How Fox News covers Melania vs how they covered Michelle Obama

Love how Fox attacked Michelle for how much she spent for a gown to visit the Queen and then fawn over every outfit that Melania wears

34A2EF2000000578-3610965-image-m-25_1464272989378.jpg
seems like playtime is a tad jealous....yea sure your not....

uh-huh.

i've been married to the same faithful man for 35 years. he's never cheated with a porn star, banging her without a rubber when my son was just 4 months old, & putting us both at risk in getting an STD. there is nothing about melania that i would want.
ok thats cool.....lol....
 
Is this board?

Feel free to find a corresponding video but it seems to me if you were gonna draw up a comparison you'd go where your resources are. Fox Noise has always used race baiting as its bread and butter. You know, obsessing over --- Jeremiah Wright... Henry Louis Gates.... "White House Hip Hop Barbecue"..... "New Black Panthers".... Shirley Sherrod.... even the fake edit of Hillary Clinton at a black church. It's what pays the bills down there.
i asked my question first.....

Actually the OP already demonstrated Fox Noise first. All you did was pose the question. It's still open, go find it if you think it's out there.
so what?.....all you did is pose another question.....so that question is still open,so you go find it if you think it's out there....

I didn't pose another question Harry ---- you did. I just said go ahead and make the case if you think there is one.

The OP and his video already made a case. It's clearly laid out and documented. It centers on Fox Noise presumably because the evidence for it is plentiful, but it doesn't mean FNC has a monopoly on it.

Think of that as a score in the top of the first inning. If you think there are runs to be scored in the bottom of that inning, go score them. Don't just sit back and say "we could score if we had a turn at bat" --- TAKE that turn at bat. It's YOUR gig to go find it if you think it's out there, not mine.
yea you did....who wrote .....Is this board?.........a question in reply to my question about cnn....so maybe you had better take your own advice....

You raised the comparison Harry. That makes it your burden of proof. DTMB did too and he got the same answer.
Certainly ISN'T mine.
 
Love how Fox attacked Michelle for how much she spent for a gown to visit the Queen and then fawn over every outfit that Melania wears

34A2EF2000000578-3610965-image-m-25_1464272989378.jpg
seems like playtime is a tad jealous....yea sure your not....

uh-huh.

i've been married to the same faithful man for 35 years. he's never cheated with a porn star, banging her without a rubber when my son was just 4 months old, & putting us both at risk in getting an STD. there is nothing about melania that i would want.
ok thats cool.....lol....

it's simply a fact.
 
i asked my question first.....

Actually the OP already demonstrated Fox Noise first. All you did was pose the question. It's still open, go find it if you think it's out there.
so what?.....all you did is pose another question.....so that question is still open,so you go find it if you think it's out there....

I didn't pose another question Harry ---- you did. I just said go ahead and make the case if you think there is one.

The OP and his video already made a case. It's clearly laid out and documented. It centers on Fox Noise presumably because the evidence for it is plentiful, but it doesn't mean FNC has a monopoly on it.

Think of that as a score in the top of the first inning. If you think there are runs to be scored in the bottom of that inning, go score them. Don't just sit back and say "we could score if we had a turn at bat" --- TAKE that turn at bat. It's YOUR gig to go find it if you think it's out there, not mine.
yea you did....who wrote .....Is this board?.........a question in reply to my question about cnn....so maybe you had better take your own advice....

You raised the comparison Harry. That makes it your burden of proof. DTMB did too and he got the same answer.
Certainly ISN'T mine.
you said you did not ask a question....you did....why are you trying to get around it?...
 
Actually the OP already demonstrated Fox Noise first. All you did was pose the question. It's still open, go find it if you think it's out there.
so what?.....all you did is pose another question.....so that question is still open,so you go find it if you think it's out there....

I didn't pose another question Harry ---- you did. I just said go ahead and make the case if you think there is one.

The OP and his video already made a case. It's clearly laid out and documented. It centers on Fox Noise presumably because the evidence for it is plentiful, but it doesn't mean FNC has a monopoly on it.

Think of that as a score in the top of the first inning. If you think there are runs to be scored in the bottom of that inning, go score them. Don't just sit back and say "we could score if we had a turn at bat" --- TAKE that turn at bat. It's YOUR gig to go find it if you think it's out there, not mine.
yea you did....who wrote .....Is this board?.........a question in reply to my question about cnn....so maybe you had better take your own advice....

You raised the comparison Harry. That makes it your burden of proof. DTMB did too and he got the same answer.
Certainly ISN'T mine.
you said you did not ask a question....you did....why are you trying to get around it?...

My "question" was rhetorical, to illustrate yours.

Again, if you or DTMB want an answer to the question of whether CNN's coverage was different, then it's up to y'all to find out, not anybody else.
 
so what?.....all you did is pose another question.....so that question is still open,so you go find it if you think it's out there....

I didn't pose another question Harry ---- you did. I just said go ahead and make the case if you think there is one.

The OP and his video already made a case. It's clearly laid out and documented. It centers on Fox Noise presumably because the evidence for it is plentiful, but it doesn't mean FNC has a monopoly on it.

Think of that as a score in the top of the first inning. If you think there are runs to be scored in the bottom of that inning, go score them. Don't just sit back and say "we could score if we had a turn at bat" --- TAKE that turn at bat. It's YOUR gig to go find it if you think it's out there, not mine.
yea you did....who wrote .....Is this board?.........a question in reply to my question about cnn....so maybe you had better take your own advice....

You raised the comparison Harry. That makes it your burden of proof. DTMB did too and he got the same answer.
Certainly ISN'T mine.
you said you did not ask a question....you did....why are you trying to get around it?...

My "question" was rhetorical, to illustrate yours.

Again, if you or DTMB want an answer to the question of whether CNN's coverage was different, then it's up to y'all to find out, not anybody else.
maybe mine was too.....
 
I didn't pose another question Harry ---- you did. I just said go ahead and make the case if you think there is one.

The OP and his video already made a case. It's clearly laid out and documented. It centers on Fox Noise presumably because the evidence for it is plentiful, but it doesn't mean FNC has a monopoly on it.

Think of that as a score in the top of the first inning. If you think there are runs to be scored in the bottom of that inning, go score them. Don't just sit back and say "we could score if we had a turn at bat" --- TAKE that turn at bat. It's YOUR gig to go find it if you think it's out there, not mine.
yea you did....who wrote .....Is this board?.........a question in reply to my question about cnn....so maybe you had better take your own advice....

You raised the comparison Harry. That makes it your burden of proof. DTMB did too and he got the same answer.
Certainly ISN'T mine.
you said you did not ask a question....you did....why are you trying to get around it?...

My "question" was rhetorical, to illustrate yours.

Again, if you or DTMB want an answer to the question of whether CNN's coverage was different, then it's up to y'all to find out, not anybody else.
maybe mine was too.....

Okay fair point but as I told DTMB, if it's supposed to be argument it amounts to a Tu Quoque Fallacy. As such it doesn't affect the original point. Perhaps CNN is different, perhaps not. But the only one we have actual evidence for is Fox Noise.
 
It is sad that people calling themselves "Americans" feel the need to debase and insult a learned lady, Michelle Obama, who is known to be a gracious and kind woman of class. She married a learned, gracious, kind, and classy man. Melania married a man who is at her low level.
I don't give a flying-fuck how educated someone is...if they're clearly racists.

How have been Barack or Michelle Obama "clearly racist"? Are you aware that a popular, well-known white, heterosexual man traveled, with his younger son, on Barack Obama's campaign trail?
WOW!!!
I guess Obama has a white friend or two....when they need them.

No......i was just reading Barry and Moochie's writings in college and afterwards. Then I observed their words and their actions over a decade of public service.

It was crystal clear to anyone willing to open their eyes.

I also observed the Obama's actions over a decade. There was nothing wrong with anything either of them said or did. What was supposed to be "crystal clear"? That they are fine people? Now we have a filthy whore masquerading as president (look at his slovenly and degraded sexual history) and a gold digger who is supposed to be Third Lady. The Obamas have class and dignity. donny and melania have neither.
 
I also observed the Obama's actions over a decade. There was nothing wrong with anything either of them said or did. What was supposed to be "crystal clear"? That they are fine people? Now we have a filthy whore masquerading as president (look at his slovenly and degraded sexual history) and a gold digger who is supposed to be Third Lady. The Obamas have class and dignity. donny and melania have neither.
Meh. Trump is a much better president.
 
yea you did....who wrote .....Is this board?.........a question in reply to my question about cnn....so maybe you had better take your own advice....

You raised the comparison Harry. That makes it your burden of proof. DTMB did too and he got the same answer.
Certainly ISN'T mine.
you said you did not ask a question....you did....why are you trying to get around it?...

My "question" was rhetorical, to illustrate yours.

Again, if you or DTMB want an answer to the question of whether CNN's coverage was different, then it's up to y'all to find out, not anybody else.
maybe mine was too.....

Okay fair point but as I told DTMB, if it's supposed to be argument it amounts to a Tu Quoque Fallacy. As such it doesn't affect the original point. Perhaps CNN is different, perhaps not. But the only one we have actual evidence for is Fox Noise.
well i dont watch them,i get my world happenings from you guys right here in this forum......the people here post everything.....
 
I also observed the Obama's actions over a decade. There was nothing wrong with anything either of them said or did. What was supposed to be "crystal clear"? That they are fine people? Now we have a filthy whore masquerading as president (look at his slovenly and degraded sexual history) and a gold digger who is supposed to be Third Lady. The Obamas have class and dignity. donny and melania have neither.
Meh. Trump is a much better president.

filthy donny has been the worst president of my lifetime and probably the worst president in U.S. history. he is just a filthy tramp and he married (the latest time) a tramp. Skank married skank.
 
I also observed the Obama's actions over a decade. There was nothing wrong with anything either of them said or did. What was supposed to be "crystal clear"? That they are fine people? Now we have a filthy whore masquerading as president (look at his slovenly and degraded sexual history) and a gold digger who is supposed to be Third Lady. The Obamas have class and dignity. donny and melania have neither.
Meh. Trump is a much better president.

filthy donny has been the worst president of my lifetime and probably the worst president in U.S. history. he is just a filthy tramp and he married (the latest time) a tramp. Skank married skank.
Trump is the sorriest excuse for a President in my lifetime. A total embarrassment

But in terms of damage done to the nation, Bush43 was far worse
 
It is sad that people calling themselves "Americans" feel the need to debase and insult a learned lady, Michelle Obama, who is known to be a gracious and kind woman of class. She married a learned, gracious, kind, and classy man. Melania married a man who is at her low level.
Trump wanted a trophy wife and Melania was a Gold Digger

A perfect match
Yet she shows more class every day than Moochie does.

If you consider porn shots to be classy
It was classy porn.
 
I also observed the Obama's actions over a decade. There was nothing wrong with anything either of them said or did. What was supposed to be "crystal clear"? That they are fine people? Now we have a filthy whore masquerading as president (look at his slovenly and degraded sexual history) and a gold digger who is supposed to be Third Lady. The Obamas have class and dignity. donny and melania have neither.
Meh. Trump is a much better president.

filthy donny has been the worst president of my lifetime and probably the worst president in U.S. history. he is just a filthy tramp and he married (the latest time) a tramp. Skank married skank.
Trump is the sorriest excuse for a President in my lifetime. A total embarrassment

But in terms of damage done to the nation, Bush43 was far worse

SO far.
 
It is sad that people calling themselves "Americans" feel the need to debase and insult a learned lady, Michelle Obama, who is known to be a gracious and kind woman of class. She married a learned, gracious, kind, and classy man. Melania married a man who is at her low level.
Trump wanted a trophy wife and Melania was a Gold Digger

A perfect match
Yet she shows more class every day than Moochie does.

If you consider porn shots to be classy
It was classy porn.

I guess for some, there are porn stars you marry, and then there are porn stars you lock in your hotel room and pay $130k to not talk about it. :dunno:
 
It is sad that people calling themselves "Americans" feel the need to debase and insult a learned lady, Michelle Obama, who is known to be a gracious and kind woman of class. She married a learned, gracious, kind, and classy man. Melania married a man who is at her low level.
I don't give a flying-fuck how educated someone is...if they're clearly racists.

How have been Barack or Michelle Obama "clearly racist"? Are you aware that a popular, well-known white, heterosexual man traveled, with his younger son, on Barack Obama's campaign trail?
WOW!!!
I guess Obama has a white friend or two....when they need them.

No......i was just reading Barry and Moochie's writings in college and afterwards. Then I observed their words and their actions over a decade of public service.

It was crystal clear to anyone willing to open their eyes.

I also observed the Obama's actions over a decade. There was nothing wrong with anything either of them said or did. What was supposed to be "crystal clear"? That they are fine people? Now we have a filthy whore masquerading as president (look at his slovenly and degraded sexual history) and a gold digger who is supposed to be Third Lady. The Obamas have class and dignity. donny and melania have neither.
Your problem is you listened to the a fawning press that censored the truth about those two assholes.
You never took the time to read everything about them.
Nor did you take the time to read what both of those bigots wrote about race...about white people....about their screwed up impressions of this country and what it was founded on.
 

Forum List

Back
Top