"man-caused" global warming - a different perspective

[TheDude]

Scientists and liberals alike portray global-warming as man-caused. Okay, sure, let's say that's true. George Carlin once said "we won't destroy the Earth. Earth will shake us off like flees".

Point is, this business may simply be Earth's rejection of human population. It's HIGHLY possible the "Earth's intent" is to reduce or eliminate the human population. That's just how shit works.

We can talk man-caused global warming 24-7, but it's a wasted effort to assume we'll do anything about it, and be sure we won't. Liberal Hollywood is a prime example. They adamantly shriek man-caused global warming, playing the victim roll, all while they warm up their yachts, 10,000 square ft. homes, pools and private jets. In other terms, as long as human population isn't addressed, which it won't be, whether it's global warming, disease or otherwise, humans are fucked and we've earned it.

 

[BluesLegend]

Liberals support all kinds of crazy shit, so long as it doesn't inconvenience them personally. They are the party of do as we say not as we do.

 

[forkup]

Scientists and liberals alike portray global-warming as man-caused. Okay, sure, let's say that's true. George Carlin once said "we won't destroy the Earth. Earth will shake us off like flees".

Point is, this business may simply be Earth's rejection of human population. It's HIGHLY possible the "Earth's intent" is to reduce or eliminate the human population. That's just how shit works.

We can talk man-caused global warming 24-7, but it's a wasted effort to assume we'll do anything about it, and be sure we won't. Liberal Hollywood is a prime example. They adamantly shriek man-caused global warming, playing the victim roll, all while they warm up their yachts, 10,000 square ft. homes, pools and private jets. In other terms, as long as human population isn't addressed, which it won't be, whether it's global warming, disease or otherwise, humans are fucked and we've earned it.

Bit cynical, don't you think? I do believe it's also wrong. The human race has fought environmental and biological treats before and won. Even global warming is being fought and some countries are actually on target to become carbon neutral over the next 20 years. As more of the effects of global warming start to hit the incentive to do something about it will also become more pronounced. I don't claim it'll be easy. I don't even claim it will be completely reversed. But using" it's to late so we don't need to address it" as a line of reasoning is wrong from both a moral and pragmatic standpoint.

 

[IsaacNewton]

The 'Earth' isn't in danger. It is the razor thin layer of life on it's surface. The rock and dirt don't matter. It is the life that is in jeopardy.

And the 35 billion tons of carbon that humans inject into the atmosphere are altering the chemistry of the oceans and the atmosphere that is already resulting in the 6th major mass extinction.

 

[BluesLegend]

The 'Earth' isn't in danger. It is the razor thin layer of life on it's surface. The rock and dirt don't matter. It is the life that is in jeopardy.

And the 35 billion tons of carbon that humans inject into the atmosphere are altering the chemistry of the oceans and the atmosphere that is already resulting in the 6th major mass extinction.

Carbon is an essential building block of life.

 

[TheDude]

Scientists and liberals alike portray global-warming as man-caused. Okay, sure, let's say that's true. George Carlin once said "we won't destroy the Earth. Earth will shake us off like flees".

Point is, this business may simply be Earth's rejection of human population. It's HIGHLY possible the "Earth's intent" is to reduce or eliminate the human population. That's just how shit works.

We can talk man-caused global warming 24-7, but it's a wasted effort to assume we'll do anything about it, and be sure we won't. Liberal Hollywood is a prime example. They adamantly shriek man-caused global warming, playing the victim roll, all while they warm up their yachts, 10,000 square ft. homes, pools and private jets. In other terms, as long as human population isn't addressed, which it won't be, whether it's global warming, disease or otherwise, humans are fucked and we've earned it.

Bit cynical, don't you think? I do believe it's also wrong. The human race has fought environmental and biological treats before and won. Even global warming is being fought and some countries are actually on target to become carbon neutral over the next 20 years. As more of the effects of global warming start to hit the incentive to do something about it will also become more pronounced. I don't claim it'll be easy. I don't even claim it will be completely reversed. But using" it's to late so we don't need to address it" as a line of reasoning is wrong from both a moral and pragmatic standpoint.

carbon neutral? Ha!............... I'll believe that when I see it. Doesn't matter if they do, which they won't, because it doesn't address the primary problem.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

The sun came up today and it started warming up. I am quite concerned

 

[BluesLegend]

Scientists and liberals alike portray global-warming as man-caused. Okay, sure, let's say that's true. George Carlin once said "we won't destroy the Earth. Earth will shake us off like flees".

Point is, this business may simply be Earth's rejection of human population. It's HIGHLY possible the "Earth's intent" is to reduce or eliminate the human population. That's just how shit works.

We can talk man-caused global warming 24-7, but it's a wasted effort to assume we'll do anything about it, and be sure we won't. Liberal Hollywood is a prime example. They adamantly shriek man-caused global warming, playing the victim roll, all while they warm up their yachts, 10,000 square ft. homes, pools and private jets. In other terms, as long as human population isn't addressed, which it won't be, whether it's global warming, disease or otherwise, humans are fucked and we've earned it.

Bit cynical, don't you think? I do believe it's also wrong. The human race has fought environmental and biological treats before and won. Even global warming is being fought and some countries are actually on target to become carbon neutral over the next 20 years. As more of the effects of global warming start to hit the incentive to do something about it will also become more pronounced. I don't claim it'll be easy. I don't even claim it will be completely reversed. But using" it's to late so we don't need to address it" as a line of reasoning is wrong from both a moral and pragmatic standpoint.

carbon neutral? Ha!............... I'll believe that when I see it. Doesn't matter if they do, which they won't, because it doesn't address the primary problem.

Only liberals would demonize elements on the periodic table, talk about anti science.

 

[Timmy]

Scientists and liberals alike portray global-warming as man-caused. Okay, sure, let's say that's true. George Carlin once said "we won't destroy the Earth. Earth will shake us off like flees".

Point is, this business may simply be Earth's rejection of human population. It's HIGHLY possible the "Earth's intent" is to reduce or eliminate the human population. That's just how shit works.

We can talk man-caused global warming 24-7, but it's a wasted effort to assume we'll do anything about it, and be sure we won't. Liberal Hollywood is a prime example. They adamantly shriek man-caused global warming, playing the victim roll, all while they warm up their yachts, 10,000 square ft. homes, pools and private jets. In other terms, as long as human population isn't addressed, which it won't be, whether it's global warming, disease or otherwise, humans are fucked and we've earned it.

Funny how you mention Hollywood . California has been a world leader in fighting pollution . And you can see the results in fighting off smog for example .

It doesn't have to be all or nothing . You can use reason. We don't have to live in a tee pee in order to be an environmentalist.

 

[BluesLegend]

Scientists and liberals alike portray global-warming as man-caused. Okay, sure, let's say that's true. George Carlin once said "we won't destroy the Earth. Earth will shake us off like flees".

Point is, this business may simply be Earth's rejection of human population. It's HIGHLY possible the "Earth's intent" is to reduce or eliminate the human population. That's just how shit works.

We can talk man-caused global warming 24-7, but it's a wasted effort to assume we'll do anything about it, and be sure we won't. Liberal Hollywood is a prime example. They adamantly shriek man-caused global warming, playing the victim roll, all while they warm up their yachts, 10,000 square ft. homes, pools and private jets. In other terms, as long as human population isn't addressed, which it won't be, whether it's global warming, disease or otherwise, humans are fucked and we've earned it.

Funny how you mention Hollywood . California has been a world leader in fighting pollution . And you can see the results in fighting off smog for example .

It doesn't have to be all or nothing . You can use reason. We don't have to live in a tee pee in order to be an environmentalist.

Lib please how many lanes do California highways have now 20?

 

[TomParks]

God controls climate change period....man made climate change is a hoax

 

[IsaacNewton]

The 'Earth' isn't in danger. It is the razor thin layer of life on it's surface. The rock and dirt don't matter. It is the life that is in jeopardy.

And the 35 billion tons of carbon that humans inject into the atmosphere are altering the chemistry of the oceans and the atmosphere that is already resulting in the 6th major mass extinction.

Carbon is an essential building block of life.

So is iron, eat a pound of it.

 

[IsaacNewton]

Reality, the one thing that terrifies conservatives more than anything else.

 

[TheDude]

Reality, the one thing that terrifies conservatives more than anything else.

Sure sounds neat. Meanwhile it's liberals who lead ass first.

 

[BluesLegend]

The 'Earth' isn't in danger. It is the razor thin layer of life on it's surface. The rock and dirt don't matter. It is the life that is in jeopardy.

And the 35 billion tons of carbon that humans inject into the atmosphere are altering the chemistry of the oceans and the atmosphere that is already resulting in the 6th major mass extinction.

Carbon is an essential building block of life.

So is iron, eat a pound of it.

Your librage is noted, what other elements trigger you lib?

 

[Chuz Life]

Reality, the one thing that terrifies conservatives more than anything else.

Yeah.....

Ummmmm.....

Read my mind.

 

[Timmy]

Scientists and liberals alike portray global-warming as man-caused. Okay, sure, let's say that's true. George Carlin once said "we won't destroy the Earth. Earth will shake us off like flees".

Point is, this business may simply be Earth's rejection of human population. It's HIGHLY possible the "Earth's intent" is to reduce or eliminate the human population. That's just how shit works.

We can talk man-caused global warming 24-7, but it's a wasted effort to assume we'll do anything about it, and be sure we won't. Liberal Hollywood is a prime example. They adamantly shriek man-caused global warming, playing the victim roll, all while they warm up their yachts, 10,000 square ft. homes, pools and private jets. In other terms, as long as human population isn't addressed, which it won't be, whether it's global warming, disease or otherwise, humans are fucked and we've earned it.

Funny how you mention Hollywood . California has been a world leader in fighting pollution . And you can see the results in fighting off smog for example .

It doesn't have to be all or nothing . You can use reason. We don't have to live in a tee pee in order to be an environmentalist.

Lib please how many lanes do California highways have now 20?

What is your point ?

It is better than having 2 lanes of stopped traffic .

 

[BluesLegend]

Scientists and liberals alike portray global-warming as man-caused. Okay, sure, let's say that's true. George Carlin once said "we won't destroy the Earth. Earth will shake us off like flees".

Point is, this business may simply be Earth's rejection of human population. It's HIGHLY possible the "Earth's intent" is to reduce or eliminate the human population. That's just how shit works.

We can talk man-caused global warming 24-7, but it's a wasted effort to assume we'll do anything about it, and be sure we won't. Liberal Hollywood is a prime example. They adamantly shriek man-caused global warming, playing the victim roll, all while they warm up their yachts, 10,000 square ft. homes, pools and private jets. In other terms, as long as human population isn't addressed, which it won't be, whether it's global warming, disease or otherwise, humans are fucked and we've earned it.

Funny how you mention Hollywood . California has been a world leader in fighting pollution . And you can see the results in fighting off smog for example .

It doesn't have to be all or nothing . You can use reason. We don't have to live in a tee pee in order to be an environmentalist.

Lib please how many lanes do California highways have now 20?

What is your point ?

It is better than having 2 lanes of stopped traffic .

Those environment loving green Californian's have the highest number of registered vehicles in the country spewing pollution into the air.

 

[forkup]

Scientists and liberals alike portray global-warming as man-caused. Okay, sure, let's say that's true. George Carlin once said "we won't destroy the Earth. Earth will shake us off like flees".

Point is, this business may simply be Earth's rejection of human population. It's HIGHLY possible the "Earth's intent" is to reduce or eliminate the human population. That's just how shit works.

We can talk man-caused global warming 24-7, but it's a wasted effort to assume we'll do anything about it, and be sure we won't. Liberal Hollywood is a prime example. They adamantly shriek man-caused global warming, playing the victim roll, all while they warm up their yachts, 10,000 square ft. homes, pools and private jets. In other terms, as long as human population isn't addressed, which it won't be, whether it's global warming, disease or otherwise, humans are fucked and we've earned it.

Bit cynical, don't you think? I do believe it's also wrong. The human race has fought environmental and biological treats before and won. Even global warming is being fought and some countries are actually on target to become carbon neutral over the next 20 years. As more of the effects of global warming start to hit the incentive to do something about it will also become more pronounced. I don't claim it'll be easy. I don't even claim it will be completely reversed. But using" it's to late so we don't need to address it" as a line of reasoning is wrong from both a moral and pragmatic standpoint.

carbon neutral? Ha!............... I'll believe that when I see it. Doesn't matter if they do, which they won't, because it doesn't address the primary problem.

Only liberals would demonize elements on the periodic table, talk about anti science.

Fighting semantics because you don't want to fight the premise of what someone says, is a time old debating trick, used by those who are LOSING that debate.
Sweden commits to becoming carbon neutral by 2045 with new law
It's the name they given it.

 

[Timmy]

Scientists and liberals alike portray global-warming as man-caused. Okay, sure, let's say that's true. George Carlin once said "we won't destroy the Earth. Earth will shake us off like flees".

Point is, this business may simply be Earth's rejection of human population. It's HIGHLY possible the "Earth's intent" is to reduce or eliminate the human population. That's just how shit works.

We can talk man-caused global warming 24-7, but it's a wasted effort to assume we'll do anything about it, and be sure we won't. Liberal Hollywood is a prime example. They adamantly shriek man-caused global warming, playing the victim roll, all while they warm up their yachts, 10,000 square ft. homes, pools and private jets. In other terms, as long as human population isn't addressed, which it won't be, whether it's global warming, disease or otherwise, humans are fucked and we've earned it.

Funny how you mention Hollywood . California has been a world leader in fighting pollution . And you can see the results in fighting off smog for example .

It doesn't have to be all or nothing . You can use reason. We don't have to live in a tee pee in order to be an environmentalist.

Lib please how many lanes do California highways have now 20?

What is your point ?

It is better than having 2 lanes of stopped traffic .

Those environment loving green Californian's have the highest number of registered vehicles in the country spewing pollution into the air.

Yes . Because they have the most people . They also have the toughest emissions.