Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Quote: Originally Posted by eots
There is the fact that several former NIST chief fire investigators have made these charges,,as well as members of the 9/11 commission and a number of former U.S air crash investigators and former presidents of the U.S air crash investigation board
Gee one isn't enough? Quit moving the goalposts and engage in the debate. Here this is the basis for the argument.OK, I'll play with you, Princess. What former NIST chief fire investigators other than James Quintiere have made charges and what charges did they make?
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=YQAkgKQ7G-U]Little_Physics_Lesson.flv - YouTube[/ame]
Did I move the goal posts or did some lying asshole cut the quote from Eots claiming "several former NIST chief fire investigators have made these charges." Eots was bright enough to bail out rather than make a fool of himself (because he was lying) and he's not all that smart. Obviously you aren't even that bright, Princess.
BTW, you should know that Quintiere left the NIST in 1990. He has access to no facts you and I can't find, not that you seem interested in facts. Like most CTs he's just trying to make a name for himself but he offers no facts and subscribes to no CT ... he just thinks the official report is incomplete and flawed.
Quote: Originally Posted by eots
There is the fact that several former NIST chief fire investigators have made these charges,,as well as members of the 9/11 commission and a number of former U.S air crash investigators and former presidents of the U.S air crash investigation board
Gee one isn't enough? Quit moving the goalposts and engage in the debate. Here this is the basis for the argument.
Little_Physics_Lesson.flv - YouTube
Did I move the goal posts or did some lying asshole cut the quote from Eots claiming "several former NIST chief fire investigators have made these charges." Eots was bright enough to bail out rather than make a fool of himself (because he was lying) and he's not all that smart. Obviously you aren't even that bright, Princess.
BTW, you should know that Quintiere left the NIST in 1990. He has access to no facts you and I can't find, not that you seem interested in facts. Like most CTs he's just trying to make a name for himself but he offers no facts and subscribes to no CT ... he just thinks the official report is incomplete and flawed.
You moved the goalposts, the man posted info about a former NIST employee, who dismiss because he may have left the agency, big deal. Eots made his point and you want another employee, instead of dealing with it, you move the goalposts. This is typical of you tho, just like ignoring the little physics presentation that is the heart of the objection to the OCT narrative you can't defend, and chose to run away from on a consistent basis.
Now that it has been shown you concede to the facts of physics, we can proceed to the motives and people who had assess to the WTC complex, to facilitate the planting of whatever it was that was used to help bring down 100's of tons of steel and reinforced buildings that were designed to withstand airliner impacts.
Quote: Originally Posted by eots
There is the fact that several former NIST chief fire investigators have made these charges,,as well as members of the 9/11 commission and a number of former U.S air crash investigators and former presidents of the U.S air crash investigation board
Did I move the goal posts or did some lying asshole cut the quote from Eots claiming "several former NIST chief fire investigators have made these charges." Eots was bright enough to bail out rather than make a fool of himself (because he was lying) and he's not all that smart. Obviously you aren't even that bright, Princess.
BTW, you should know that Quintiere left the NIST in 1990. He has access to no facts you and I can't find, not that you seem interested in facts. Like most CTs he's just trying to make a name for himself but he offers no facts and subscribes to no CT ... he just thinks the official report is incomplete and flawed.
You moved the goalposts, the man posted info about a former NIST employee, who dismiss because he may have left the agency, big deal. Eots made his point and you want another employee, instead of dealing with it, you move the goalposts. This is typical of you tho, just like ignoring the little physics presentation that is the heart of the objection to the OCT narrative you can't defend, and chose to run away from on a consistent basis.
Now that it has been shown you concede to the facts of physics, we can proceed to the motives and people who had assess to the WTC complex, to facilitate the planting of whatever it was that was used to help bring down 100's of tons of steel and reinforced buildings that were designed to withstand airliner impacts.
1.1. MY INVOLVEMENT
I became involved in the WTC investigations as an observer and a fire
scientist. I followed the NIST activities throughout. In late September I
was invited to be part of the American Society of Civil Engineering team of
experts that were to attempt to investigate the scene. I was asked to be on a
backup team and began to receive emails on activities of the ASCE team at
the WTC site. The ASCE did not get easy access, and were initially
concerned about the pending and later actual sale of the steel debris from
the scene.
http://www.enfp.umd.edu/sites/default/files/documents/quintiere-nato.pdf
Quote: Originally Posted by eots
There is the fact that several former NIST chief fire investigators have made these charges,,as well as members of the 9/11 commission and a number of former U.S air crash investigators and former presidents of the U.S air crash investigation board
Gee one isn't enough? Quit moving the goalposts and engage in the debate. Here this is the basis for the argument.
Little_Physics_Lesson.flv - YouTube
Did I move the goal posts or did some lying asshole cut the quote from Eots claiming "several former NIST chief fire investigators have made these charges." Eots was bright enough to bail out rather than make a fool of himself (because he was lying) and he's not all that smart. Obviously you aren't even that bright, Princess.
BTW, you should know that Quintiere left the NIST in 1990. He has access to no facts you and I can't find, not that you seem interested in facts. Like most CTs he's just trying to make a name for himself but he offers no facts and subscribes to no CT ... he just thinks the official report is incomplete and flawed.
You moved the goalposts, the man posted info about a former NIST employee, who dismiss because he may have left the agency, big deal. Eots made his point and you want another employee, instead of dealing with it, you move the goalposts.
Quote: Originally Posted by eots
There is the fact that several former NIST chief fire investigators have made these charges,,as well as members of the 9/11 commission and a number of former U.S air crash investigators and former presidents of the U.S air crash investigation board
Did I move the goal posts or did some lying asshole cut the quote from Eots claiming "several former NIST chief fire investigators have made these charges." Eots was bright enough to bail out rather than make a fool of himself (because he was lying) and he's not all that smart. Obviously you aren't even that bright, Princess.
BTW, you should know that Quintiere left the NIST in 1990. He has access to no facts you and I can't find, not that you seem interested in facts. Like most CTs he's just trying to make a name for himself but he offers no facts and subscribes to no CT ... he just thinks the official report is incomplete and flawed.
You moved the goalposts, the man posted info about a former NIST employee, who dismiss because he may have left the agency, big deal. Eots made his point and you want another employee, instead of dealing with it, you move the goalposts. This is typical of you tho, just like ignoring the little physics presentation that is the heart of the objection to the OCT narrative you can't defend, and chose to run away from on a consistent basis.
Now that it has been shown you concede to the facts of physics, we can proceed to the motives and people who had assess to the WTC complex, to facilitate the planting of whatever it was that was used to help bring down 100's of tons of steel and reinforced buildings that were designed to withstand airliner impacts.
1.1. MY INVOLVEMENT
I became involved in the WTC investigations as an observer and a fire
scientist. I followed the NIST activities throughout. In late September I
was invited to be part of the American Society of Civil Engineering team of
experts that were to attempt to investigate the scene. I was asked to be on a
backup team and began to receive emails on activities of the ASCE team at
the WTC site. The ASCE did not get easy access, and were initially
concerned about the pending and later actual sale of the steel debris from
the scene.
http://www.enfp.umd.edu/sites/default/files/documents/quintiere-nato.pdf
You moved the goalposts, the man posted info about a former NIST employee, who dismiss because he may have left the agency, big deal. Eots made his point and you want another employee, instead of dealing with it, you move the goalposts. This is typical of you tho, just like ignoring the little physics presentation that is the heart of the objection to the OCT narrative you can't defend, and chose to run away from on a consistent basis.
Now that it has been shown you concede to the facts of physics, we can proceed to the motives and people who had assess to the WTC complex, to facilitate the planting of whatever it was that was used to help bring down 100's of tons of steel and reinforced buildings that were designed to withstand airliner impacts.
1.1. MY INVOLVEMENT
I became involved in the WTC investigations as an observer and a fire
scientist. I followed the NIST activities throughout. In late September I
was invited to be part of the American Society of Civil Engineering team of
experts that were to attempt to investigate the scene. I was asked to be on a
backup team and began to receive emails on activities of the ASCE team at
the WTC site. The ASCE did not get easy access, and were initially
concerned about the pending and later actual sale of the steel debris from
the scene.
http://www.enfp.umd.edu/sites/default/files/documents/quintiere-nato.pdf
Nice of you to return to the scene of your crime, Princess. Can I trouble you to post the names of the "several former NIST chief fire investigators" who you claim have made "these charges" and the charges they have made?
1.1. MY INVOLVEMENT
I became involved in the WTC investigations as an observer and a fire
scientist. I followed the NIST activities throughout. In late September I
was invited to be part of the American Society of Civil Engineering team of
experts that were to attempt to investigate the scene. I was asked to be on a
backup team and began to receive emails on activities of the ASCE team at
the WTC site. The ASCE did not get easy access, and were initially
concerned about the pending and later actual sale of the steel debris from
the scene.
http://www.enfp.umd.edu/sites/default/files/documents/quintiere-nato.pdf
Nice of you to return to the scene of your crime, Princess. Can I trouble you to post the names of the "several former NIST chief fire investigators" who you claim have made "these charges" and the charges they have made?
and clearly Dr Q had much more involvment than you pretended
it should of read..."several former NIST and chief fire investigators have made these charges.
Fire Fighter Erik Lawyer Slams NIST And The 9/11 "Investigation" - YouTube
SAYTROLL doesn't believe anything unless it's on WikiPedia.
Nice of you to return to the scene of your crime, Princess. Can I trouble you to post the names of the "several former NIST chief fire investigators" who you claim have made "these charges" and the charges they have made?
and clearly Dr Q had much more involvment than you pretended
Dr. Q complained he couldn't get formal responses to his questions. If he was so involved why did he need formal responses? Nonetheless, he has serious differences with you and the CT movement:
"Although Dr. Quintiere was strongly critical of NIST’s conclusions and its investigatory process, he made it clear he was not a supporter of theories that the Twin Towers were brought down by pre-planted explosives."
So much for loony tune CTs.
it should of read..."several former NIST and chief fire investigators have made these charges.
Fire Fighter Erik Lawyer Slams NIST And The 9/11 "Investigation" - YouTube
I see. So you are finally admitting your original statement was untrue. Thanks, but I already knew that and it's a bit late to be changing your tune, Princess. You lied to enhance your CT and ended up exposing yourself and your feeble CT movement but thanks for playing.
You're dismissed.
Yanno.........................considering that we all saw the plane slam into the building, leaving a pretty discernable mark where it went in, and also considering that the WHOLE FUCKING PLANE went into the building (based on the entry marks).
As well as considering that the WHOLE BUILDING FELL DOWN OVER 90 STORIES FROM WHERE THE PLANE HIT, does anyone really think that the engine would have made it through the wreckage?
Fuck it I tried being nice, and gave this troll a chance.Quote: Originally Posted by eots
There is the fact that several former NIST chief fire investigators have made these charges,,as well as members of the 9/11 commission and a number of former U.S air crash investigators and former presidents of the U.S air crash investigation board
Did I move the goal posts or did some lying asshole cut the quote from Eots claiming "several former NIST chief fire investigators have made these charges." Eots was bright enough to bail out rather than make a fool of himself (because he was lying) and he's not all that smart. Obviously you aren't even that bright, Princess.
BTW, you should know that Quintiere left the NIST in 1990. He has access to no facts you and I can't find, not that you seem interested in facts. Like most CTs he's just trying to make a name for himself but he offers no facts and subscribes to no CT ... he just thinks the official report is incomplete and flawed.
You moved the goalposts, the man posted info about a former NIST employee, who dismiss because he may have left the agency, big deal. Eots made his point and you want another employee, instead of dealing with it, you move the goalposts.
What the hell are you whining about, Princess? Ideots claimed, and I quote, "several former NIST chief fire investigators have made these charges" and I asked him to name them. You do know what the word "several" means, right Princess?
Below is some of what Quintiere said about 9/11. See if you can find anything which supports your wild-eyed theories or, for that matter, any CT:
I think the official conclusion that NIST arrived at is questionable, explained Dr. Quintiere.
Theyre [NIST] the central government lab for fire. There are good people there and they can do a good job."
Although Dr. Quintiere was strongly critical of NISTs conclusions and its investigatory process, he made it clear he was not a supporter of theories that the Twin Towers were brought down by pre-planted explosives. If you go to World Trade Center One, nine minutes before its collapse, there was a line of smoke that puffed out. This is one of the basis of the conspiracy theories that says the smoke puffing out all around the building is due to somebody setting off an explosive charge. Well, I think, more likely, its one of the floors falling down.
Dr. Quintiere then presented his and his students research that contradicts the NIST report and points to a different cause for the collapses; the application of insufficient fire-proofing insulation on the truss rods in the Twin Towers.
