Hell vs G*D and other ridiculous F*%K&N Cen$or$hip

Discussion in 'Religion and Ethics' started by JD_2B, Oct 17, 2009.

  1. JD_2B
    Offline

    JD_2B Little Vixen

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2009
    Messages:
    1,092
    Thanks Received:
    118
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Nunya, Wudjathink
    Ratings:
    +118
    So, Right wing fundie nutjobs-

    Why is it that the censors are OK if they remove the word "GOD" from the dialogue, but KEEP the word HELL?

    Or B!tch

    Or SLUT

    Or Whore

    Or Tits

    Or hand job

    Or any number of other words that are disgusting and NOT censored???

    And how come it is oh so politically correct to show movies and television that involves people getting raped and murdered, or showing hookers catching their johns, and showing tv shows about beer, and pot and other drugs that actually encourage the usage of these, but yet- nobody says a damn thing about them..

    Why is it okay with Fundamentalists to show scantily clad women's posters in a magazine, or on a billboard, or to have some show where two women are getting it on, even without showing any of the most private body parts, and YET- when Brokeback mountain came out, or at the opening of Will and Grace- it was a freaking ongoing damned OUTRAGE that gay MEN were on a show- and kissed?? Big freaking deal. Could this be because it is somehow okay with fundamentalists to keep the women in a position of lowly subservitude to men- and that the whole "war on homosexuality" is only aimed at men, because of this?? I swear, religious fundies are so BRAINWASHED at this point! You have BRAINS! USE THEM, ALREADY!!!

    Tell me- why is it SOOOOOO important to you that the bible be taught in our public schools?? So you can spread this practice of censorship of free thinking?? Is it in some hopes that the death penalty will somehow gain popularity amongst our youth, or maybe it is that the kids will start stoning each other to death for wearing a scarf on their heads- God only knows they like shooting each other, as it is- and yet the concept of kids having their own guns for protection, is just out of the question, lol, right? And don't give me this crap about "Oh we dont want any of that"- bull!!! All too often, fundies talk about this stuff, and its never about love or compassion, tolerance or anything else that can be construed as positive or even constructive.

    Oh and lets not forget the whole concept of money actually going to the education system.. or to victims of rape or domestic abuse, or any other important cause.. Noooo cant have that- that would be socialism. Let's instead bail out automotive companies that have not JUST once taken financial nosedives- lets allot the money to them, and the oil companies, too- oh we shan't forget them!! /Epic sarcastic rant

    Why are the fundies so DAMNED back-ass wards??? I really want to know, and I want my answers to be full, complete, and truthful. :confused:
     
  2. eagleseven
    Offline

    eagleseven Quod Erat Demonstrandum

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2009
    Messages:
    6,518
    Thanks Received:
    1,254
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    OH
    Ratings:
    +1,255
    In short, few things make sense.

    Also, you forgot the </rant> tag.
     
  3. JD_2B
    Offline

    JD_2B Little Vixen

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2009
    Messages:
    1,092
    Thanks Received:
    118
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Nunya, Wudjathink
    Ratings:
    +118

    Nuh uh- I put it in there, just without the little sideyways V's or whatever they are called..

    /epic sarcastic rant


    :lol:

    I still want some answers, dangit..
     
  4. RadiomanATL
    Offline

    RadiomanATL Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2009
    Messages:
    24,944
    Thanks Received:
    3,823
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Not here
    Ratings:
    +3,836
    Because goddammit, we don't like those words. Only Bitches, sluts and whores use those words while they give handjobs and show off their titties.


    (Did I miss any?)
     
  5. Fatality
    Offline

    Fatality SunCrackedSoul

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2009
    Messages:
    2,475
    Thanks Received:
    280
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +280
    ok, what part of that was supposed to make sense?
     
  6. Mad Scientist
    Offline

    Mad Scientist Deplorable Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    23,936
    Thanks Received:
    5,211
    Trophy Points:
    270
    Ratings:
    +7,676
    So, left wing religiphobe nutjobs-

    Why don't you attack Islam? The religion that will actually kill you?

    Gutless, that's why.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  7. RetiredGySgt
    Online

    RetiredGySgt Platinum Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    39,503
    Thanks Received:
    5,897
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Ratings:
    +8,920
    Attention, ALERT, ALERT, RETARD RANT, RETARD RANT.
     
  8. RetiredGySgt
    Online

    RetiredGySgt Platinum Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    39,503
    Thanks Received:
    5,897
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Ratings:
    +8,920
    Let me get this right? You don't want the Government to look at Driver License photo's to catch criminals BUT you want to attack those of religion with your made up bullshit rant? I have that about right?
     
  9. Si modo
    Offline

    Si modo Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2009
    Messages:
    41,538
    Thanks Received:
    6,382
    Trophy Points:
    1,810
    Location:
    St. Eligius
    Ratings:
    +8,701
    Who the hell is censoring you? WTF are you going on about? :cuckoo:
     
  10. JD_2B
    Offline

    JD_2B Little Vixen

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2009
    Messages:
    1,092
    Thanks Received:
    118
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Nunya, Wudjathink
    Ratings:
    +118
    Like I said before- it is not an issue for them to use Drivers License photos on suspects- SUSPECTS do not include analyzing the entire population of the U.S. of A. against a picture for purposes of apprehending someone based solely on a picture, and no name.

    I am also not attacking anyone- OK well maybe the sarcastic tones make it look like an attack, but its not- its voicing my own awareness of religious fundamentalists backwards way of thinking. Unintelligible?? Sure- I suppose to those who are lacking intelligence it might be.. :lol:

    I guess it would be better to go to the more specific threads, since this is all just SOO overwhelming to you.. ;-)
     

Share This Page