Hypocrisy: Good Coin Of The Realm

[Flanders]

Hypocrisy is good coin of the realm for baby-killers. Eleanor Holmes Norton is a case in point:

. . . Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-Washington, D.C.) testified before the Rules Committee, having been denied the opportunity to do so before the Judiciary Committee, even though the bill contains a provision particular to her district and no other.

“[HR 7] targets my district, as a district, and insults us by having the audacity to say how we should spend money that you had nothing to do with,” Norton said.

Norton does not mind forcing everyone to pay for abortions with money she had nothing to do with, but she mounts her moral high horse in defense of killing babies with tax dollars. Where the hell does she think those tax dollars come from? Is she so stupid she believes abortionists are the only ones who pay taxes? I know that Washington, D.C. has more parasites per square inch than every other city in the country, but it’s safe to assume that at least a few residents of the nation’s capital object to paying for things they do not believe in.

Not satisfied with being an abortion hypocrite Norton noted that:

. . . in the 19th century, residents of Washington, D.C., had home rule, but that it ended when Reconstruction did (with the ushering in of the Jim Crow era).

The way in which HR 7 exercises its prohibition on the District of Columbia’s use of its own tax dollars for abortion care, Norton said, is to redefine D.C. “as a federal jurisdiction for purposes of abortion.”

I’ll wager that Hypocrite Norton loves every federal law that forces the culture of death on the country, while she resents any law that protects an individual’s Right to NOT pay for abortions.

And, as usual, another liberal tried to make her case by asking a clever question:

“How can you redefine who we are?” she asked the committee’s Republicans. “Who do you think you are?”

Her question went unanswered.

House Republicans Send Anti-Choice ‘No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion’ Bill to the Floor (UPDATED)
by Adele M. Stan, RH Reality Check
January 28, 2014 - 9:23 am

House Republicans Send Anti-Choice 'No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion' Bill to the Floor (UPDATED)​

I would have answered: Someone who is wise to a pack of goddamned lying baby-killing parasites.

It is a tax

Associate Justices Ginsburg, Kagan, and Sotomayor were overjoyed when Chief Justice John Roberts called HillaryCare II a tax; so I can understand why Sebelius v. Hobby Lobby and Conestoga Wood Specialties v. Sebelius is such a problem. The First and Thirteenth Amendments mean nothing to liberals, while the trend to stop funding abortions with tax dollars has been going against the infanticide crowd since Roe v. Wade:

The Hyde Amendment should not be confused with the Mexico City Policy, which prohibited US government funds from going to agencies that promote or perform abortions in other countries. It prevented funds to agencies that promoted abortion regardless of whether or not they actually performed them, while the Hyde Amendment has a more limited scope.

The Stupak–Pitts Amendment, an amendment to the Affordable Health Care for America Act, was introduced by Democratic Rep. Bart Stupak of Michigan. It prohibits use of Federal funds "to pay for any abortion or to cover any part of the costs of any health plan that includes coverage of abortion" except in cases of rape, incest or danger to the life of the mother, and was included in the bill as passed by the House of Representatives on November 7, 2009. However, the Senate bill passed by the House on March 21, 2010 did not contain that Hyde Amendment language. As part of an agreement between Rep. Stupak and President Obama to secure Stupak's vote, the President issued an executive order on March 24, 2010 affirming that the Hyde Amendment would extend to the new bill.

Hyde Amendment - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia​

With all of the focus on Sebelius v. Hobby Lobby and Conestoga Wood Specialties v. Sebelius it was a pleasure finding one article that takes on the issue of funding abortions through the United Nations.

First, let’s deal with the Mexico City Policy:

President Obama signed an executive order today reversing the ban that prohibits funding to international family planning groups that provide abortions, as first reported by ABC News.

Obama Overturns 'Mexico City Policy' Implemented by Reagan
Jan. 23, 2009
By JAKE TAPPER, SUNLEN MILLER and HUMA KHAN

Obama Overturns 'Mexico City Policy' Implemented by Reagan - ABC News​

See this thread for another overturned RR executive order that is almost as bad as the one overturning the Mexico City Policy:

http://www.usmessageboard.com/general-global-topics/216659-double-the-penalty.html

Question: Will the next Republican president have the guts to overturn Taqiyya the Liar’s EOs? If the answer is NO what does that say about Republicans repealing HillaryCare II?

Now, let’s look at some numbers:

For example, “empowering women” or “improving maternal health,” “combating HIV/AIDS” and “ensuring environmental sustainability” are frequently used as code words for introducing “family planning” methods and getting abortion legalized in every country that their advocates can (and illegally introducing chemical abortions into countries where abortion is still illegal). “Universal primary education” also incorporates the “comprehensive sex education” agenda in these countries.

The UN’s 2014-2015 regular budget is $5.5 billion of which the U.S. contributes approximately 25 percent, namely $1.4 billion. The U.S. additionally funds separate UN agencies annually. The last report we have states that in 2010 the U.S. gave about $7.7 billion to UN agencies. How much U.S. money is funding "comprehensive sex education" and "family planning" overseas? How much U.S. money is going to support organizations that promote abortion internationally?

The Department of State and USAID spends about $700 million a year for “family planning” purposes including post-abortion care for incomplete abortions. A report by UNFPA gives insight into the 2012 international contraceptive distribution, including breakdown of UNFPA and USAID monetary support of all kinds of contraceptives including abortifacients like Plan B, funded in part with U.S. money. The U.S. annually supports groups that promote abortions: the World Health Organization (WHO) received $386 million, the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) received $255 million, and the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) has received between $35-51 million a year from 2009-2012.

What is U.S. Money Actually Funding at the UN and Overseas?
Arina Grossu | Mar 28, 2014

What is U.S. Money Actually Funding at the UN and Overseas? - Arina Grossu - Page full​

Tax dollars are funding abortions in this country and abroad even though most Americans do not want to pay for abortions irrespective of their religious beliefs, yet the infanticide crowd has successfully separated abortion funding from everything else. Their arguments always end in the same place: You will pay for abortions and that’s an end to it.

Tragically, neither I nor anyone else knows how to make baby-killers justify their “Right” to force everyone else to pay for abortions. Every time they open their goddamned mouths it’s about a woman’s Right to choose, or the health of women.

 

[Flanders]

Is there a better reason than Gosnell?

Arizona Rep. Trent Franks (R) is capitalizing on the trial of Kermit Gosnell by attempting to push a bill through Congress that would ban abortion after 20 weeks for women in Washington, D.C..

"King" Rep. Trent Franks Tries to Ban Abortion in D.C...Again.
By Blog for Choice
on May 9, 2013 5:12 PM

Blog for Choice - Community, Connection, Change​

By opposing the bill so vigorously Eleanor Holmes Norton might just as well have defended Gosnell.

God only knows what Norton will say if this proposed movie about Gosnell ever gets made. I’m pretty sure every Democrat will do everything possible to have it banned from television.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CAAll1R29vs&feature=player_embedded]Historic crowdfunding for movie about abortionist Kermit Gosnell - YouTube[/ame]​

'Gosnell' movie will depict 'America's biggest serial killer'
By Paul Bedard | MARCH 29, 2014 AT 8:01 AM

'Gosnell' movie will depict 'America's biggest serial killer' | WashingtonExaminer.com

 

[Flanders]

In speaking out about Kermit Gosnell actor Kevin Sorbo and his wife Sam Jenkins took on three of the most powerful forces in this country:

1. The butchers in government.

2. The liberal media.

3. Hollywood.

Mr. & Mrs. Sorbo have more to lose than most of us because they work in an industry that demands loyalty to abortion.

Although the news media and Hollywood relish telling stories about horrific crimes and serial killers, they are strangely silent about Dr. Kermit Gosnell, an abortionist who killed living, viable babies by snipping their spinal cords with scissors, and who is “America’s most prolific serial killer,” said actor Kevin Sorbo and his wife Sam Jenkins in a video to promote funding for a movie about Gosnell.

“Kermit Gosnell is America’s most prolific serial killer,” says Kevin Sorbo, who starred in the TV series Hercules: The Legendary Journeys. “For more than three decades he was an abortion doctor in Philadelphia, where he delivered live, viable babies, who cried and fought for their life before he murdered them by severing their spinal cords with a scissors. He called it snipping. It’s the crime of the century, but most of the media and Hollywood have ignored the story.”

Sorbo’s wife, Sam Jenkins, also an actor, says, “Hollywood loves serial killers. TV and movies are full of these stories, the scarier the better would seem to be the motto. CSI, Criminal Minds, Person of Interest, The Black List, The Following, Law & Order, and CIS, Dexter, and many movies follow suit.”

“Even our national and local news is dominated by the crimes committed every day in our society,” she says. “So, it’s very odd that America’s biggest serial killer has been virtually ignored, erased from history. … We need to confront and expose this story. Why did so many people do nothing for so long? Why, when Gosnell was prosecuted, did the media ignore it? Why does Hollywood want to ignore it?”

Hercules Actor Kevin Sorbo: Hollywood, Media Ignoring ‘The Crime of the Century’
April 9, 2014 - 12:24 PM
By Michael W. Chapman

Hercules Actor Kevin Sorbo: Hollywood, Media Ignoring ?The Crime of the Century? | CNS News​

The public stance taken by the Sorbos against such unbelievable cruelty makes me question the causes Hollywood’s bleeding hearts like George Clooney seem to love. I suggest that Clooney and his ilk go to their pals in the United Nations and ask them to speak out against the reasons that allowed Kermit Gosnell to operate for so long:

https://www.looktothestars.org/celebrity/george-clooney

 

[emilynghiem]

In speaking out about Kermit Gosnell actor Kevin Sorbo and his wife Sam Jenkins took on three of the most powerful forces in this country:

1. The butchers in government.

2. The liberal media.

3. Hollywood.

Mr. & Mrs. Sorbo have more to lose than most of us because they work in an industry that demands loyalty to abortion.

Although the news media and Hollywood relish telling stories about horrific crimes and serial killers, they are strangely silent about Dr. Kermit Gosnell, an abortionist who killed living, viable babies by snipping their spinal cords with scissors, and who is “America’s most prolific serial killer,” said actor Kevin Sorbo and his wife Sam Jenkins in a video to promote funding for a movie about Gosnell.

“Kermit Gosnell is America’s most prolific serial killer,” says Kevin Sorbo, who starred in the TV series Hercules: The Legendary Journeys. “For more than three decades he was an abortion doctor in Philadelphia, where he delivered live, viable babies, who cried and fought for their life before he murdered them by severing their spinal cords with a scissors. He called it snipping. It’s the crime of the century, but most of the media and Hollywood have ignored the story.”

Sorbo’s wife, Sam Jenkins, also an actor, says, “Hollywood loves serial killers. TV and movies are full of these stories, the scarier the better would seem to be the motto. CSI, Criminal Minds, Person of Interest, The Black List, The Following, Law & Order, and CIS, Dexter, and many movies follow suit.”

“Even our national and local news is dominated by the crimes committed every day in our society,” she says. “So, it’s very odd that America’s biggest serial killer has been virtually ignored, erased from history. … We need to confront and expose this story. Why did so many people do nothing for so long? Why, when Gosnell was prosecuted, did the media ignore it? Why does Hollywood want to ignore it?”

Hercules Actor Kevin Sorbo: Hollywood, Media Ignoring ‘The Crime of the Century’
April 9, 2014 - 12:24 PM
By Michael W. Chapman

Hercules Actor Kevin Sorbo: Hollywood, Media Ignoring ?The Crime of the Century? | CNS News​

The public stance taken by the Sorbos against such unbelievable cruelty makes me question the causes Hollywood’s bleeding hearts like George Clooney seem to love. I suggest that Clooney and his ilk go to their pals in the United Nations and ask them to speak out against the reasons that allowed Kermit Gosnell to operate for so long:

https://www.looktothestars.org/celebrity/george-clooney

I think the prochoice side takes for granted that the prolife folks will invest their time, energy and resources going after these cases. They are too busy defending cases that the prolife movement won't take up. What about the forced abortions in China? Who is dealing with that?

Look at the Singlepayer advocates who oppose the mandate, but won't speak out; they rely on the Conservative opposition to deal with that problem with ACA, so they don't care to.

Also with war, so many liberals oppose excessive or corrupt war spending in principle, but benefit from image of unchallenged defense the military offers America to ensure security.

Both sides do this on various issues. Gun rights advocates are not going to protest the abuse of firearms in school shootings, because the liberal groups already do that.