise acceptable.

Note the absence of a question mark.

Because all the lawsuits are being laughed out of court?