Looks like somebody's afraid of Walker.So, is it not in the voters interest to know a candidate is beholden to a kook cult special interest group?
Walker's groupies are a lot like Walker. They cry when things get a little tough.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Looks like somebody's afraid of Walker.So, is it not in the voters interest to know a candidate is beholden to a kook cult special interest group?
Walker's groupies are a lot like Walker. They cry when things get a little tough.
That's because you're a liberal.Going into the 2010 midterms the Dems had control of both those Houses and the Governorship though the incumbent governor had decided not to run for reelection and it went for Obama in 2012 so I would say it's reasonable to say if not now until recently it had been a blue state and could go back to one. Since Walkers election in 2010 the Democrats have had two chances to vote him out and failed both times to do so given that it seems the people of Wisconsin must feel he is doing something right.Walker has won election and reelection three times in four years in a blue state and has managed to get things done. For the people who are sick of Washington gridlock this has real appeal.
Blue State? Walker has GOP control of both Houses to work with, in other words a Rubber Stamp legislature. Also, much like Washington, there is a bitter divide between the GOP and the Dems.
Trust me, if the Dems had control of just one of the Houses, Walker wouldn't been able to cover his ass and push back paying the due short term debt so he could claim a balanced budget.
Considering, thanks to the recession, Minnesota was in worse shape (2 billion more in the red, But now there is no comparison, Minnesta is so far ahead in about every economic sense than our neighbor who once was called our twin, Wisconsin is lagging nationally economically.
For the life of me I can't figure out the attraction to Walker. Kasich is a much better candidate with a superior resume
Actually, you're a liberal. But then liberals always classify themselves as moderates.Actually, I'm moderate. But then cons classify anyone to the left of them as liberals.
Now back to my post, prove me wrong. You can't.
Secondly, Kasich is far superior than Walker, as his resume clearly shows. All Walker has going for him is that he made a name for himself minimizing unions. Economically, no one can say he has been a success when comparing him to the other 49 governors.
Like she blew away that boy who should have been serving coffee to Bill and Teddy?
Actually, you're a liberal. But then liberals always classify themselves as moderates.Actually, I'm moderate. But then cons classify anyone to the left of them as liberals.
Now back to my post, prove me wrong. You can't.
Secondly, Kasich is far superior than Walker, as his resume clearly shows. All Walker has going for him is that he made a name for himself minimizing unions. Economically, no one can say he has been a success when comparing him to the other 49 governors.
Walker really hasn't done that great of a job for Wisconsin's economy.
The state had to defer payment of short-term debt payments to erase a budget short fall. Wisconsin rates 40th in private sector job growth.
Bottom-line is that Wisconsin is lagging behind the nation economically.
Walker has won election and reelection three times in four years in a blue state and has managed to get things done. For the people who are sick of Washington gridlock this has real appeal.
Harvard educated elitist assholes have done enough damage.I like Walker because he would lose by more than 10 points to Hillary. Yes, I like him.
Make it twenty:
I wouldn't be sure about that.
Again, elections are not decided by partisans. Yes, we all know the union thugs and Democrats just hate Walker, maybe for good reason, maybe not.
But at the end of the day, this election is going to be decided by that 10% in the middle who don't live and breathe this stuff like we do here. They vote for the guy they'd like to have a beer with.
So you've got Walker, who has solid, midwestern roots, vs. Hillary who just comes off as shrill much of the time.
I wouldn't vote for Bush, Cruz, Trump or most of the rest of the GOP Clown car.
I'd give serious consideration to voting for Walker or Rubio.
The GOP will probably blow it and nominate Bush, but Walker shouldn't be dismissed.
In the end, it will be a 3-5% win by whomever wins. We're just that divided.
As for your consideration of Walker or Rubio, his lack of a college degree in this complex world doesn't give you a moment's pause?
Most of America does not see fit to graduate from college, why should they expect a President to?
I like him because liberals hate him.I like him because he has shown leadership in doing what he promised to do.
He is on my short list for pres
Why is that question even being asked? How retarded are you that this matters?
Actually, you're a liberal. But then liberals always classify themselves as moderates.
Even though these are not real debates I'm interested in seeing Cruz in action.
I respect Alan Dershowitz's intellect, smarts and whatnot but disagree with his liberalism, defending OJ and other stuff, but I'm intrigued about his comments about the Cruz he knew at Harvard. Ranked him the smartest guy he'd come across and the best debater to boot.