I have seen the light

[Skull Pilot]

She paid in because she was forced to pay in. She collected what she was due. There is no hypocrisy here but in your feeble mind.

Tell me, I think SS is a scam and a waste of my money but i pay in so I don't get thrown in jail. I pay in because the government forces me to pay in. In your tiny mind does that make me a hypocrite or a law abiding citizen?

Seems in the eyes of the far left...you are a law abiding citizen if you alow them to save your money for you but you are a hypocrite if you take it back when they give it to you.

Hmmm...I wonder...

If someone is anti 2nd ammendment and they are in a mall....would they be thankful or angry if their life is saved by a gun carrying citizen in the mall who shot down someone randomly shooting people.

If they are anything but angry that their life was saved...they would be a hypocrite per the lefts thought process.

I said I am glad she took the help.

Where did I say I wanted her to not take it?


Why do you pretend people said something other than they say?


In the end Rand realised even she had not provided for herself and her husband and needed the money.

Im glad it was there for them and for every other person who has needed it over the years including Paul Ryan who as a young man discovered his fathers lifeless corpse and then collected SS and was put through college with government money.

Or she realized that if she would have had the 15% of her own money she would have been better off but because she had no fucking choice on what to do with her own money and the fucking government mismanaged her money she actually had less than she should have.

 

[Sallow]

Its not the government who said SS was evil.

It was rand who said it was evil.

She accepted the money and Im glad she did.

She would have died without her cancer treatments.

it IS an evil TM.

I do not ask the government to take my money and save it for me. They force me to hand it over to them.

She did not accept money from the government. She accepted HER money that the government promised they would hold for her and give back to her when she needs it.

Why is this so hard for you to understand?

I don't ask my government to take my money to be used to turn people in other countries like Iraq into red goo either. But shit happens. And that was evil.

 

[Intense]

I wish someone would have sent this to G.W. Bush in 2002

What difference does it make to the dead, the orphans, and the homeless, whether the mad destruction is wrought under the name of totalitarianism or the holy name of liberty and democracy?
Mahatma Gandhi

I wish every President and Field Commander would consider it Daily, regardless of Party Affiliation.

 

[Truthmatters]

Seems in the eyes of the far left...you are a law abiding citizen if you alow them to save your money for you but you are a hypocrite if you take it back when they give it to you.

Hmmm...I wonder...

If someone is anti 2nd ammendment and they are in a mall....would they be thankful or angry if their life is saved by a gun carrying citizen in the mall who shot down someone randomly shooting people.

If they are anything but angry that their life was saved...they would be a hypocrite per the lefts thought process.

I said I am glad she took the help.

Where did I say I wanted her to not take it?


Why do you pretend people said something other than they say?


In the end Rand realised even she had not provided for herself and her husband and needed the money.

Im glad it was there for them and for every other person who has needed it over the years including Paul Ryan who as a young man discovered his fathers lifeless corpse and then collected SS and was put through college with government money.

And if she did not have the money deducted from her paycheck weekly...she likely would have had it saved...and likely easier access to it.

She made lots of money, why did she not save more if it to PROVE that people with vurtually NO extra income could survive to old age without it?


She knew she needed the money and hid her taking of it from the public.


Now if she felt intitiled to it like ALL who pay in then she sould have proudly taken it in full view of her public.

I think she was intitled to it, she paid in like everyone else.

There was no need to hide that she took it was there.


Paul Ryan received it as a child when his father died and his father paid into it and it saved the Ryan family.



SS has saved many families this way and sholuld continue to save many families this way as it was designed to do.

Its a great progam.

 

[Jarhead]

Its not the government who said SS was evil.

It was rand who said it was evil.

She accepted the money and Im glad she did.

She would have died without her cancer treatments.

it IS an evil TM.

I do not ask the government to take my money and save it for me. They force me to hand it over to them.

She did not accept money from the government. She accepted HER money that the government promised they would hold for her and give back to her when she needs it.

Why is this so hard for you to understand?

I don't ask my government to take my money to be used to turn people in other countries like Iraq into red goo either. But shit happens. And that was evil.

no...but I dont criticize you and spin your intentions and integrity when you speak out against it.

 

[Skull Pilot]

I said I am glad she took the help.

Where did I say I wanted her to not take it?


Why do you pretend people said something other than they say?


In the end Rand realised even she had not provided for herself and her husband and needed the money.

Im glad it was there for them and for every other person who has needed it over the years including Paul Ryan who as a young man discovered his fathers lifeless corpse and then collected SS and was put through college with government money.

And if she did not have the money deducted from her paycheck weekly...she likely would have had it saved...and likely easier access to it.

She made lots of money, why did she not save more if it to PROVE that people with vurtually NO extra income could survive to old age without it?


She knew she needed the money and hid her taking of it from the public.


Now if she felt intitiled to it like ALL who pay in then she sould have proudly taken it in full view of her public.

I think she was intitled to it, she paid in like everyone else.

There was no need to hide that she took it was there.


Paul Ryan received it as a child when his father died and his father paid into it and it saved the Ryan family.



SS has saved many families this way and sholuld continue to save many families this way as it was designed to do.

Its a great progam.

It was her money. Was she just supposed to consider it a charitable donation to the sheep?

 

[M14 Shooter]

I have been converted, years of common sense conservative and republican thought have won me over. I am saved. But I will need help as I transition a mind lost so long in liberalism. So please correct any lingering liberal ideas as I reform myself.

I now believe: Freedom is all you need and government should leave us alone. The Federal deficit started in 2009. Unions and teachers are the fault of our educational woes. Fannie and Freddie all by themselves caused the financial meltdown. The unemployed are not looking for jobs and are lazy to boot. Taxes are bad bad bad. Corporations are the best and really honest people. Global warming is a fraud made up by tree huggers. Our founding principles were perfect, Ms Bachmann showed me the way. Slavery was really kinda nice. Social Security, Medicare, and Healthcare are socialism. Minimum wage is too high and outsourcing is a just great. Joe McCarthy was just one super guy. And Sarah, Glenn, and Michelle Bachmann are super patriots who really know history. Any criticism of American policy is anti American hate. Am I right so far?

So fellow conservatives, republicans, tea partyers, and righties, what have I missed? Help me see more of the light.

Ah. Another useful idiot. Stalin is proud.

 

[uscitizen]

I said I am glad she took the help.

Where did I say I wanted her to not take it?


Why do you pretend people said something other than they say?


In the end Rand realised even she had not provided for herself and her husband and needed the money.

Im glad it was there for them and for every other person who has needed it over the years including Paul Ryan who as a young man discovered his fathers lifeless corpse and then collected SS and was put through college with government money.

And if she did not have the money deducted from her paycheck weekly...she likely would have had it saved...and likely easier access to it.

She made lots of money, why did she not save more if it to PROVE that people with vurtually NO extra income could survive to old age without it?


She knew she needed the money and hid her taking of it from the public.


Now if she felt intitiled to it like ALL who pay in then she sould have proudly taken it in full view of her public.

I think she was intitled to it, she paid in like everyone else.

There was no need to hide that she took it was there.


Paul Ryan received it as a child when his father died and his father paid into it and it saved the Ryan family.



SS has saved many families this way and sholuld continue to save many families this way as it was designed to do.

Its a great progam.

Very good Point there that most have missed.

Rand DID prove herself to be WRONG.

 

[Intense]

I have been converted, years of common sense conservative and republican thought have won me over. I am saved. But I will need help as I transition a mind lost so long in liberalism. So please correct any lingering liberal ideas as I reform myself.

I now believe: Freedom is all you need and government should leave us alone. The Federal deficit started in 2009. Unions and teachers are the fault of our educational woes. Fannie and Freddie all by themselves caused the financial meltdown. The unemployed are not looking for jobs and are lazy to boot. Taxes are bad bad bad. Corporations are the best and really honest people. Global warming is a fraud made up by tree huggers. Our founding principles were perfect, Ms Bachmann showed me the way. Slavery was really kinda nice. Social Security, Medicare, and Healthcare are socialism. Minimum wage is too high and outsourcing is a just great. Joe McCarthy was just one super guy. And Sarah, Glenn, and Michelle Bachmann are super patriots who really know history. Any criticism of American policy is anti American hate. Am I right so far? Umm NO!

So fellow conservatives, republicans, tea partyers, and righties, what have I missed? Help me see more of the light.

Some here might be laughing with you, but you can peddle that smut somewhere else.

Conservatives dont see anything the way you described.

Im not fooled by you ya troll.

Lighten Up."Rush" has done the same thing more than a couple of times for fun. It's all good. In his own way, maybe Midcan5 is learning from Rush. I say we chip in and get him a Gitmo Mug for his hot chocolate.

 

[del]

Its not the government who said SS was evil.

It was rand who said it was evil.

She accepted the money and Im glad she did.

She would have died without her cancer treatments.

she died anyway, idiot.

 

[Truthmatters]

And if she did not have the money deducted from her paycheck weekly...she likely would have had it saved...and likely easier access to it.

She made lots of money, why did she not save more if it to PROVE that people with vurtually NO extra income could survive to old age without it?


She knew she needed the money and hid her taking of it from the public.


Now if she felt intitiled to it like ALL who pay in then she sould have proudly taken it in full view of her public.

I think she was intitled to it, she paid in like everyone else.

There was no need to hide that she took it was there.


Paul Ryan received it as a child when his father died and his father paid into it and it saved the Ryan family.



SS has saved many families this way and sholuld continue to save many families this way as it was designed to do.

Its a great progam.

Very good Point there that most have missed.

Rand DID prove herself to be WRONG.

Yes she did.

Even her with a huge lifetime income could not manage her money well enough that she could take this money and DONATE it to poor people or something.

She instead found herself and her husband in need of the money to survive cancer and old age.


She proved even wealthy people can make mistakes and end up impoverished in this country.

Im glad SS and medicare was there for them and everyone else.


She survived her cancer and died of heart failure a few years later.

 

[Intense]

I said I am glad she took the help.

Where did I say I wanted her to not take it?


Why do you pretend people said something other than they say?


In the end Rand realised even she had not provided for herself and her husband and needed the money.

Im glad it was there for them and for every other person who has needed it over the years including Paul Ryan who as a young man discovered his fathers lifeless corpse and then collected SS and was put through college with government money.

And if she did not have the money deducted from her paycheck weekly...she likely would have had it saved...and likely easier access to it.

She made lots of money, why did she not save more if it to PROVE that people with vurtually NO extra income could survive to old age without it?


She knew she needed the money and hid her taking of it from the public.


Now if she felt intitiled to it like ALL who pay in then she sould have proudly taken it in full view of her public.

I think she was intitled to it, she paid in like everyone else.

There was no need to hide that she took it was there.

Paul Ryan received it as a child when his father died and his father paid into it and it saved the Ryan family.

SS has saved many families this way and sholuld continue to save many families this way as it was designed to do.

Its a great progam.

Maybe you should ask her and get back to us after consulting your Psychic or Ouija board, rather than anger her Spirit with your usual spin.

 

[Skull Pilot]

And if she did not have the money deducted from her paycheck weekly...she likely would have had it saved...and likely easier access to it.

She made lots of money, why did she not save more if it to PROVE that people with vurtually NO extra income could survive to old age without it?


She knew she needed the money and hid her taking of it from the public.


Now if she felt intitiled to it like ALL who pay in then she sould have proudly taken it in full view of her public.

I think she was intitled to it, she paid in like everyone else.

There was no need to hide that she took it was there.


Paul Ryan received it as a child when his father died and his father paid into it and it saved the Ryan family.



SS has saved many families this way and sholuld continue to save many families this way as it was designed to do.

Its a great progam.

Very good Point there that most have missed.

Rand DID prove herself to be WRONG.

Quite an assumption.

If she had all the money the government confiscated in order to fund the Ponzi scam of SS she very well might have had millions more dollars.

But I guess we'll never know will we?

 

[Intense]

She made lots of money, why did she not save more if it to PROVE that people with vurtually NO extra income could survive to old age without it?


She knew she needed the money and hid her taking of it from the public.


Now if she felt intitiled to it like ALL who pay in then she sould have proudly taken it in full view of her public.

I think she was intitled to it, she paid in like everyone else.

There was no need to hide that she took it was there.


Paul Ryan received it as a child when his father died and his father paid into it and it saved the Ryan family.



SS has saved many families this way and sholuld continue to save many families this way as it was designed to do.

Its a great progam.

Very good Point there that most have missed.

Rand DID prove herself to be WRONG.

Yes she did.

Even her with a huge lifetime income could not manage her money well enough that she could take this money and DONATE it to poor people or something.

She instead found herself and her husband in need of the money to survive cancer and old age.


She proved even wealthy people can make mistakes and end up impoverished in this country.

Im glad SS and medicare was there for them and everyone else.


She survived her cancer and died of heart failure a few years later.

There is nothing wrong with Value for Value TM.

 

[Sallow]

it IS an evil TM.

I do not ask the government to take my money and save it for me. They force me to hand it over to them.

She did not accept money from the government. She accepted HER money that the government promised they would hold for her and give back to her when she needs it.

Why is this so hard for you to understand?

I don't ask my government to take my money to be used to turn people in other countries like Iraq into red goo either. But shit happens. And that was evil.

no...but I dont criticize you and spin your intentions and integrity when you speak out against it.

 

[Truthmatters]

Im glad you agree SS and medicare are great values for the American people Intense.

 

[Nosmo King]

Seems in the eyes of the far left...you are a law abiding citizen if you alow them to save your money for you but you are a hypocrite if you take it back when they give it to you.

Hmmm...I wonder...

If someone is anti 2nd ammendment and they are in a mall....would they be thankful or angry if their life is saved by a gun carrying citizen in the mall who shot down someone randomly shooting people.

If they are anything but angry that their life was saved...they would be a hypocrite per the lefts thought process.

The first thing I would do is wonder why we have regressed to Dodge City morality! Why the hell are all these guns being fired at the mall? Why are the guns firing firing 20, 30, 40 shots in such quick succession? Shouldn't there be an outright ban on high capacity magazines and semi or full automatic firing systems? Don't weapons like these belong in well regulated militias not the mall?

Is yelling "FIRE!" in a crowded theater as dangerous as firing doaens of bullets in less than a minute?

And if yelling "FIRE!" in a theater is not protected speech, why is a semi automatic handgun firing 20 shots from the same magazine a protected firearm?

So in order to stop a criminal from firing a weapon, we must ban all weapons? In order not to offend a potential terrorist, we must treat everyone like a potential terrorist? In order not to offend_____(fill in the blank) we must treat everyone like ___________ (fill in the blank)

It's this same everyone or no one philosophy of the left that begets things like a 5th grader being expelled for having a butter knife in her lunch box.

Why don't you try actually thinking like a reasonable person for a change?

If thinking as a reasonable person means jumping to outlandish conclusions, then I'll be happy as I am.

Ban all weapons? Where in the recesses of your mind did you develop that bon mot? Why don't we ban all semi and/or full automatic weapons, ban high capacity clips and tax the hell out of ammo for a start?

 

[Two Thumbs]

She paid in because she was forced to pay in. She collected what she was due. There is no hypocrisy here but in your feeble mind.

Tell me, I think SS is a scam and a waste of my money but i pay in so I don't get thrown in jail. I pay in because the government forces me to pay in. In your tiny mind does that make me a hypocrite or a law abiding citizen?

Seems in the eyes of the far left...you are a law abiding citizen if you alow them to save your money for you but you are a hypocrite if you take it back when they give it to you.

Hmmm...I wonder...

If someone is anti 2nd ammendment and they are in a mall....would they be thankful or angry if their life is saved by a gun carrying citizen in the mall who shot down someone randomly shooting people.

If they are anything but angry that their life was saved...they would be a hypocrite per the lefts thought process.

The first thing I would do is wonder why we have regressed to Dodge City morality! Why the hell are all these guns being fired at the mall? Why are the guns firing firing 20, 30, 40 shots in such quick succession? Shouldn't there be an outright ban on high capacity magazines and semi or full automatic firing systems? Don't weapons like these belong in well regulated militias not the mall?

Is yelling "FIRE!" in a crowded theater as dangerous as firing doaens of bullets in less than a minute?

And if yelling "FIRE!" in a theater is not protected speech, why is a semi automatic handgun firing 20 shots from the same magazine a protected firearm?

There ya go guys.

she all but says she would be mad that her life was saved.

I don't know if this is frikken comical or plain ol' sad.

 

[Jarhead]

I don't ask my government to take my money to be used to turn people in other countries like Iraq into red goo either. But shit happens. And that was evil.

no...but I dont criticize you and spin your intentions and integrity when you speak out against it.

Never have I and never will I.

However, I will always criticize those that criticize the military personnel.

But I will never criticize anyone who speaks out against war.

 

[Nosmo King]

Seems in the eyes of the far left...you are a law abiding citizen if you alow them to save your money for you but you are a hypocrite if you take it back when they give it to you.

Hmmm...I wonder...

If someone is anti 2nd ammendment and they are in a mall....would they be thankful or angry if their life is saved by a gun carrying citizen in the mall who shot down someone randomly shooting people.

If they are anything but angry that their life was saved...they would be a hypocrite per the lefts thought process.

The first thing I would do is wonder why we have regressed to Dodge City morality! Why the hell are all these guns being fired at the mall? Why are the guns firing firing 20, 30, 40 shots in such quick succession? Shouldn't there be an outright ban on high capacity magazines and semi or full automatic firing systems? Don't weapons like these belong in well regulated militias not the mall?

Is yelling "FIRE!" in a crowded theater as dangerous as firing doaens of bullets in less than a minute?

And if yelling "FIRE!" in a theater is not protected speech, why is a semi automatic handgun firing 20 shots from the same magazine a protected firearm?

There ya go guys.

she all but says she would be mad that her life was saved.

I don't know if this is frikken comical or plain ol' sad.

Along with the other points you missed are: I did not say I would be mad if my life was saved. I did say too many guns are designed as dangerous in any hands other than professional military. And I'm a man.