public goods are used equally by all parties. The Post Office is one of those things. But in this modern age of UPS, FedEx and DHL, it is proving that it can be done faster and better by private companies and for a profit while saving the customers money.I'm saying its unconstitutional as well, thats why it doesn't work. None of that is in the enumerated powers or the amendments, so again I ask, please convince me to trust the federal government. Thanks.
Whoops.
The Post Office sure is mentioned in the Constitution.
Therefore, the public good could potentially be satisfied by the private sector as long as the government is used to only maintain standards of security and quality and universal service. The mechanics of it all could be outsourced over a period of time for currently it could not handle the volume.
Ending the Post Office would kill more businesses and cost more jobs than you could possibly imagine. But that's not my point.
The OP, like many "Constitutional Scholars" on this message board, posting copypasta from a piece of Conservo-spam and neglected to actually fact-check it to the point where he claimed that the Post Office was unconstitutional.