easyt65
Diamond Member
- Aug 4, 2015
- 90,307
- 61,084
- 2,645
In her e-mail to her subordinate she orders him to strip the classification off of the e-mail and send it vial Unclassified means. Some Liberals have suggested she meant was to strip the Title of the document off and send it via UNCLASS Means....EITHER WAY Hillary is ordering a CRIME to be committed.
Libs think stripping the title off is no big deal - WRONG.
1. Marking a classified document as classified does not make the information classified. NOT marking or removing the classified marking from classified documents don't make the information Unclassified.
2. Stripping the Title off the document, as it will explain below, is an attempt to subvert the system, rules, and LAW so you can send the classified information via Unclassified means without anyone EVER knowing about it or seeing the information...UNLESS the FBI investigates your ass and pulls all your documents and e-mails. AS the article will show below, stripping the heading / ID info off the documents / info you create a document that does NOT show up for any FOIA requests or even a Subpoena. No title = nothing to use to reference the document = no way to FIND it or know it exists! To find it after this happens, someone has to pour through your documents / e-mails to find it....which is just what the FBI did!
- THIS DEMONSTRATES AN ACTIVE INTENTIONAL ACT / PLAN TO BREAK THE LAW AND HIDE IT ALL FROM EVERYONE....
THIS HILLARY E-MAIL WHERE SHE DIRECTS HER SUBORDINATE TO DO THIS COMPLETELY F*S HILLARY! The ironic...and fulfilling...thing to it also is that this elitist Gruber-thinking ('Americans are stupid'), self-serving CRIMINAL did it to HERSELF! Nixon had his tapes....Hillary had her e-mails!
BOOYA! Buh-Bye, you criminal POS! Enjoy prison food!
-------------------------------
“Aren’t you ordering [Jake Sullivan] to violate the laws on handling classified material there?” John Dickerson confronted the Friday e-mail release from Hillary Clinton’s secret e-mail server head-on in an interview with the former Secretary of State yesterday on Face the Nation. Hillary responded by attempting to spin, leaving Dickerson unconvinced at best. “As the State Department said just this week,” Hillary replied, “that didn’t happen.” Actually, what the State Department said was that they had no records to show what happened...
Hillary tries arguing that “headings are not classification notices,” but classification is noted in headings — and that’s why they would need to be removed in order to move from a secure transmission to nonsecure transmission.
Clearly in this context, “identifying headings” relate to classification levels. If the information was unclassified, this e-mail would have been entirely unnecessary. As I noted earlier, someone as “meticulous” and “careful” as Sullivan would have already known that he didn’t need to have unclassified material transmitted securely in the first place. On top of that, Hillary wanted this information urgently. If it was unclassified, why would it be so urgent, and why couldn’t Hillary or her immediate team simply dig it up for her?
Clearly she wanted to “subvert the rules,” but the big question is whether the DoJ will allow Hillary to continue to live in that bubble. Woodward also explains that the “nonpaper” effort is itself a dodge around the rules.
WALLACE: Explain that, explain that to the rest of the world here. What’s a nonpaper and what is taking the heading off?
WOODWARD: "By taking it off, it’s just a piece of paper that has a bunch of paragraphs. And there’s no classification, there’s no subject, so it’s not in the system, so no one can discover it through Freedom of Information Act or some sort of subpoena.
*** Hillary was ordering a specific action that would allow a classified document be sent via UN-classified means without ever being able to be 'seen', tracked, or 'found by a FOIA request or Subpoena!
I mean, look, here is Hillary Clinton, somebody who worked on the staff of the Nixon impeachment committee, and what was the lesson, one of the lessons from that? Never write anything down.
She did years of Whitewater investigations where she was the target, and here, many years later, she’s saying oh, let’s subvert the rules and writing it out herself? You know, whether that’s some sort of crime I think is not the issue. The issue is, it shows she kind of feels immune, that she lives in a bubble, and no one is ever going to find this out. Well, now we have."
-------
"It’s a deception all the way down. Is it a crime? If Sullivan balked at doing this, then not in and of itself, but we don’t know whether he did or not — and neither does State. But it demonstrates that Hillary was well aware of the import of classified markings and had ordered her aides to defeat that system. That makes her “none of it was marked classified” excuse moot, and gives any prosecutor within six weeks of passing a bar exam plenty of evidence to pursue a case in federal court — especially when more than 1300 other examples of classified transmission and storage through unsecured means exist in the system Hillary forced everyone else to use."
Hillary: By ordering “identifying headings” removed, I meant “don’t transmit classified info,” or something
Libs think stripping the title off is no big deal - WRONG.
1. Marking a classified document as classified does not make the information classified. NOT marking or removing the classified marking from classified documents don't make the information Unclassified.
2. Stripping the Title off the document, as it will explain below, is an attempt to subvert the system, rules, and LAW so you can send the classified information via Unclassified means without anyone EVER knowing about it or seeing the information...UNLESS the FBI investigates your ass and pulls all your documents and e-mails. AS the article will show below, stripping the heading / ID info off the documents / info you create a document that does NOT show up for any FOIA requests or even a Subpoena. No title = nothing to use to reference the document = no way to FIND it or know it exists! To find it after this happens, someone has to pour through your documents / e-mails to find it....which is just what the FBI did!
- THIS DEMONSTRATES AN ACTIVE INTENTIONAL ACT / PLAN TO BREAK THE LAW AND HIDE IT ALL FROM EVERYONE....
THIS HILLARY E-MAIL WHERE SHE DIRECTS HER SUBORDINATE TO DO THIS COMPLETELY F*S HILLARY! The ironic...and fulfilling...thing to it also is that this elitist Gruber-thinking ('Americans are stupid'), self-serving CRIMINAL did it to HERSELF! Nixon had his tapes....Hillary had her e-mails!
BOOYA! Buh-Bye, you criminal POS! Enjoy prison food!
-------------------------------
“Aren’t you ordering [Jake Sullivan] to violate the laws on handling classified material there?” John Dickerson confronted the Friday e-mail release from Hillary Clinton’s secret e-mail server head-on in an interview with the former Secretary of State yesterday on Face the Nation. Hillary responded by attempting to spin, leaving Dickerson unconvinced at best. “As the State Department said just this week,” Hillary replied, “that didn’t happen.” Actually, what the State Department said was that they had no records to show what happened...
Hillary tries arguing that “headings are not classification notices,” but classification is noted in headings — and that’s why they would need to be removed in order to move from a secure transmission to nonsecure transmission.
Clearly in this context, “identifying headings” relate to classification levels. If the information was unclassified, this e-mail would have been entirely unnecessary. As I noted earlier, someone as “meticulous” and “careful” as Sullivan would have already known that he didn’t need to have unclassified material transmitted securely in the first place. On top of that, Hillary wanted this information urgently. If it was unclassified, why would it be so urgent, and why couldn’t Hillary or her immediate team simply dig it up for her?
Clearly she wanted to “subvert the rules,” but the big question is whether the DoJ will allow Hillary to continue to live in that bubble. Woodward also explains that the “nonpaper” effort is itself a dodge around the rules.
WALLACE: Explain that, explain that to the rest of the world here. What’s a nonpaper and what is taking the heading off?
WOODWARD: "By taking it off, it’s just a piece of paper that has a bunch of paragraphs. And there’s no classification, there’s no subject, so it’s not in the system, so no one can discover it through Freedom of Information Act or some sort of subpoena.
*** Hillary was ordering a specific action that would allow a classified document be sent via UN-classified means without ever being able to be 'seen', tracked, or 'found by a FOIA request or Subpoena!
I mean, look, here is Hillary Clinton, somebody who worked on the staff of the Nixon impeachment committee, and what was the lesson, one of the lessons from that? Never write anything down.
She did years of Whitewater investigations where she was the target, and here, many years later, she’s saying oh, let’s subvert the rules and writing it out herself? You know, whether that’s some sort of crime I think is not the issue. The issue is, it shows she kind of feels immune, that she lives in a bubble, and no one is ever going to find this out. Well, now we have."
-------
"It’s a deception all the way down. Is it a crime? If Sullivan balked at doing this, then not in and of itself, but we don’t know whether he did or not — and neither does State. But it demonstrates that Hillary was well aware of the import of classified markings and had ordered her aides to defeat that system. That makes her “none of it was marked classified” excuse moot, and gives any prosecutor within six weeks of passing a bar exam plenty of evidence to pursue a case in federal court — especially when more than 1300 other examples of classified transmission and storage through unsecured means exist in the system Hillary forced everyone else to use."
Hillary: By ordering “identifying headings” removed, I meant “don’t transmit classified info,” or something
