House Repub: Cannot release Epstein fight logs because colleagues would be compromised

[Muhammed]

Be honest, no party wants them released

How did you come to that conclusion?

 

[CarlinAnnArbor]

So, if the list is provided, what happens if some/most/all of the people are not involved in Epstein's sex escapades?

Are they guilty before innocent? A witch hunt? Reputation by association?

Well, Trump has always been guilty until proven innocent. Should apply to Democrats now too

 

[bigrebnc1775]

So, if the list is provided, what happens if some/most/all of the people are not involved in Epstein's sex escapades?

Are they guilty before innocent? A witch hunt? Reputation by association?

Ask prince Edwards

 

[Couchpotato]

I don't care. I want to know who in Congress or is a nominee or probable nominee who is on the list. Yeah, trump is probably on the list.

If Trumps name was on that list we’d know

 

[LeroyDumonde]

So, if the list is provided, what happens if some/most/all of the people are not involved in Epstein's sex escapades?

Are they guilty before innocent? A witch hunt? Reputation by association?

That's a good start. Powerful people don't associate with child sex traffickers in order to do good.

 

[bodecea]

Ask prince Edwards

"prince Edwards" Who is that?

 

[bodecea]

Billy Clinton was there 29 times. That makes him and his blue dress the #1 pedo. MAGA

Prove that statement...unless you are lying.


I guess you are lying then.

 

[Captain Caveman]

That's a good start. Powerful people don't associate with child sex traffickers in order to do good.

I remember once I was in a place of work where I inherited the branch as a manager. One guy had been there a number of years, but he couldn't get on with the staff. Eventually, I sacked him (employment law in the UK makes it hard to sack people). But a few years later, I left that company, and a year later, that guy was in the paper, jailed for having sex with a 13 yr old. So does that mean everyone who associated with him (work colleagues) are paedophiles? Obviously not.

So the people on Epstein's list need investigated, but not aired in public. Only those found guilty should then be named.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

"prince Edwards" Who is that?

Excuse me prince Andrew

The Royal Family's Troubling Connection to Jeffrey Epstein

Epstein's associate Ghislaine Maxwell, who also happens to be Prince Andrew's former friend, was just sentenced to 20 years in prison.

www.townandcountrymag.com

 

[JimH52]

Release the list or admit to totally corrupt government. One way or the other, it's up to the American people to vote out the would be coverup artists. If your representative is covering up this list, your representative sucks. No exceptions.

When the courts stepped in, the repubs say let the voters decide. But now they say, let us decide if the flight list is released. That is Hypocrisy.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

When the courts stepped in, the repubs say let the voters decide. But now they say, let us decide if the flight list is released. That is Hypocrisy.

No dumbass Republicans want the list released democrats not so much. I bet you would want to know if Trump was on the list.

 

[LeroyDumonde]

I remember once I was in a place of work where I inherited the branch as a manager. One guy had been there a number of years, but he couldn't get on with the staff. Eventually, I sacked him (employment law in the UK makes it hard to sack people). But a few years later, I left that company, and a year later, that guy was in the paper, jailed for having sex with a 13 yr old. So does that mean everyone who associated with him (work colleagues) are paedophiles? Obviously not.

So the people on Epstein's list need investigated, but not aired in public. Only those found guilty should then be named.

Thank you for providing a great example of how to intentionally miss the point of what I said.

 

[Captain Caveman]

Thank you for providing a great example of how to intentionally miss the point of what I said.

I intentionally ignored your point.

 

[ThunderKiss1965]

House Republican: Jeffrey Epstein flight logs not released because colleagues would be ‘compromised’

A House Republican contended that the flight logs from accused child sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein’s private jet haven’t been released because too many lawmakers could be “compromised” by their release.

www.washingtontimes.com

That is a good reason. He has to protect his buddies whose name appeared on Epstein's flight list.

Well aren't you a little disingenuous loon. Burchett is calling for the release of the flight records.

 

[strollingbones]

Ask prince Edwards

Prince andrew

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Prince andrew

Dumbass if you had looked I made the correction

 

[bodecea]

No dumbass Republicans want the list released democrats not so much. I bet you would want to know if Trump was on the list.

I am a Democrat and definitely want that list released.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

I am a Democrat and definitely want that list released.

Bull dyke the thread is a lie. But I don't recall you calling the op a liar

 

[mamooth]

No, President Trump is not on the list.

So why did push the BigLie about Biden showering with his daughter, a BigLie that even FOX News considers too depraved to push?

You must understand that doing that will send you to the SpecialHell. Yet you do it anyways, knowing that the SpecialHell awaits you.

Is it that you want to be sodomized by fiery spikey demons for all of eternity?

 

[mamooth]

Well aren't you a little disingenuous loon. Burchett is calling for the release of the flight records.

And who controls the House, and thus are the ones blocking that release?