Holos
Senior Member
Why do we need governments to ensure the health of populations? And what is the true use for civil health insurance, public or private?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Why do we need governments to ensure the health of populations? And what is the true use for civil health insurance, public or private?
Why do we need governments to ensure the health of populations? And what is the true use for civil health insurance, public or private?
Why do we need governments to ensure the health of populations? And what is the true use for civil health insurance, public or private?
Why do we need governments to ensure the health of populations
For war
.
Why do we need governments to ensure the health of populations? And what is the true use for civil health insurance, public or private?
Maybe you need to start with your perception of "health."
Why do we need governments to ensure the health of populations? And what is the true use for civil health insurance, public or private?
Maybe you need to start with your perception of "health."
To be healthy and know that I am healthy, or to understand public and private governmental healthcare?
Why do we need governments to ensure the health of populations? And what is the true use for civil health insurance, public or private?
Why do we need governments to ensure the health of populations
For war
.
So if an entire population commits to abstain from any and all wars, to the ultimate possible extent of complete and total extermination of their own histories and heritages in the benefit and success of the violating oppressors, does the entire population become consistently healthy without the need for continuous contribution to common healthcare regulations?
Why do we need governments to ensure the health of populations? And what is the true use for civil health insurance, public or private?
Maybe you need to start with your perception of "health."
To be healthy and know that I am healthy, or to understand public and private governmental healthcare?
Why do we need governments to ensure the health of populations? And what is the true use for civil health insurance, public or private?
Why do we need governments to ensure the health of populations
For war
.
So if an entire population commits to abstain from any and all wars, to the ultimate possible extent of complete and total extermination of their own histories and heritages in the benefit and success of the violating oppressors, does the entire population become consistently healthy without the need for continuous contribution to common healthcare regulations?
You a lawyer or something ?
.
Lol...
Why do we need governments to ensure the health of populations? And what is the true use for civil health insurance, public or private?
Maybe you need to start with your perception of "health."
To be healthy and know that I am healthy, or to understand public and private governmental healthcare?
To understand that health, at birth, is neither a commodity nor a matter of the sins of the fathers, but a complex legacy of inheritance and environment, and from then on is a result of a host of factors.
Why do we need governments to ensure the health of populations? And what is the true use for civil health insurance, public or private?
Maybe you need to start with your perception of "health."
To be healthy and know that I am healthy, or to understand public and private governmental healthcare?
You may have been born healthy, and God bless. Not everyone is as fortunate. So, should people who aren't born healthy just die, or should they be assisted?
Why do we need governments to ensure the health of populations? And what is the true use for civil health insurance, public or private?
Maybe you need to start with your perception of "health."
To be healthy and know that I am healthy, or to understand public and private governmental healthcare?
You may have been born healthy, and God bless. Not everyone is as fortunate. So, should people who aren't born healthy just die, or should they be assisted?
I don't think that question pertains to understanding healthcare since the beginning assumption is already the absence of health.
Why do we need governments to ensure the health of populations? And what is the true use for civil health insurance, public or private?
Maybe you need to start with your perception of "health."
To be healthy and know that I am healthy, or to understand public and private governmental healthcare?
You may have been born healthy, and God bless. Not everyone is as fortunate. So, should people who aren't born healthy just die, or should they be assisted?
I don't think that question pertains to understanding healthcare since the beginning assumption is already the absence of health.
Is it?
Maybe you need to start with your perception of "health."
To be healthy and know that I am healthy, or to understand public and private governmental healthcare?
You may have been born healthy, and God bless. Not everyone is as fortunate. So, should people who aren't born healthy just die, or should they be assisted?
I don't think that question pertains to understanding healthcare since the beginning assumption is already the absence of health.
Is it?
Yes, please read your question again.
The short answer is that we do not.Why do we need governments to ensure the health of populations? And what is the true use for civil health insurance, public or private?
To be healthy and know that I am healthy, or to understand public and private governmental healthcare?
You may have been born healthy, and God bless. Not everyone is as fortunate. So, should people who aren't born healthy just die, or should they be assisted?
I don't think that question pertains to understanding healthcare since the beginning assumption is already the absence of health.
Is it?
Yes, please read your question again.
What I'm reading is your assumption that everyone is born healthy. Does not compute.
The short answer is that we do not.Why do we need governments to ensure the health of populations? And what is the true use for civil health insurance, public or private?
The long answer is that we do not 'need' government for anything at all. Government is a function of what we, collectively, want and believe can be done better by a central authority. As a people, we have found that certain functions of government are more efficient or better for the health of the people at large if it controls certain aspects of daily life. Things like requiring proper labeling of products or requiring warnings for products that are blatantly unhealthy. There is a real debate on weather or not government has a grater role to play is actual healthcare itself as well.
We do not need the government to ensure that criminals are caught and prosecuted for breaking the law (or even to define what is lawful itself) either but it certainly is a far better solution to most of us than a anarchy without law in general or a pseudo law enforced by the strongest - though that may be considered a form of government as well.
Why agency over authority? What functional difference do you see in changing the statement in that manner?The short answer is that we do not.Why do we need governments to ensure the health of populations? And what is the true use for civil health insurance, public or private?
The long answer is that we do not 'need' government for anything at all. Government is a function of what we, collectively, want and believe can be done better by a central authority. As a people, we have found that certain functions of government are more efficient or better for the health of the people at large if it controls certain aspects of daily life. Things like requiring proper labeling of products or requiring warnings for products that are blatantly unhealthy. There is a real debate on weather or not government has a grater role to play is actual healthcare itself as well.
We do not need the government to ensure that criminals are caught and prosecuted for breaking the law (or even to define what is lawful itself) either but it certainly is a far better solution to most of us than a anarchy without law in general or a pseudo law enforced by the strongest - though that may be considered a form of government as well.
Thanks for sharing your perspective. I generally agree on the definition and nature of government you have made evident, but I would substitute the word authority for agency in the first paragraph. Furthermore, I would like to inform you about the true nature of Anarchy as a lawful political organization, however we might want to use an active or passive government within Anarchic principles and procedures.
Why agency over authority? What functional difference do you see in changing the statement in that manner?The short answer is that we do not.Why do we need governments to ensure the health of populations? And what is the true use for civil health insurance, public or private?
The long answer is that we do not 'need' government for anything at all. Government is a function of what we, collectively, want and believe can be done better by a central authority. As a people, we have found that certain functions of government are more efficient or better for the health of the people at large if it controls certain aspects of daily life. Things like requiring proper labeling of products or requiring warnings for products that are blatantly unhealthy. There is a real debate on weather or not government has a grater role to play is actual healthcare itself as well.
We do not need the government to ensure that criminals are caught and prosecuted for breaking the law (or even to define what is lawful itself) either but it certainly is a far better solution to most of us than a anarchy without law in general or a pseudo law enforced by the strongest - though that may be considered a form of government as well.
Thanks for sharing your perspective. I generally agree on the definition and nature of government you have made evident, but I would substitute the word authority for agency in the first paragraph. Furthermore, I would like to inform you about the true nature of Anarchy as a lawful political organization, however we might want to use an active or passive government within Anarchic principles and procedures.
I do not see how anarchy can be considered a lawful political organization. Certainly you can have a lawful and organized group that calls for anarchy within the nation itself but an actual anarchy cannot, by definition be a 'lawful' or organized in nature.
Definition of ANARCHY
The absence of government and law are the definition of anarchy.