If liberals support free speech, why was an army needed...

[K9Buck]

...to protect Ben Shapiro and conservatives at Berkley?

 

[BlackFlag]

Because Shapiro went to Berkeley for no other reason than how liberal the locals are, intending to insult them, their values and their beliefs for the sake of publicity.

 

[Manonthestreet]

Because Shapiro went to Berkeley for no other reason than how liberal the locals are, meaning to insult their values and beliefs for the sake of publicity.

Classic 2 yr old reply

 

[BlackFlag]

Because Shapiro went to Berkeley for no other reason than how liberal the locals are, meaning to insult their values and beliefs for the sake of publicity.

Classic 2 yr old reply

 

[Pete7469]

Because Shapiro went to Berkeley for no other reason than how liberal the locals are, meaning to insult their values and beliefs for the sake of publicity.

Classic 2 yr old reply

You expected some insight from BlackFag?

LOL...

Liberal "values"....

LOL...

 

[GreenBean]

Because Shapiro went to Berkeley for no other reason than how liberal the locals are, intending to insult them, their values and their beliefs for the sake of publicity.

And what about these Incidents .....

Berkeley protest erupts after Donald Trump wins presidency | The Daily Californian


UC Berkeley riot at Yiannopoulos event tests free speech, incites funding threat from Trump

Berkeley protesters form human chain to stop white students from getting to class

Berkeley Teacher Charged In Connection With Riot At 2016 Sacramento Rally


Riot breaks out at UC Berkeley amid protest of Breitbart editor's speech (VIDEO)

Up To 5,000 People Riot Near UC Berkeley Campus Overnight

Berkeley, Calif., protest gets violent for second night

Updated Statement on Violent Protest at University of California, Berkeley - FIRE

 

[Dogmaphobe]

It wasn't because of liberals, but those like blackFlag virulently opposed to liberal ideals.

 

[Moonglow]

...to protect Ben Shapiro and conservatives at Berkley?

Because these people are not liberals, why you fellows have a need to incorrectly identify these folks is beyond me..

 

[BlackFlag]

Because Shapiro went to Berkeley for no other reason than how liberal the locals are, intending to insult them, their values and their beliefs for the sake of publicity.

And what about these Incidents .....

Berkeley protest erupts after Donald Trump wins presidency | The Daily Californian


UC Berkeley riot at Yiannopoulos event tests free speech, incites funding threat from Trump

Berkeley protesters form human chain to stop white students from getting to class

Berkeley Teacher Charged In Connection With Riot At 2016 Sacramento Rally


Riot breaks out at UC Berkeley amid protest of Breitbart editor's speech (VIDEO)

Up To 5,000 People Riot Near UC Berkeley Campus Overnight

Berkeley, Calif., protest gets violent for second night

Updated Statement on Violent Protest at University of California, Berkeley - FIRE

What about them?

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

Who said liberals support free speech?

 

[Moonglow]

Who said liberals support free speech?

They do if they are real liberals, if not, then there is no liberalism at play...

 

[K9Buck]

...to protect Ben Shapiro and conservatives at Berkley?

Because these people are not liberals, why you fellows have a need to incorrectly identify these folks is beyond me..

They're in the camp of the left. Nationwide, anytime someone on the right has a rally, huge mobs of violent liberals show up to intimidate and physically attack them. Liberals are free to speak and have no fear that they're going to be attacked. Conservatives don't enjoy the same privilege. Someone wearing a MAGA hat has a good chance of being attacked.

 

[Moonglow]

...to protect Ben Shapiro and conservatives at Berkley?

Because these people are not liberals, why you fellows have a need to incorrectly identify these folks is beyond me..

They're in the camp of the left. Nationwide, anytime someone on the right has a rally, huge mobs of violent liberals show up to intimidate and physically attack them. Liberals are free to speak and have no fear that they're going to be attacked. Conservatives don't enjoy the same privilege. Someone wearing a MAGA hat has a good chance of being attacked.

Some maybe, but not all...I am not, nor are the liberals that are repubs..

 

[K9Buck]

Who said liberals support free speech?

They do if they are real liberals, if not, then there is no liberalism at play...

Bullshit. Prominent liberals have been virtually mute regarding the violence of BlM, antifa and occupy. They're outspoken when it comes to white nationalists, but mute when they're on their side. Their silence is their consent.

 

[K9Buck]

Who said liberals support free speech?

Liberals.

 

[Moonglow]

Who said liberals support free speech?

They do if they are real liberals, if not, then there is no liberalism at play...

Bullshit. Prominent liberals have been virtually mute regarding the violence of BlM, antifa and occupy. They're outspoken when it comes to white nationalists, but mute when they're on their side. Their silence is their consent.

Just like when you assert the 5th amendment when in court??..Oh yeah the prominent leaders took that right away when the Drug War was ramped up during Reagan..

 

[K9Buck]

Because Shapiro went to Berkeley for no other reason than how liberal the locals are, intending to insult them, their values and their beliefs for the sake of publicity.

Shapiro was invited to speak at a private, conservative function inside of a campus building. Don't like what he says? Don't go. You fascist k*nts want to violently silence anyone who says something you don't like. Let me clue you in on something, dumbass, you and your ilk are the problem in America. Got it, dumbass?

 

[K9Buck]

Who said liberals support free speech?

They do if they are real liberals, if not, then there is no liberalism at play...

Bullshit. Prominent liberals have been virtually mute regarding the violence of BlM, antifa and occupy. They're outspoken when it comes to white nationalists, but mute when they're on their side. Their silence is their consent.

Just like when you assert the 5th amendment when in court??..Oh yeah the prominent leaders took that right away when the Drug War was ramped up during Reagan..

Typical k*nt-act response.

 

[defcon4]

Berkeley protest erupts after Donald Trump wins presidency | The Daily Californian

Trump won the presidency "for no other reason than how liberal the locals are, intending to insult them, their values and their beliefs for the sake of publicity."

 

[Moonglow]

Who said liberals support free speech?

They do if they are real liberals, if not, then there is no liberalism at play...

Bullshit. Prominent liberals have been virtually mute regarding the violence of BlM, antifa and occupy. They're outspoken when it comes to white nationalists, but mute when they're on their side. Their silence is their consent.

Just like when you assert the 5th amendment when in court??..Oh yeah the prominent leaders took that right away when the Drug War was ramped up during Reagan..

Typical k*nt-act response.

When did you become so eloquent, catechism class?