Hitler actually deregulated guns

[OohPooPahDoo]

Another NRA myth exposed

The Hitler gun control lie - Salon.com

 

[Warrior102]

Now you Libberhoids are defending Hitler?

 

[OODA_Loop]

For certain elite class, genetically pure citizens.

Obama will do the same.

 

[Ravi]

Great article. I especially liked this bit, that exposes the basic retardation of rightwingnutters:

The law did prohibit Jews and other persecuted classes from owning guns, but this should not be an indictment of gun control in general. Does the fact that Nazis forced Jews into horrendous ghettos indict urban planning? Should we eliminate all police officers because the Nazis used police officers to oppress and kill the Jews? What about public works — Hitler loved public works projects? Of course not. These are merely implements that can be used for good or ill, much as gun advocates like to argue about guns themselves. If guns don’t kill people, then neither does gun control cause genocide (genocidal regimes cause genocide).

 

[CrusaderFrank]

"The law did prohibit Jews and other persecuted classes from owning guns, but this should not be an indictment of gun control in general."

And Liberals defend it

 

[Ravi]

I'm also surprised he didn't name Frances as this explains him to a tee:

“Their assertion that they need these guns to protect themselves from the government — as supposedly the Jews would have done against the Hitler regime — means not only that they are innocent of any knowledge and understanding of the past, but also that they are consciously or not imbued with the type of fascist or Bolshevik thinking that they can turn against a democratically elected government, indeed turn their guns on it, just because they don’t like its policies, its ideology, or the color, race and origin of its leaders.

Crusader Frances, fascist wingnut.

 

[OODA_Loop]

Great article. I especially liked this bit, that exposes the basic retardation of rightwingnutters:

The law did prohibit Jews and other persecuted classes from owning guns, but this should not be an indictment of gun control in general. Does the fact that Nazis forced Jews into horrendous ghettos indict urban planning? Should we eliminate all police officers because the Nazis used police officers to oppress and kill the Jews? What about public works — Hitler loved public works projects? Of course not. These are merely implements that can be used for good or ill, much as gun advocates like to argue about guns themselves. If guns don’t kill people, then neither does gun control cause genocide (genocidal regimes cause genocide).

Why yes your circular logic overides that Hitler disarmed the very ones he attempted to exterminate.

 

[USNavyVet]

"The law did prohibit Jews and other persecuted classes from owning guns, but this should not be an indictment of gun control in general."

And Liberals defend it

They destroy their own arguments with their own words and don't even know it. That is why the term "libtards" is so appropriate.

 

[OohPooPahDoo]

Now you Libberhoids are defending Hitler?

No one is defending hitler you inbred piece of stupid.

 

[Ravi]

Great article. I especially liked this bit, that exposes the basic retardation of rightwingnutters:

The law did prohibit Jews and other persecuted classes from owning guns, but this should not be an indictment of gun control in general. Does the fact that Nazis forced Jews into horrendous ghettos indict urban planning? Should we eliminate all police officers because the Nazis used police officers to oppress and kill the Jews? What about public works — Hitler loved public works projects? Of course not. These are merely implements that can be used for good or ill, much as gun advocates like to argue about guns themselves. If guns don’t kill people, then neither does gun control cause genocide (genocidal regimes cause genocide).

Why yes your circular logic overides that Hitler disarmed the very ones he attempted to exterminate.

Much like you nutters would pee your pants if immigrants were allowed to own guns.

 

[OohPooPahDoo]

For certain elite class, genetically pure citizens.

Obama will do the same.

I'm guessing you had a clumsy mother and grew up in a home with hard floors.

 

[007]

The depth of LUNACY and HYPOCRISY of the SPIN that the leftist obama defenders will go to is absolutely MIND NUMBING.

Now they're defending HITLER to further their agenda.

 

[OohPooPahDoo]

Great article. I especially liked this bit, that exposes the basic retardation of rightwingnutters:

The law did prohibit Jews and other persecuted classes from owning guns, but this should not be an indictment of gun control in general. Does the fact that Nazis forced Jews into horrendous ghettos indict urban planning? Should we eliminate all police officers because the Nazis used police officers to oppress and kill the Jews? What about public works — Hitler loved public works projects? Of course not. These are merely implements that can be used for good or ill, much as gun advocates like to argue about guns themselves. If guns don’t kill people, then neither does gun control cause genocide (genocidal regimes cause genocide).

The true teabagger nutpartier does hate cops and public works. Cops are a tool of big Obammdummy gubment - and gubment has NO RIGHT to tell us what we can and can't do!

 

[OohPooPahDoo]

"The law did prohibit Jews and other persecuted classes from owning guns, but this should not be an indictment of gun control in general."

And Liberals defend it

You should be more worried about the folks who defend retards because you're gonna need someone to stick up for you some day.

 

[OohPooPahDoo]

Hey everyone - everything LIBRUL= HITLER - and anyone who uses "history" to show otherwise is DEFENDING HITLER!!!

Nice argument rightwingers! Don't you guys have a lawn service business to go run now?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Raise you right hand if you believe American gun laws are too lax

 

[Wry Catcher]

Great article. I especially liked this bit, that exposes the basic retardation of rightwingnutters:

The law did prohibit Jews and other persecuted classes from owning guns, but this should not be an indictment of gun control in general. Does the fact that Nazis forced Jews into horrendous ghettos indict urban planning? Should we eliminate all police officers because the Nazis used police officers to oppress and kill the Jews? What about public works — Hitler loved public works projects? Of course not. These are merely implements that can be used for good or ill, much as gun advocates like to argue about guns themselves. If guns don’t kill people, then neither does gun control cause genocide (genocidal regimes cause genocide).

Why yes your circular logic overides that Hitler disarmed the very ones he attempted to exterminate.

He "attempted to exterminate? I hope this was inadvertent and you don't deny the Holocaust too.

 

[OohPooPahDoo]

"The law did prohibit Jews and other persecuted classes from owning guns, but this should not be an indictment of gun control in general."

And Liberals defend it

They destroy their own arguments with their own words and don't even know it. That is why the term "libtards" is so appropriate.

The argument that Hitler made guns illegal ISN'T OUR ARGUMENT you fucking ignorant twit. Its the NRA's argument and it is FACTUALLY WRONG.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

"We are socialists, we are enemies of today's capitalistic economic system for the exploitation of the economically weak, with its unfair salaries, with its unseemingly evaluation of a human being according to wealth and prosperity instead of responsibility and performance, and we are determined to destroy their system under all conditions." -- Adolf Hitler, Progressive

 

[mudwhistle]

Great article. I especially liked this bit, that exposes the basic retardation of rightwingnutters:

The law did prohibit Jews and other persecuted classes from owning guns, but this should not be an indictment of gun control in general. Does the fact that Nazis forced Jews into horrendous ghettos indict urban planning? Should we eliminate all police officers because the Nazis used police officers to oppress and kill the Jews? What about public works — Hitler loved public works projects? Of course not. These are merely implements that can be used for good or ill, much as gun advocates like to argue about guns themselves. If guns don’t kill people, then neither does gun control cause genocide (genocidal regimes cause genocide).

Why yes your circular logic overides that Hitler disarmed the very ones he attempted to exterminate.

Much like you nutters would pee your pants if immigrants were allowed to own guns.

What kind of immigrants?

It's clear that Hitler believed in double-standards like Democrats. He made sure that his victims were disarmed so they couldn't defend themselves.