How did the left become the "party of science"?

I never have denied 'climate change'.....ever. I have denied 'man made' climate change.
You deny what NASA scientists claim: "There is unequivocal evidence that Earth is warming at an unprecedented rate. Human activity is the principal cause."

You deny evidence. Unequivocal evidence.

 
I never have denied 'climate change'.....ever. I have denied 'man made' climate change.
again______________________________

refute the evidence. Oh wait! You're not a scientist, let alone a climate scientist.

Do scientists agree on climate change?​

Yes, the vast majority of actively publishing climate scientists – 97 percent – agree that humans are causing global warming and climate change. Most of the leading science organizations around the world have issued public statements expressing this, including international and U.S. science academies, the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, and a whole host of reputable scientific bodies around the world. A list of these organizations is provided here.

 
It's beyond clear the dainty is in so far over his head that he's in peril of getting the bends. :laugh2:
Refute a point:


Do scientists agree on climate change?​


Yes, the vast majority of actively publishing climate scientists – 97 percent – agree that humans are causing global warming and climate change. Most of the leading science organizations around the world have issued public statements expressing this, including international and U.S. science academies, the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, and a whole host of reputable scientific bodies around the world. A list of these organizations is provided here.

 
GOP vs the left?

The left is not a political party.

Didn't say it was, but let's not play word games here. When I say 'The Left' I'm talking about more than just the dem party, I'm talking about all the academics and media people and every other bullshit artist who has been telling us that everything is going to hell due to climate change.
 
I mean when you come right down to it their track record is not very impressive at all.

In the late 80's-early 90's they were all saying that everyone is going to get cancer from the hole in the ozone. There is still a large chunk of the human race that is cancer free.

In the late 2000's Al Gore told us there would be no polar ice caps by 2013 due to global warming. They're still there.

Greta Thunberg said we would all be dead from climate change by now. And of course, being a teenager with no area of expertise in the field, she should be taken seriously.

They told us at the beginning of covid that masks don't work. Then they did if they were N95. Then a piece of pillow case over your face was sufficient.

They are also the same people that pushed rules such as you must have a mask on in a restaurant when waiting for your food, but can remove them when eating because covid apparently took a break during mealtime.

They said the "vaccine" would prevent covid. It didn't. Then it would stop the transmission of it. It didn't. Then it would be a mild case if vaccinated. Vaccinated people still died and they still do.

They try to force the idea that the number of genders is infinite. Scientifically, there are two.

Sigh, I guess they wormed their way deep into government (people who fund science) and academia....You know the people who research and affirm conclusions that those who fund them want to hear.

As soon as they figured out that they could call anything they want "science" and nobody would question it.

R.6daf5016c00f796ddde402ff54ef8f81


The world wonders..... 😐

How did the left become the "party of science"?​


When they put a little boy into a lab; but off his junk; and called him a "her."
 
Didn't say it was, but let's not play word games here. When I say 'The Left' I'm talking about more than just the dem party, I'm talking about all the academics and media people and every other bullshit artist who has been telling us that everything is going to hell due to climate change.
Yet you say 'GOP' and it's not about semantics. Try and keep up. You're arguing about one party vs?
 
Refute a point:


Do scientists agree on climate change?​


Yes, the vast majority of actively publishing climate scientists – 97 percent – agree that humans are causing global warming and climate change. Most of the leading science organizations around the world have issued public statements expressing this, including international and U.S. science academies, the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, and a whole host of reputable scientific bodies around the world. A list of these organizations is provided here.


This is absolute, 100% bullshit that has been debunked long ago. And I think you know that.
 
It's beyond clear the dainty is in so far over his head that he's in peril of getting the bends. :laugh2:
You and Meister fill into a group here. Sad. But many of us, most serious, rational folk have kept the faith with scientists and still do so.

Trust in scientists​

When it comes to the standing of scientists, 73% of U.S. adults have a great deal or fair amount of confidence in scientists to act in the public’s best interests. But trust in scientists is 14 points lower than it was at the early stages of the pandemic.

The share expressing the strongest level of trust in scientists – saying they have a great deal of confidence in them – has fallen from 39% in 2020 to 23% today.

As trust in scientists has fallen, distrust has grown: Roughly a quarter of Americans (27%) now say they have not too much or no confidence in scientists to act in the public’s best interests, up from 12% in April 2020.

Ratings of medical scientists mirror the trend seen in ratings of scientists generally. Read Chapter 1 of the report for a detailed analysis of this data.

 

Forum List

Back
Top