homeowners win case against bank

  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #2
When these homeowners get to court, they find a laundry list of shoddy practices that undercut lenders’ legal claim to foreclose, say consumer attorneys who have pursued these cases. Many cases are tainted by “robo-signers” who failed to properly review files, despite swearing under oath they had done so. Other title claims are undone by improper accounting, including unwarranted fees, and payments that were not credited.

Consumer attorneys also are attacking lenders’ effort to paper over missing links in the chain of documents required to prove that a bank owns a loan and has the right to foreclose. Some of those defective paper trails date to the sloppy underwriting that accompanied the frenzy of mortgage lending in the 2000s, when hundreds of now-defunct lenders churned out a blizzard of notes that were instantly offloaded to investors.

“There are more (homeowner) claims because lenders operated in flagrant disregard of the law,” said Diana Thompson, a veteran consumer attorney with the National Consumer Law Center. “You only have a claim against the lender if the lender didn't do what they were supposed to do.”


http://economywatch.msnbc.msn.com/_...ers-battle-banks-to-stop-foreclosures-and-win
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #3
This is who the right wants to have complete control of uor country.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #5
this is what deregulation gets the American people you fool
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #7
The bill Clinton signed was never implimented by Bush and team
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #8
SEC Votes for Final Rules Defining How Banks Can Be Securities Brokers
Eight Years After Passage of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, Key Provisions Will Now Be Implemented
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
2007-190
Washington, D.C., Sept. 19, 2007 - Ending eight years of stalled negotiations and impasse, the Commission today voted to adopt, jointly with the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Board), new rules that will finally implement the bank broker provisions of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999. The Board will consider these final rules at its Sept. 24, 2007 meeting. The Commission and the Board consulted with and sought the concurrence of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and Office of Thrift Supervision.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #9
They gamed the regulations in the bill so they were not implimented until AFTER this mess was made by the republicans
 
Do you even fucking care your assholes ruined so many American lives?
 
This is who the right wants to have complete control of uor country.


laugh3.gif
laugh3.gif
laugh3.gif
laugh3.gif
laugh3.gif
 
funny how you people just ignore that the banks cheated like fucking criminals
 
The Bush team held back all the protections for YEARS in the GLB act.


It is cold hard court documented fact.

The banks broke what laws were left anyway.

They are who you want deregulated.

So they can distroy lives with impunity
 
funny how you people just ignore that the banks cheated like fucking criminals


I don't care what the banks did or did not do. The borrower is the one who signs on the lines and AGREES to it all.


No one forced anyone to purchase a home they could not afford. Its too bad that greed for more then what you can pay for is what put so many people into this situation.
 
defending the banks for cheating the American people is who the right is in this country now
 
Its like your party doesnt care about voters.

You cant cheat enough to win with that platform
 
And hopefully the off shot of all of this is that banks will go back to the old practices of demanding 20-30% cash down on a mortgage before they even consider giving anyone a loan


But then of course the the likes of liesmatters will all scream...... the poor the poor.... no one will lend to the poor.
 

Forum List

Back
Top