Here Come Trump's Judges

[2aguy]

do all these judicial picks support corporations over individual citizens?

No...they support the law and the Constitution.

 

[2aguy]

do all these judicial picks support corporations over individual citizens?

Pretty much, yes. That's because a corporation has the same rights as an individual.

A corporation is a synthetic person created for doing business.

no it's not and people who think it is are wrong imo.

Corporations when first even allowed to be created were not even allowed to talk or speak or donate to or endorse any political stance or candidate....if they did, then they lost their corporation status....

And that was a violation of the 1st Amendment....

 

[2aguy]

do all these judicial picks support corporations over individual citizens?

What is that supposed to mean?

when you looked at Gorsuch's decisions, he tended to side with corporation's rights OVER individual citizens....

are the judicial picks more likely to favor big business and corporations in their decisions?

No....he sided with the law. That is what a judge is supposed to do.

 

[2aguy]

Will they be impeached when Trump is found guilty of treason?

Susan Rice will be in jail long before Trump is.....as will huma abedin and her sexual predator husband anthony weiner........maybe even hilary.....

 

[blastoff]

Will they be impeached when Trump is found guilty of treason?

There is no evidence of any crimes by DJ Trump yet.

So don't hold your breath.

I know lots of people who are holding their breath and turning blue.

No no no no no!!! Please, oh please hold your breath until Trump's impeachment.

 

[JakeStarkey]

do all these judicial picks support corporations over individual citizens?

Pretty much, yes. That's because a corporation has the same rights as an individual.

A corporation is a synthetic person created for doing business.

no it's not and people who think it is are wrong imo.

Corporations when first even allowed to be created were not even allowed to talk or speak or donate to or endorse any political stance or candidate....if they did, then they lost their corporation status....

And that was a violation of the 1st Amendment....

Corporations then can face a corporate death penalty in criminal cases, and its stockholders can be fined many times the face value of the dividends issued during a criminal period of time.

 

[Care4all]

do all these judicial picks support corporations over individual citizens?

Pretty much, yes. That's because a corporation has the same rights as an individual.

A corporation is a synthetic person created for doing business.

no it's not and people who think it is are wrong imo.

Corporations when first even allowed to be created were not even allowed to talk or speak or donate to or endorse any political stance or candidate....if they did, then they lost their corporation status....

And that was a violation of the 1st Amendment....

Corporations then can face a corporate death penalty in criminal cases, and its stockholders can be fined many times the face value of the dividends issued during a criminal period of time.

precisely!

 

[Zorro!]

One has to remember it isn't just the Supreme Court that is a concern, its the District and Circuit courts as well.

So far Trump seems to be following his word on his court nominees.

Opinion | Here come Trump’s judges: President to put forward more strong judicial nominees

Monday, according to Adam Liptak in the New York Times, Trump will announce 10 more judicial nominees to lower courts. The nominees make up an impressive list of highly respected jurists, attorneys and legal thinkers. Those of us who doubted Trump would take judicial nominations seriously may have some crow to eat. Especially when one looks at the names to be announced for appellate court vacancies, this is as strong a list of nominees as one could hope for.

WINNING: Trump Gets Another Judge on the Ninth Circuit Over Democrat Objections.

 

[dannyboys]

President Trump my very well get to put at least one, possibly two more SCJ on the bench.
He has six more glorious years to do so!
Add them to the dozens more lower court strict Constitutionalists judges and the President will go down in history as the greatest President of all time!
Ruth is hanging on my a thread. She's praying for a DEM president in 2020.
Sorry Ruth baby. Ain't going to happen.
The one and only reason the DEMs are so fucking desperate to get Trump out of the White house is b/c of the judges.
They DEMs are so fucking stupid they aren't thinking about what a President Pence would do.
Pence would have every school kid in the country singing the N.A. twice a day and watching evangelical TV shows for two hours a day.

 

[rightwinger]

One has to remember it isn't just the Supreme Court that is a concern, its the District and Circuit courts as well.

So far Trump seems to be following his word on his court nominees.

Opinion | Here come Trump’s judges: President to put forward more strong judicial nominees

Monday, according to Adam Liptak in the New York Times, Trump will announce 10 more judicial nominees to lower courts. The nominees make up an impressive list of highly respected jurists, attorneys and legal thinkers. Those of us who doubted Trump would take judicial nominations seriously may have some crow to eat. Especially when one looks at the names to be announced for appellate court vacancies, this is as strong a list of nominees as one could hope for.

Republicans realize that future elections will not be kind to them

Even their Gerrymander of the House is breaking. The White House is becoming out of reach.

Their respinse is to stock the courts with young arch conservatives with lifetime appointments

That way they can challenge any Democratic legislation on the most obscure argument imaginable and throw it out

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Back in 2016 this was one main reason I voted Trump. The other was to put an end to this political correct nonsense.

So far my vote is reaping benefits

 

[martybegan]

One has to remember it isn't just the Supreme Court that is a concern, its the District and Circuit courts as well.

So far Trump seems to be following his word on his court nominees.

Opinion | Here come Trump’s judges: President to put forward more strong judicial nominees

Monday, according to Adam Liptak in the New York Times, Trump will announce 10 more judicial nominees to lower courts. The nominees make up an impressive list of highly respected jurists, attorneys and legal thinkers. Those of us who doubted Trump would take judicial nominations seriously may have some crow to eat. Especially when one looks at the names to be announced for appellate court vacancies, this is as strong a list of nominees as one could hope for.

Republicans realize that future elections will not be kind to them

Even their Gerrymander of the House is breaking. The White House is becoming out of reach.

Their respinse is to stock the courts with young arch conservatives with lifetime appointments

That way they can challenge any Democratic legislation on the most obscure argument imaginable and throw it out

Same tired lines over and over again.

States can do whatever bullshit liberal crap their own people vote for. The issue is when you try to force it on States that want no part of it.

 

[rightwinger]

One has to remember it isn't just the Supreme Court that is a concern, its the District and Circuit courts as well.

So far Trump seems to be following his word on his court nominees.

Opinion | Here come Trump’s judges: President to put forward more strong judicial nominees

Monday, according to Adam Liptak in the New York Times, Trump will announce 10 more judicial nominees to lower courts. The nominees make up an impressive list of highly respected jurists, attorneys and legal thinkers. Those of us who doubted Trump would take judicial nominations seriously may have some crow to eat. Especially when one looks at the names to be announced for appellate court vacancies, this is as strong a list of nominees as one could hope for.

Republicans realize that future elections will not be kind to them

Even their Gerrymander of the House is breaking. The White House is becoming out of reach.

Their respinse is to stock the courts with young arch conservatives with lifetime appointments

That way they can challenge any Democratic legislation on the most obscure argument imaginable and throw it out

Same tired lines over and over again.

States can do whatever bullshit liberal crap their own people vote for. The issue is when you try to force it on States that want no part of it.

Has nothing to do with what I posted

Try again

 

[martybegan]

One has to remember it isn't just the Supreme Court that is a concern, its the District and Circuit courts as well.

So far Trump seems to be following his word on his court nominees.

Opinion | Here come Trump’s judges: President to put forward more strong judicial nominees

Monday, according to Adam Liptak in the New York Times, Trump will announce 10 more judicial nominees to lower courts. The nominees make up an impressive list of highly respected jurists, attorneys and legal thinkers. Those of us who doubted Trump would take judicial nominations seriously may have some crow to eat. Especially when one looks at the names to be announced for appellate court vacancies, this is as strong a list of nominees as one could hope for.

Republicans realize that future elections will not be kind to them

Even their Gerrymander of the House is breaking. The White House is becoming out of reach.

Their respinse is to stock the courts with young arch conservatives with lifetime appointments

That way they can challenge any Democratic legislation on the most obscure argument imaginable and throw it out

Same tired lines over and over again.

States can do whatever bullshit liberal crap their own people vote for. The issue is when you try to force it on States that want no part of it.

Has nothing to do with what I posted

Try again

What you posted is prog-twatwaddle.

Try having an original thought for once.

 

[rightwinger]

One has to remember it isn't just the Supreme Court that is a concern, its the District and Circuit courts as well.

So far Trump seems to be following his word on his court nominees.

Opinion | Here come Trump’s judges: President to put forward more strong judicial nominees

Monday, according to Adam Liptak in the New York Times, Trump will announce 10 more judicial nominees to lower courts. The nominees make up an impressive list of highly respected jurists, attorneys and legal thinkers. Those of us who doubted Trump would take judicial nominations seriously may have some crow to eat. Especially when one looks at the names to be announced for appellate court vacancies, this is as strong a list of nominees as one could hope for.

Republicans realize that future elections will not be kind to them

Even their Gerrymander of the House is breaking. The White House is becoming out of reach.

Their respinse is to stock the courts with young arch conservatives with lifetime appointments

That way they can challenge any Democratic legislation on the most obscure argument imaginable and throw it out

Same tired lines over and over again.

States can do whatever bullshit liberal crap their own people vote for. The issue is when you try to force it on States that want no part of it.

Has nothing to do with what I posted

Try again

What you posted is prog-twatwaddle.

Try having an original thought for once.

It is an accurate description of what Republicans themselves say they are doing

 

[martybegan]

One has to remember it isn't just the Supreme Court that is a concern, its the District and Circuit courts as well.

So far Trump seems to be following his word on his court nominees.

Opinion | Here come Trump’s judges: President to put forward more strong judicial nominees

Republicans realize that future elections will not be kind to them

Even their Gerrymander of the House is breaking. The White House is becoming out of reach.

Their respinse is to stock the courts with young arch conservatives with lifetime appointments

That way they can challenge any Democratic legislation on the most obscure argument imaginable and throw it out

Same tired lines over and over again.

States can do whatever bullshit liberal crap their own people vote for. The issue is when you try to force it on States that want no part of it.

Has nothing to do with what I posted

Try again

What you posted is prog-twatwaddle.

Try having an original thought for once.

It is an accurate description of what Republicans themselves say they are doing

I'm sure you can find direct quotes.

 

[rightwinger]

Republicans realize that future elections will not be kind to them

Even their Gerrymander of the House is breaking. The White House is becoming out of reach.

Their respinse is to stock the courts with young arch conservatives with lifetime appointments

That way they can challenge any Democratic legislation on the most obscure argument imaginable and throw it out

Same tired lines over and over again.

States can do whatever bullshit liberal crap their own people vote for. The issue is when you try to force it on States that want no part of it.

Has nothing to do with what I posted

Try again

What you posted is prog-twatwaddle.

Try having an original thought for once.

It is an accurate description of what Republicans themselves say they are doing

I'm sure you can find direct quotes.

Then-candidate Donald Trump capitalized on that passion during the 2016 campaign and made appointing judges to the Supreme Court one of his talking points. It worked.

"I think it's one of the reasons I got elected. I think the people of this country did not want to see what was happening with the Supreme Court," said Trump, shortly before his inauguration in 2017.

As Supreme Court Nears Solid Conservative Majority, GOP Reaps Reward From 'Long Game'

 

[martybegan]

Same tired lines over and over again.

States can do whatever bullshit liberal crap their own people vote for. The issue is when you try to force it on States that want no part of it.

Has nothing to do with what I posted

Try again

What you posted is prog-twatwaddle.

Try having an original thought for once.

It is an accurate description of what Republicans themselves say they are doing

I'm sure you can find direct quotes.

Then-candidate Donald Trump capitalized on that passion during the 2016 campaign and made appointing judges to the Supreme Court one of his talking points. It worked.

"I think it's one of the reasons I got elected. I think the people of this country did not want to see what was happening with the Supreme Court," said Trump, shortly before his inauguration in 2017.

As Supreme Court Nears Solid Conservative Majority, GOP Reaps Reward From 'Long Game'

So what? Where is the quote of a conservative saying they know they can't get elected anymore?

What I found at the top of the Article:

What is important for conservatives is a court that will respect and enforce all the limits on governmental power and control contained in the Constitution."

The rest is just typical NPR progressive assumptions of what they THINK progressives are thinking and saying.

As for Trump, he's delivering what he promised, and it's part of what got him elected.

 

[bodecea]

One has to remember it isn't just the Supreme Court that is a concern, its the District and Circuit courts as well.

So far Trump seems to be following his word on his court nominees.

Opinion | Here come Trump’s judges: President to put forward more strong judicial nominees

Monday, according to Adam Liptak in the New York Times, Trump will announce 10 more judicial nominees to lower courts. The nominees make up an impressive list of highly respected jurists, attorneys and legal thinkers. Those of us who doubted Trump would take judicial nominations seriously may have some crow to eat. Especially when one looks at the names to be announced for appellate court vacancies, this is as strong a list of nominees as one could hope for.

donnie would have to find a lot of crooked people who he has something on to make any kind of difference in our federal courts.

 

[martybegan]

One has to remember it isn't just the Supreme Court that is a concern, its the District and Circuit courts as well.

So far Trump seems to be following his word on his court nominees.

Opinion | Here come Trump’s judges: President to put forward more strong judicial nominees

Monday, according to Adam Liptak in the New York Times, Trump will announce 10 more judicial nominees to lower courts. The nominees make up an impressive list of highly respected jurists, attorneys and legal thinkers. Those of us who doubted Trump would take judicial nominations seriously may have some crow to eat. Especially when one looks at the names to be announced for appellate court vacancies, this is as strong a list of nominees as one could hope for.

donnie would have to find a lot of crooked people who he has something on to make any kind of difference in our federal courts.

So you are equating strict constructionism and the corresponding limits on the federal government, with the corresponding adherence to personal rights explicit in the constitution with only coming from people who are crooked?

Typical prog inability to even fathom people who disagree with them.