How AGW fraudsters turn October into hottest month!!!

[jc456]

I agree. The Economic Policy Journal people are total frauds.

^^^^
Peer reviewed...

Peer review is only acceptable if its from a left wit site they approve of..

Now my little dumb fuck, post some peer reviewed articles supporting some of the asinine idiocy that you pull out of your ass.

why????????????????????????????????????????

 

[jc456]

When the religion gets utterly pwned, expect the same response as always...................shoot the messenger!!!

But facts are facts.........anybody with half a brain can read that graph!!! These frauds screw with the raw data all the time and the religion knows it too. That's fair play for them..........distort.......confuse.........fake..........whatever it takes. The article speaks for itself.

Once the facts dispel their myths, those who cling to any bogus theory (see: 9/11 or Sandy Hook conspiracy theorists) are exposed not as seekers of truth but rather rag-tag members of a belief movement.

peer review..............peer review.......peer review. I think they'd explode if they couldn't write that everyday!! it's so fnnn funny stuff. GIGANTOR

 

[jc456]

Billy Boob, the people that publish real science in peer reviewed journals are my instructors. In the journals, and lectures in the class room.

And? Peer review has been usurped by those that have an agenda.

http://online.wsj.com/articles/hank...-is-harming-scientific-credibility-1405290747

Science used to be non political, its not that way anymore.

Mark

The Wall Street Journal is not a science journal, and since Ruppert took it over, not a very good source to quote from at all.

And the articles in the journals have little to do with politics, mostly observations on the cryosphere, the warming and acidification of the ocean, and melting of the permafrost.

Who cares??????????????

 

[jc456]

The whole "peer review" scam narrative is waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay past the point of anybody caring. Might have mattered some back in the days where Al Gore mattered. Those days are long gone now. The whole "peer review" talking point holds sway in Starbucks and the nether-regions of the internet, but nowhere else. Regular people dismiss that stuff now.....because the peer review teams are the same teams making all these predictions over the years that fall flat on their face.

Sadly, you are correct. Who peer reviews the members of the IPCC? Why, other members of course.

Mark

Really stupid now, aren't you? The whole scientfic community peer reviews major reports like that. And you see the results in the immediate pointing out of errors that are inevitiably in such reports.

Who cares????????????????????????????

 

[jc456]

Why don't you just post from the Daily Globe. Same credibility as WUWT

hahahahaahahaahahaha you're starting to lose it old scrocks.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

We'll call this the official denier surrender thread.

Nearly every denier here is now a full-time delusional conspiracy crank. A moron who guzzles his cult's piss with gusto. A pale mewling spineless thing that attempts to walk upright and fails. A kook loser.

Deniers, your cult has collapsed. Now, you're just weeping over its passing. You need to accept it and move on.

You and g5000 need to hook-up

 

[jc456]

After I pointed out how most of the deniers here are now full-time crybaby conspiracy loons, it's probably wasn't the best choice of tactics for deniers to scream their idiot conspiracy theories even louder.

But then, nobody ever accused them of being smart. Loyal cult parrots, definitely, but that doesn't require a 3-digit IQ.

dude/ dudette/ it ..... who cares???????????????????????????

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Billy Boob, the people that publish real science in peer reviewed journals are my instructors. In the journals, and lectures in the class room.

And? Peer review has been usurped by those that have an agenda.

http://online.wsj.com/articles/hank...-is-harming-scientific-credibility-1405290747

Science used to be non political, its not that way anymore.

Mark

The Wall Street Journal is not a science journal, and since Ruppert took it over, not a very good source to quote from at all.

And the articles in the journals have little to do with politics, mostly observations on the cryosphere, the warming and acidification of the ocean, and melting of the permafrost.

Only other Cult members can review the altered data

 

[jc456]

Billy Boob, the people that publish real science in peer reviewed journals are my instructors. In the journals, and lectures in the class room.

And? Peer review has been usurped by those that have an agenda.

http://online.wsj.com/articles/hank...-is-harming-scientific-credibility-1405290747

Science used to be non political, its not that way anymore.

Mark

The Wall Street Journal is not a science journal, and since Ruppert took it over, not a very good source to quote from at all.

And the articles in the journals have little to do with politics, mostly observations on the cryosphere, the warming and acidification of the ocean, and melting of the permafrost.

Only other Cult members can review the altered data

and understand the procedure used, since you have to belong to the cult in order to view such material. BTW, Ain't this fun today? I've been on for fifteen minutes and it feels like hours. I'm lovin' it!!!

 

[martybegan]

We'll call this the official denier surrender thread.

Nearly every denier here is now a full-time delusional conspiracy crank. A moron who guzzles his cult's piss with gusto. A pale mewling spineless thing that attempts to walk upright and fails. A kook loser.

Deniers, your cult has collapsed. Now, you're just weeping over its passing. You need to accept it and move on.

Explain why the graphs are different, and why the warming ones are correct. Don't link something, explain it.

 

[martybegan]

I agree. The Economic Policy Journal people are total frauds.

Explain why the graphs are different, and why the warming ones are correct. Don't link something, explain it.

 

[skookerasbil]

Gotta keep this one on top of the page fella's............

These obsessed frauds.......the people need to be enlightened that you don't place OCD types in a position to affect public policy. They tried that in the 30's in Germany........didn't work out so well.

 

[mamooth]

You and g5000 need to hook-up

Frank, has Obama used ebola to declare martial law yet, as you so loudly proclaimed was going to happen?

You're a drooling cult imbecile, Frank, jabbering out whatever moron conspiracy your masters feed you. While the other deniers here aren't quite as stupid as you yet, they're all working hard at their self-lobotomies, and they hope to reach your level some day.

 

[mamooth]

Explain why the graphs are different, and why the warming ones are correct. Don't link something, explain it.

It's mainly because TOBS (Time of OBServation) bias made the older graphs look warmer. Very simplified, that means before the stations were automated, the readings tended to be taken at warmer times of day.

If you refuse to correct for that known bias, you're fudging data. So like all deniers, you're essentially demanding that data be fudged.

 

[jc456]

Explain why the graphs are different, and why the warming ones are correct. Don't link something, explain it.

It's mainly because TOBS (Time of OBServation) bias made the older graphs look warmer. Very simplified, that means before the stations were automated, the readings tended to be taken at warmer times of day.

If you refuse to correct for that known bias, you're fudging data. So like all deniers, you're essentially demanding that data be fudged.

hahaahahahhahhahahahahhaaaa sure!!

 

[jc456]

You and g5000 need to hook-up

Frank, has Obama used ebola to declare martial law yet, as you so loudly proclaimed was going to happen?

You're a drooling cult imbecile, Frank, jabbering out whatever moron conspiracy your masters feed you. While the other deniers here aren't quite as stupid as you yet, they're all working hard at their self-lobotomies, and they hope to reach your level some day.

not yet, but he is going to break the law and illegally allow illegals into the country. ILLEGALLY!!!!!!!

BTW, can you say ILLEGAL?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

You and g5000 need to hook-up

Frank, has Obama used ebola to declare martial law yet, as you so loudly proclaimed was going to happen?

You're a drooling cult imbecile, Frank, jabbering out whatever moron conspiracy your masters feed you. While the other deniers here aren't quite as stupid as you yet, they're all working hard at their self-lobotomies, and they hope to reach your level some day.

You and g5000 take turns drinking up.

Oh wait, that won't work, you both need to service a faucet, right?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Explain why the graphs are different, and why the warming ones are correct. Don't link something, explain it.

It's mainly because TOBS (Time of OBServation) bias made the older graphs look warmer. Very simplified, that means before the stations were automated, the readings tended to be taken at warmer times of day.

If you refuse to correct for that known bias, you're fudging data. So like all deniers, you're essentially demanding that data be fudged.

The more accurate and unadjusted the data, the bigger the DENIAL!!!

 

[mamooth]

You and g5000 take turns drinking up.

Oh wait, that won't work, you both need to service a faucet, right?

So did you make an error by stating Obama was deliberately spreading ebola so he could declare martial law, or do you still stand by that claim?

 

[skookerasbil]

scientists fucking with the data is gay

The AGW k00ks are getting so decimated on this forum these days they've gotten around to changing the subject to Ebola on an ENVIRONMENT forum. More gayness.

We love making these people look like dicks!!