Judicial review
Gold Member
- Banned
- #1
You guys tried to tell me that there was no biasedness. Now you know you are wrong. No hiding it now.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Dafuck are you babbling about now? Shouldn't you be stalking some purportedly female poster?
Dafuck are you babbling about now? Shouldn't you be stalking some purportedly female poster?
I love being validated. Now the US supreme court is exposed and can be corrected. Judicial reform just became a huge campaign issue.
Dafuck are you babbling about now? Shouldn't you be stalking some purportedly female poster?
I love being validated. Now the US supreme court is exposed and can be corrected. Judicial reform just became a huge campaign issue.
And what did it do that was "left-leaning", pray?
Dafuck are you babbling about now? Shouldn't you be stalking some purportedly female poster?
I love being validated. Now the US supreme court is exposed and can be corrected. Judicial reform just became a huge campaign issue.
And what did it do that was "left-leaning", pray?
use personal political beliefs to change law and make law, which isn't there job as Supreme Court justices.
-- and what law did they "make"?
-- and what law did they "make"?
"Case law."
-- and what law did they "make"?
"Case law."
Yeah I didn't think anybody had an answer.
Have you reviewed the ruling and can cite fed statue that was violated?You guys tried to tell me that there was no biasedness. Now you know you are wrong. No hiding it now.
Was it because the tax initiated in the Senate and not the House where taxes must originate from?-- and what law did they "make"?
"Case law."
Yeah I didn't think anybody had an answer.
They put their own words in the ACA to make it a tax to make it constitutional. The words were clear, and Roberts changed them, just read the US supreme courts reasons behind ruling in favor of ACA to see this, and scalias dissent crushes Roberts on this exact thing.
The Supremos merely rule on the legality of the law, they do not create any law...Dafuck are you babbling about now? Shouldn't you be stalking some purportedly female poster?
I love being validated. Now the US supreme court is exposed and can be corrected. Judicial reform just became a huge campaign issue.
And what did it do that was "left-leaning", pray?
use personal political beliefs to change law and make law, which isn't there job as Supreme Court justices.
biasedness= no such animal.....You guys tried to tell me that there was no biasedness. Now you know you are wrong. No hiding it now.
Depends, if they are takers or givers.....same sex is not equal to opposite sex
Have you reviewed the ruling and can cite fed statue that was violated?You guys tried to tell me that there was no biasedness. Now you know you are wrong. No hiding it now.
what is stupid human bean you are. they give us liberals K wedge issues gay wedge issues wow they give corporations everything with its has to do with business. I told you they will give us all theYou guys tried to tell me that there was no biasedness. Now you know you are wrong. No hiding it now.
The Supremos merely rule on the legality of the law, they do not create any law...Dafuck are you babbling about now? Shouldn't you be stalking some purportedly female poster?
I love being validated. Now the US supreme court is exposed and can be corrected. Judicial reform just became a huge campaign issue.
And what did it do that was "left-leaning", pray?
use personal political beliefs to change law and make law, which isn't there job as Supreme Court justices.