This wikiHow definition of a sweet enemy includes good advice to individuals; especially the young and immature:
Frankly, punching them out is the most effective way to deal with them. Knock a sweet enemy on his or her ass and they will stay far away from you from then on. Unfortunately, youngsters have to identify them first. Most do not have the maturity. Most adults can’t get physical, or won’t because of laws protecting the vilest of creatures. In fact, collectivist laws force you to associate with sweet enemies in the schools, in the workplace, and even in social settings. Ultimately, sweet enemies will always be a one-on-one proposition. Not so with the caring enemy.
A caring enemy is the sweet enemy all grown up. The caring enemy destroys countries, societies, cultures, and individual liberties. Many in government have identified America’s caring enemy while many support and protect them. Tragically, a large number of private sector Americans refuse to see caring enemies for what they are. That failure shackles those in government who would gladly rein in the caring enemy before they destroy the country. It’s like your parents telling you not to hang out with a specific “friend” but you do the opposite anyway.
If you’ve read this far you must be asking “Who is he talking about?” Answer: TEACHERS. Let me explain my position by beginning with this:
Sweden’s Supreme Court is no different than America’s in that the court is taking the heat while it was teachers who dictated the decision behind the scenes. The same thing happens in America. Example: An American court ruled that parental Rights end at the schoolhouse door:
The outrage against that decision was directed at the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals when it should have been directed towards the NEA (National Education Association). Misdirected outrage occurs because the caring enemy is so well hidden and protected by the media it is almost impossible for the public to identify the real enemy. Even well-informed conservative journalists blame the courts, or legislators, rather than lay the blame where it originates.
Here’s the part I like best about Sweden:
Non-existent International Law is the Holy Grail to the NEA and to Socialists the world over —— except when it stands in the way of the NEA’s agenda. A happy cynic might smile and say that Sweden’s High Court proved that International law does not exist.
And Universal Human Rights is the philosophical foundation for every United Nations charity hustle. I can’t imagine what those judges in Sweden were thinking. B.S. is B.S., but you don’t mess with Human Rights when denying them could come back and bite the UN’s income on the ass.
So why connect the NEA to a decision handed down in Sweden’s Supreme Court? Try this:
The NEA is the largest professional organization in the world. The NEA belongs to Education International, a global federation of teachers' unions. The NEA is also the largest labor union in America. So nobody can tell me the NEA did not have its dirty hand in the Johansson decision through Sweden’s teachers’ union just as the NEA is behind every desirable decision in American courts. Had the ruling in Sweden gone the other way you can be sure the NEA would be using its considerable influence and resources to overturn a hostile decision.
Finally, a little background.
Teachers began their long march in 1857. (Karl Marx wrote the Communist Manifesto 9 years earlier).
Around 1960, in spite of the longstanding opposition to giving public sector employees the power inherent in collective bargaining, teachers’ unions began enriching their members with tax dollars negotiated through collective bargaining. I use the word negotiated loosely since the taxpayer never has a seat at bargaining tables. In effect, pubic sector unions negotiate with themselves.
The exorbitant salaries teachers “negotiated” allows them to contribute part of their SALARY to Democrats, and to causes advancing socialism’s ideology, without breaking the law that prohibits contributing union DUES to political parties, candidates and causes.
More importantly, NEA membership before 1960 was much less than one million. Today it is approximately 3.5 million. Indeed, after JFK’s assassination the entire parasite class began its phenomenal growth in tandem with LBJ’s Great Society and the parasites in the education industry. Surprise, surprise! LBJ was a teacher before running for elected office.
A Sweet enemy describes a person who you hold close but most likely will stab you in the back at some time. He/she may appear innocent, carefree and overly lovely, but if you should look closer you might see the bad eyes, the cold stare and even catch a cold breeze from his/her breathe. The fact is that sweet enemies have a reason for being close to you - just simply to destroy or harm you. It is often difficult to find out these types of people actually mean any harm, but they do. Here are the various ways of finding them out.
How to Identify a Sweet Enemy - wikiHow
Frankly, punching them out is the most effective way to deal with them. Knock a sweet enemy on his or her ass and they will stay far away from you from then on. Unfortunately, youngsters have to identify them first. Most do not have the maturity. Most adults can’t get physical, or won’t because of laws protecting the vilest of creatures. In fact, collectivist laws force you to associate with sweet enemies in the schools, in the workplace, and even in social settings. Ultimately, sweet enemies will always be a one-on-one proposition. Not so with the caring enemy.
A caring enemy is the sweet enemy all grown up. The caring enemy destroys countries, societies, cultures, and individual liberties. Many in government have identified America’s caring enemy while many support and protect them. Tragically, a large number of private sector Americans refuse to see caring enemies for what they are. That failure shackles those in government who would gladly rein in the caring enemy before they destroy the country. It’s like your parents telling you not to hang out with a specific “friend” but you do the opposite anyway.
If you’ve read this far you must be asking “Who is he talking about?” Answer: TEACHERS. Let me explain my position by beginning with this:
The justices of the Supreme Court of Sweden have finished the destruction of a family that was begun in their lower courts, rejecting an appeal of a ruling that permanently separated a young boy from his parents because he was being homeschooled.
“In a perfunctory order the Swedish Supreme Court rejected a desperate appeal by Christer and Annie Johansson, parents of Domenic Johansson, who was torn from his parents while minutes from takeoff on an international flight as the family prepared to move to India,” said a report from the Home School Legal Defense Association, which along with a team from the Alliance Defending Freedom has been fighting on behalf of the family.
XXXXX
WND has reported on the case from its beginning, when Domenic was seized by armed Swedish police officers operating on the orders of social services agencies from on board a Turkish Airlines flight June 25, 2009, because he was being homeschooled.
He was 7 at the time.
Sweden’s Supreme Court is no different than America’s in that the court is taking the heat while it was teachers who dictated the decision behind the scenes. The same thing happens in America. Example: An American court ruled that parental Rights end at the schoolhouse door:
The outrage against that decision was directed at the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals when it should have been directed towards the NEA (National Education Association). Misdirected outrage occurs because the caring enemy is so well hidden and protected by the media it is almost impossible for the public to identify the real enemy. Even well-informed conservative journalists blame the courts, or legislators, rather than lay the blame where it originates.
Here’s the part I like best about Sweden:
“The taking of this child for homeschooling and while the family was moving out of the country is an egregious violation of basic human rights and international law standards. Sweden is a party to numerous treaties that require them to respect the rights of parents to make education decisions and to leave the country if they choose. This is a dangerous precedent if permitted to stand.”
Judges rule to destroy homeschoolers' family
Swedish court rejects appeal of order separating parents from only child
Published: 15 hours ago
BOB UNRUH
Judges rule to destroy homeschoolers? family
Non-existent International Law is the Holy Grail to the NEA and to Socialists the world over —— except when it stands in the way of the NEA’s agenda. A happy cynic might smile and say that Sweden’s High Court proved that International law does not exist.
And Universal Human Rights is the philosophical foundation for every United Nations charity hustle. I can’t imagine what those judges in Sweden were thinking. B.S. is B.S., but you don’t mess with Human Rights when denying them could come back and bite the UN’s income on the ass.
So why connect the NEA to a decision handed down in Sweden’s Supreme Court? Try this:
The NEA is the largest professional organization in the world. The NEA belongs to Education International, a global federation of teachers' unions. The NEA is also the largest labor union in America. So nobody can tell me the NEA did not have its dirty hand in the Johansson decision through Sweden’s teachers’ union just as the NEA is behind every desirable decision in American courts. Had the ruling in Sweden gone the other way you can be sure the NEA would be using its considerable influence and resources to overturn a hostile decision.
Finally, a little background.
Teachers began their long march in 1857. (Karl Marx wrote the Communist Manifesto 9 years earlier).
Around 1960, in spite of the longstanding opposition to giving public sector employees the power inherent in collective bargaining, teachers’ unions began enriching their members with tax dollars negotiated through collective bargaining. I use the word negotiated loosely since the taxpayer never has a seat at bargaining tables. In effect, pubic sector unions negotiate with themselves.
The exorbitant salaries teachers “negotiated” allows them to contribute part of their SALARY to Democrats, and to causes advancing socialism’s ideology, without breaking the law that prohibits contributing union DUES to political parties, candidates and causes.
More importantly, NEA membership before 1960 was much less than one million. Today it is approximately 3.5 million. Indeed, after JFK’s assassination the entire parasite class began its phenomenal growth in tandem with LBJ’s Great Society and the parasites in the education industry. Surprise, surprise! LBJ was a teacher before running for elected office.
Last edited: