Hottest August Ever Or Biggest Fraud Ever??

[jc456]

More bull shit from the cluelessly inept...

Billy, are you still claiming to have a Ph.D. in solar sciences, or are you officially abandoning that bullshit claim? After all, given how badly you stink at science and logic, nobody is buying it. You've shown no ability at anything except parroting nonsense from denier websites.

there you go along with Jiminey, nobody, really, are you sure or are you lying again. oh,oh,oh...you're lying!!!!!!! LoSiNg

You two are such an inclusive group. You really make me laugh.

 

[flacaltenn]

Cool everywhere, but still the warmest ever...ever wonder how they do it? Here are a couple of examples:

Not mamy temperature stations in Antarctica, but GISS manages to turn quite a large area in Antarctica that had an anomaly of -0.5 degrees into a +6.0 degree anomaly and claimed to do it with a precision of 0.01 degrees.

Look at Africa... very little coverage over most of the continent so they are free to just make it up as they go...and again, report that their fantasy is precise to 0,01 degrees....and the same thing happens over most of the earth since the temperature over most of the earth is not well measured...

Anyone who continues to believe these obvious and blatant fraudsters is, to put it bluntly, a fool.

Funniest part of this process is --- if they don't like the result after mucking with the sparse stations --- THEN they start merging satellite data !!!! This is NASA we're talking about here. Because satellite data is GOOD only if it gives the result you want..

 

[IanC]

Obviously it was neither the warmest August nor the biggest fraud but they did get another press release that will live forever on the internet long after it has been proven false.

 

[Crick]

I missed that Ian. Which post was it that proved NASA's comments false?

 

[jc456]

I missed that Ian. Which post was it that proved NASA's comments false?

Dude, you're such a k00k, perhaps you should reread what he posted. Me thinks you again jumped willy nilly again. LOL...You are a hoot though!!!!!

 

[IanC]

Obviously it was neither the warmest August nor the biggest fraud but they did get another press release that will live forever on the internet long after it has been proven false.

I would like to thank crick for pointing out my ackward use of English. I changed phrases in mid sentence and the superfluous 'been' changed the tense. Obviously I meant "...long after it has proven false".

Isn't it odd how so many of the areas around the world have such poor temperature measurements that infilling and estimates are needed just to assign any number at all yet areas with good spatial coverage, like the US, are belittled as only '2% of the surface'.

 

[SSDD]

Obviously it was neither the warmest August nor the biggest fraud but they did get another press release that will live forever on the internet long after it has been proven false.

I would like to thank crick for pointing out my ackward use of English. I changed phrases in mid sentence and the superfluous 'been' changed the tense. Obviously I meant "...long after it has proven false".

Isn't it odd how so many of the areas around the world have such poor temperature measurements that infilling and estimates are needed just to assign any number at all yet areas with good spatial coverage, like the US, are belittled as only '2% of the surface'.

And the places with the least data collection are invariably the hottest places on earth.

 

[Sallow]

So, August was cool in the US, parts of Siberia, South America, the southern part of Asia, western Europe, Antarctica, Africa, and Australia and either the first or second coldest August on record north of 80 degrees..

So what does NASA say? Two guesses and one of them isn't the truth. According to NASA, the world just experienced its hottest August on record?

Here is GISS vs RSS:

Exactly how far out there does one have to be to continue to believe the climate science establishment?

Yeah..that crazy Science Establishment.

Better to believe the oil companies, who's sole motivation is profit.

The planet be damned.

 

[Sallow]

We're going into a damn ice age and the AGW nutters stick to the established narrative no matter what.

Whats next? Global cooling due to global warming.


That's the next shill these fraudsters will come up with!!!

Wouldn't it be a kick in the head if 1) AGW is actually real and 2) Its really a defense against another Ice Age?

Maybe Ice ages are common in planets that support life, and the only way societies can flourish is to modify the atmosphere to prevent them.

Talk about evolution.

A DEFENSE AGAINST THE ICE AGE???

That's too much.

 

[martybegan]

We're going into a damn ice age and the AGW nutters stick to the established narrative no matter what.

Whats next? Global cooling due to global warming.


That's the next shill these fraudsters will come up with!!!

Wouldn't it be a kick in the head if 1) AGW is actually real and 2) Its really a defense against another Ice Age?

Maybe Ice ages are common in planets that support life, and the only way societies can flourish is to modify the atmosphere to prevent them.

Talk about evolution.

A DEFENSE AGAINST THE ICE AGE???

That's too much.

Why is it such a stretch? Life has been shown to preserve itself, and an Ice Age would be a catastrophic hit to our way of life and our civilization. Maybe a civilization has to reach a certain level of tech to protect itself from Ice Ages, and production of greenhouse gases to prevent them is a evolutionary defense.

We have people postulating that reason we seem so alone in the Galaxy is that civilizations kill themselves off once they reach a certain level of technology, who is to say that they need to also develop a certain level just to survive?

 

[martybegan]

Yeah..that crazy Science Establishment.

Better to believe the oil companies, who's sole motivation is profit.

The planet be damned.

As opposed to progressives, who's sole motive is power.

People who are motivated by profit are predictable and can be bought off.

People who want to control what you can do "for your own good" are far less predictable and are nearly impossible to buy off.

 

[jc456]

Yeah..that crazy Science Establishment.

Better to believe the oil companies, who's sole motivation is profit.

The planet be damned.

As opposed to progressives, who's sole motive is power.

People who are motivated by profit are predictable and can be bought off.

People who want to control what you can do "for your own good" are far less predictable and are nearly impossible to buy off.

And dangerous!!!!

 

[mamooth]

Life has been shown to preserve itself, and an Ice Age would be a catastrophic hit to our way of life and our civilization.

In 20,000 - 50,000 years. Do you understand the concept of the passage of time, and what 20,000 years means?

Your plan to warm the earth _now_ to defeat an ice age in 20,000 years would be like running the furnace full blast starting in June because winter will eventually arrive. It's a complete failure of common sense, same as almost all denier talk.

Stupidity causes much more harm than malice. Denier stupidity would cause global catastrophes, if anyone was dumb enough to listen to them.

 

[martybegan]

Life has been shown to preserve itself, and an Ice Age would be a catastrophic hit to our way of life and our civilization.

In 20,000 - 50,000 years. Do you understand the concept of the passage of time, and what 20,000 years means?

Your plan to warm the earth _now_ to defeat an ice age in 20,000 years would be like running the furnace full blast starting in June because winter will eventually arrive. It's a complete failure of common sense, same as almost all denier talk.

Stupidity causes much more harm than malice. Denier stupidity would cause global catastrophes, if anyone was dumb enough to listen to them.

This is speculation, nothing more. Your tired devotion to your pathetic religion makes anything posted in opposition to your cherished view something to be mocked. Its sad that AGW cultists such as yourself are so slavish and lacking of critical thinking.

 

[SSDD]

So, August was cool in the US, parts of Siberia, South America, the southern part of Asia, western Europe, Antarctica, Africa, and Australia and either the first or second coldest August on record north of 80 degrees..

So what does NASA say? Two guesses and one of them isn't the truth. According to NASA, the world just experienced its hottest August on record?

Here is GISS vs RSS:

Exactly how far out there does one have to be to continue to believe the climate science establishment?

Yeah..that crazy Science Establishment.

Better to believe the oil companies, who's sole motivation is profit.

The planet be damned.

Typical shallow liberal thinking....it is why you guys are the undisputed kings of unintended consequences....oil companies will make their money with or without a climate crisis... those involved in climate science, on the other hand need the crisis to keep the enormous amounts of money flowing...so which side is more likely to fudge in order to keep the money rolling in?

 

[Crick]

Typical SSDD non-thinking

 

[SSDD]

Typical SSDD non-thinking

No answer? Typical shallow thinking. You just can't escape what you are. Occam says that climate science is more likely to fudge since their livelihood is dependent on a climate crisis...no crisis...no money and it is back to trying to get a gig on the local news as a weatherman. If there is a crisis, oil companies make money...if there is no crisis...oil companies make money....the crisis benefits both....lack of crisis only hurts one.....the one who will be hurt by no crisis is therefore more likely to lie in order to maintain crisis.

 

[Crick]

Typical SSDD non-thinking

No answer?

Nothing worth responding to.

Typical shallow thinking.

From the man who flunked every branch of science offered. Man... that really burns.

You just can't escape what you are.

None of us can - in the short term. In the long term we can make all sorts of improvements. You, for instance, could learn how the world really works.

Occam says that climate science is more likely to fudge since their livelihood is dependent on a climate crisis...no crisis

Surely you must have known that you didn't have the faintest idea what ol' William said about anything. Didn't it occur to you that it might be a good idea to look the man up before making yourself look more idiotic than you already have?

...no money and it is back to trying to get a gig on the local news as a weatherman. If there is a crisis, oil companies make money...if there is no crisis...oil companies make money....the crisis benefits both....lack of crisis only hurts one.....the one who will be hurt by no crisis is therefore more likely to lie in order to maintain crisis.

Then, why don't all scientists lie all the time? We could have plagues of imaginary diseases. They could tell us that mystery insects are destroying all our food crops. NASA needs to blow up an asteroid right now. Research is about to invent teleportation, faster-than-light travel, telekinesis, making food from thin air, terraforming, room-temperature superconductors... all we need is more money. Right?


So stupid

 

[flacaltenn]

Typical SSDD non-thinking

No answer?

Nothing worth responding to.

Typical shallow thinking.

From the man who flunked every branch of science offered. Man... that really burns.

You just can't escape what you are.

None of us can - in the short term. In the long term we can make all sorts of improvements. You, for instance, could learn how the world really works.

Occam says that climate science is more likely to fudge since their livelihood is dependent on a climate crisis...no crisis

Surely you must have known that you didn't have the faintest idea what ol' William said about anything. Didn't it occur to you that it might be a good idea to look the man up before making yourself look more idiotic than you already have?

...no money and it is back to trying to get a gig on the local news as a weatherman. If there is a crisis, oil companies make money...if there is no crisis...oil companies make money....the crisis benefits both....lack of crisis only hurts one.....the one who will be hurt by no crisis is therefore more likely to lie in order to maintain crisis.

Then, why don't all scientists lie all the time? We could have plagues of imaginary diseases. They could tell us that mystery insects are destroying all our food crops. NASA needs to blow up an asteroid right now. Research is about to invent teleportation, faster-than-light travel, telekinesis, making food from thin air, terraforming, room-temperature superconductors... all we need is more money. Right?


So stupid

They tend to lie a lot more if the study is largely a public policy issue. And the money comes from orgs with indebtness to govt funding..

See 2nd hand smoke, renewables performance, forest management and others..

 

[Crick]

Then, why don't all scientists lie all the time? We could have plagues of imaginary diseases. They could tell us that mystery insects are destroying all our food crops. NASA needs to blow up an asteroid right now. Research is about to invent teleportation, faster-than-light travel, telekinesis, making food from thin air, terraforming, room-temperature superconductors... all we need is more money. Right?


So stupid

They tend to lie a lot more if the study is largely a public policy issue. And the money comes from orgs with indebtness to govt funding..

See 2nd hand smoke, renewables performance, forest management and others..

What did I list that wouldn't qualify? You think there's more money to be had from fraud in forest management than from fraud in public health?


That wasn't much of a response. The idea that climate scientists are all, as a group, lying to make money is just batshit crazy. Have some self respect. At least have enough self respect to steer clear of the complete whackos on your bus.