tap4154
VIP Member
Profiting From a Childs Illiteracy
By NICHOLAS D. KRISTOF
Published: December 7, 2012
JACKSON, Ky.
THIS is what poverty sometimes looks like in America: parents here in Appalachian hill country pulling their children out of literacy classes. Moms and dads fear that if kids learn to read, they are less likely to qualify for a monthly check for having an intellectual disability.
Many people in hillside mobile homes here are poor and desperate, and a $698 monthly check per child from the Supplemental Security Income program goes a long way and those checks continue until the child turns 18.
The kids get taken out of the program because the parents are going to lose the check, said Billie Oaks, who runs a literacy program here in Breathitt County, a poor part of Kentucky. Its heartbreaking.
This is painful for a liberal to admit, but conservatives have a point when they suggest that Americas safety net can sometimes entangle people in a soul-crushing dependency. Our poverty programs do rescue many people, but other times they backfire.
Some young people here dont join the military (a traditional escape route for poor, rural Americans) because its easier to rely on food stamps and disability payments.
Antipoverty programs also discourage marriage: In a means-tested program like S.S.I., a woman raising a child may receive a bigger check if she refrains from marrying that hard-working guy she likes. Yet marriage is one of the best forces to blunt poverty. In married couple households only one child in 10 grows up in poverty, while almost half do in single-mother households.
Most wrenching of all are the parents who think its best if a child stays illiterate, because then the family may be able to claim a disability check each month.
One of the ways you get on this program is having problems in school, notes Richard V. Burkhauser, a Cornell University economist who co-wrote a book last year about these disability programs. If you do better in school, you threaten the income of the parents. Its a terrible incentive.
About four decades ago, most of the children S.S.I. covered had severe physical handicaps or mental retardation that made it difficult for parents to hold jobs about 1 percent of all poor children. But now 55 percent of the disabilities it covers are fuzzier intellectual disabilities short of mental retardation, where the diagnosis is less clear-cut. More than 1.2 million children across America a full 8 percent of all low-income children are now enrolled in S.S.I. as disabled, at an annual cost of more than $9 billion.
Full column here:
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/09/o...-a-childs-illiteracy.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
By NICHOLAS D. KRISTOF
Published: December 7, 2012
JACKSON, Ky.
THIS is what poverty sometimes looks like in America: parents here in Appalachian hill country pulling their children out of literacy classes. Moms and dads fear that if kids learn to read, they are less likely to qualify for a monthly check for having an intellectual disability.
Many people in hillside mobile homes here are poor and desperate, and a $698 monthly check per child from the Supplemental Security Income program goes a long way and those checks continue until the child turns 18.
The kids get taken out of the program because the parents are going to lose the check, said Billie Oaks, who runs a literacy program here in Breathitt County, a poor part of Kentucky. Its heartbreaking.
This is painful for a liberal to admit, but conservatives have a point when they suggest that Americas safety net can sometimes entangle people in a soul-crushing dependency. Our poverty programs do rescue many people, but other times they backfire.
Some young people here dont join the military (a traditional escape route for poor, rural Americans) because its easier to rely on food stamps and disability payments.
Antipoverty programs also discourage marriage: In a means-tested program like S.S.I., a woman raising a child may receive a bigger check if she refrains from marrying that hard-working guy she likes. Yet marriage is one of the best forces to blunt poverty. In married couple households only one child in 10 grows up in poverty, while almost half do in single-mother households.
Most wrenching of all are the parents who think its best if a child stays illiterate, because then the family may be able to claim a disability check each month.
One of the ways you get on this program is having problems in school, notes Richard V. Burkhauser, a Cornell University economist who co-wrote a book last year about these disability programs. If you do better in school, you threaten the income of the parents. Its a terrible incentive.
About four decades ago, most of the children S.S.I. covered had severe physical handicaps or mental retardation that made it difficult for parents to hold jobs about 1 percent of all poor children. But now 55 percent of the disabilities it covers are fuzzier intellectual disabilities short of mental retardation, where the diagnosis is less clear-cut. More than 1.2 million children across America a full 8 percent of all low-income children are now enrolled in S.S.I. as disabled, at an annual cost of more than $9 billion.
Full column here:
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/09/o...-a-childs-illiteracy.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
