Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
More whining from the right – poor conservatives, hapless victims of the 'evil' media.The anti war left are not anti war.....
If Romney had been elected in 2012 and in the year before his reelection campaign had bombed a hospital, decided to keep troops in Afghanistan, and had details of his robot assassin program leaked, things would probably look a little different today.
If Romney were president right now, the White House would be surrounded by protesters and candlelight peace vigils night and day. Some would wave American flags, some would wave signs calling for impeachment, some would have pictures caricaturing the president as Hitler or an animal. They would chant “Not in our name!”, or “Bring them home!”, or “Hey ho, hey ho, Romney has got to go!”
If Romney were president, nightly news reports on CBS, NBC, and ABC would have regular features on war crimes, quagmires, and collateral damage. CNN would be wall-to-wall with team coverage of protests, interviews of bombing witnesses, and Anderson Cooper walking through rubble in full body armor.
If Romney were president, every political analyst left of Judge Napolitano would be fretting over the war-weary public turning the upcoming election into a referendum against the president and his party. Vox and FiveThirtyEight would have maps showing how many Senate seats Republicans would lose because of the president’s sure-to-plummet approval rating. And then there’s MSNBC.
If Romney were president, MSNBC would be holding mock war crimes tribunals on Chris Hayes, explaining the ins and outs of the process with expert guests. Lena Dunham would be on Maddow every night aghast (but still giggling!) at this warmonger-in-chief. Chris Matthews would be yelling at Michael Moore, trying to find out when charges would be filed at the Hague.
If Romney were president, Democrats in Congress would be calling for hearings and investigations for each transgression: the bombing, troop levels, and drone policy. Chuck Schumer would hold daily press briefings scolding the wreckless president from behind the glasses perched precariously down his nose. Someone would accurately quote Sheila Jackson-Lee condeming the terrible bombing of the “orphanage in Pakistan”.
But Mitt Romney isn’t president, Barack Obama is, so no one cares.
Here's What Would Be Happening if President Romney Had Bombed a Hospital in Afghanistan | United Liberty | Free Market - Individual Liberty - Limited Government
Speculation fallacy. Whole OP full of 'em. Dismissed.
Actually Romney probably would have bombed Jeep factories that "moved to China".
No speculation at all, there is a long and clear pattern by the leftist media to hold Republicans to a standard that no explanation is good enough and Democrats to a standard that no explanation is required
You just posted "no speculation at all" followed immediately by "there is a long and clear pattern".
I mean immediately. Naught but a comma intervening.
Do you ever actually read your own posts? You should. They're a hoot.
Check this out:
If Romney had been elected in 2012 and in the year before his reelection campaign had bombed a hospital, decided to keep troops in Afghanistan, and had details of his robot assassin program leaked, things would probably look a little different today.
If Romney were president right now, the White House would be surrounded by protesters and candlelight peace vigils night and day. Some would wave American flags, some would wave signs calling for impeachment, some would have pictures caricaturing the president as Hitler or an animal. They would chant “Not in our name!”, or “Bring them home!”, or “Hey ho, hey ho, Romney has got to go!”
If Romney were president, nightly news reports on CBS, NBC, and ABC would have regular features on war crimes, quagmires, and collateral damage. CNN would be wall-to-wall with team coverage of protests, interviews of bombing witnesses, and Anderson Cooper walking through rubble in full body armor.
If Romney were president, every political analyst left of Judge Napolitano would be fretting over the war-weary public turning the upcoming election into a referendum against the president and his party. Vox and FiveThirtyEight would have maps showing how many Senate seats Republicans would lose because of the president’s sure-to-plummet approval rating. And then there’s MSNBC.
If Romney were president, MSNBC would be holding mock war crimes tribunals on Chris Hayes, explaining the ins and outs of the process with expert guests. Lena Dunham would be on Maddow every night aghast (but still giggling!) at this warmonger-in-chief. Chris Matthews would be yelling at Michael Moore, trying to find out when charges would be filed at the Hague.
If Romney were president, Democrats in Congress would be calling for hearings and investigations for each transgression: the bombing, troop levels, and drone policy. Chuck Schumer would hold daily press briefings scolding the wreckless president from behind the glasses perched precariously down his nose. Someone would accurately quote Sheila Jackson-Lee condeming the terrible bombing of the “orphanage in Pakistan”.
Now see if you can find a recurring verb in there. I made it bold.
Now tell me what tense that is.
"Future patternistic"?
I think my favourite is the "charges would be filed at The Hague". A future conditional based on another future conditional. Speculation fallacy-on-speculation fallacy hot action. Fallacies gone wild.
Order yours today.
Pop quiz --- what's this thing?
---- "Would" stove.
More whining from the right – poor conservatives, hapless victims of the 'evil' media.The anti war left are not anti war.....
If Romney had been elected in 2012 and in the year before his reelection campaign had bombed a hospital, decided to keep troops in Afghanistan, and had details of his robot assassin program leaked, things would probably look a little different today.
If Romney were president right now, the White House would be surrounded by protesters and candlelight peace vigils night and day. Some would wave American flags, some would wave signs calling for impeachment, some would have pictures caricaturing the president as Hitler or an animal. They would chant “Not in our name!”, or “Bring them home!”, or “Hey ho, hey ho, Romney has got to go!”
If Romney were president, nightly news reports on CBS, NBC, and ABC would have regular features on war crimes, quagmires, and collateral damage. CNN would be wall-to-wall with team coverage of protests, interviews of bombing witnesses, and Anderson Cooper walking through rubble in full body armor.
If Romney were president, every political analyst left of Judge Napolitano would be fretting over the war-weary public turning the upcoming election into a referendum against the president and his party. Vox and FiveThirtyEight would have maps showing how many Senate seats Republicans would lose because of the president’s sure-to-plummet approval rating. And then there’s MSNBC.
If Romney were president, MSNBC would be holding mock war crimes tribunals on Chris Hayes, explaining the ins and outs of the process with expert guests. Lena Dunham would be on Maddow every night aghast (but still giggling!) at this warmonger-in-chief. Chris Matthews would be yelling at Michael Moore, trying to find out when charges would be filed at the Hague.
If Romney were president, Democrats in Congress would be calling for hearings and investigations for each transgression: the bombing, troop levels, and drone policy. Chuck Schumer would hold daily press briefings scolding the wreckless president from behind the glasses perched precariously down his nose. Someone would accurately quote Sheila Jackson-Lee condeming the terrible bombing of the “orphanage in Pakistan”.
But Mitt Romney isn’t president, Barack Obama is, so no one cares.
Here's What Would Be Happening if President Romney Had Bombed a Hospital in Afghanistan | United Liberty | Free Market - Individual Liberty - Limited Government
It cracks me up how bad you are at the English language and your complete and utter inability to learn how to use quote marks, and when not to use them. Again, you don't use quote marks for the voices in your head. You use quote marks when you are quoting someone's actual words.
Classic, you're so pompous with such an over-inflated ego, and yet you can't master high school English. Classic
More whining from the right – poor conservatives, hapless victims of the 'evil' media.The anti war left are not anti war.....
If Romney had been elected in 2012 and in the year before his reelection campaign had bombed a hospital, decided to keep troops in Afghanistan, and had details of his robot assassin program leaked, things would probably look a little different today.
If Romney were president right now, the White House would be surrounded by protesters and candlelight peace vigils night and day. Some would wave American flags, some would wave signs calling for impeachment, some would have pictures caricaturing the president as Hitler or an animal. They would chant “Not in our name!”, or “Bring them home!”, or “Hey ho, hey ho, Romney has got to go!”
If Romney were president, nightly news reports on CBS, NBC, and ABC would have regular features on war crimes, quagmires, and collateral damage. CNN would be wall-to-wall with team coverage of protests, interviews of bombing witnesses, and Anderson Cooper walking through rubble in full body armor.
If Romney were president, every political analyst left of Judge Napolitano would be fretting over the war-weary public turning the upcoming election into a referendum against the president and his party. Vox and FiveThirtyEight would have maps showing how many Senate seats Republicans would lose because of the president’s sure-to-plummet approval rating. And then there’s MSNBC.
If Romney were president, MSNBC would be holding mock war crimes tribunals on Chris Hayes, explaining the ins and outs of the process with expert guests. Lena Dunham would be on Maddow every night aghast (but still giggling!) at this warmonger-in-chief. Chris Matthews would be yelling at Michael Moore, trying to find out when charges would be filed at the Hague.
If Romney were president, Democrats in Congress would be calling for hearings and investigations for each transgression: the bombing, troop levels, and drone policy. Chuck Schumer would hold daily press briefings scolding the wreckless president from behind the glasses perched precariously down his nose. Someone would accurately quote Sheila Jackson-Lee condeming the terrible bombing of the “orphanage in Pakistan”.
But Mitt Romney isn’t president, Barack Obama is, so no one cares.
Here's What Would Be Happening if President Romney Had Bombed a Hospital in Afghanistan | United Liberty | Free Market - Individual Liberty - Limited Government
It cracks me up how bad you are at the English language and your complete and utter inability to learn how to use quote marks, and when not to use them. Again, you don't use quote marks for the voices in your head. You use quote marks when you are quoting someone's actual words.
Classic, you're so pompous with such an over-inflated ego, and yet you can't master high school English. Classic
Absolute fucking bullshit. Quote marks are commonly used to denote "so-called". Anyone even partially fluent in the language knows this.
More whining from the right – poor conservatives, hapless victims of the 'evil' media.The anti war left are not anti war.....
If Romney had been elected in 2012 and in the year before his reelection campaign had bombed a hospital, decided to keep troops in Afghanistan, and had details of his robot assassin program leaked, things would probably look a little different today.
If Romney were president right now, the White House would be surrounded by protesters and candlelight peace vigils night and day. Some would wave American flags, some would wave signs calling for impeachment, some would have pictures caricaturing the president as Hitler or an animal. They would chant “Not in our name!”, or “Bring them home!”, or “Hey ho, hey ho, Romney has got to go!”
If Romney were president, nightly news reports on CBS, NBC, and ABC would have regular features on war crimes, quagmires, and collateral damage. CNN would be wall-to-wall with team coverage of protests, interviews of bombing witnesses, and Anderson Cooper walking through rubble in full body armor.
If Romney were president, every political analyst left of Judge Napolitano would be fretting over the war-weary public turning the upcoming election into a referendum against the president and his party. Vox and FiveThirtyEight would have maps showing how many Senate seats Republicans would lose because of the president’s sure-to-plummet approval rating. And then there’s MSNBC.
If Romney were president, MSNBC would be holding mock war crimes tribunals on Chris Hayes, explaining the ins and outs of the process with expert guests. Lena Dunham would be on Maddow every night aghast (but still giggling!) at this warmonger-in-chief. Chris Matthews would be yelling at Michael Moore, trying to find out when charges would be filed at the Hague.
If Romney were president, Democrats in Congress would be calling for hearings and investigations for each transgression: the bombing, troop levels, and drone policy. Chuck Schumer would hold daily press briefings scolding the wreckless president from behind the glasses perched precariously down his nose. Someone would accurately quote Sheila Jackson-Lee condeming the terrible bombing of the “orphanage in Pakistan”.
But Mitt Romney isn’t president, Barack Obama is, so no one cares.
Here's What Would Be Happening if President Romney Had Bombed a Hospital in Afghanistan | United Liberty | Free Market - Individual Liberty - Limited Government
It cracks me up how bad you are at the English language and your complete and utter inability to learn how to use quote marks, and when not to use them. Again, you don't use quote marks for the voices in your head. You use quote marks when you are quoting someone's actual words.
Classic, you're so pompous with such an over-inflated ego, and yet you can't master high school English. Classic
Absolute fucking bullshit. Quote marks are commonly used to denote "so-called". Anyone even partially fluent in the language knows this.
Quote marking the "left wing" media would make sense, quoting the "evil" media doesn't
More whining from the right – poor conservatives, hapless victims of the 'evil' media.The anti war left are not anti war.....
If Romney had been elected in 2012 and in the year before his reelection campaign had bombed a hospital, decided to keep troops in Afghanistan, and had details of his robot assassin program leaked, things would probably look a little different today.
If Romney were president right now, the White House would be surrounded by protesters and candlelight peace vigils night and day. Some would wave American flags, some would wave signs calling for impeachment, some would have pictures caricaturing the president as Hitler or an animal. They would chant “Not in our name!”, or “Bring them home!”, or “Hey ho, hey ho, Romney has got to go!”
If Romney were president, nightly news reports on CBS, NBC, and ABC would have regular features on war crimes, quagmires, and collateral damage. CNN would be wall-to-wall with team coverage of protests, interviews of bombing witnesses, and Anderson Cooper walking through rubble in full body armor.
If Romney were president, every political analyst left of Judge Napolitano would be fretting over the war-weary public turning the upcoming election into a referendum against the president and his party. Vox and FiveThirtyEight would have maps showing how many Senate seats Republicans would lose because of the president’s sure-to-plummet approval rating. And then there’s MSNBC.
If Romney were president, MSNBC would be holding mock war crimes tribunals on Chris Hayes, explaining the ins and outs of the process with expert guests. Lena Dunham would be on Maddow every night aghast (but still giggling!) at this warmonger-in-chief. Chris Matthews would be yelling at Michael Moore, trying to find out when charges would be filed at the Hague.
If Romney were president, Democrats in Congress would be calling for hearings and investigations for each transgression: the bombing, troop levels, and drone policy. Chuck Schumer would hold daily press briefings scolding the wreckless president from behind the glasses perched precariously down his nose. Someone would accurately quote Sheila Jackson-Lee condeming the terrible bombing of the “orphanage in Pakistan”.
But Mitt Romney isn’t president, Barack Obama is, so no one cares.
Here's What Would Be Happening if President Romney Had Bombed a Hospital in Afghanistan | United Liberty | Free Market - Individual Liberty - Limited Government
It cracks me up how bad you are at the English language and your complete and utter inability to learn how to use quote marks, and when not to use them. Again, you don't use quote marks for the voices in your head. You use quote marks when you are quoting someone's actual words.
Classic, you're so pompous with such an over-inflated ego, and yet you can't master high school English. Classic
Absolute fucking bullshit. Quote marks are commonly used to denote "so-called". Anyone even partially fluent in the language knows this.
Quote marking the "left wing" media would make sense, quoting the "evil" media doesn't
Amazing that even this simplicity soars over your pointy head.
--- Without even scanning back to glean the context I can see that writing <the "evil" media> is obvious sarcasm, pointed at the addressed post, to mean "what you think is the evil media". Ain't friggin' rocket surgery; it's called irony.
i·ro·ny1
ˈīrənē/
noun
noun: irony
the expression of one's meaning by using language that normally signifies the opposite, typically for humorous or emphatic effect.
"“Don't go overboard with the gratitude,” he rejoined with heavy irony"
synonyms: sarcasm, causticity, cynicism, mockery, satire, sardonicism
"that note of irony in her voice"
More whining from the right – poor conservatives, hapless victims of the 'evil' media.
It cracks me up how bad you are at the English language and your complete and utter inability to learn how to use quote marks, and when not to use them. Again, you don't use quote marks for the voices in your head. You use quote marks when you are quoting someone's actual words.
Classic, you're so pompous with such an over-inflated ego, and yet you can't master high school English. Classic
Absolute fucking bullshit. Quote marks are commonly used to denote "so-called". Anyone even partially fluent in the language knows this.
Quote marking the "left wing" media would make sense, quoting the "evil" media doesn't
Amazing that even this simplicity soars over your pointy head.
--- Without even scanning back to glean the context I can see that writing <the "evil" media> is obvious sarcasm, pointed at the addressed post, to mean "what you think is the evil media". Ain't friggin' rocket surgery; it's called irony.
i·ro·ny1
ˈīrənē/
noun
noun: irony
the expression of one's meaning by using language that normally signifies the opposite, typically for humorous or emphatic effect.
"“Don't go overboard with the gratitude,” he rejoined with heavy irony"
synonyms: sarcasm, causticity, cynicism, mockery, satire, sardonicism
"that note of irony in her voice"
Right, which in that case you don't use quote marks, my point. I didn't say I didn't get what he said, I said you don't quote it. you don't.
I always said the worst writers are English teachers and journalists. Thanks for proving me right ... again
It cracks me up how bad you are at the English language and your complete and utter inability to learn how to use quote marks, and when not to use them. Again, you don't use quote marks for the voices in your head. You use quote marks when you are quoting someone's actual words.
Classic, you're so pompous with such an over-inflated ego, and yet you can't master high school English. Classic
Absolute fucking bullshit. Quote marks are commonly used to denote "so-called". Anyone even partially fluent in the language knows this.
Quote marking the "left wing" media would make sense, quoting the "evil" media doesn't
Amazing that even this simplicity soars over your pointy head.
--- Without even scanning back to glean the context I can see that writing <the "evil" media> is obvious sarcasm, pointed at the addressed post, to mean "what you think is the evil media". Ain't friggin' rocket surgery; it's called irony.
i·ro·ny1
ˈīrənē/
noun
noun: irony
the expression of one's meaning by using language that normally signifies the opposite, typically for humorous or emphatic effect.
"“Don't go overboard with the gratitude,” he rejoined with heavy irony"
synonyms: sarcasm, causticity, cynicism, mockery, satire, sardonicism
"that note of irony in her voice"
Right, which in that case you don't use quote marks, my point. I didn't say I didn't get what he said, I said you don't quote it. you don't.
I always said the worst writers are English teachers and journalists. Thanks for proving me right ... again
That would immediately improve if you gave it up and went into something you can handle.
Of course you quote it. That's what sets it apart to make it clear for the "literate" people.
Absolute fucking bullshit. Quote marks are commonly used to denote "so-called". Anyone even partially fluent in the language knows this.
Quote marking the "left wing" media would make sense, quoting the "evil" media doesn't
Amazing that even this simplicity soars over your pointy head.
--- Without even scanning back to glean the context I can see that writing <the "evil" media> is obvious sarcasm, pointed at the addressed post, to mean "what you think is the evil media". Ain't friggin' rocket surgery; it's called irony.
i·ro·ny1
ˈīrənē/
noun
noun: irony
the expression of one's meaning by using language that normally signifies the opposite, typically for humorous or emphatic effect.
"“Don't go overboard with the gratitude,” he rejoined with heavy irony"
synonyms: sarcasm, causticity, cynicism, mockery, satire, sardonicism
"that note of irony in her voice"
Right, which in that case you don't use quote marks, my point. I didn't say I didn't get what he said, I said you don't quote it. you don't.
I always said the worst writers are English teachers and journalists. Thanks for proving me right ... again
That would immediately improve if you gave it up and went into something you can handle.
Of course you quote it. That's what sets it apart to make it clear for the "literate" people.
As I said, journalists are horrible writers, you're as bad as English teachers. The evidence is dropped on my doorstep every morning. And by reading your posts
I am neither an English teacher nor a journalist
I have been a newspaper editor
I am neither an English teacher nor a journalist
I have been a newspaper editor
How long have you been a retard?
I am neither an English teacher nor a journalist
I have been a newspaper editor
How long have you been a retard?
How long have you been a loser?
I mean, you're so adept at it.
The anti war left are not anti war.....
If Romney had been elected in 2012 and in the year before his reelection campaign had bombed a hospital, decided to keep troops in Afghanistan, and had details of his robot assassin program leaked, things would probably look a little different today.
Speculation fallacy. Whole OP full of 'em. Dismissed.
Actually Romney probably would have bombed Jeep factories that "moved to China".
No speculation at all, there is a long and clear pattern by the leftist media to hold Republicans to a standard that no explanation is good enough and Democrats to a standard that no explanation is required
Poor Leftards hate to have their hypocrisy rubbed in their face.More whining from the right – poor conservatives, hapless victims of the 'evil' media.The anti war left are not anti war.....
If Romney had been elected in 2012 and in the year before his reelection campaign had bombed a hospital, decided to keep troops in Afghanistan, and had details of his robot assassin program leaked, things would probably look a little different today.
If Romney were president right now, the White House would be surrounded by protesters and candlelight peace vigils night and day. Some would wave American flags, some would wave signs calling for impeachment, some would have pictures caricaturing the president as Hitler or an animal. They would chant “Not in our name!”, or “Bring them home!”, or “Hey ho, hey ho, Romney has got to go!”
If Romney were president, nightly news reports on CBS, NBC, and ABC would have regular features on war crimes, quagmires, and collateral damage. CNN would be wall-to-wall with team coverage of protests, interviews of bombing witnesses, and Anderson Cooper walking through rubble in full body armor.
If Romney were president, every political analyst left of Judge Napolitano would be fretting over the war-weary public turning the upcoming election into a referendum against the president and his party. Vox and FiveThirtyEight would have maps showing how many Senate seats Republicans would lose because of the president’s sure-to-plummet approval rating. And then there’s MSNBC.
If Romney were president, MSNBC would be holding mock war crimes tribunals on Chris Hayes, explaining the ins and outs of the process with expert guests. Lena Dunham would be on Maddow every night aghast (but still giggling!) at this warmonger-in-chief. Chris Matthews would be yelling at Michael Moore, trying to find out when charges would be filed at the Hague.
If Romney were president, Democrats in Congress would be calling for hearings and investigations for each transgression: the bombing, troop levels, and drone policy. Chuck Schumer would hold daily press briefings scolding the wreckless president from behind the glasses perched precariously down his nose. Someone would accurately quote Sheila Jackson-Lee condeming the terrible bombing of the “orphanage in Pakistan”.
But Mitt Romney isn’t president, Barack Obama is, so no one cares.
Here's What Would Be Happening if President Romney Had Bombed a Hospital in Afghanistan | United Liberty | Free Market - Individual Liberty - Limited Government
