ThinkCritically
Open to opinion
Doesn't follow. You would need for there to BE a requirement that the language NOT be changed, not simply NOT be a requirement that it BE changed.
As I pointed out above, you are mistaken. We have had declarations of war when the fighting had not yet started, when we were the aggressors for reasons we thought good at the time. Actually, come to think of it, that was true in World War I, too, so add that to the list.
You would make an excellent bureaucratic lawyer. I love how well you use semantics as a justification for unconstitutional wars.
You, on the other hand, make an excellent internet troll, and a fine candidate for the ignore list.
You are right, that was a low blow calling you a lawyer....peace? I suggest that you don't just take your ball and go home though, by ignoring me. Or is that the approach that you take in life....
Last edited: