Mikeoxenormous
Diamond Member
Long response, and while you’ll find I disagree with parts, I appreciate the effort and will try to reply in kind.
For this part, I was referring to WV, where we just passed an anti-CRT law, and it was discussed in a regular radio broadcast Our Legislature Today, that covers what the WV legislature is doing. When asked if he knew of any instances where CRT was being taught in WV K12 he was forced to admit there weren’t any he knew of. Fortunately Higher Ed was removed from the final bill but still it is a bad bill.
A couple of issues here…first, with source. I did read the article but was disturbed by a few things. One is that for some of it’s strongest claims it offered no links or links that looped back to it’s own articles. That makes it difficult to evaluate It’s accuracy.
On “accurate history”…how do we define it (and who defines it)? That is good question that unfortunately today is largely being answered by politicians not historians. There is a lot to be said for history being written by the victors and that is apparent in the way our history has long been taught, from the viewpoint and achievements of white, male Americans. Traditionally, the voices, tragedies and contributions of blacks, women, Hispanics and others have been marginalized or omitted. Now that have found some political strength tbey want their stories to be included in history.
Gotta go, out of time, will address more later.
Well, there is the "facts" of history, and then there are the truths of the progressive party. I prefer facts, because just like with a person with a vagina and XX chromosome, it is a fact of science that is a woman, even i who never graduated from college understands.On “accurate history”…how do we define it (and who defines it)?