Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All hail the goracle! And hallowed are the algorian...
There you have it, folks!!! The science isn't on their side, so they have to go back to talking about Gore. Do you really need any other evidence that the whole opposition to AGW theory is based on politics rather than science?!?!
There you have it, folks!!! The science isn't on their side, so they have to go back to talking about Gore. Do you really need any other evidence that the whole opposition to AGW theory is based on politics rather than science?!?!
Hush junior, we already showed the science isn't in your favor, now we are just making fun of you faithful...
Move over, gramps, you've yet to show you know anything about the science. The science is simple, but you just try to complicate things to further your own political agenda.
Move over, gramps, you've yet to show you know anything about the science. The science is simple, but you just try to complicate things to further your own political agenda.
BWAHAHAHAHA
Yeah, Gore said it, you believe it, simple as that.
That ain't "science," it's faith. You cultists sure are funny.
Move over, gramps, you've yet to show you know anything about the science. The science is simple, but you just try to complicate things to further your own political agenda.
BWAHAHAHAHA
Yeah, Gore said it, you believe it, simple as that.
That ain't "science," it's faith. You cultists sure are funny.
You're a real moron. I don't talk about Gore, except to show what fools those who do, are. What's more cultish than the FAITH that we can't possibly be doing anything to the climate of something as large as Earth?
Move over, gramps, you've yet to show you know anything about the science. The science is simple, but you just try to complicate things to further your own political agenda.
BWAHAHAHAHA
Yeah, Gore said it, you believe it, simple as that.
That ain't "science," it's faith. You cultists sure are funny.
You're a real moron. I don't talk about Gore, except to show what fools those who do, are. What's more cultish than the FAITH that we can't possibly be doing anything to the climate of something as large as Earth?
There you have it, folks!!! The science isn't on their side, so they have to go back to talking about Gore. Do you really need any other evidence that the whole opposition to AGW theory is based on politics rather than science?!?!
Hush junior, we already showed the science isn't in your favor, now we are just making fun of you faithful...
Move over, gramps, you've yet to show you know anything about the science. The science is simple, but you just try to complicate things to further your own political agenda.
Climate change debunked? Not so fast
New research suggesting that cloud cover, not carbon dioxide, causes global warming is getting buzz in climate skeptic circles. But mainstream climate scientists dismissed the research as unrealistic and politically motivated.
"It is not newsworthy," Daniel Murphy, a National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) cloud researcher, wrote in an email to LiveScience.
The study, published July 26 in the open-access online journal Remote Sensing, got public attention when a writer for The Heartland Institute, a libertarian think-tank that promotes climate change skepticism, wrote for Forbes magazine that the study disproved the global warming worries of climate change "alarmists." However, mainstream climate scientists say that the argument advanced in the paper is neither new nor correct. The paper's author, University of Alabama, Huntsville researcher Roy Spencer, is a climate change skeptic and controversial figure within the climate research community.
New NASA Data Blow Gaping Hole In Global Warming Alarmism
NASA satellite data from the years 2000 through 2011 show the Earth's atmosphere is allowing far more heat to be released into space than alarmist computer models have predicted, reports a new study in the peer-reviewed science journal Remote Sensing. The study indicates far less future global warming will occur than United Nations computer models have predicted, and supports prior studies indicating increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide trap far less heat than alarmists have claimed.
Study co-author Dr. Roy Spencer, a principal research scientist at the University of Alabama in Huntsville and U.S. Science Team Leader for the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer flying on NASA's Aqua satellite, reports that real-world data from NASA's Terra satellite contradict multiple assumptions fed into alarmist computer models.
I am tired of warmers...
Want truth on this? Dig and dig some more overload yourself with info from both sides then follow your nose. If it smells, tastes, and looks like shit, its shit no matter who gave it to you... QUOTE]
that it, in a nutshell
Arctic ice melt could pause in near future, then resume again
August 11, 2011
BOULDER—Although Arctic sea ice appears fated to melt away as the climate continues to warm, the ice may temporarily stabilize or somewhat expand at times over the next few decades, new research indicates.
The computer modeling study, by scientists at the National Center for Atmospheric Research, reinforces previous findings by other research teams that the level of Arctic sea ice loss observed in recent decades cannot be explained by natural causes alone, and that the ice will eventually disappear during summer if climate change continues.
But in an unexpected new result, the NCAR research team found that Arctic ice under current climate conditions is as likely to expand as it is to contract for periods of up to about a decade.
“One of the results that surprised us all was the number of computer simulations that indicated a temporary halt to the loss of the ice,” says NCAR scientist Jennifer Kay, the lead author. “The computer simulations suggest that we could see a 10-year period of stable ice or even a slight increase in the extent of the ice. Even though the observed ice loss has accelerated over the last decade, the fate of sea ice over the next decade depends not only on human activity but also on climate variability that cannot be predicted.”
THey are already hedging their bets...
Arctic ice melt could pause in near future, then resume again | UCAR
Arctic ice melt could pause in near future, then resume again
August 11, 2011
BOULDERAlthough Arctic sea ice appears fated to melt away as the climate continues to warm, the ice may temporarily stabilize or somewhat expand at times over the next few decades, new research indicates.
The computer modeling study, by scientists at the National Center for Atmospheric Research, reinforces previous findings by other research teams that the level of Arctic sea ice loss observed in recent decades cannot be explained by natural causes alone, and that the ice will eventually disappear during summer if climate change continues.
But in an unexpected new result, the NCAR research team found that Arctic ice under current climate conditions is as likely to expand as it is to contract for periods of up to about a decade.
One of the results that surprised us all was the number of computer simulations that indicated a temporary halt to the loss of the ice, says NCAR scientist Jennifer Kay, the lead author. The computer simulations suggest that we could see a 10-year period of stable ice or even a slight increase in the extent of the ice. Even though the observed ice loss has accelerated over the last decade, the fate of sea ice over the next decade depends not only on human activity but also on climate variability that cannot be predicted.
Once again if the ice melts its warming if it expands its still warming.... UNBELIEVABLE!
THey are already hedging their bets...
Arctic ice melt could pause in near future, then resume again | UCAR
Arctic ice melt could pause in near future, then resume again
August 11, 2011
BOULDERAlthough Arctic sea ice appears fated to melt away as the climate continues to warm, the ice may temporarily stabilize or somewhat expand at times over the next few decades, new research indicates.
The computer modeling study, by scientists at the National Center for Atmospheric Research, reinforces previous findings by other research teams that the level of Arctic sea ice loss observed in recent decades cannot be explained by natural causes alone, and that the ice will eventually disappear during summer if climate change continues.
But in an unexpected new result, the NCAR research team found that Arctic ice under current climate conditions is as likely to expand as it is to contract for periods of up to about a decade.
One of the results that surprised us all was the number of computer simulations that indicated a temporary halt to the loss of the ice, says NCAR scientist Jennifer Kay, the lead author. The computer simulations suggest that we could see a 10-year period of stable ice or even a slight increase in the extent of the ice. Even though the observed ice loss has accelerated over the last decade, the fate of sea ice over the next decade depends not only on human activity but also on climate variability that cannot be predicted.
Once again if the ice melts its warming if it expands its still warming.... UNBELIEVABLE!
You seem to have missed an important point, "the fate of sea ice over the next decade depends not only on human activity but also on climate variability that cannot be predicted". It seems it's not true that AGW proponents forget about natural cycles. They're saying IT IS those cycles AND human activity. You seem to be completely misreading the statement.
Save the Earth from overpopulation by euthanasia. I'll let you go first.You could settle the debate and do the whole world a favor by using your head to block all the suns rays from hitting half the planet for an extra hour each day.I am tired of warmers...
THey are already hedging their bets...
Arctic ice melt could pause in near future, then resume again | UCAR
Once again if the ice melts its warming if it expands its still warming.... UNBELIEVABLE!
You seem to have missed an important point, "the fate of sea ice over the next decade depends not only on human activity but also on climate variability that cannot be predicted". It seems it's not true that AGW proponents forget about natural cycles. They're saying IT IS those cycles AND human activity. You seem to be completely misreading the statement.
Nah, I got that one it was right after this one..
The computer simulations suggest that we could see a 10-year period of stable ice or even a slight increase in the extent of the ice."
A decade of stable, increased or less ice? Really? Gee thats a very safe bet now isn't it. SO then no matter what they want us to know its still evidence for AGW.... Sure, sure.. But hey you go on ahead and believe what they want you to don't let the truth get in the way of your zealotry.
Isn't there an "Anti-Moron" rule on this board?!?!
Why? You want Sucks Old Cocks banned?