georgephillip
Diamond Member
In a very unlikely best-case situation, my solution would encourage millions of eligible voters who don't usually see anything worth voting for the get involved and vote against all incumbents running for reelection in both major parties.How does "choosing" between Obama or Perry or Mitt change the corruption on Wall Street?Yea, well I didn't see 0bama complaining when he got a bunch of Corporate $ in 2008, the left thought it was great!! But since the Divider-in-Chief threw most of them under the bus, and it's going the other way, now it's a problem. Such smart folks around these parts this morning.
Chicago politics go both ways, you wash my back, I'll wash yours. But when you forget to return the favor, you get nothing, ever, again.
0bama hasn't lived in the Chicago Area long enough to get the whole picture. He can't even do the Chicago game right.
Vote against Wall Street by refusing the "choice" of Republican OR Democrat.
Yeah..like that's worked so well in the past.
You've got one party that is working overtime to get us to third world nation status by pandering to every whim of the wealthy...the Republicans, and another party that panders to the wealthy but at least listens to everyone else and throws them a bone now and again.
Sitting out elections is what puts Republicans into power.
Use already existing third party slates appearing on ballots from Manhattan to Manhattan Beach to FLUSH hundreds of Republicans AND Democrats from the US Congress and White House.
"Choosing" between Republican OR Democrats has no affect on Wall Street or the Pentagon since both parties serve the richest 1% of voters at the expense of 99% of Americans.