How Is Obama Not A Total Ass?

[easyt65]

You can pretend this isn't significant, if you want to sound like a hack retard.

You seriously can't engage someone in debate without being nasty and personally attacking them, can you? Sad...

Anyway...

There is no treaty. Never was.
There isn't even an 'Agreement'. Never was.
Obama may be the only President to, as it says above, make a deal with HIMSELF.

Iran rejected Obama's deal. They did and said what they needed to go to get Barry to drop the sanctions, give them a massive amount of money, and open the right to trade with other nations again.....all of which has happened...and Iran did not have to surrender one thing.

The only one still truly clinging to the idea that some 'deal' exists is Obama. Barry and Kerry, such a smooth negotiators, gave Iran almost everything they asked for, and we got SHITE t show for it.

We didn't get our hostages back.
Iran keeps its missile program.
Iran got it's billions back.
Iran is free to trade again....
And technically, if they wanted to go down that road, they could ignore anything about stopping their nuclear program found in the 'deal' because they never full agreed to it.

--------------------------
Did Iran’s parliament approve a ‘different’ Iranian nuclear deal?

“Iran has already torn it [the nuclear deal] up. Iran has not approved the agreement that President Obama has said that they have approved. They have approved a different agreement in their parliament.”

— Former senator Rick Santorum (R-Pa.), remarks in the Republican undercard debate, Jan. 14, 2016

--------------------------
A Bad Deal Off to a Worse Start

"President Barack Obama never submitted his Iranian nuclear deal for ratification by the Congress because he knew it would have no chance of passing. That does not make the United States unique: The Iranian parliament has never approved it either (that body passed a heavily amended version) and the Iranian president has never signed it. The Iranian cabinet has never even discussed it. And the other members of the P5+1 – Britain, China, Germany, France and Russia – have likewise given it short legal shrift. Indeed, President Obama "may end up being the only person in the world to sign his much-wanted deal, in effect making a treaty with himself," as the Gatestone Institute's Amir Taheri has said."


Welcome to another Barry Foreign Policy 'success'.

 

[easyt65]

A BIG, FAT LIE fed to you dumb shits by your propaganda outlets which you blindly parroted.

I see your being exposed last week had no impact on you...you just keep tossing your opinion as the appropriate response to links and facts.


Not fearing Obama’s ‘snap back’, Iran openly develops Nuclear Missile Delivery Capability

Remember the famous ‘snapping back’ of sanctions that President Obama promised last year if Iran were to violate the Nuclear Agreement? The New York Times had hailed the ‘snap back’ as a diplomatic masterstroke, writing “snapback mechanism [to re-impose sanctions on Iran] is one of the most unusual parts of the deal. In the event that Iran is perceived as violating it, the agreement allows the full raft of penalties to resume automatically.”

Well guess what, Iran continues to violate the Nuclear Deal and President Obama’s ‘full raft’ is nowhere to be seen. Obama Administration has instead responded reluctantly to Islamic Republic of Iran’s repeated testing of ballistic missiles capable to carrying nuclear warheads by blacklisting a handful of Iranian companies.

THEN AGAIN, I am actually agreeing with you that Obama is right - Iran isn't violating his deal with...himself...as missile testing was not included in his deal.

As my last post pointed out, the Iranians may have taken some steps to appease Obama and others, but they did not HAVE to do any of it because Iran's parliament never agree to the deal....as ours never did.

Barry's 'deal' accomplished really one thing - cementing part of his legacy, at least in his mind.

 

[easyt65]

PolitiFact Sheet: 6 things to know about the Iran nuclear deal

1. The deal aims to extend the time it would take for Iran to make a nuclear bomb.
- It has been reported terrorists are now trying to get their hands on nuclear material with which they can build 'dirty' bombs. Our BPAs are carrying around Geiger counters now to try to detect any being smuggled into the US. Iran would LOVE to get a nuke, but a 'dirty' bomb would be fine in the meantime. Oh, and 'slow Iran from getting a nuke' is about equal to trying to 'contain' ISIS.

"Under the deal, Iran will lose 97 percent of its stockpile of enriched uranium. It will also give up 14,000 of its 20,000 centrifuges, the machines used to enrich uranium, and agree to only enrich uranium to a level unsuitable for weapons for 15 years."
- Iran's parliament never officially signed off on this...which means there really isn't a binding legitimate deal in place.

2. Like 'shovel-ready' projects in Obama's Stimulus bill, there aren't any 'any where / any time inspections in Obama's 'deal'

The Iran deal "violates promises the president made to the American people," said Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla. "It is not an anytime, anywhere inspection process."


3. As part of the agreement, the United States and other countries will lift economic sanctions against Iran on "Implementation Day" in 2016, allowing Iran access to billions of dollars.

4. If Iran slips up, the sanctions can come back, though not without problems.

Our allies, like our own Congress have not signed the deal. Iran has been given access to it's money, and should they break any part of Obama's 'deal (with himself) good luck getting the countries trading with Iran again to re-impose the sanctions.

PolitiFact Sheet: 6 things to know about the Iran nuclear deal

 

[ShaklesOfBigGov]

Please explain.

Obama: Iran not following 'spirit' of deal

Did you read your own link?

I did.

Did someone read it to you?

So you know Iran has met all of its obligations under the nuclear agreement, contrary to all the claims made by the Chicken Littles who said they wouldn't.

You also know Obama has kept other sanctions in place due to Iran's behaviors not covered in the nuclear agreement, and that Iran is unhappy about it.

In short, this Administration has made a lot of progress in rolling back Iran's nuclear program several years, while previous Administrations utterly failed to stop Iran from moving closer and closer to acquiring nukes.

Good!

Despite all the patting on the back you give Ovama, Iran has moved ahead with ballistic missile tests. When the IAEA devised a plan to inspect Iran’s Parchin facility, the Iranians refused inspectors access and allowed only a ceremonial visit, Iran was also allowed to collect their own site samples. The president also accepted an agreement back in July 2015 which allowed Iran to keep their industrial-sized nuclear program it built in defiance of the United Nations. I wouldn't be at all surprised with how much Iran can get away with, if they are able to tell UN inspectors where they are "allowed" to conduct its investigations on Iran's nuclear compliance. After all, what excuse could possibly be made for Iran to continue on conducting ballistic missile tests? Is the administration that oblivious, that a response to reestablish strict sanctions is not needed?

Obama has to keep on giving to ‘save’ his Iran deal

 

[PoliticalChic]

Please explain.

Obama: Iran not following 'spirit' of deal

Did you read your own link?

I did.

Did someone read it to you?

So you know Iran has met all of its obligations under the nuclear agreement, contrary to all the claims made by the Chicken Littles who said they wouldn't.

You also know Obama has kept other sanctions in place due to Iran's behaviors not covered in the nuclear agreement, and that Iran is unhappy about it.

In short, this Administration has made a lot of progress in rolling back Iran's nuclear program several years, while previous Administrations utterly failed to stop Iran from moving closer and closer to acquiring nukes.

Good!

Despite all the patting on the back you give Ovama, Iran has moved ahead with ballistic missile tests. When the IAEA devised a plan to inspect Iran’s Parchin facility, the Iranians refused inspectors access and allowed only a ceremonial visit, Iran was also allowed to collect their own site samples. The president also accepted an agreement back in July 2015 which allowed Iran to keep their industrial-sized nuclear program it built in defiance of the United Nations. I wouldn't be at all surprised with how much Iran can get away with, if they are able to tell UN inspectors where they are "allowed" to conduct its investigations on Iran's nuclear compliance. After all, what excuse could possibly be made for Iran to continue on conducting ballistic missile tests? Is the administration that oblivious, that a response to reestablish strict sanctions is not needed?

Obama has to keep on giving to ‘save’ his Iran deal

And, of course, Obama has kept secret that Iran has been paying 20% of North Korea's GDP for years, keeping North Korea as their nuclear laboratory, and this is not covered by any aspect of the 'treaty.'


"Experts say the deal worked out by Secretary of State John F. Kerry carries no known prohibition against North Korea performing Iran’s nuclear arms research, paid out of the $100 billion to $150 billion the deal frees up in Iranian assets.

“There appears to be little in the Iran nuclear agreement that would prevent Iran from continuing or increasing its personnel and financial investments in North Korea’s future missile and nuclear warhead programs,” Mr. Niksch told a House Foreign Affairs subcommittee in July. “It seems to me that North Korea may receive from Iran upwards of $2 [billion] to $3 billion annually from Iran for the various forms of collaboration between them.”
John Brennan: U.S. watching for nuclear cooperation between Iran, North Korea


\