Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
"It has nothing to do with newly purchased land back then", and thank you for a smart statement. Maybe Rota and the others will stop talking about the past.
We deal with what we have now. More than 11 mm illegals, millions of birth right citizens, and the need to control immigration.
One, the illegals most of them are not going "home" because they are home.
Two, the birthright citizens and most of the other legal Hispanics are going to vote against anyone who talks deportations and walls.
So, Three, lets set down and talk reform.
Lying about the past, you meanLetting them in legally.
Our Constitution says the Government is suppose to protect our borders from invasion.
Not let in hundreds of children coming in illegally by ignoring the laws.
Not letting drug cartels store their drugs in American caves.
Uhm, no. That is not the reason why the treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo did not specify closed borders.
Think it through again. Let's see if you can figure this out.
That treaty has nothing to do with it.
The Mexican Government worked with the US government to deport them in 1954.
You need to rethink it.
No. You missed the point, because you are uneducated about this.
The reason why a closed border was NOT specified in the treaty was because, after Mexico's crushing loss in the war in the mid 1800's and the ceding of so much land to us, after the treaty was signed, many, many, many Mexicans suddenly found themselves overnight on OUR side of the border and wanted to go home. The best way to do this was with an open border, where they could pack up their stuff and simply go.
You see, educating yourself just a wee bit can go a long way.
I do not advocate for an open border. But the Righties are missing the real ports of entry for the majority of illegal immigrants who get here, namely via air and seaports on all three coasts.
You are the one not educated.
90% choose to remain in the new USA land.
10% wanted to go back to Mexico.
Totally different situation than what is happening today.
That has nothing to do with today, too many are here illegally, whether it be crossing the borders or overstaying their visas.
It has nothing to do with newly purchased land back then.
every time their bankrupt ideas and logic get's shot down with facts, they retreat to the standard fallback position of talking about the past.
Yes that is what the far right does.Lying about the past, you meanUhm, no. That is not the reason why the treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo did not specify closed borders.
Think it through again. Let's see if you can figure this out.
That treaty has nothing to do with it.
The Mexican Government worked with the US government to deport them in 1954.
You need to rethink it.
No. You missed the point, because you are uneducated about this.
The reason why a closed border was NOT specified in the treaty was because, after Mexico's crushing loss in the war in the mid 1800's and the ceding of so much land to us, after the treaty was signed, many, many, many Mexicans suddenly found themselves overnight on OUR side of the border and wanted to go home. The best way to do this was with an open border, where they could pack up their stuff and simply go.
You see, educating yourself just a wee bit can go a long way.
I do not advocate for an open border. But the Righties are missing the real ports of entry for the majority of illegal immigrants who get here, namely via air and seaports on all three coasts.
You are the one not educated.
90% choose to remain in the new USA land.
10% wanted to go back to Mexico.
Totally different situation than what is happening today.
That has nothing to do with today, too many are here illegally, whether it be crossing the borders or overstaying their visas.
It has nothing to do with newly purchased land back then.
every time their bankrupt ideas and logic get's shot down with facts, they retreat to the standard fallback position of talking about the past.
No. No No No. You lie, you lie and you lie.This President
- has engaged in human trafficking to bring illegals into the US against existing Immigration policy
- refuses to enforce existing Immigration Law
- defends cities that violate US law and provides safe haven to violent illegals
-- 'FOR OPEN BORDERS'!
Mexico requires voter IDs while Liberals Obama refuses to allow them. Obama even went to Africa and helped them set up their own voter ID system...but opposes it back at home. Last election a woman bragged how she voted for Obama 6 times to help him win. After she was arrested Obama sent Atty General Eric Holder to drop the charges against her....
-- Does NOT Require Voter ID
Jake Starkey, get your head out of CNN's / Obama's / the DNC's rear and join us in the REAL WORLD.
I was a republican and I will not vote as a republican again..... It's because of these stupid Rightwingers.I am not a dem and your are not GOP. You are a reactionary far right wing xenophobic nativist. We will lose this election to the Dems because of folks like you.We have 11 no more than 12 mm illegals in the country. We have millions of their citizen children. A wall and a deportation will not happen. Let's get to work on a bill again. Use the Senate bill and go from there.
No new bill is needed. We have sufficient laws already on the books. What you dems want is amnesty because you see millions of potential dem voters----------and you fricken well know thats what this is really all about.
Well, it depends on how you want to define it.
Actually, our treaty with Mexico never demanded a closed border, and there is a reason for this.
Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Letting them in legally.
Our Constitution says the Government is suppose to protect our borders from invasion.
Not let in hundreds of children coming in illegally by ignoring the laws.
Not letting drug cartels store their drugs in American caves.
Uhm, no. That is not the reason why the treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo did not specify closed borders.
Think it through again. Let's see if you can figure this out.
That treaty has nothing to do with it.
The Mexican Government worked with the US government to deport them in 1954.
You need to rethink it.
No. You missed the point, because you are uneducated about this.
The reason why a closed border was NOT specified in the treaty was because, after Mexico's crushing loss in the war in the mid 1800's and the ceding of so much land to us, after the treaty was signed, many, many, many Mexicans suddenly found themselves overnight on OUR side of the border and wanted to go home. The best way to do this was with an open border, where they could pack up their stuff and simply go.
You see, educating yourself just a wee bit can go a long way.
I do not advocate for an open border. But the Righties are missing the real ports of entry for the majority of illegal immigrants who get here, namely via air and seaports on all three coasts.
You are the one not educated.
90% choose to remain in the new USA land.
10% wanted to go back to Mexico.
Totally different situation than what is happening today.
That has nothing to do with today, too many are here illegally, whether it be crossing the borders or overstaying their visas.
It has nothing to do with newly purchased land back then.
My parents came here in 1930 is that mean they are branded as murderers? That my question. Not cutting lines.
I guess only American citizens have to obey the law.
I'm confused, the establishment keeps telling us these are just good honest law abiding people looking for work? /sarcasm
Letting them in legally.
Our Constitution says the Government is suppose to protect our borders from invasion.
Not let in hundreds of children coming in illegally by ignoring the laws.
Not letting drug cartels store their drugs in American caves.
Uhm, no. That is not the reason why the treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo did not specify closed borders.
Think it through again. Let's see if you can figure this out.
That treaty has nothing to do with it.
The Mexican Government worked with the US government to deport them in 1954.
You need to rethink it.
No. You missed the point, because you are uneducated about this.
The reason why a closed border was NOT specified in the treaty was because, after Mexico's crushing loss in the war in the mid 1800's and the ceding of so much land to us, after the treaty was signed, many, many, many Mexicans suddenly found themselves overnight on OUR side of the border and wanted to go home. The best way to do this was with an open border, where they could pack up their stuff and simply go.
You see, educating yourself just a wee bit can go a long way.
I do not advocate for an open border. But the Righties are missing the real ports of entry for the majority of illegal immigrants who get here, namely via air and seaports on all three coasts.
You are the one not educated.
90% choose to remain in the new USA land.
10% wanted to go back to Mexico.
Totally different situation than what is happening today.
That has nothing to do with today, too many are here illegally, whether it be crossing the borders or overstaying their visas.
It has nothing to do with newly purchased land back then.
That is statistically very highly unlikely.
Where are your stats to back such a claim up?
prove it, then. Prove the number of illegals here is what you claim.....you can't you just make up random numbers.We have 11 no more than 12 mm illegals in the country. We have millions of their citizen children. A wall and a deportation will not happen. Let's get to work on a bill again. Use the Senate bill and go from there.
I am not a dem and your are not GOP. You are a reactionary far right wing xenophobic nativist. We will lose this election to the Dems because of folks like you.We have 11 no more than 12 mm illegals in the country. We have millions of their citizen children. A wall and a deportation will not happen. Let's get to work on a bill again. Use the Senate bill and go from there.
No new bill is needed. We have sufficient laws already on the books. What you dems want is amnesty because you see millions of potential dem voters----------and you fricken well know thats what this is really all about.
Oh another fake Republican, disgusted that we aren't more like dems.I was a republican and I will not vote as a republican again..... It's because of these stupid Rightwingers.I am not a dem and your are not GOP. You are a reactionary far right wing xenophobic nativist. We will lose this election to the Dems because of folks like you.We have 11 no more than 12 mm illegals in the country. We have millions of their citizen children. A wall and a deportation will not happen. Let's get to work on a bill again. Use the Senate bill and go from there.
No new bill is needed. We have sufficient laws already on the books. What you dems want is amnesty because you see millions of potential dem voters----------and you fricken well know thats what this is really all about.
Who used the word completely?
Well, it depends on how you want to define it.
Actually, our treaty with Mexico never demanded a closed border, and there is a reason for this.
Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Letting them in legally.
Our Constitution says the Government is suppose to protect our borders from invasion.
Not let in hundreds of children coming in illegally by ignoring the laws.
Not letting drug cartels store their drugs in American caves.
Uhm, no. That is not the reason why the treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo did not specify closed borders.
Think it through again. Let's see if you can figure this out.
That treaty has nothing to do with it.
The Mexican Government worked with the US government to deport them in 1954.
You need to rethink it.
No. You missed the point, because you are uneducated about this.
The reason why a closed border was NOT specified in the treaty was because, after Mexico's crushing loss in the war in the mid 1800's and the ceding of so much land to us, after the treaty was signed, many, many, many Mexicans suddenly found themselves overnight on OUR side of the border and wanted to go home. The best way to do this was with an open border, where they could pack up their stuff and simply go.
You see, educating yourself just a wee bit can go a long way.
I do not advocate for an open border. But the Righties are missing the real ports of entry for the majority of illegal immigrants who get here, namely via air and seaports on all three coasts.
"It has nothing to do with newly purchased land back then", and thank you for a smart statement. Maybe Rota and the others will stop talking about the past.
We deal with what we have now. More than 11 mm illegals, millions of birth right citizens, and the need to control immigration.
One, the illegals most of them are not going "home" because they are home.
Two, the birthright citizens and most of the other legal Hispanics are going to vote against anyone who talks deportations and walls.
So, Three, lets set down and talk reform.
Won't happen. My number have been posted dozens of times on the Board so no you and the idjits don't get "just once more." Your day is over.prove it, then. Prove the number of illegals here is what you claim.....you can't you just make up random numbers.We have 11 no more than 12 mm illegals in the country. We have millions of their citizen children. A wall and a deportation will not happen. Let's get to work on a bill again. Use the Senate bill and go from there.
nahh..we've had enough chatter from the left..heard all the excuses.
deport.all.illegals.
Racists are the assholes of the world. And when they try to take over a wing of my GOP, I will point them out 7 x 7 years.spends the last 7 years smearing and lying about the opposition and making snarky comments to grandstand and try to rub opponents noses in the fact that they lost the elections...chickens are coming home to roost now and it's getting uncomfortable so he "changes" sides...comical..
I'm glad you mentioned. Most hispanics are family oriented hardworking, free enterprise, freedom."It has nothing to do with newly purchased land back then", and thank you for a smart statement. Maybe Rota and the others will stop talking about the past.
We deal with what we have now. More than 11 mm illegals, millions of birth right citizens, and the need to control immigration.
One, the illegals most of them are not going "home" because they are home.
Two, the birthright citizens and most of the other legal Hispanics are going to vote against anyone who talks deportations and walls.
So, Three, lets set down and talk reform.
yeah, we get it. 'reform' to you leftists means 'amnesty' and new dem voters. We know what this is really about, but whats funny is that the hispanic population is also turning away from the dem/lib party. Most hispanics are family oriented, religious, hard working people who embrace freedom and free enterprise. They are seeing through the fraud that is dem/liberalism.
You libs had your chance and you blew it with the kenyan fraud. I find that very funny..
