I have seen the light

I actually don't think you should give it back. But then what about the people who pay in to the system and then need to get help either through food stamps, unemployment, etc....Calling them freeloaders is hypocritical. (not calling you out specifically) They are entitled to this aid just as you are entitled to what you need.

Food stamps is a program I support wholeheartedly...although I do believe there should be a bit more regulation with it. There should be only select places you can redeem them for food as they should be treated as a stop gap and not a way of life for people...and the food should be nutritional and the amount enough to ensure 3 healthy meals a day per person per family.

Unemployment is insurance...the employee purchases such insurance with a .60 cent deduction per week from their paycheck. Some of us use the inusrance, others of us are lucky enough to not have to use the insurance...but it is inusrance that is ALSO subsidized by the two former employers of record per unemployed individual.

Welfare is a necessary evil in my eyes and that, too should be regulated better.

Social Security? Nothing more than the government one day saying "you people are not to be trusted with your money, so we will hold it for you until you need it"

Ironically, we have found that the government was not to be trusted with our savings!

Well you are reasonable, unlike others on this site who say end all of these programs and stop the draining of "my" money when they themselves take part in similar programs. That was the only point I was trying to make.

Persoanlly, I say end SS...

Give us all of our money back that you promised you would keep in a lock box and end it now.

As for the others....regulate them better....but we, as Americans are a giving people....and if you, the governemnt wants to give to the poor on our behalf with our tax dollars...go for it....just regulate it better....and eliminate fraud and abuse.

Its funny when you think of the irony...The government says people cant be trusted and that is why they need to deduct FICA for retirement.....but when you say to the government that people cant be trusted as it pertains to abuse and fraud of their entitlements the response is.."have more faith in your fellow American"
 
I have been converted, years of common sense conservative and republican thought have won me over. I am saved. But I will need help as I transition a mind lost so long in liberalism. So please correct any lingering liberal ideas as I reform myself.

I now believe: Freedom is all you need and government should leave us alone. The Federal deficit started in 2009. Unions and teachers are the fault of our educational woes. Fannie and Freddie all by themselves caused the financial meltdown. The unemployed are not looking for jobs and are lazy to boot. Taxes are bad bad bad. Corporations are the best and really honest people. Global warming is a fraud made up by tree huggers. Our founding principles were perfect, Ms Bachmann showed me the way. Slavery was really kinda nice. Social Security, Medicare, and Healthcare are socialism. Minimum wage is too high and outsourcing is a just great. Joe McCarthy was just one super guy. And Sarah, Glenn, and Michelle Bachmann are super patriots who really know history. Any criticism of American policy is anti American hate. Am I right so far?

So fellow conservatives, republicans, tea partyers, and righties, what have I missed? Help me see more of the light.

I get it, (snicker snicker) it's sarcasm. Ho-hum
 
You need to go study the history of this country and understand WHY these programs were started.

When they were NOT in place the elderly who had no opportunity to save for their retirements were living in chicken coops or the street.


We became dependent on these programs because they were the BEST way to insure people had some dignity in old age.

I do not need to study the history of this country. I have already done so...but thanks for the advice.

SS was instituted as a FORCED savings plan for all intents and purposes...becuase it was beleived by government that Americans prefer to spend more on TODAY without a concern for tomorrow.

It was and still is a "daddy government" plan.

So the Government in their iinfinite wisdom decided it best to take money from you today and give it back to you when you retire...at an age that THEY decide is appropriate.

The "elderly" you speak of?

If they took what SS took out of their check and saved it on their own, they would have the same amount for retirement but without government intervention.



Why didnt Rand herself do this?

Maybe because it's illegal not to pay into the Ponzi scam of SS
 
I do not need to study the history of this country. I have already done so...but thanks for the advice.

SS was instituted as a FORCED savings plan for all intents and purposes...becuase it was beleived by government that Americans prefer to spend more on TODAY without a concern for tomorrow.

It was and still is a "daddy government" plan.

So the Government in their iinfinite wisdom decided it best to take money from you today and give it back to you when you retire...at an age that THEY decide is appropriate.

The "elderly" you speak of?

If they took what SS took out of their check and saved it on their own, they would have the same amount for retirement but without government intervention.



Why didnt Rand herself do this?

Maybe because it's illegal not to pay into the Ponzi scam of SS

Take money from us then expect us not to take it back when the government desides is some how a bad thing.

I don't get that, not at all.
 
Its not the government who said SS was evil.

It was rand who said it was evil.

She accepted the money and Im glad she did.

She would have died without her cancer treatments.
 
Its not the government who said SS was evil.

It was rand who said it was evil.

She accepted the money and Im glad she did.

She would have died without her cancer treatments.

it IS an evil TM.

I do not ask the government to take my money and save it for me. They force me to hand it over to them.

She did not accept money from the government. She accepted HER money that the government promised they would hold for her and give back to her when she needs it.

Why is this so hard for you to understand?
 
Its not the government who said SS was evil.

It was rand who said it was evil.

She accepted the money and Im glad she did.

She would have died without her cancer treatments.

She paid in because she was forced to pay in. She collected what she was due. There is no hypocrisy here but in your feeble mind.

Tell me, I think SS is a scam and a waste of my money but i pay in so I don't get thrown in jail. I pay in because the government forces me to pay in. In your tiny mind does that make me a hypocrite or a law abiding citizen?
 
Its not the government who said SS was evil.

It was rand who said it was evil.

She accepted the money and Im glad she did.

She would have died without her cancer treatments.

She paid in because she was forced to pay in. She collected what she was due. There is no hypocrisy here but in your feeble mind.

Tell me, I think SS is a scam and a waste of my money but i pay in so I don't get thrown in jail. I pay in because the government forces me to pay in. In your tiny mind does that make me a hypocrite or a law abiding citizen?

Seems in the eyes of the far left...you are a law abiding citizen if you alow them to save your money for you but you are a hypocrite if you take it back when they give it to you.

Hmmm...I wonder...

If someone is anti 2nd ammendment and they are in a mall....would they be thankful or angry if their life is saved by a gun carrying citizen in the mall who shot down someone randomly shooting people.

If they are anything but angry that their life was saved...they would be a hypocrite per the lefts thought process.
 
I have been converted, years of common sense conservative and republican thought have won me over. I am saved. But I will need help as I transition a mind lost so long in liberalism. So please correct any lingering liberal ideas as I reform myself.

I now believe: Freedom is all you need and government should leave us alone. The Federal deficit started in 2009. Unions and teachers are the fault of our educational woes. Fannie and Freddie all by themselves caused the financial meltdown. The unemployed are not looking for jobs and are lazy to boot. Taxes are bad bad bad. Corporations are the best and really honest people. Global warming is a fraud made up by tree huggers. Our founding principles were perfect, Ms Bachmann showed me the way. Slavery was really kinda nice. Social Security, Medicare, and Healthcare are socialism. Minimum wage is too high and outsourcing is a just great. Joe McCarthy was just one super guy. And Sarah, Glenn, and Michelle Bachmann are super patriots who really know history. Any criticism of American policy is anti American hate. Am I right so far?

So fellow conservatives, republicans, tea partyers, and righties, what have I missed? Help me see more of the light.
Gee, midcan! Sorry to hear of your recent head trauma. While you're checking off things from your "To be a Conservative" list, you might consider gun control. Now that you're a card carrying John Bircher, think about what a great society we could have if we just armed ourselves to the teeth and shot for the sake of the second amendment! Public safety be damned, if you got your piece, then it's up to you to protect yourself from the other armed citizens.

And you forgot to take a stand on eroding civil liberties! Rights are okay for you, but don't let others enjoy them.
 
Its not the government who said SS was evil.

It was rand who said it was evil.

She accepted the money and Im glad she did.

She would have died without her cancer treatments.

She paid in because she was forced to pay in. She collected what she was due. There is no hypocrisy here but in your feeble mind.

Tell me, I think SS is a scam and a waste of my money but i pay in so I don't get thrown in jail. I pay in because the government forces me to pay in. In your tiny mind does that make me a hypocrite or a law abiding citizen?

Seems in the eyes of the far left...you are a law abiding citizen if you alow them to save your money for you but you are a hypocrite if you take it back when they give it to you.

Hmmm...I wonder...

If someone is anti 2nd ammendment and they are in a mall....would they be thankful or angry if their life is saved by a gun carrying citizen in the mall who shot down someone randomly shooting people.

If they are anything but angry that their life was saved...they would be a hypocrite per the lefts thought process.

If we subscribed to liberal logic, we could call them hypocrites for being happy that a law abiding citizen with a gun saved their lives.
 
She paid in because she was forced to pay in. She collected what she was due. There is no hypocrisy here but in your feeble mind.

Tell me, I think SS is a scam and a waste of my money but i pay in so I don't get thrown in jail. I pay in because the government forces me to pay in. In your tiny mind does that make me a hypocrite or a law abiding citizen?

Seems in the eyes of the far left...you are a law abiding citizen if you alow them to save your money for you but you are a hypocrite if you take it back when they give it to you.

Hmmm...I wonder...

If someone is anti 2nd ammendment and they are in a mall....would they be thankful or angry if their life is saved by a gun carrying citizen in the mall who shot down someone randomly shooting people.

If they are anything but angry that their life was saved...they would be a hypocrite per the lefts thought process.

If we subscribed to liberal logic, we could call them hypocrites for being happy that a law abiding citizen with a gun saved their lives.

uh....that was my point.:lol:
 
I have been converted, years of common sense conservative and republican thought have won me over. I am saved. But I will need help as I transition a mind lost so long in liberalism. So please correct any lingering liberal ideas as I reform myself.

I now believe: Freedom is all you need and government should leave us alone. The Federal deficit started in 2009. Unions and teachers are the fault of our educational woes. Fannie and Freddie all by themselves caused the financial meltdown. The unemployed are not looking for jobs and are lazy to boot. Taxes are bad bad bad. Corporations are the best and really honest people. Global warming is a fraud made up by tree huggers. Our founding principles were perfect, Ms Bachmann showed me the way. Slavery was really kinda nice. :confused: Social Security, Medicare, and Healthcare are socialism. Minimum wage is too high and outsourcing is a just great. Joe McCarthy was just one super guy. And Sarah, Glenn, and Michelle Bachmann are super patriots who really know history. Any criticism of American policy is anti American hate. Am I right so far? Umm NO!

So fellow conservatives, republicans, tea partyers, and righties, what have I missed? Help me see more of the light.

Some here might be laughing with you, but you can peddle that smut somewhere else.

Conservatives dont see anything the way you described.

Im not fooled by you ya troll. :fu:
 
I have been converted, years of common sense conservative and republican thought have won me over. I am saved. But I will need help as I transition a mind lost so long in liberalism. So please correct any lingering liberal ideas as I reform myself.

I now believe: Freedom is all you need and government should leave us alone. The Federal deficit started in 2009. Unions and teachers are the fault of our educational woes. Fannie and Freddie all by themselves caused the financial meltdown. The unemployed are not looking for jobs and are lazy to boot. Taxes are bad bad bad. Corporations are the best and really honest people. Global warming is a fraud made up by tree huggers. Our founding principles were perfect, Ms Bachmann showed me the way. Slavery was really kinda nice. Social Security, Medicare, and Healthcare are socialism. Minimum wage is too high and outsourcing is a just great. Joe McCarthy was just one super guy. And Sarah, Glenn, and Michelle Bachmann are super patriots who really know history. Any criticism of American policy is anti American hate. Am I right so far?

So fellow conservatives, republicans, tea partyers, and righties, what have I missed? Help me see more of the light.

You have seen nothing but a boring attempt at sarcasm to copy and paste......
 
Its not the government who said SS was evil.

It was rand who said it was evil.

She accepted the money and Im glad she did.

She would have died without her cancer treatments.

She paid in because she was forced to pay in. She collected what she was due. There is no hypocrisy here but in your feeble mind.

Tell me, I think SS is a scam and a waste of my money but i pay in so I don't get thrown in jail. I pay in because the government forces me to pay in. In your tiny mind does that make me a hypocrite or a law abiding citizen?

Seems in the eyes of the far left...you are a law abiding citizen if you alow them to save your money for you but you are a hypocrite if you take it back when they give it to you.

Hmmm...I wonder...

If someone is anti 2nd ammendment and they are in a mall....would they be thankful or angry if their life is saved by a gun carrying citizen in the mall who shot down someone randomly shooting people.

If they are anything but angry that their life was saved...they would be a hypocrite per the lefts thought process.
The first thing I would do is wonder why we have regressed to Dodge City morality! Why the hell are all these guns being fired at the mall? Why are the guns firing firing 20, 30, 40 shots in such quick succession? Shouldn't there be an outright ban on high capacity magazines and semi or full automatic firing systems? Don't weapons like these belong in well regulated militias not the mall?

Is yelling "FIRE!" in a crowded theater as dangerous as firing doaens of bullets in less than a minute?

And if yelling "FIRE!" in a theater is not protected speech, why is a semi automatic handgun firing 20 shots from the same magazine a protected firearm?
 
Its not the government who said SS was evil.

It was rand who said it was evil.

She accepted the money and Im glad she did.

She would have died without her cancer treatments.

She paid in because she was forced to pay in. She collected what she was due. There is no hypocrisy here but in your feeble mind.

Tell me, I think SS is a scam and a waste of my money but i pay in so I don't get thrown in jail. I pay in because the government forces me to pay in. In your tiny mind does that make me a hypocrite or a law abiding citizen?

Seems in the eyes of the far left...you are a law abiding citizen if you alow them to save your money for you but you are a hypocrite if you take it back when they give it to you.

Hmmm...I wonder...

If someone is anti 2nd ammendment and they are in a mall....would they be thankful or angry if their life is saved by a gun carrying citizen in the mall who shot down someone randomly shooting people.

If they are anything but angry that their life was saved...they would be a hypocrite per the lefts thought process.

I said I am glad she took the help.

Where did I say I wanted her to not take it?


Why do you pretend people said something other than they say?


In the end Rand realised even she had not provided for herself and her husband and needed the money.

Im glad it was there for them and for every other person who has needed it over the years including Paul Ryan who as a young man discovered his fathers lifeless corpse and then collected SS and was put through college with government money.
 
She paid in because she was forced to pay in. She collected what she was due. There is no hypocrisy here but in your feeble mind.

Tell me, I think SS is a scam and a waste of my money but i pay in so I don't get thrown in jail. I pay in because the government forces me to pay in. In your tiny mind does that make me a hypocrite or a law abiding citizen?

Seems in the eyes of the far left...you are a law abiding citizen if you alow them to save your money for you but you are a hypocrite if you take it back when they give it to you.

Hmmm...I wonder...

If someone is anti 2nd ammendment and they are in a mall....would they be thankful or angry if their life is saved by a gun carrying citizen in the mall who shot down someone randomly shooting people.

If they are anything but angry that their life was saved...they would be a hypocrite per the lefts thought process.
The first thing I would do is wonder why we have regressed to Dodge City morality! Why the hell are all these guns being fired at the mall? Why are the guns firing firing 20, 30, 40 shots in such quick succession? Shouldn't there be an outright ban on high capacity magazines and semi or full automatic firing systems? Don't weapons like these belong in well regulated militias not the mall?

Is yelling "FIRE!" in a crowded theater as dangerous as firing doaens of bullets in less than a minute?

And if yelling "FIRE!" in a theater is not protected speech, why is a semi automatic handgun firing 20 shots from the same magazine a protected firearm?

yes, yes. yes and I agree.
The sanctity of the 2nd ammendemnt can be maintained with proper regulation.

No American citizen needs ant full...and most semi automatic firearms.
 
She paid in because she was forced to pay in. She collected what she was due. There is no hypocrisy here but in your feeble mind.

Tell me, I think SS is a scam and a waste of my money but i pay in so I don't get thrown in jail. I pay in because the government forces me to pay in. In your tiny mind does that make me a hypocrite or a law abiding citizen?

Seems in the eyes of the far left...you are a law abiding citizen if you alow them to save your money for you but you are a hypocrite if you take it back when they give it to you.

Hmmm...I wonder...

If someone is anti 2nd ammendment and they are in a mall....would they be thankful or angry if their life is saved by a gun carrying citizen in the mall who shot down someone randomly shooting people.

If they are anything but angry that their life was saved...they would be a hypocrite per the lefts thought process.

I said I am glad she took the help.

Where did I say I wanted her to not take it?


Why do you pretend people said something other than they say?


In the end Rand realised even she had not provided for herself and her husband and needed the money.

Im glad it was there for them and for every other person who has needed it over the years including Paul Ryan who as a young man discovered his fathers lifeless corpse and then collected SS and was put through college with government money.

And if she did not have the money deducted from her paycheck weekly...she likely would have had it saved...and likely easier access to it.
 
She paid in because she was forced to pay in. She collected what she was due. There is no hypocrisy here but in your feeble mind.

Tell me, I think SS is a scam and a waste of my money but i pay in so I don't get thrown in jail. I pay in because the government forces me to pay in. In your tiny mind does that make me a hypocrite or a law abiding citizen?

Seems in the eyes of the far left...you are a law abiding citizen if you alow them to save your money for you but you are a hypocrite if you take it back when they give it to you.

Hmmm...I wonder...

If someone is anti 2nd ammendment and they are in a mall....would they be thankful or angry if their life is saved by a gun carrying citizen in the mall who shot down someone randomly shooting people.

If they are anything but angry that their life was saved...they would be a hypocrite per the lefts thought process.
The first thing I would do is wonder why we have regressed to Dodge City morality! Why the hell are all these guns being fired at the mall? Why are the guns firing firing 20, 30, 40 shots in such quick succession? Shouldn't there be an outright ban on high capacity magazines and semi or full automatic firing systems? Don't weapons like these belong in well regulated militias not the mall?

Is yelling "FIRE!" in a crowded theater as dangerous as firing doaens of bullets in less than a minute?

And if yelling "FIRE!" in a theater is not protected speech, why is a semi automatic handgun firing 20 shots from the same magazine a protected firearm?

So in order to stop a criminal from firing a weapon, we must ban all weapons? In order not to offend a potential terrorist, we must treat everyone like a potential terrorist? In order not to offend_____(fill in the blank) we must treat everyone like ___________ (fill in the blank)

It's this same everyone or no one philosophy of the left that begets things like a 5th grader being expelled for having a butter knife in her lunch box.

Why don't you try actually thinking like a reasonable person for a change?
 

Forum List

Back
Top