2aguy
Diamond Member
- Jul 19, 2014
- 111,977
- 52,257
- 2,290
do all these judicial picks support corporations over individual citizens?
No...they support the law and the Constitution.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
do all these judicial picks support corporations over individual citizens?
no it's not and people who think it is are wrong imo.Pretty much, yes. That's because a corporation has the same rights as an individual.do all these judicial picks support corporations over individual citizens?
A corporation is a synthetic person created for doing business.
Corporations when first even allowed to be created were not even allowed to talk or speak or donate to or endorse any political stance or candidate....if they did, then they lost their corporation status....
when you looked at Gorsuch's decisions, he tended to side with corporation's rights OVER individual citizens....do all these judicial picks support corporations over individual citizens?
What is that supposed to mean?
are the judicial picks more likely to favor big business and corporations in their decisions?
Will they be impeached when Trump is found guilty of treason?
No no no no no!!! Please, oh please hold your breath until Trump's impeachment.There is no evidence of any crimes by DJ Trump yet.Will they be impeached when Trump is found guilty of treason?
So don't hold your breath.
I know lots of people who are holding their breath and turning blue.
Corporations then can face a corporate death penalty in criminal cases, and its stockholders can be fined many times the face value of the dividends issued during a criminal period of time.no it's not and people who think it is are wrong imo.Pretty much, yes. That's because a corporation has the same rights as an individual.do all these judicial picks support corporations over individual citizens?
A corporation is a synthetic person created for doing business.
Corporations when first even allowed to be created were not even allowed to talk or speak or donate to or endorse any political stance or candidate....if they did, then they lost their corporation status....
And that was a violation of the 1st Amendment....
precisely!Corporations then can face a corporate death penalty in criminal cases, and its stockholders can be fined many times the face value of the dividends issued during a criminal period of time.no it's not and people who think it is are wrong imo.Pretty much, yes. That's because a corporation has the same rights as an individual.do all these judicial picks support corporations over individual citizens?
A corporation is a synthetic person created for doing business.
Corporations when first even allowed to be created were not even allowed to talk or speak or donate to or endorse any political stance or candidate....if they did, then they lost their corporation status....
And that was a violation of the 1st Amendment....
WINNING: Trump Gets Another Judge on the Ninth Circuit Over Democrat Objections.One has to remember it isn't just the Supreme Court that is a concern, its the District and Circuit courts as well.
So far Trump seems to be following his word on his court nominees.
Opinion | Here come Trump’s judges: President to put forward more strong judicial nominees
Monday, according to Adam Liptak in the New York Times, Trump will announce 10 more judicial nominees to lower courts. The nominees make up an impressive list of highly respected jurists, attorneys and legal thinkers. Those of us who doubted Trump would take judicial nominations seriously may have some crow to eat. Especially when one looks at the names to be announced for appellate court vacancies, this is as strong a list of nominees as one could hope for.
Republicans realize that future elections will not be kind to themOne has to remember it isn't just the Supreme Court that is a concern, its the District and Circuit courts as well.
So far Trump seems to be following his word on his court nominees.
Opinion | Here come Trump’s judges: President to put forward more strong judicial nominees
Monday, according to Adam Liptak in the New York Times, Trump will announce 10 more judicial nominees to lower courts. The nominees make up an impressive list of highly respected jurists, attorneys and legal thinkers. Those of us who doubted Trump would take judicial nominations seriously may have some crow to eat. Especially when one looks at the names to be announced for appellate court vacancies, this is as strong a list of nominees as one could hope for.
Republicans realize that future elections will not be kind to themOne has to remember it isn't just the Supreme Court that is a concern, its the District and Circuit courts as well.
So far Trump seems to be following his word on his court nominees.
Opinion | Here come Trump’s judges: President to put forward more strong judicial nominees
Monday, according to Adam Liptak in the New York Times, Trump will announce 10 more judicial nominees to lower courts. The nominees make up an impressive list of highly respected jurists, attorneys and legal thinkers. Those of us who doubted Trump would take judicial nominations seriously may have some crow to eat. Especially when one looks at the names to be announced for appellate court vacancies, this is as strong a list of nominees as one could hope for.
Even their Gerrymander of the House is breaking. The White House is becoming out of reach.
Their respinse is to stock the courts with young arch conservatives with lifetime appointments
That way they can challenge any Democratic legislation on the most obscure argument imaginable and throw it out
Has nothing to do with what I postedRepublicans realize that future elections will not be kind to themOne has to remember it isn't just the Supreme Court that is a concern, its the District and Circuit courts as well.
So far Trump seems to be following his word on his court nominees.
Opinion | Here come Trump’s judges: President to put forward more strong judicial nominees
Monday, according to Adam Liptak in the New York Times, Trump will announce 10 more judicial nominees to lower courts. The nominees make up an impressive list of highly respected jurists, attorneys and legal thinkers. Those of us who doubted Trump would take judicial nominations seriously may have some crow to eat. Especially when one looks at the names to be announced for appellate court vacancies, this is as strong a list of nominees as one could hope for.
Even their Gerrymander of the House is breaking. The White House is becoming out of reach.
Their respinse is to stock the courts with young arch conservatives with lifetime appointments
That way they can challenge any Democratic legislation on the most obscure argument imaginable and throw it out
Same tired lines over and over again.
States can do whatever bullshit liberal crap their own people vote for. The issue is when you try to force it on States that want no part of it.
Has nothing to do with what I postedRepublicans realize that future elections will not be kind to themOne has to remember it isn't just the Supreme Court that is a concern, its the District and Circuit courts as well.
So far Trump seems to be following his word on his court nominees.
Opinion | Here come Trump’s judges: President to put forward more strong judicial nominees
Monday, according to Adam Liptak in the New York Times, Trump will announce 10 more judicial nominees to lower courts. The nominees make up an impressive list of highly respected jurists, attorneys and legal thinkers. Those of us who doubted Trump would take judicial nominations seriously may have some crow to eat. Especially when one looks at the names to be announced for appellate court vacancies, this is as strong a list of nominees as one could hope for.
Even their Gerrymander of the House is breaking. The White House is becoming out of reach.
Their respinse is to stock the courts with young arch conservatives with lifetime appointments
That way they can challenge any Democratic legislation on the most obscure argument imaginable and throw it out
Same tired lines over and over again.
States can do whatever bullshit liberal crap their own people vote for. The issue is when you try to force it on States that want no part of it.
Try again
Has nothing to do with what I postedRepublicans realize that future elections will not be kind to themOne has to remember it isn't just the Supreme Court that is a concern, its the District and Circuit courts as well.
So far Trump seems to be following his word on his court nominees.
Opinion | Here come Trump’s judges: President to put forward more strong judicial nominees
Monday, according to Adam Liptak in the New York Times, Trump will announce 10 more judicial nominees to lower courts. The nominees make up an impressive list of highly respected jurists, attorneys and legal thinkers. Those of us who doubted Trump would take judicial nominations seriously may have some crow to eat. Especially when one looks at the names to be announced for appellate court vacancies, this is as strong a list of nominees as one could hope for.
Even their Gerrymander of the House is breaking. The White House is becoming out of reach.
Their respinse is to stock the courts with young arch conservatives with lifetime appointments
That way they can challenge any Democratic legislation on the most obscure argument imaginable and throw it out
Same tired lines over and over again.
States can do whatever bullshit liberal crap their own people vote for. The issue is when you try to force it on States that want no part of it.
Try again
What you posted is prog-twatwaddle.
Try having an original thought for once.
Has nothing to do with what I postedRepublicans realize that future elections will not be kind to themOne has to remember it isn't just the Supreme Court that is a concern, its the District and Circuit courts as well.
So far Trump seems to be following his word on his court nominees.
Opinion | Here come Trump’s judges: President to put forward more strong judicial nominees
Even their Gerrymander of the House is breaking. The White House is becoming out of reach.
Their respinse is to stock the courts with young arch conservatives with lifetime appointments
That way they can challenge any Democratic legislation on the most obscure argument imaginable and throw it out
Same tired lines over and over again.
States can do whatever bullshit liberal crap their own people vote for. The issue is when you try to force it on States that want no part of it.
Try again
What you posted is prog-twatwaddle.
Try having an original thought for once.
It is an accurate description of what Republicans themselves say they are doing
Has nothing to do with what I postedRepublicans realize that future elections will not be kind to them
Even their Gerrymander of the House is breaking. The White House is becoming out of reach.
Their respinse is to stock the courts with young arch conservatives with lifetime appointments
That way they can challenge any Democratic legislation on the most obscure argument imaginable and throw it out
Same tired lines over and over again.
States can do whatever bullshit liberal crap their own people vote for. The issue is when you try to force it on States that want no part of it.
Try again
What you posted is prog-twatwaddle.
Try having an original thought for once.
It is an accurate description of what Republicans themselves say they are doing
I'm sure you can find direct quotes.
Has nothing to do with what I postedSame tired lines over and over again.
States can do whatever bullshit liberal crap their own people vote for. The issue is when you try to force it on States that want no part of it.
Try again
What you posted is prog-twatwaddle.
Try having an original thought for once.
It is an accurate description of what Republicans themselves say they are doing
I'm sure you can find direct quotes.
Then-candidate Donald Trump capitalized on that passion during the 2016 campaign and made appointing judges to the Supreme Court one of his talking points. It worked.
"I think it's one of the reasons I got elected. I think the people of this country did not want to see what was happening with the Supreme Court," said Trump, shortly before his inauguration in 2017.
As Supreme Court Nears Solid Conservative Majority, GOP Reaps Reward From 'Long Game'
What is important for conservatives is a court that will respect and enforce all the limits on governmental power and control contained in the Constitution."
donnie would have to find a lot of crooked people who he has something on to make any kind of difference in our federal courts.One has to remember it isn't just the Supreme Court that is a concern, its the District and Circuit courts as well.
So far Trump seems to be following his word on his court nominees.
Opinion | Here come Trump’s judges: President to put forward more strong judicial nominees
Monday, according to Adam Liptak in the New York Times, Trump will announce 10 more judicial nominees to lower courts. The nominees make up an impressive list of highly respected jurists, attorneys and legal thinkers. Those of us who doubted Trump would take judicial nominations seriously may have some crow to eat. Especially when one looks at the names to be announced for appellate court vacancies, this is as strong a list of nominees as one could hope for.
donnie would have to find a lot of crooked people who he has something on to make any kind of difference in our federal courts.One has to remember it isn't just the Supreme Court that is a concern, its the District and Circuit courts as well.
So far Trump seems to be following his word on his court nominees.
Opinion | Here come Trump’s judges: President to put forward more strong judicial nominees
Monday, according to Adam Liptak in the New York Times, Trump will announce 10 more judicial nominees to lower courts. The nominees make up an impressive list of highly respected jurists, attorneys and legal thinkers. Those of us who doubted Trump would take judicial nominations seriously may have some crow to eat. Especially when one looks at the names to be announced for appellate court vacancies, this is as strong a list of nominees as one could hope for.