Fort Fun Indiana
Diamond Member
- Mar 10, 2017
- 102,567
- 83,916
- 3,645
so, they are lying for grant money. Fascinating. what percentage of them? 100%? 50%? then there is still 50% to account for. Now, remember, they are all in general agreement. So, they are all liars, or are the rest just incompetent?"still won't post the research of the acedmey of Athens did on man made climate change."Am I going to debate accepted scientific theories with a bunch of blog-educated deniers? Negative, ghost rider."Get the fuck over yourself who said anything I was smarter "
You are smarter than them all, or they are all lying, or a mix of the two.. Pick your poison. Any of them are absurd.
Listen you little cock sucker are you going to debate or just deflect?
No, that's an exercise for a freshman college course. Hint: it always ends the same way.
I am way more interested in the other stuff you need to account for, especially this grand conspiracy or grand incompetence, whichever the case may be. I'm all ears, like your avatar.
Once again needle dick, still won't post the research of the acedmey of Athens did on man made climate change..of course you won't you will be like the original poster and just parrot 200 science organization"s like a good propaganda tool that you are.
What a ridiculous idea... as if every scientific society or researcher who is a member (like, the US Geological Society, which also endorses the consensus) has to repeat the work of all the others. Nobody even implied such a claim, and to imply, much less directly expect them to have done this is just really stupid. The point was the consensus of the major scientific organizations around the globe.
Now, back to the question: All incompetent, all liars, or a mix of both?
Of course you and the original poster did, so know you telling us they agree just to get grant money?
Yup that's part of it.
.