Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Ultimately I believe the GOP will have to back off much of the social/religious issues such as Homosexual marriage, abortion, etc. with the simple doctrine of "sin is between the sinner and God" (which we all are.)
You guys really should read the Constitution.
Ultimately I believe the GOP will have to back off much of the social/religious issues such as Homosexual marriage, abortion, etc. with the simple doctrine of "sin is between the sinner and God" (which we all are.)
Ultimately I believe the GOP will have to back off much of the social/religious issues such as Homosexual marriage, abortion, etc. with the simple doctrine of "sin is between the sinner and God" (which we all are.)
When I hit the booth, my vote always focuses on the bottom line.
Social issues were checked at the curb.
So what happened when Bush got into office? He had majorities in BOTH houses of congress for 6 years. How did the budget fare then?
What is MAGIC about having a dem president and a rethug congress? It doesn't make any sense, if CONZ are the only ones to do things right?
Ultimately I believe the GOP will have to back off much of the social/religious issues such as Homosexual marriage, abortion, etc. with the simple doctrine of "sin is between the sinner and God" (which we all are.)
So what happened when Bush got into office? He had majorities in BOTH houses of congress for 6 years. How did the budget fare then?
What is MAGIC about having a dem president and a rethug congress? It doesn't make any sense, if CONZ are the only ones to do things right?
Actually, I'm inclined to agree that a solidly GOP house and Senate might be a good thing for Obama and the US if he gets re-elected. Why? Because such division forces compromise. But currently, Obama's worst enemies in Congress are the Democrats. When Obama proposes compromises, but both sides of the aisle stomp their feet like petulant children, nothing gets done. But if both houses of Congress were Red, GOP dream bills would get passed that would make their way to Obama's desk, giving him the chance to take a stand and veto them, and force the GOP to come to a compromise with him after all.
The history of America is the history of slow liberalism.
we only have to look at our history where we began and where we are today to see that. So many vast changes and always toward more rights for people. The only question we seem to have is do Democrats, at times, move too fast for the people? When people feel uncomforable with pace they vote in America's anchor, the Republican party. After a time again it's time to move forward and so back comes the Democratic party. But make no mistake our goal is always more liberalism and a better life for the people. The Repubicans would like to believe the Constitution is part of the anchor but so far it has not impeded progress.
You're expecting Obama to take an principled stand.
He's purely political. Solutions are not an option.
The history of America is the history of slow liberalism.
we only have to look at our history where we began and where we are today to see that. So many vast changes and always toward more rights for people. The only question we seem to have is do Democrats, at times, move too fast for the people? When people feel uncomforable with pace they vote in America's anchor, the Republican party. After a time again it's time to move forward and so back comes the Democratic party. But make no mistake our goal is always more liberalism and a better life for the people. The Repubicans would like to believe the Constitution is part of the anchor but so far it has not impeded progress.
More rights for citizens from the liberals?
Do you really expect us to take you seriously when you post BS like that? When it comes to removing people's rights, the liberals and Democrats are worse than the Republicans and the Republicans are a crappy benchmark to set in the first place.
Immie
The history of America is the history of slow liberalism.
we only have to look at our history where we began and where we are today to see that. So many vast changes and always toward more rights for people. The only question we seem to have is do Democrats, at times, move too fast for the people? When people feel uncomforable with pace they vote in America's anchor, the Republican party. After a time again it's time to move forward and so back comes the Democratic party. But make no mistake our goal is always more liberalism and a better life for the people. The Repubicans would like to believe the Constitution is part of the anchor but so far it has not impeded progress.
More rights for citizens from the liberals?
Do you really expect us to take you seriously when you post BS like that? When it comes to removing people's rights, the liberals and Democrats are worse than the Republicans and the Republicans are a crappy benchmark to set in the first place.
Immie
Do Americans have more rights today than in 1789? What might those rights be? Did conservatives or liberals push for those rights?
More rights for citizens from the liberals?
Do you really expect us to take you seriously when you post BS like that? When it comes to removing people's rights, the liberals and Democrats are worse than the Republicans and the Republicans are a crappy benchmark to set in the first place.
Immie
Do Americans have more rights today than in 1789? What might those rights be? Did conservatives or liberals push for those rights?
It sure as hell was not liberals or at least not today's liberals.
Immie
It is today's liberal who are pushing for more rights for gays to serve their country and to marry
It s liberals defending the rights of workers to collectively bargain
Where do conservatives stand on that?
On my own two feet,I don't need nor want anyone collectively bargaining for me,I do a fine job on my own. I don't need a crutch to earn a living.
The history of America is the history of slow liberalism.
we only have to look at our history where we began and where we are today to see that. So many vast changes and always toward more rights for people. The only question we seem to have is do Democrats, at times, move too fast for the people? When people feel uncomforable with pace they vote in America's anchor, the Republican party. After a time again it's time to move forward and so back comes the Democratic party. But make no mistake our goal is always more liberalism and a better life for the people. The Repubicans would like to believe the Constitution is part of the anchor but so far it has not impeded progress.
More rights for citizens from the liberals?
Do you really expect us to take you seriously when you post BS like that? When it comes to removing people's rights, the liberals and Democrats are worse than the Republicans and the Republicans are a crappy benchmark to set in the first place.
Immie
Do Americans have more rights today than in 1789? What might those rights be? Did conservatives or liberals push for those rights?
More rights for citizens from the liberals?
Do you really expect us to take you seriously when you post BS like that? When it comes to removing people's rights, the liberals and Democrats are worse than the Republicans and the Republicans are a crappy benchmark to set in the first place.
Immie
Do Americans have more rights today than in 1789? What might those rights be? Did conservatives or liberals push for those rights?
It sure as hell was not liberals or at least not today's liberals.
Immie
Do Americans have more rights today than in 1789? What might those rights be? Did conservatives or liberals push for those rights?
It sure as hell was not liberals or at least not today's liberals.
Immie
It is today's liberal who are pushing for more rights for gays to serve their country and to marry
It s liberals defending the rights of workers to collectively bargain
Where do conservatives stand on that?