So it was "more harmful" to lose $15,000 than to lose $23,000 had they not gotten a tax rebate.The Further Adventures of Obamanomics!
How the $8,000 Tax Credit Cost Home Buyers $15,000:
The government's recent $8,000 cash incentive for first-time home buyers has proved even more costly for recipients than for taxpayers, according to data released Monday. Typical buyers have lost twice as much to price declines as they received from the program.
The median home value fell to about $170,000 in March from $185,000 a year earlier, according to Zillow.com. That means a buyer who closed on a house just before the tax-credit program expired in April 2010 collected $8,000 but has since lost $15,000 in value. Those who bought earlier in the program have done worse; the median price is down $20,000 from March 2009.
"The $8,000 first-time home buyers tax credit . . . has brought many new families into the housing market," the White House boasted in November 2009 upon announcing an extension and expansion of the program. Judging by sales declines since, that seems beyond doubt. Over the past year, the pace of existing home sales has fallen more than 6% and that of new home sales has fallen 22%.
The credit wasn't great for taxpayers, either. IRS says it paid $26 billion in home buyer credits in 2009 and 2010, enough to cover the maximum $8,000 credit for more than 3 million buyers. (It says at least $513 million went for fraudulent claims. Some claimants hadn't bought houses. Some filed twice. Some were under age 18 or incarcerated.) ...
How the $8,000 Tax Credit Cost Home Buyers $15,000 - SmartMoney.com
How much more proof do Progressives need to see that their central planning, social engineering, Big Government policies always end up doing far more harm than good?
How about not buying a house in the first place and waiting until prices reduce even further?
Now you are onto something called common sense. Keep that train of thought going.