Herman Cain could be described as a "monster"

[Ravi]

Hours after being publicly identified as one of several women to accuse Republican presidential candidate Herman Cain of sexual harassment, civil servant Karen Kraushaar told ABC News that Cain could be described as a "monster."

Kraushaar said overnight she had attempted to dodge the media spotlight because she feared retaliation from Cain supporters. Her identity was revealed Tuesday and she has since hired a security team to guard her home outside Washington, D.C.

Herman Cain Could Be Described as a 'Monster,' Accuser Says - ABC News

 

[California Girl]

He could indeed. Freedom of speech does give one the right to make a fucking idiot of oneself, so, technically, she is right.

 

[The Rabbi]

Obama could be described as a turnip.
Pelosi could be described as a toaster oven.

So what? She has even less credibility now.

 

[Truthmatters]

the fact that the right would continue to support this man after all we now know is insanity

 

[Full-Auto]

the fact that the right would continue to support this man after all we now know is insanity

What do you know, beyond he said she said?




Why nothing goerge, were democrats and dont need reasons for wanting tabloid news.

 

[WillowTree]

the fact that the right would continue to support this man after all we now know is insanity

you really don't know jack shit! what you have is a she said he said 14 years in the making with no proof and no witness.. so what the fuck is it that you think you know cow?

 

[Chris]

DES MOINES, Iowa — A conservative Iowa radio host, who on Wednesday became the latest person to accuse Herman Cain of acting inappropriately toward women, declined to offer specifics about the presidential candidate’s behavior but suggested that Cain was “compromised in his private life.”

Steve Deace, who hosts a syndicated two-hour radio program in Iowa, said that two of his female staff members were subjected to “inappropriate and awkward” comments by Cain. But he refused to identify them or elaborate on the seriousness of the allegations.

After his show on Wednesday night, Deace held an impromptu press conference outside his Des Moines studio while his two female staff members rushed out of the building, escorted by two men who attempted to keep reporters away.

One of the women was identified to ABC News by an independent source as a victim of the behavior Deace mentioned. Both of the women repeatedly refused to comment on anything related to the controversy.

Deace, an influential conservative figure in the state, declined to say whether he had the women’s consent before going public with the allegations, but added, “As a staff we are very tight and we are very close and we share everything with one another.”

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politic...-herman-cain-compromised-in-his-private-life/

 

[Truthmatters]

Cain seems to like blondes

 

[The Rabbi]

Wow, Chris. A non-news story. How uncharacteristic of you.

 

[Lonestar_logic]

the fact that the right would continue to support this man after all we now know is insanity

Why let a little thing like the presumption of innocence stop you from being an idiot.

 

[Chris]

Herman Cain is going down in flames because he failed to learn the first rule of political scandal: Don’t make statements that can be falsified.

You can lie about what you believe. You can lie about what you’d do if elected. You can deny that your tax reform plan would raise taxes. You can get away with all of these things because they’re matters of speculation, interpretation, or argument. But if you make specific factual claims about the past, as Cain did in his Tuesday press conference about sexual harassment allegations, you can be flatly disproved. Worse, you can goad your accusers into backing up their charges with evidence. That’s what Cain has done. His press conference is a road map to his destruction.

The press conference began with Cain’s attorney, Lin Wood, claiming that accuser Sharon Bialek had mysteriously chosen “to tell her story to a third person for the first time” after “14 years, when recollections have faded [and] witnesses cannot be located.” Really? Bialek has affidavits from two people to whom she reported the incident when it happened.

Then Cain took the stand. “I saw [Gloria] Allred and her client [Bialek] yesterday in that news conference for the very first time,” he declared. “My first response … was, ‘I don't even know who this woman is.’” Under questioning, Cain repeated, “I didn't recognize the face. I didn't recognize the name, nor the voice.” But Bialek says she spoke with Cain a month ago at a Tea Party event, and one eyewitness has already come forward: Amy Jacobson, a Chicago radio host. “They were hugging,” Jacobson tells the Chicago Sun-Times. “She was inches from his ear,” and Cain was telling her, “Uh, huh. Uh, huh.”

In an interview with ABC yesterday, Cain said of Bialek, “I don't even know who this lady is.” ABC’s Jonathan Karl asked him: “You don't remember having drinks with her back in '97, you don't remember giving her a ride in your car?” Cain replied, “Absolutely not.”

That’s odd, because Bialek says that when she arrived in Washington to meet with Cain in mid-July 1997, she found that her reservation at the Capitol Hilton had been converted to a “palatial suite.” She says that Cain told her, “I upgraded you.” Would Bialek recognize the room today? Does the hotel keep records of who paid for which room? If so, the source of payment for that room on that night can be checked. The same might be true of Bialek’s reported dinner with Cain at an Italian restaurant that evening. Can she identify the restaurant? Does the restaurant keep payment records going that far back? Cain had better hope not.

Herman Cain sexual harassment press conference: His falsifiable statements will destroy him. - Slate Magazine

 

[mudwhistle]

Hours after being publicly identified as one of several women to accuse Republican presidential candidate Herman Cain of sexual harassment, civil servant Karen Kraushaar told ABC News that Cain could be described as a "monster."

Kraushaar said overnight she had attempted to dodge the media spotlight because she feared retaliation from Cain supporters. Her identity was revealed Tuesday and she has since hired a security team to guard her home outside Washington, D.C.

Herman Cain Could Be Described as a 'Monster,' Accuser Says - ABC News

Yes.....the monster she allowed to remain free until he became the leader in the GOP race.

I can see I need my waders because the shit is getting deep.

I expect that she is going to accuse him of just about anything she can imagine.



Btw, people are getting tired of this nonsense.

 

[Intense]

the fact that the right would continue to support this man after all we now know is insanity

TM doing some under cover work at Cain Nazi Indoctrination Camp.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RHgCNzMWyo4&feature=related]bingo - YouTube[/ame]

 

[Truthmatters]

Cain is a serial sexual harasser.

That is what the evidence shows.

Why are you now lying about what I have said?

 

[tinydancer]

If the left choose to believe Sharon just on her word and just her word with no proof, then Larry Sinclair must be believed.

 

[Ravi]

Cain is a serial sexual harasser.

It is starting to look like that. One woman would have easily been dismissed. There are just too many women to dismiss now. And at his press conference yesterday he opened himself up to a lot more doubt.

 

[Warrior102]

Is Cain wearing an Orange Jump Suit yet Liberals ???

Didn't get your wish, huh?

Some women make bogus bullshit claims and you're ready to send the guy to the electric chair.

It'll be a fine day when Obama is packing and Cain is moving in to 1600 Penn. Ave.

 

[Full-Auto]

Cain is a serial sexual harasser.

That is what the evidence shows.

Why are you now lying about what I have said?

WHAT EVIDENCE?

come on skippy. Post up.

 

[WillowTree]

Cain is a serial sexual harasser.

That is what the evidence shows.

Why are you now lying about what I have said?

what is the evidence? lay it out.

 

[Lonestar_logic]

Cain is a serial sexual harasser.

That is what the evidence shows.

Why are you now lying about what I have said?

Since when are accusations considered evidence?