Idiot Maddow reports Palin invasion spoof as fact-video

Can you show where he ever admitted fault? I know he's sorry -- sorry he got caught.

You guys make this to easy.

Rather Admits 'Mistake in Judgment' (washingtonpost.com)
IOW, a non-retraction-retraction.

"We believe the story is true, even though we had to fabricate the facts".

Moving goalposts are we?

Heck..what can you expect.

Right wing anarchists/Eliminationists don't like the rules anyway..man!

They are a downer!
 
Can you show where he ever admitted fault? I know he's sorry -- sorry he got caught.

You guys make this to easy.

Rather Admits 'Mistake in Judgment' (washingtonpost.com)
:clap2: Cool. Doesn't look like he really learned anything, though:

At the same time, he said, "The fact that copies of the documents could be true was not enough. We needed to be able to prove they were authentic."

"Obviously," Rather added, "I would like to get the original documents if they still exist."

:lol:

I don't think the facts were wrong either. Rather got snookered.

Even Bush "Can't recall" what the heck he was doing. But he did admit to maybe reading magazines on base.

So, I dunno, it took about a million or so tax payer bucks to teach him to be a grade A pilot? (And from what I understand..a pretty good one at that)

Only to use his skills to read magazines on base?

And that's not news?

Hookay.
 
Fox News Boycott | Republicans Want to Acquire Another FOX-Style Network


what may be a Freudian Slip, author Robert G. Kaufman, makes the following statement regarding what the Republican party should do “when Obama fails” (his words).

“If I had to recommend one single thing that the Republicans should be doing to help articulate the message, it is to acquire another television network so that there is not just FOX, but multiple sources of alternative information that will do a much better job than we did in 2008 to keep things honest. “

Obviously, this isn’t a revelation about the GOP owning Fox News, but rather the fact that Fox News is responsible to the right. This further proves that Fox News is neither fair nor balanced.
 
Yeah. And that negates all the finger-pointing...how, exactly?

It's probably cancelled out by the clever twisting of the pundit's names, the questioning of their intellect, posting unflattering photos and lying about them "never ever" apologizing.
I'm sure you feel that way.

Yeah..I do.

You get smacked..you smack back.

And then nuke em from space.

Only way to be sure.:lol:
 
IOW, a non-retraction-retraction.

"We believe the story is true, even though we had to fabricate the facts".

Moving goalposts are we?

Heck..what can you expect.

Right wing anarchists/Eliminationists don't like the rules anyway..man!

They are a downer!
What's a bigger downer is your lame attempt at strawman.


Rather engaged in a non-retraction-retraction....It's not apologizing for getting it wrong, it's apologizing for getting caught....There's a difference.
 
So, in summary:

Maddow makes a stupid mistake that could have been prevented with 15 seconds on Google, and --

1. It's Stephanie's fault.

2. It's the GOP's fault.

3. It's Fox News' fault.

4. It's Beck's fault.

5. It's Palin's fault.

6. It's conservatives' fault.


That about cover it?

Now go find that in anyones post but yours.

Dave you really need to stick to what people actually say instead of making crap up mmmkay

OMG

OH MY GOD!

The Irony is just pooring out of my computer right now. :lol:
 
:clap2: Cool. Doesn't look like he really learned anything, though:

At the same time, he said, "The fact that copies of the documents could be true was not enough. We needed to be able to prove they were authentic."

"Obviously," Rather added, "I would like to get the original documents if they still exist."

:lol:

I don't think the facts were wrong either. Rather got snookered.

Even Bush "Can't recall" what the heck he was doing. But he did admit to maybe reading magazines on base.

So, I dunno, it took about a million or so tax payer bucks to teach him to be a grade A pilot? (And from what I understand..a pretty good one at that)

Only to use his skills to read magazines on base?

And that's not news?

Hookay.
:lol: You really think it was about the taxpayers getting their money's worth?

No, it was about discrediting Bush, for anything, with anything, even if it had to be made up. As this was.
 
It's probably cancelled out by the clever twisting of the pundit's names, the questioning of their intellect, posting unflattering photos and lying about them "never ever" apologizing.
I'm sure you feel that way.

Yeah..I do.

You get smacked..you smack back.

And then nuke em from space.

Only way to be sure.:lol:
:lol: I prefer the orbital ion cannon. More precise targeting.

low_orbit_ion_cannon.jpg
 
:clap2: Cool. Doesn't look like he really learned anything, though:

At the same time, he said, "The fact that copies of the documents could be true was not enough. We needed to be able to prove they were authentic."

"Obviously," Rather added, "I would like to get the original documents if they still exist."

:lol:

I don't think the facts were wrong either. Rather got snookered.

Even Bush "Can't recall" what the heck he was doing. But he did admit to maybe reading magazines on base.

So, I dunno, it took about a million or so tax payer bucks to teach him to be a grade A pilot? (And from what I understand..a pretty good one at that)

Only to use his skills to read magazines on base?

And that's not news?

Hookay.
:lol: You really think it was about the taxpayers getting their money's worth?

No, it was about discrediting Bush, for anything, with anything, even if it had to be made up. As this was.

So you think that was money well spent.

Good to know.:clap2:
 
I don't think the facts were wrong either. Rather got snookered.

Even Bush "Can't recall" what the heck he was doing. But he did admit to maybe reading magazines on base.

So, I dunno, it took about a million or so tax payer bucks to teach him to be a grade A pilot? (And from what I understand..a pretty good one at that)

Only to use his skills to read magazines on base?

And that's not news?

Hookay.
:lol: You really think it was about the taxpayers getting their money's worth?

No, it was about discrediting Bush, for anything, with anything, even if it had to be made up. As this was.

So you think that was money well spent.

Good to know.:clap2:
Did I say that? Where? :confused:
 
Fox News Boycott | Republicans Want to Acquire Another FOX-Style Network


what may be a Freudian Slip, author Robert G. Kaufman, makes the following statement regarding what the Republican party should do “when Obama fails” (his words).

“If I had to recommend one single thing that the Republicans should be doing to help articulate the message, it is to acquire another television network so that there is not just FOX, but multiple sources of alternative information that will do a much better job than we did in 2008 to keep things honest. “

Obviously, this isn’t a revelation about the GOP owning Fox News, but rather the fact that Fox News is responsible to the right. This further proves that Fox News is neither fair nor balanced.


Let me explain something to t=you that I'm sure has been done many times before.

News outlets on the right; Fox and conservative radio

News outlets on the left; msn, nbc, cbs, abc, cnn, liberal radio, public radio, pbs

You wanna cry b/c some people want another conservative outlet?

piss off
 
Rachel happily owned up to getting punked and graciously praised the people who did it.

Pure class, the kind that is non-existent on the Right.

Exactly. She made a mistake, she owned up to it.

Compare to Bill O': "I will never trust the Bush Administration if we don't find WMDs in Iraq...."

FOXNews.com - The WMD Controversy Heats Up - Bill OReilly | The OReilly Factor
um, then how come in her 10 minute "apology" it was 9 minutes of clips of Glen Beck and one minute where she admitted she got snookered by a satire site(really good satire)
 

Forum List

Back
Top