Fiona Hill’s Lawyer Says Sondland Lied!!
The lawyer for Fiona Hill, a key witness in the House impeachment inquiry, accused Gordon Sondland, the U.S. ambassador to the European Union, of lying in his testimony about interactions with her.
“Sondland has fabricated communications with Dr. Hill, none of which were over coffee,” Lee Wolosky said in a tweet Wednesday. Sondland had testified that he and Hill had a coffee at the time she left her job as a senior aide on the White House’s National Security Council. Sondland said she had never expressed “critical comments” to him about President Donald Trump’s policy toward Ukraine.
“Dr. Hill told Sondland what she told lawmakers — the lack of coordination on Ukraine was disastrous,” Wolosky tweeted, and said the forcing out of Marie Yovanovitch, the ambassador to Ukraine, was “shameful.”
(Excerpt) Read more at news-yahoo-com.cdn.ampproject.org ...
------------
A.) Sondland didn’t know and still doesn’t why aid was held up.
He, as said here, “presumed” it was because of corruption. Kellyanne brought this up.
He then told Yermak his assumption.
Presumption and assuming on Sondland’s part don’t prove anything and certainly not quid pro quo.
As said here, he supposedly tells Yermak the aid may not be released without an anti-corruption statement.
Again, as stated here, Sondland says this was also based upon an assumption.
Sondland also said when he spoke with Trump that Trump wanted no quid pro quo with Ukraine.
It is either the aforementioned, or B.) Sondland flipped.
If he did flip his script was he lying then or now? If he is lying his testimony is not credible.
And he should be indicted for LYING BEFORE CONGRESS!
The lawyer for Fiona Hill, a key witness in the House impeachment inquiry, accused Gordon Sondland, the U.S. ambassador to the European Union, of lying in his testimony about interactions with her.
“Sondland has fabricated communications with Dr. Hill, none of which were over coffee,” Lee Wolosky said in a tweet Wednesday. Sondland had testified that he and Hill had a coffee at the time she left her job as a senior aide on the White House’s National Security Council. Sondland said she had never expressed “critical comments” to him about President Donald Trump’s policy toward Ukraine.
“Dr. Hill told Sondland what she told lawmakers — the lack of coordination on Ukraine was disastrous,” Wolosky tweeted, and said the forcing out of Marie Yovanovitch, the ambassador to Ukraine, was “shameful.”
(Excerpt) Read more at news-yahoo-com.cdn.ampproject.org ...
------------
A.) Sondland didn’t know and still doesn’t why aid was held up.
He, as said here, “presumed” it was because of corruption. Kellyanne brought this up.
He then told Yermak his assumption.
Presumption and assuming on Sondland’s part don’t prove anything and certainly not quid pro quo.
As said here, he supposedly tells Yermak the aid may not be released without an anti-corruption statement.
Again, as stated here, Sondland says this was also based upon an assumption.
Sondland also said when he spoke with Trump that Trump wanted no quid pro quo with Ukraine.
It is either the aforementioned, or B.) Sondland flipped.
If he did flip his script was he lying then or now? If he is lying his testimony is not credible.
And he should be indicted for LYING BEFORE CONGRESS!
