Sallow
The Big Bad Wolf.
I wonder if a brokered convention means Paul is VP?
I'm hoping for a Santorum/Bachmann ticket.
Beats Obama/Biden.
In hilarity? You betcha!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I wonder if a brokered convention means Paul is VP?
I'm hoping for a Santorum/Bachmann ticket.
Beats Obama/Biden.
I wonder if a brokered convention means Paul is VP?
How about Paul/Santorum?
Paul/Romney earns the good doctor a dirt nap forever and I think he knows it too.
I wonder if a brokered convention means Paul is VP?
How about Paul/Santorum?
Paul/Romney earns the good doctor a dirt nap forever and I think he knows it too.
Seems like the guy with more votes on the first ballot is in the driver's seat in a brokered situation.
I wonder if a brokered convention means Paul is VP?
How about Paul/Santorum?
Paul/Romney earns the good doctor a dirt nap forever and I think he knows it too.
I wonder if a brokered convention means Paul is VP?
How about Paul/Santorum?
Paul/Romney earns the good doctor a dirt nap forever and I think he knows it too.
If only you GOP voters had a say in who the nominee is, maybe Ron Paul would have a chance, but you don't. The GOP have already said no so stop asking for or suggesting Ron Paul. NO! Leave the party if you don't like it. You won't be the first or last people the GOP alienate.
But Republican voters will vote for anyone the GOP throws at them. Herman Cain, Donald Trump, Paris Hilton, Lindsay Lohan, Snookie, Omorosa, Kim Kardashian.
No matter how bad the candidate is, the GOP will say they are going to beat Obama. No they won't.
Reagan beat the USSR but he also empowered Iran and Bin Ladin.
You cant catch flies with vinegar. If we really wanted to change Iran peaceully we would have shunned our boycots and unfroze their funds during Katami's time and rewarded the Iranian people with our support for a move toward more tolerant government.
The youth in Iran are going through the same problems that the 99%'ers/Wallstreet Protesters are going through here in America. The rich/powerful have screwed up the system and while they have gotten richer, the rest of us have fallen behind. Can't afford college, can't find jobs, economy sucks. But meanwhile, just like here in America, the moola's keep getting richer.
Funny you want to support the people of Iran but not the people of America. The people in Wisconsin or on Wallstreet are probably commies and socialists to you. But the people in Iran, you want them to revolt for the same things? Odd.
Seems our government is just as corrupt as Irans, Greece, France, Syria, Egypts. And everywhere its the rich that are corrupt, not the unions and not the poor and not entitlements.
I haven't seen a presidential candidate as inept as Romney at thinking on his feet since the half-breed who won in 2008.
But whatcha gonna do?
Really? Let me introduce you to the intern in chief who is failing at on the job training, Barack Obama.
Can somebody tell kwc why this post makes me ?
Do y'all really think that bible thumping will pull Sanitarium thru?
He is a religious right conservative.
Is that the current definition of a real conservative?
And btw the GOP already has a LOT of big problems.
I dont see the problem here...
Santorum is the only 'real' conservative left if ya ask me.
And he thinks contraception is bad. An opinion that a majority of American voters disagree with. But, yeah there is no problem here...
He is'nt 'thumping Bibles'.... he is however responding to the medias STUPID questions regarding his religious beliefs.
Folks dont forget, we have a serious issue with spending in DC and no real solutions from the left. Santorum is offering solutions, but all you idiots seem to hear is he is Catholic and does'nt use rubbers! Big FUCKING deal..... give me a break guys!
Santorum will never be President of the United States.
Hopefully the American people will look at what the current social liberal has done and decide that putting another social "anything" in office is a foolish thing. But I don't know if we can learn from our mistakes since you guys are still beating the drum for the worst president in history.
You guys are the only ones braying about "failure". President Obama's been one of the most successful Presidents in American history. And if he doesn't fuck anything up in the next few months..he going to sail into the White House again. Most people on the planet really like the guy.
Romney?
Santorum?
Gingrich?
Not so much.
Hopefully the American people will look at what the current social liberal has done and decide that putting another social "anything" in office is a foolish thing. But I don't know if we can learn from our mistakes since you guys are still beating the drum for the worst president in history.
You guys are the only ones braying about "failure". President Obama's been one of the most successful Presidents in American history. And if he doesn't fuck anything up in the next few months..he going to sail into the White House again. Most people on the planet really like the guy.
Romney?
Santorum?
Gingrich?
Not so much.
Be sure and check for polyps while you have your head up your ass.
If Santorum defeats Romney in Michigan, the democrats will throw a party.
Just like they did in 80 when Reagan got the nomination.
Idjits.
If Santorum defeats Romney in Michigan, the democrats will throw a party.
Just like they did in 80 when Reagan got the nomination.
Idjits.
should i use the "santorum is no ronald reagan" line now?
Just like they did in 80 when Reagan got the nomination.
Idjits.
should i use the "santorum is no ronald reagan" line now?
And Reagan was no Santorum, duh, so what?
My point still stands. In 1980 Dems/libtards and RINOs were making the same stupid fallacious arguments that a conservative cant win in the general election.
The record shows otherwise as Reagan, nixon, Bush the Elder in 88 and W ran as conservatives and won. Dole, Ford, McCain and Bush the Elder after he exposed himself as a conservative fraud all lost.
Judging from the historical record Santorum would be a shoe in.
should i use the "santorum is no ronald reagan" line now?
And Reagan was no Santorum, duh, so what?
My point still stands. In 1980 Dems/libtards and RINOs were making the same stupid fallacious arguments that a conservative cant win in the general election.
The record shows otherwise as Reagan, nixon, Bush the Elder in 88 and W ran as conservatives and won. Dole, Ford, McCain and Bush the Elder after he exposed himself as a conservative fraud all lost.
Judging from the historical record Santorum would be a shoe in.
Unless he loses, then the Right will claim he wasn't really a conservative. Funny that.
Mitt Romney faces defeat in his family's home state of Michigan | World news | The Observer
The GOP may have a huge problem brewing...
Mitt Romney faces defeat in his family's home state of Michigan | World news | The Observer
The GOP may have a huge problem brewing...
Just like they did in 80 when Reagan got the nomination.
Idjits.
should i use the "santorum is no ronald reagan" line now?
And Reagan was no Santorum, duh, so what?
My point still stands. In 1980 Dems/libtards and RINOs were making the same stupid fallacious arguments that a conservative cant win in the general election.
The record shows otherwise as Reagan, nixon, Bush the Elder in 88 and W ran as conservatives and won. Dole, Ford, McCain and Bush the Elder after he exposed himself as a conservative fraud all lost.
Judging from the historical record Santorum would be a shoe in.
Just like they did in 80 when Reagan got the nomination.
Idjits.
should i use the "santorum is no ronald reagan" line now?
And Reagan was no Santorum, duh, so what?
My point still stands. In 1980 Dems/libtards and RINOs were making the same stupid fallacious arguments that a conservative cant win in the general election.
The record shows otherwise as Reagan, nixon, Bush the Elder in 88 and W ran as conservatives and won. Dole, Ford, McCain and Bush the Elder after he exposed himself as a conservative fraud all lost.
Judging from the historical record Santorum would be a shoe in.
should i use the "santorum is no ronald reagan" line now?
And Reagan was no Santorum, duh, so what?
My point still stands. In 1980 Dems/libtards and RINOs were making the same stupid fallacious arguments that a conservative cant win in the general election.
The record shows otherwise as Reagan, nixon, Bush the Elder in 88 and W ran as conservatives and won. Dole, Ford, McCain and Bush the Elder after he exposed himself as a conservative fraud all lost.
Judging from the historical record Santorum would be a shoe in.
You don't get it. Santorum is an extreme social conservative but he has a voting record that states clearly that he was NO fiscal conservative.
At a time when our country is in the tank as far a debt, jobs, gas prices, I don't want a President who is going to do nothing but PREACH about social issues, that I could give a rat's ass about. When you don't have a job to put a roof over your families head, food to put on the table, gas to put in the car, social issues ARE NOT A PRIORITY.
Santorum is attempting to force his Catholic views on the rest of the country, it's obvious, I am a protestant and he has absolutely no right what-so-ever to force his extreme views down my throat.
He is a hypocrit, he has a paper trail that leads right from those earmarks all the way back to his campaign war chest. What's Christian about that??
should i use the "santorum is no ronald reagan" line now?
And Reagan was no Santorum, duh, so what?
My point still stands. In 1980 Dems/libtards and RINOs were making the same stupid fallacious arguments that a conservative cant win in the general election.
The record shows otherwise as Reagan, nixon, Bush the Elder in 88 and W ran as conservatives and won. Dole, Ford, McCain and Bush the Elder after he exposed himself as a conservative fraud all lost.
Judging from the historical record Santorum would be a shoe in.
Santorum is a conservative fraud.
Voted for a debt ceiling increase 5 times.
Voted for an increase in the minimum wage 6 times.
Voted for a 10% increase in the Arts and Humanities.
Voted against e-verify for illegal immigrants.
Voted against Right to work 3 times.
Voted down a decrease in spending for the Arts and Humanities.
Voted 3 years in a row as one of the top corrupt senators, where even Democrats were included in this list.
Do you see any endorsements from top level senators going his way?? I don't. There is a reason for the lack of endorsements, they know him. You have just been fooled by him.