George Costanza
A Friendly Liberal
- Thread starter
- #61
Rationalizing the original crime of speeding, and suggesting the laughable solution of just waiting for the speeder to come home (as if this were mayberry) is just farcical.
Is it? You seem to be ignoring the many, documented cases where, in the name of apprehending someone who has merely broken a traffic law, innocent people have died or been permanently maimed, disfigured and/or injured.
When viewed in that (undeniable) context, how "farcical" does it really seem to you?
You may be willing to make a trade-off like that; I sure am not. But then, like most conservatives, since you don't see it ever happening to you, it doesn't really concern you.
You realise that by using the Shogun, "Farcical" you don't make more sense.
I am not "using" Shogun's "farcical" - I am QUOTING him. Hate to say it, old sport, but YOU are the one who isn't making sense here.
But I digress.
I think you invite MORE lawless.
Well, it comes down to a question of trade-off, doesn't it? As I said before - when the cops refuse to chase someone, it doesn't mean the guy gets away. More often than not, they go to his home and arrest him there, assuming they get his license number, which they almost always do.