- Jan 16, 2009
- 3,026
- 1,359
- 200
- Banned
- #221
Yeah, found liable by the partisan leftwing handpicked jury. That's what I said.
That is not how juries are formed.
Education would be of benefit to you.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Yeah, found liable by the partisan leftwing handpicked jury. That's what I said.
You may apologize at any time.
NEW YORK (AP) — A jury found Donald Trump liable Tuesday for sexually abusing advice columnist E. Jean Carroll in 1996
Jury finds Trump liable for sexual abuse, awards accuser $5M
A jury has found Donald Trump liable for sexually abusing advice columnist E. Jean Carroll in 1996. Jurors awarded her $5 million in a judgment that could haunt the former president as he campaigns to regain the White House. The verdict was announced in a federal courtroom in New York City on...apnews.com
“Supposed to be..”Supposed to be claimed as 1994 in the article
I cant read it lol“Supposed to be..”
It’s not there
You seem to have problems. I had no problemI cant read it lol
Its says free trial to read it.You seem to have problems. I had no problem
All I did was clickIts says free trial to read it.
So did I. It says free trial to continue. No thanksAll I did was click
Why does it work for me and everyone else then?So did I. It says free trial to continue. No thanks
So quote and link should be easy. Please provide it. I couldn’t find it
Lol. I told you what it says when I try to read itWhy does it work for me and everyone else then?
Per your article: He cited the fact that jurors at a trial in a separate but related lawsuit in May found that Trump sexually abused Carroll in a New York department store in the mid-1990s, and defamed her in statements he made when he denied her allegation last fall.No need to apologize. You are welcome.
Trump suffers big loss in E. Jean Carroll defamation case, judge says he's liable
Donald Trump is set to stand trial in a defamation case by E. Jean Carroll just as the 2024 Republican presidential nomination primaries are set to start.www.cnbc.com
A federal judge ruled that Donald Trump is liable for defamatory statements he made about writer E. Jean Carroll in 2019 when she went public with claims he raped her decades earlier.
Upcoming trial for Carroll’s lawsuit against Trump will only deal with the question of how much the former president should pay her in monetary damages for defaming her.
According to Trump’s lawyer. Was that in a deposition? If so it should have been entered into evidence and be available to the public.Try reading the link, it makes it easier to find. See from the link:
She was later forced to change her story after New York Magazine pointed out that the dress she said she was wearing had not been sold in 1994. Carroll later claimed the alleged attack occurred in 1995 or 1996. But she is still not clear on the date it took place.
Reading is fundamental.
.
That is NOT a quote. Nor is it linked to a quote. That’s something a lawyer claimed … outside of the courtroom as far as I can tellTry reading the link, it makes it easier to find. See from the link:
She was later forced to change her story after New York Magazine pointed out that the dress she said she was wearing had not been sold in 1994. Carroll later claimed the alleged attack occurred in 1995 or 1996. But she is still not clear on the date it took place.
Reading is fundamental.
.
According to Trump’s lawyer. Was that in a deposition? If so it should have been entered into evidence and be available to the public.
Can you find it?
That is NOT a quote. Nor is it linked to a quote. That’s something a lawyer claimed … outside of the courtroom as far as I can tell
And there’s no proof she said thatAnd???????????
.
I am DIRECTLY addressing the thread stupid.Why are you trying to deflect from the thread?
.
What's bullshit, is that if it concerns Trump, we seem to want to throw out Statutes of limitations, Defendant rights, and what ever avenues the Defendant has to argue his case...Disgusting....I am DIRECTLY addressing the thread stupid.
The entire thing appears to be bullshit
What's bullshit, is that if it concerns Trump, we seem to want to throw out Statutes of limitations, Defendant rights, and what ever avenues the Defendant has to argue his case...Disgusting....