Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
O care is patterned after the UK's NHS, and that system is failing. That's the problem with any of these set ups. They are not going to address the problem of the US health care system because the trial lawyers association makes too much money off of lawsuits.
The reality of the situation is more people have to pay more for less than before. That IS the reality of the situation. The US can afford a better health care system than we had, and most certainly better than what is being shoved down our throats. If you weren't so mindlessly partisan you would admit it.
Sorry pal...but that is one of the dumbest posts you have ever made. Do you think before you post?
Obamacare is nothing close to the UKs universal healthcare. Universal healthcare has the government running hospitals and doctors working for the government
Obamacare is patterned after Romneycare and the plan from the GOP Heritage think tank
Yes, I do. Why don't you? It takes a while for a system as large as the UK's NHS to collapse, but collapse it is doing. It is failing to provide adequate care to it's patients so they are dying in higher numbers now, than before NHS was instigated. That is what's known as a fact. O care is likewise a disaster. Those of us who had health insurance now have to pay for more, and we get less for it, than before. The NET increase in people with health insurance with all of the bullshit, is 3 million. The net cost to get those 3 million insured is greater than the benefits that will be received.
You used to make decent posts but I see those days are now past. That's a shame.
And once again. Can somebody...ANYBODY, show us an accomplishment that Hillary has under her belt? Anybody?....Bueller?
When given a chance to save yourself, you double down on dumb
Claiming Obamacare remotely resembles Britains national healthcare only solidifies that
But that is what the rightwing propaganda machine dictates, so what else can you expect?
I didn't say it resembled it. I said it was going to FAIL just like it. Can you not discern the difference? Were O care so damned good, why did they delay implementation? Why did they allow the multinational corporations to opt out? Why did they do everything to benefit the insurance companies, but not those who are going to paying for it?
And, once again, TELL US WHAT THE FUCK HILLARY HAS DONE THAT YOU THINK MAKES HER SO DAMNED GREAT A CANDIDATE!
It's a simple question and you fluffers have been avoiding that for 34 pages! ANSWER THE DAMNED QUESTION!
You said "O care is patterned after the UKs NHS" in post 327. Backtracking now does not change the record.
Why are you lying now?
If you bother to read the thread you are posting in, you can see I addressed it multiple times. You are free to respond too any of themSorry pal...but that is one of the dumbest posts you have ever made. Do you think before you post?
Obamacare is nothing close to the UKs universal healthcare. Universal healthcare has the government running hospitals and doctors working for the government
Obamacare is patterned after Romneycare and the plan from the GOP Heritage think tank
Yes, I do. Why don't you? It takes a while for a system as large as the UK's NHS to collapse, but collapse it is doing. It is failing to provide adequate care to it's patients so they are dying in higher numbers now, than before NHS was instigated. That is what's known as a fact. O care is likewise a disaster. Those of us who had health insurance now have to pay for more, and we get less for it, than before. The NET increase in people with health insurance with all of the bullshit, is 3 million. The net cost to get those 3 million insured is greater than the benefits that will be received.
You used to make decent posts but I see those days are now past. That's a shame.
And once again. Can somebody...ANYBODY, show us an accomplishment that Hillary has under her belt? Anybody?....Bueller?
When given a chance to save yourself, you double down on dumb
Claiming Obamacare remotely resembles Britains national healthcare only solidifies that
But that is what the rightwing propaganda machine dictates, so what else can you expect?
I didn't say it resembled it. I said it was going to FAIL just like it. Can you not discern the difference? Were O care so damned good, why did they delay implementation? Why did they allow the multinational corporations to opt out? Why did they do everything to benefit the insurance companies, but not those who are going to paying for it?
And, once again, TELL US WHAT THE FUCK HILLARY HAS DONE THAT YOU THINK MAKES HER SO DAMNED GREAT A CANDIDATE!
It's a simple question and you fluffers have been avoiding that for 34 pages! ANSWER THE DAMNED QUESTION!
You said "O care is patterned after the UKs NHS" in post 327. Backtracking now does not change the record.
Why are you lying now?
Are you ever going to address the OP or are you going to continue to post irrelevant BS to try and cover for the fact that Hillary has ZERO accomplishments to her name? 35 pages of doing EVERYTHING but listing a single damned accomplishment for this woman. What the hell is wrong with you people...
The United States health care system is the most expensive in the world, but this report and prior editions consistently show the U.S. underperforms relative to other countries on most dimensions of performance. Among the 11 nations studied in this report—Australia, Canada, France, Germany, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States—the U.S. ranks last, as it did in the 2010, 2007, 2006, and 2004 editions
Mirror Mirror on the Wall 2014 Update How the U.S. Health Care System Compares Internationally - The Commonwealth Fund
Obama administration officials and other supporters of the Affordable Care Act say they worry that the tax-filing season will generate new anger as uninsured consumers learn that they must pay tax penalties and as many people struggle with complex forms needed to justify tax credits they received in 2014 to pay for health insurance.
The White House has already granted some exemptions and is considering more to avoid a political firestorm
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/01/us...bles.html?_r=0
LOL.
Cool, so your link would support SINGLE PAYER forms of UHC like other other industrialized nation. MEDICARE FOR ALL. Thanks for agreeing
lol
LOL, do you always have trouble following a conversation?
The article is an Obama article....and the point of it is that he continues to change the law to suit his political purposes.
You really aren't up for these conversations.
Weird, you mean Obama, a politician is trying to adjust to the politics? Shocking. Perhaps take politics out of it and like the rest of the world, go to a UHC like Medicare for all? Simple really? Oh but the 'job creators', wouldn't get to make profits over human life and well being...
Dad to three....are you teaching them not to have any ethics or integrity like their Dad?
Cool, so your link would support SINGLE PAYER forms of UHC like other other industrialized nation. MEDICARE FOR ALL. Thanks for agreeing
lol
LOL, do you always have trouble following a conversation?
The article is an Obama article....and the point of it is that he continues to change the law to suit his political purposes.
You really aren't up for these conversations.
Weird, you mean Obama, a politician is trying to adjust to the politics? Shocking. Perhaps take politics out of it and like the rest of the world, go to a UHC like Medicare for all? Simple really? Oh but the 'job creators', wouldn't get to make profits over human life and well being...
Dad to three....are you teaching them not to have any ethics or integrity like their Dad?
I'm raising four conservatives with ethics, so I'll have his spawn outnumbered.
Says the psychotic with a pic of the traitorous conservative shooting the Prez
Of course being First Lady is an accomplishment, especially one given the access that Hillary was. She met with world leaders, cabinet members, congressional leaders and dealt with the POTUS on a day to day basis.Being married to a governor or president isn't a qualification. She was a senator without accomplishment there. Hillary is generally regarded as possibly the worst secretary of state that we ever had. In her own words the disastrous reset with Russia was her best work.
Of course being First Lady is an accomplishment, especially one given the access that Hillary was. She met with world leaders, cabinet members, congressional leaders and dealt with the POTUS on a day to day basis.Being married to a governor or president isn't a qualification. She was a senator without accomplishment there. Hillary is generally regarded as possibly the worst secretary of state that we ever had. In her own words the disastrous reset with Russia was her best work.
Does any Republican have knowledge of the day to day workings of the White House?
Just that gives her more qualifications than any current Republican
Of course being First Lady is an accomplishment, especially one given the access that Hillary was. She met with world leaders, cabinet members, congressional leaders and dealt with the POTUS on a day to day basis.Being married to a governor or president isn't a qualification. She was a senator without accomplishment there. Hillary is generally regarded as possibly the worst secretary of state that we ever had. In her own words the disastrous reset with Russia was her best work.
Does any Republican have knowledge of the day to day workings of the White House?
Just that gives her more qualifications than any current Republican
That's a liberal progressive pile of pig crap.
It describes the GOP position on healthcare for the last 50 years
Dumbass Hillary's plan was voted down 98-0
God you are a stupid ass.
Give the rest of the story and we can discuss
The story is only this.....
Hillary's Health Care plan was was voted down 98-0 in the Senate.
Discuss.
Gladly, Democrats agreed to kill Hillarycare in order to craft a bipartisan bill. The bipartisan bill lasted until Republicans took control of Congress, then healthcare was blocked for nearly twenty years until Obamacare came along
That's of course not even true. Much less responsive.the ONLY qualification necessary for a candidate to qualify for the Office of POTUS is that candidate be a citizen of the USA. Aside from that, the people decide at the ballot box. ANYONE can be POTUS.
Past results are no indicator of future performance.Since 1952, it has been rare for the same party to win three presidential elections in a row, and never four or more in a row. After eight years of Democrat Barack Obama in the presidency, there (I estimate) is a 90 percent chance the new Prez elected in 2016 will be the Republican/GOP nominee.
But. . .
. . .there is a reasonable chance the Republican President elected in 2016 will be defeated for reelection in 2020. After all, four out of the past five Presidents voted out after only one term were Republicans.
That's of course not even true. Much less responsive.the ONLY qualification necessary for a candidate to qualify for the Office of POTUS is that candidate be a citizen of the USA. Aside from that, the people decide at the ballot box. ANYONE can be POTUS.
The question is why does anyone think Hillary is qualifed for the job, not why she meets the minimal qualification to become president.
And the answer is, she isnt. She has no accomplishments to suggest she would make a good president. Her biggest claims seem to be her vagina and her last name.
You obviously didnt read my post so yours isnt worth responding to.That's of course not even true. Much less responsive.the ONLY qualification necessary for a candidate to qualify for the Office of POTUS is that candidate be a citizen of the USA. Aside from that, the people decide at the ballot box. ANYONE can be POTUS.
The question is why does anyone think Hillary is qualifed for the job, not why she meets the minimal qualification to become president.
And the answer is, she isnt. She has no accomplishments to suggest she would make a good president. Her biggest claims seem to be her vagina and her last name.
anyone thinking certainly disqualifies your stupid butt. Go ahead list the qualifications that mandatory to qualify for the office of POTUS ... ya know, as described in the Constitution.... not some dipshit's opinion.
That's of course not even true. Much less responsive.the ONLY qualification necessary for a candidate to qualify for the Office of POTUS is that candidate be a citizen of the USA. Aside from that, the people decide at the ballot box. ANYONE can be POTUS.
The question is why does anyone think Hillary is qualifed for the job, not why she meets the minimal qualification to become president.
And the answer is, she isnt. She has no accomplishments to suggest she would make a good president. Her biggest claims seem to be her vagina and her last name.
anyone thinking certainly disqualifies your stupid butt. Go ahead list the qualifications that mandatory to qualify for the office of POTUS ... ya know, as described in the Constitution.... not some dipshit's opinion.
I'll bet if Hillary announced she wasnt running she'd get a 69% approval as well. Hell, I'd approve of her.Hillary left office with a 69% approval rating.
