Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Their assertion that they need these guns to protect themselves from the government as supposedly the Jews would have done against the Hitler regime means not only that they are innocent of any knowledge and understanding of the past, but also that they are consciously or not imbued with the type of fascist or Bolshevik thinking that they can turn against a democratically elected government, indeed turn their guns on it, just because they dont like its policies, its ideology, or the color, race and origin of its leaders.
Great article. I especially liked this bit, that exposes the basic retardation of rightwingnutters:
The law did prohibit Jews and other persecuted classes from owning guns, but this should not be an indictment of gun control in general. Does the fact that Nazis forced Jews into horrendous ghettos indict urban planning? Should we eliminate all police officers because the Nazis used police officers to oppress and kill the Jews? What about public works Hitler loved public works projects? Of course not. These are merely implements that can be used for good or ill, much as gun advocates like to argue about guns themselves. If guns dont kill people, then neither does gun control cause genocide (genocidal regimes cause genocide).
"The law did prohibit Jews and other persecuted classes from owning guns, but this should not be an indictment of gun control in general."
And Liberals defend it
Now you Libberhoids are defending Hitler?
Much like you nutters would pee your pants if immigrants were allowed to own guns.Great article. I especially liked this bit, that exposes the basic retardation of rightwingnutters:
The law did prohibit Jews and other persecuted classes from owning guns, but this should not be an indictment of gun control in general. Does the fact that Nazis forced Jews into horrendous ghettos indict urban planning? Should we eliminate all police officers because the Nazis used police officers to oppress and kill the Jews? What about public works Hitler loved public works projects? Of course not. These are merely implements that can be used for good or ill, much as gun advocates like to argue about guns themselves. If guns dont kill people, then neither does gun control cause genocide (genocidal regimes cause genocide).
Why yes your circular logic overides that Hitler disarmed the very ones he attempted to exterminate.
For certain elite class, genetically pure citizens.
Obama will do the same.
Great article. I especially liked this bit, that exposes the basic retardation of rightwingnutters:
The law did prohibit Jews and other persecuted classes from owning guns, but this should not be an indictment of gun control in general. Does the fact that Nazis forced Jews into horrendous ghettos indict urban planning? Should we eliminate all police officers because the Nazis used police officers to oppress and kill the Jews? What about public works — Hitler loved public works projects? Of course not. These are merely implements that can be used for good or ill, much as gun advocates like to argue about guns themselves. If guns don’t kill people, then neither does gun control cause genocide (genocidal regimes cause genocide).
"The law did prohibit Jews and other persecuted classes from owning guns, but this should not be an indictment of gun control in general."
And Liberals defend it
Great article. I especially liked this bit, that exposes the basic retardation of rightwingnutters:
The law did prohibit Jews and other persecuted classes from owning guns, but this should not be an indictment of gun control in general. Does the fact that Nazis forced Jews into horrendous ghettos indict urban planning? Should we eliminate all police officers because the Nazis used police officers to oppress and kill the Jews? What about public works Hitler loved public works projects? Of course not. These are merely implements that can be used for good or ill, much as gun advocates like to argue about guns themselves. If guns dont kill people, then neither does gun control cause genocide (genocidal regimes cause genocide).
Why yes your circular logic overides that Hitler disarmed the very ones he attempted to exterminate.
"The law did prohibit Jews and other persecuted classes from owning guns, but this should not be an indictment of gun control in general."
And Liberals defend it
They destroy their own arguments with their own words and don't even know it. That is why the term "libtards" is so appropriate.
Much like you nutters would pee your pants if immigrants were allowed to own guns.Great article. I especially liked this bit, that exposes the basic retardation of rightwingnutters:
The law did prohibit Jews and other persecuted classes from owning guns, but this should not be an indictment of gun control in general. Does the fact that Nazis forced Jews into horrendous ghettos indict urban planning? Should we eliminate all police officers because the Nazis used police officers to oppress and kill the Jews? What about public works Hitler loved public works projects? Of course not. These are merely implements that can be used for good or ill, much as gun advocates like to argue about guns themselves. If guns dont kill people, then neither does gun control cause genocide (genocidal regimes cause genocide).
Why yes your circular logic overides that Hitler disarmed the very ones he attempted to exterminate.