Josf
Active Member
- Apr 20, 2015
- 379
- 21
- 26
If it is demonstrated well enough that the criminals have taken over at the so called Federal level of so called American government, then there may be a general demand for the return of rule of law so as to pull the plug on the power flowing to those criminals who are now set to run another so called election to replace the current criminal "president" with a new criminal "president," to preside over the criminal federal government for the next 4, or 8, years.
If said demand for a return to rule of law grows to a sufficient level of force, then a number of competitive options for people to invest their time and effort into one, or more, of these competitive options will begin to satisfy, or supply, that demand for a return to rule of law.
Observation: It has been demonstrated beyond reasonable doubt that the criminals have taken over and they keep very good records as to precisely how much they, the criminals, are benefiting from the criminal takeover of the people in America.
Demonstration of said observation in meticulous detail:
U.S. National Debt Clock Real Time
Demonstration of said observation, again in meticulous detail, as said criminal takeover spreads from the Federal level to the local level, as the criminal operation is copied as a franchise, and the franchise invades each locality within the boarders of the place formerly known as The Untied States of America.
Given the demonstrable fact that the criminals actually document their criminal take-over of government from the former federal level on down to the former peaceful, law abiding, city level, those who claim that said criminals are not criminals are aiding and abetting, lending moral support and material support to said criminals in fact, as their crediting, their apologizing for, said criminals constitute said treasonous false statements.
The criminals confess the fact that the criminals have taken over and that is well documented by the criminals who have taken over in fact. The criminals explain, in detail, precisely how they took over, and it is therefore, in that information, a clear path that is marked by which a return to rule of law is mapped out.
1. End the FED
2. End the IRS
3. Bring the Troops home
4. Hold the worst criminals first to account for their crimes and then move toward bringing the lesser criminals to account as investment funds allow.
Number 4 above happens to be necessary in order to accomplish numbers 1, 2, and 3 above.
Number 1 above is required in order to afford to do number 4 above; unless enough people volunteer to work at accomplishing Number 4 above at their own cost; without monetary compensation.
All of that points toward Jury Duty, which has been the form in which rule of law exists for thousands of years in so called Western Civilizations going back to at least ancient Rome and ancient Greece before the Roman Empire demonstrated, once again, how the criminals take over, when the people forget how to hold the criminals to account.
In rule of law, which is formed as trial by jury according to the common laws of free people, an accuser is afforded (at no cost to the accuser) their access to rule of law in the form of an accusation, if the accusation is against someone not part of a corporate entity such as The City, The County, The State, The Federation, or The Church, or the Corporation.
An accuser calls the government locally and states the accusation; an example is a 911 call, and the caller reports a man outside in the yard threating to break into the house and perpetrate unspeakable crimes upon the people inside the home.
What happens when the so called government agents are in the yard shooting innocent people, and the innocent people call 911?
Historically the government agents offered the indisputable fact that they too, those government agents, where, are, and will always be, perpetually, subject to the laws that they claim to be their source of authority.
Here:
A Century of Lawmaking for a New Nation U.S. Congressional Documents and Debates 1774 - 1875
Quote:_______________________________________
5. Freedom of speech and debate in Congress shall not be impeached or questioned in any court or place out of Congress; and the members of Congress shall be protected in their persons from arrests and imprisonments during the time of their going to and from, and attendance on, Congress, except for treason, felony or breach of the peace.
______________________________________________
At this point in explaining competitive methods of returning to rule of law once the criminals takeover government it might help to understand that in every way that defenders defend effectively the criminals will, the criminals MUST, by necessity, counterfeit those defensive methods, and Court is an example by which there is a defensive example according to the rule of law, and there is a counterfeit version of Court in place when the criminals take over.
So victim A calls 911, and victim A is afforded, at no cost to victim A, an officer of government who arrives on the scene to redress the grievance as victim A is defended from the criminal who willfully intends to do unspeakable things to victim A.
What if the criminals pick up the phone when calling 911?
The solution arrives in the form of a more formal Redress of Grievances; and that petition is reported to a Court, and then that Court is duty bound to process, as in due process, that petition whereby the criminals who pick up the phone when calling 911 are named in the petition. The victim, which can be called victim B, reports, by accusation, formally written into a redress of grievance, that named criminal, or criminal conspirators, are posing as the government.
Said redress of grievance is then a test case which tests the viability, the moral authority, of the people operating the Court, to see if the Court is criminal or not criminal according to their own stated laws governing the Court.
If it is a common law Court, then the accusation follows through with the formation of a Grand Jury.
Examples of common law courts, in America, during the federal, perpetual, Union, whereby Congressman offer their words that they too are subject to the same laws that afford them their authority, are here:
RESPUBLICA v. CARLISLE 1 U.S. 35 1778 Justia U.S. Supreme Court Center
U.S. Supreme Court
RESPUBLICA v. CARLISLE, 1 U.S. 35 (1778)
1 U.S. 35 (Dall.)
Respublica v. Abraham Carlisle
Court of Oyer and Terminer, at Philadelphia
September Sessions, 1778
If said demand for a return to rule of law grows to a sufficient level of force, then a number of competitive options for people to invest their time and effort into one, or more, of these competitive options will begin to satisfy, or supply, that demand for a return to rule of law.
Observation: It has been demonstrated beyond reasonable doubt that the criminals have taken over and they keep very good records as to precisely how much they, the criminals, are benefiting from the criminal takeover of the people in America.
Demonstration of said observation in meticulous detail:
U.S. National Debt Clock Real Time
Demonstration of said observation, again in meticulous detail, as said criminal takeover spreads from the Federal level to the local level, as the criminal operation is copied as a franchise, and the franchise invades each locality within the boarders of the place formerly known as The Untied States of America.
Given the demonstrable fact that the criminals actually document their criminal take-over of government from the former federal level on down to the former peaceful, law abiding, city level, those who claim that said criminals are not criminals are aiding and abetting, lending moral support and material support to said criminals in fact, as their crediting, their apologizing for, said criminals constitute said treasonous false statements.
The criminals confess the fact that the criminals have taken over and that is well documented by the criminals who have taken over in fact. The criminals explain, in detail, precisely how they took over, and it is therefore, in that information, a clear path that is marked by which a return to rule of law is mapped out.
1. End the FED
2. End the IRS
3. Bring the Troops home
4. Hold the worst criminals first to account for their crimes and then move toward bringing the lesser criminals to account as investment funds allow.
Number 4 above happens to be necessary in order to accomplish numbers 1, 2, and 3 above.
Number 1 above is required in order to afford to do number 4 above; unless enough people volunteer to work at accomplishing Number 4 above at their own cost; without monetary compensation.
All of that points toward Jury Duty, which has been the form in which rule of law exists for thousands of years in so called Western Civilizations going back to at least ancient Rome and ancient Greece before the Roman Empire demonstrated, once again, how the criminals take over, when the people forget how to hold the criminals to account.
In rule of law, which is formed as trial by jury according to the common laws of free people, an accuser is afforded (at no cost to the accuser) their access to rule of law in the form of an accusation, if the accusation is against someone not part of a corporate entity such as The City, The County, The State, The Federation, or The Church, or the Corporation.
An accuser calls the government locally and states the accusation; an example is a 911 call, and the caller reports a man outside in the yard threating to break into the house and perpetrate unspeakable crimes upon the people inside the home.
What happens when the so called government agents are in the yard shooting innocent people, and the innocent people call 911?
Historically the government agents offered the indisputable fact that they too, those government agents, where, are, and will always be, perpetually, subject to the laws that they claim to be their source of authority.
Here:
A Century of Lawmaking for a New Nation U.S. Congressional Documents and Debates 1774 - 1875
Quote:_______________________________________
5. Freedom of speech and debate in Congress shall not be impeached or questioned in any court or place out of Congress; and the members of Congress shall be protected in their persons from arrests and imprisonments during the time of their going to and from, and attendance on, Congress, except for treason, felony or breach of the peace.
______________________________________________
At this point in explaining competitive methods of returning to rule of law once the criminals takeover government it might help to understand that in every way that defenders defend effectively the criminals will, the criminals MUST, by necessity, counterfeit those defensive methods, and Court is an example by which there is a defensive example according to the rule of law, and there is a counterfeit version of Court in place when the criminals take over.
So victim A calls 911, and victim A is afforded, at no cost to victim A, an officer of government who arrives on the scene to redress the grievance as victim A is defended from the criminal who willfully intends to do unspeakable things to victim A.
What if the criminals pick up the phone when calling 911?
The solution arrives in the form of a more formal Redress of Grievances; and that petition is reported to a Court, and then that Court is duty bound to process, as in due process, that petition whereby the criminals who pick up the phone when calling 911 are named in the petition. The victim, which can be called victim B, reports, by accusation, formally written into a redress of grievance, that named criminal, or criminal conspirators, are posing as the government.
Said redress of grievance is then a test case which tests the viability, the moral authority, of the people operating the Court, to see if the Court is criminal or not criminal according to their own stated laws governing the Court.
If it is a common law Court, then the accusation follows through with the formation of a Grand Jury.
Examples of common law courts, in America, during the federal, perpetual, Union, whereby Congressman offer their words that they too are subject to the same laws that afford them their authority, are here:
RESPUBLICA v. CARLISLE 1 U.S. 35 1778 Justia U.S. Supreme Court Center
U.S. Supreme Court
RESPUBLICA v. CARLISLE, 1 U.S. 35 (1778)
1 U.S. 35 (Dall.)
Respublica v. Abraham Carlisle
Court of Oyer and Terminer, at Philadelphia
September Sessions, 1778
Last edited: