Has Noah's Ark been found?

[cnm]

How does one find a fairy tale?

Bottom of the garden.

 

[LittleNipper]

Some people say yes and some say no and some say it doesn't matter. Have the ones that say yes found anything? Have the ones that say no visited any sites? I see a real conflict of what should be factual information... Consider the following: Noah's Ark Has Been Found. Why Are They Keeping Us In The Dark?

Incredibly silly article. It claims the patch of earth, which is obviously just a geological feature, has been dismissed by experts because they’re too stupid to realize they should be looking for petrified wood. It takes millions of years for that process to happen to wood. Nonsense from the internet.

I believe that is the very point. As A Christian, I do take many things on faith. From a young boy, I have always believed that the ARK and Noah's Flood were real events. I believe in Jesus the Messiah ---- and HE claimed that Noah existed and how the people of that day would be just like the people before the catching away and HIS ultimate return.
If indeed this particular site is or is not NOAH's Ark --- my faith is unscathed. HOWEVER, if indeed this is the ARK of NOAH, you are indeed correct ----- the geological experts would all look foolish and their answers highly flawed! This would be total proof that millions of years are not necessary for minerals to replace once living fibers. And that would entirely upset the validity of scientific dating methods. It would. mean that they would have to be rethought. And obviously, a worldwide flood would undermine all the present day "scientific expert" evaluations.

 

[BlackFlag]

Some people say yes and some say no and some say it doesn't matter. Have the ones that say yes found anything? Have the ones that say no visited any sites? I see a real conflict of what should be factual information... Consider the following: Noah's Ark Has Been Found. Why Are They Keeping Us In The Dark?

Incredibly silly article. It claims the patch of earth, which is obviously just a geological feature, has been dismissed by experts because they’re too stupid to realize they should be looking for petrified wood. It takes millions of years for that process to happen to wood. Nonsense from the internet.

I believe that is the very point. As A Christian, I do take many things on faith. From a young boy, I have always believed that the ARK and Noah's Flood were real events. I believe in Jesus the Messiah ---- and HE claimed that Noah existed and how the people of that day would be just like the people before the catching away and HIS ultimate return.
If indeed this particular site is or is not NOAH's Ark --- my faith is unscathed. HOWEVER, if indeed this is the ARK of NOAH, you are indeed correct ----- the geological experts would all look foolish and their answers highly flawed! This would be total proof that millions of years are not necessary for minerals to replace once living fibers. And that would entirely upset the validity of scientific dating methods. It would. mean that they would have to be rethought. And obviously, a worldwide flood would undermine all the present day "scientific expert" evaluations.

As throughout all of history, if that religious belief of yours is proven wrong, you’ll make up an excuse, evolve your beliefs a little bit, and go right on believing whatever you want.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Some people say yes and some say no and some say it doesn't matter. Have the ones that say yes found anything? Have the ones that say no visited any sites? I see a real conflict of what should be factual information... Consider the following: Noah's Ark Has Been Found. Why Are They Keeping Us In The Dark?

Wrong forum, having nothing to do with science or technology.

 

[LittleNipper]

Some people say yes and some say no and some say it doesn't matter. Have the ones that say yes found anything? Have the ones that say no visited any sites? I see a real conflict of what should be factual information... Consider the following: Noah's Ark Has Been Found. Why Are They Keeping Us In The Dark?

A lot of stuff wrong here.First the obvious.
- How does a boat gets that high in the mountains? A flood? There isn't enough water on the planet to get to 6300 feet worldwide period. Not enough H2O exists here.
- Secondly how is this sourced. The only source I saw was in the bottom of the article that linked to the exact same article somewhere else. The article keeps on referring to "geologists" and "scientists" yet no peer reviewed articles were found. In fact this is what I did find.Noah's Ark Found in Turkey?
Only one "scientist" was referred to. I put it in airquotes because this guy does hardly publish outside his creationist circle Todd Wood And even he is taking a critical stance.
- Even the article itself poses more questions then it answers. Petrified wood 4800 years old? Fossilization, the process this refers to takes at best more then double that. Rivets, lamination? The article sites the find of those things as a proof of it being truthful. It's like finding a car in the center of the pyramids and drawing the conclusion from that, that "those Egyptians sure were smart".
I appreciate the link but ANY amount of critical thinking should dispel this.

You need to read the book of Revelation with an open mind and heart. Towards the end of that book GOD reveals the look of the new earth. And one is hit with the realization that mountains as we now know them will no longer exist and that oceans as we now know them will be no longer exist. Now since GOD is taking those who believe and trust in HIM and returning them to a pre FALL of man condition, and that the new heaven and the new earth will be much as GOD originally created them ---- and that the FALL of Adam is what brought about the FLOOD and the environmental changes we now accept as "normal," then obviously, there were no ALPS but only rolling hills. The FLOOD was so catastrophic in nature that it contributed greatly to the landscape we presently have now. I believe as part of the FLOOD that meteors, comets, and what have you hit the earth and could have been the result of planets within the solar system being clobbered as a result of the FALL of ADAM. That fall affected the entire UNIVERSE because Satan is the chereb who was originally placed in charge of earth (and that likely means all planitiods everywhere). When Adam fell Satan could now accuse him and bring all manor of attack upon him and that included harming planet Earth. Ultimately, the buck stops with GOD; however, GOD can and does allow Satan to have his way on occasions when it suits GOD's eternal purpose.

 

[LittleNipper]

Some people say yes and some say no and some say it doesn't matter. Have the ones that say yes found anything? Have the ones that say no visited any sites? I see a real conflict of what should be factual information... Consider the following: Noah's Ark Has Been Found. Why Are They Keeping Us In The Dark?

Wrong forum, having nothing to do with science or technology.

It isn't the wrong forum as archeology is scientific research. Simply because this explanation goes against what you believe is scientific, doesn't make you correct and me in error.

 

[LittleNipper]

Some people say yes and some say no and some say it doesn't matter. Have the ones that say yes found anything? Have the ones that say no visited any sites? I see a real conflict of what should be factual information... Consider the following: Noah's Ark Has Been Found. Why Are They Keeping Us In The Dark?

Incredibly silly article. It claims the patch of earth, which is obviously just a geological feature, has been dismissed by experts because they’re too stupid to realize they should be looking for petrified wood. It takes millions of years for that process to happen to wood. Nonsense from the internet.

I believe that is the very point. As A Christian, I do take many things on faith. From a young boy, I have always believed that the ARK and Noah's Flood were real events. I believe in Jesus the Messiah ---- and HE claimed that Noah existed and how the people of that day would be just like the people before the catching away and HIS ultimate return.
If indeed this particular site is or is not NOAH's Ark --- my faith is unscathed. HOWEVER, if indeed this is the ARK of NOAH, you are indeed correct ----- the geological experts would all look foolish and their answers highly flawed! This would be total proof that millions of years are not necessary for minerals to replace once living fibers. And that would entirely upset the validity of scientific dating methods. It would. mean that they would have to be rethought. And obviously, a worldwide flood would undermine all the present day "scientific expert" evaluations.

As throughout all of history, if that religious belief of yours is proven wrong, you’ll make up an excuse, evolve your beliefs a little bit, and go right on believing whatever you want.

What you say seems to reflect on your own belief rather than that of my own.

 

[Syriusly]

Some people say yes and some say no and some say it doesn't matter. Have the ones that say yes found anything? Have the ones that say no visited any sites? I see a real conflict of what should be factual information... Consider the following: Noah's Ark Has Been Found. Why Are They Keeping Us In The Dark?

Have you done any research other than reading ark fansites?

 

[BlackFlag]

Some people say yes and some say no and some say it doesn't matter. Have the ones that say yes found anything? Have the ones that say no visited any sites? I see a real conflict of what should be factual information... Consider the following: Noah's Ark Has Been Found. Why Are They Keeping Us In The Dark?

Incredibly silly article. It claims the patch of earth, which is obviously just a geological feature, has been dismissed by experts because they’re too stupid to realize they should be looking for petrified wood. It takes millions of years for that process to happen to wood. Nonsense from the internet.

I believe that is the very point. As A Christian, I do take many things on faith. From a young boy, I have always believed that the ARK and Noah's Flood were real events. I believe in Jesus the Messiah ---- and HE claimed that Noah existed and how the people of that day would be just like the people before the catching away and HIS ultimate return.
If indeed this particular site is or is not NOAH's Ark --- my faith is unscathed. HOWEVER, if indeed this is the ARK of NOAH, you are indeed correct ----- the geological experts would all look foolish and their answers highly flawed! This would be total proof that millions of years are not necessary for minerals to replace once living fibers. And that would entirely upset the validity of scientific dating methods. It would. mean that they would have to be rethought. And obviously, a worldwide flood would undermine all the present day "scientific expert" evaluations.

As throughout all of history, if that religious belief of yours is proven wrong, you’ll make up an excuse, evolve your beliefs a little bit, and go right on believing whatever you want.

What you say seems to reflect on your own belief rather than that of my own.

I beieve what I can observe and test. I’ve never been presented any example as to why your fairy tale is any more believable than those of the countless other religions that exist and have existed over the millenia.

 

[LittleNipper]

Some people say yes and some say no and some say it doesn't matter. Have the ones that say yes found anything? Have the ones that say no visited any sites? I see a real conflict of what should be factual information... Consider the following: Noah's Ark Has Been Found. Why Are They Keeping Us In The Dark?

Incredibly silly article. It claims the patch of earth, which is obviously just a geological feature, has been dismissed by experts because they’re too stupid to realize they should be looking for petrified wood. It takes millions of years for that process to happen to wood. Nonsense from the internet.

I believe that is the very point. As A Christian, I do take many things on faith. From a young boy, I have always believed that the ARK and Noah's Flood were real events. I believe in Jesus the Messiah ---- and HE claimed that Noah existed and how the people of that day would be just like the people before the catching away and HIS ultimate return.
If indeed this particular site is or is not NOAH's Ark --- my faith is unscathed. HOWEVER, if indeed this is the ARK of NOAH, you are indeed correct ----- the geological experts would all look foolish and their answers highly flawed! This would be total proof that millions of years are not necessary for minerals to replace once living fibers. And that would entirely upset the validity of scientific dating methods. It would. mean that they would have to be rethought. And obviously, a worldwide flood would undermine all the present day "scientific expert" evaluations.

As throughout all of history, if that religious belief of yours is proven wrong, you’ll make up an excuse, evolve your beliefs a little bit, and go right on believing whatever you want.

What you say seems to reflect on your own belief rather than that of my own.

I beieve what I can observe and test. I’ve never been presented any example as to why your fairy tale is any more believable than those of the countless other religions that exist and have existed over the millenia.

So view this and go there and investigate for yourself!

 

[forkup]

Some people say yes and some say no and some say it doesn't matter. Have the ones that say yes found anything? Have the ones that say no visited any sites? I see a real conflict of what should be factual information... Consider the following: Noah's Ark Has Been Found. Why Are They Keeping Us In The Dark?

A lot of stuff wrong here.First the obvious.
- How does a boat gets that high in the mountains? A flood? There isn't enough water on the planet to get to 6300 feet worldwide period. Not enough H2O exists here.
- Secondly how is this sourced. The only source I saw was in the bottom of the article that linked to the exact same article somewhere else. The article keeps on referring to "geologists" and "scientists" yet no peer reviewed articles were found. In fact this is what I did find.Noah's Ark Found in Turkey?
Only one "scientist" was referred to. I put it in airquotes because this guy does hardly publish outside his creationist circle Todd Wood And even he is taking a critical stance.
- Even the article itself poses more questions then it answers. Petrified wood 4800 years old? Fossilization, the process this refers to takes at best more then double that. Rivets, lamination? The article sites the find of those things as a proof of it being truthful. It's like finding a car in the center of the pyramids and drawing the conclusion from that, that "those Egyptians sure were smart".
I appreciate the link but ANY amount of critical thinking should dispel this.

You need to read the book of Revelation with an open mind and heart. Towards the end of that book GOD reveals the look of the new earth. And one is hit with the realization that mountains as we now know them will no longer exist and that oceans as we now know them will be no longer exist. Now since GOD is taking those who believe and trust in HIM and returning them to a pre FALL of man condition, and that the new heaven and the new earth will be much as GOD originally created them ---- and that the FALL of Adam is what brought about the FLOOD and the environmental changes we now accept as "normal," then obviously, there were no ALPS but only rolling hills. The FLOOD was so catastrophic in nature that it contributed greatly to the landscape we presently have now. I believe as part of the FLOOD that meteors, comets, and what have you hit the earth and could have been the result of planets within the solar system being clobbered as a result of the FALL of ADAM. That fall affected the entire UNIVERSE because Satan is the chereb who was originally placed in charge of earth (and that likely means all planitiods everywhere). When Adam fell Satan could now accuse him and bring all manor of attack upon him and that included harming planet Earth. Ultimately, the buck stops with GOD; however, GOD can and does allow Satan to have his way on occasions when it suits GOD's eternal purpose.

-Open mind? What do you consider open mind? The way I read it, the only thing you are claiming is that somehow the Bible answers my questions asked. In order for your view of the world to make sense and give you your "open mind" I have to reject all what is known about science, in order to fit your biblical story that is in fact a derivative of the epic of Gilgamesh, not an early Jewish story.
Not for nothing that isn't an open mind, that is in fact the opposite. Rejecting all explanations that don't fit the religious account.
- I gave you frankly more respect then the article deserved. I sourced your article and I answered specific problems I have with the article. The only comeback you give is "read the Bible".

 

[forkup]

Some people say yes and some say no and some say it doesn't matter. Have the ones that say yes found anything? Have the ones that say no visited any sites? I see a real conflict of what should be factual information... Consider the following: Noah's Ark Has Been Found. Why Are They Keeping Us In The Dark?

Wrong forum, having nothing to do with science or technology.

It isn't the wrong forum as archeology is scientific research. Simply because this explanation goes against what you believe is scientific, doesn't make you correct and me in error.

No archaeology was conducted. It was literally an expedition funded by creationists. Let's try this, undoubtedly this kind of in debt analysis of rock formations has a PEER reviewed article associated with it? The typical way archaeologist share their findings. Find me this article please. Better yet find me a single member of the expedition that had a PHD in archaeology or for that matter any scientific branch.

 

[forkup]

Some people say yes and some say no and some say it doesn't matter. Have the ones that say yes found anything? Have the ones that say no visited any sites? I see a real conflict of what should be factual information... Consider the following: Noah's Ark Has Been Found. Why Are They Keeping Us In The Dark?

Wrong forum, having nothing to do with science or technology.

It isn't the wrong forum as archeology is scientific research. Simply because this explanation goes against what you believe is scientific, doesn't make you correct and me in error.

No archaeology was conducted. It was literally an expedition funded by Evangelical Christians. Let's try this, undoubtedly this kind of in debt analysis of rock formations has a PEER reviewed article associated with it? The typical way archaeologist share their findings. Find me this article please. Better yet find me a single member of the expedition that had a PHD in archaeology or for that matter any scientific branch.

The Days of Noah - Apocalypse
I found four members, none with any scientific background find me others.

 

[Crepitus]

Some people say yes and some say no and some say it doesn't matter. Have the ones that say yes found anything? Have the ones that say no visited any sites? I see a real conflict of what should be factual information... Consider the following: Noah's Ark Has Been Found. Why Are They Keeping Us In The Dark?

Wrong forum, having nothing to do with science or technology.

It isn't the wrong forum as archeology is scientific research. Simply because this explanation goes against what you believe is scientific, doesn't make you correct and me in error.

This isn't archaeology.

 

[LittleNipper]

Some people say yes and some say no and some say it doesn't matter. Have the ones that say yes found anything? Have the ones that say no visited any sites? I see a real conflict of what should be factual information... Consider the following: Noah's Ark Has Been Found. Why Are They Keeping Us In The Dark?

A lot of stuff wrong here.First the obvious.
- How does a boat gets that high in the mountains? A flood? There isn't enough water on the planet to get to 6300 feet worldwide period. Not enough H2O exists here.
- Secondly how is this sourced. The only source I saw was in the bottom of the article that linked to the exact same article somewhere else. The article keeps on referring to "geologists" and "scientists" yet no peer reviewed articles were found. In fact this is what I did find.Noah's Ark Found in Turkey?
Only one "scientist" was referred to. I put it in airquotes because this guy does hardly publish outside his creationist circle Todd Wood And even he is taking a critical stance.
- Even the article itself poses more questions then it answers. Petrified wood 4800 years old? Fossilization, the process this refers to takes at best more then double that. Rivets, lamination? The article sites the find of those things as a proof of it being truthful. It's like finding a car in the center of the pyramids and drawing the conclusion from that, that "those Egyptians sure were smart".
I appreciate the link but ANY amount of critical thinking should dispel this.

You need to read the book of Revelation with an open mind and heart. Towards the end of that book GOD reveals the look of the new earth. And one is hit with the realization that mountains as we now know them will no longer exist and that oceans as we now know them will be no longer exist. Now since GOD is taking those who believe and trust in HIM and returning them to a pre FALL of man condition, and that the new heaven and the new earth will be much as GOD originally created them ---- and that the FALL of Adam is what brought about the FLOOD and the environmental changes we now accept as "normal," then obviously, there were no ALPS but only rolling hills. The FLOOD was so catastrophic in nature that it contributed greatly to the landscape we presently have now. I believe as part of the FLOOD that meteors, comets, and what have you hit the earth and could have been the result of planets within the solar system being clobbered as a result of the FALL of ADAM. That fall affected the entire UNIVERSE because Satan is the chereb who was originally placed in charge of earth (and that likely means all planitiods everywhere). When Adam fell Satan could now accuse him and bring all manor of attack upon him and that included harming planet Earth. Ultimately, the buck stops with GOD; however, GOD can and does allow Satan to have his way on occasions when it suits GOD's eternal purpose.

-Open mind? What do you consider open mind? The way I read it, the only thing you are claiming is that somehow the Bible answers my questions asked. In order for your view of the world to make sense and give you your "open mind" I have to reject all what is known about science, in order to fit your biblical story that is in fact a derivative of the epic of Gilgamesh, not an early Jewish story.
Not for nothing that isn't an open mind, that is in fact the opposite. Rejecting all explanations that don't fit the religious account.
- I gave you frankly more respect then the article deserved. I sourced your article and I answered specific problems I have with the article. The only comeback you give is "read the Bible".

Sorry, but it is far more likely that the Babylonian Epic of Gilgamesh is a distortion of the factual oratory "tradition" if not a later story then the Genesis account itself. The Bible story is far more concise and plausible ------ without a lot of details that make no sense. I told you matter of factly that mountains such as are your concerned didn't exist but were a result of the FLOOD. The earth GOD created was a beautiful place without the dangers of cliffs and boulders and lack of oxygen.

The Pre-Flood World: What Was the Original Creation Like?

 

[LittleNipper]

Some people say yes and some say no and some say it doesn't matter. Have the ones that say yes found anything? Have the ones that say no visited any sites? I see a real conflict of what should be factual information... Consider the following: Noah's Ark Has Been Found. Why Are They Keeping Us In The Dark?

Wrong forum, having nothing to do with science or technology.

It isn't the wrong forum as archeology is scientific research. Simply because this explanation goes against what you believe is scientific, doesn't make you correct and me in error.

This isn't archaeology.

Are you an archaeologist?

 

[sealybobo]

Some people say yes and some say no and some say it doesn't matter. Have the ones that say yes found anything? Have the ones that say no visited any sites? I see a real conflict of what should be factual information... Consider the following: Noah's Ark Has Been Found. Why Are They Keeping Us In The Dark?

They say if we are going to send humans to another planet we need to send about 1000 people. Or 100. I forget. Point is, how did Noah and his 3 sons and their wives repopulate the earth?

 

[Crepitus]

Some people say yes and some say no and some say it doesn't matter. Have the ones that say yes found anything? Have the ones that say no visited any sites? I see a real conflict of what should be factual information... Consider the following: Noah's Ark Has Been Found. Why Are They Keeping Us In The Dark?

Wrong forum, having nothing to do with science or technology.

It isn't the wrong forum as archeology is scientific research. Simply because this explanation goes against what you believe is scientific, doesn't make you correct and me in error.

This isn't archaeology.

Are you an archaeologist?

Nope. Neither are you. What's your point?

 

[Sunsettommy]

Gee another Ark finding, what happened to all those OTHER ark findings of the past?

Noah's Ark Discovered ... Again and Again

There have been talk of finding the world most elusive giant ship since the 1950's, yet no CONFIRMED report has ever been issued.

 

[forkup]

Some people say yes and some say no and some say it doesn't matter. Have the ones that say yes found anything? Have the ones that say no visited any sites? I see a real conflict of what should be factual information... Consider the following: Noah's Ark Has Been Found. Why Are They Keeping Us In The Dark?

A lot of stuff wrong here.First the obvious.
- How does a boat gets that high in the mountains? A flood? There isn't enough water on the planet to get to 6300 feet worldwide period. Not enough H2O exists here.
- Secondly how is this sourced. The only source I saw was in the bottom of the article that linked to the exact same article somewhere else. The article keeps on referring to "geologists" and "scientists" yet no peer reviewed articles were found. In fact this is what I did find.Noah's Ark Found in Turkey?
Only one "scientist" was referred to. I put it in airquotes because this guy does hardly publish outside his creationist circle Todd Wood And even he is taking a critical stance.
- Even the article itself poses more questions then it answers. Petrified wood 4800 years old? Fossilization, the process this refers to takes at best more then double that. Rivets, lamination? The article sites the find of those things as a proof of it being truthful. It's like finding a car in the center of the pyramids and drawing the conclusion from that, that "those Egyptians sure were smart".
I appreciate the link but ANY amount of critical thinking should dispel this.

You need to read the book of Revelation with an open mind and heart. Towards the end of that book GOD reveals the look of the new earth. And one is hit with the realization that mountains as we now know them will no longer exist and that oceans as we now know them will be no longer exist. Now since GOD is taking those who believe and trust in HIM and returning them to a pre FALL of man condition, and that the new heaven and the new earth will be much as GOD originally created them ---- and that the FALL of Adam is what brought about the FLOOD and the environmental changes we now accept as "normal," then obviously, there were no ALPS but only rolling hills. The FLOOD was so catastrophic in nature that it contributed greatly to the landscape we presently have now. I believe as part of the FLOOD that meteors, comets, and what have you hit the earth and could have been the result of planets within the solar system being clobbered as a result of the FALL of ADAM. That fall affected the entire UNIVERSE because Satan is the chereb who was originally placed in charge of earth (and that likely means all planitiods everywhere). When Adam fell Satan could now accuse him and bring all manor of attack upon him and that included harming planet Earth. Ultimately, the buck stops with GOD; however, GOD can and does allow Satan to have his way on occasions when it suits GOD's eternal purpose.

-Open mind? What do you consider open mind? The way I read it, the only thing you are claiming is that somehow the Bible answers my questions asked. In order for your view of the world to make sense and give you your "open mind" I have to reject all what is known about science, in order to fit your biblical story that is in fact a derivative of the epic of Gilgamesh, not an early Jewish story.
Not for nothing that isn't an open mind, that is in fact the opposite. Rejecting all explanations that don't fit the religious account.
- I gave you frankly more respect then the article deserved. I sourced your article and I answered specific problems I have with the article. The only comeback you give is "read the Bible".

Sorry, but it is far more likely that the Babylonian Epic of Gilgamesh is a distortion of the factual oratory "tradition" if not a later story then the Genesis account itself. The Bible story is far more concise and plausible ------ without a lot of details that make no sense. I told you matter of factly that mountains such as are your concerned didn't exist but were a result of the FLOOD. The earth GOD created was a beautiful place without the dangers of cliffs and boulders and lack of oxygen.

The Pre-Flood World: What Was the Original Creation Like?

Some people say yes and some say no and some say it doesn't matter. Have the ones that say yes found anything? Have the ones that say no visited any sites? I see a real conflict of what should be factual information... Consider the following: Noah's Ark Has Been Found. Why Are They Keeping Us In The Dark?

A lot of stuff wrong here.First the obvious.
- How does a boat gets that high in the mountains? A flood? There isn't enough water on the planet to get to 6300 feet worldwide period. Not enough H2O exists here.
- Secondly how is this sourced. The only source I saw was in the bottom of the article that linked to the exact same article somewhere else. The article keeps on referring to "geologists" and "scientists" yet no peer reviewed articles were found. In fact this is what I did find.Noah's Ark Found in Turkey?
Only one "scientist" was referred to. I put it in airquotes because this guy does hardly publish outside his creationist circle Todd Wood And even he is taking a critical stance.
- Even the article itself poses more questions then it answers. Petrified wood 4800 years old? Fossilization, the process this refers to takes at best more then double that. Rivets, lamination? The article sites the find of those things as a proof of it being truthful. It's like finding a car in the center of the pyramids and drawing the conclusion from that, that "those Egyptians sure were smart".
I appreciate the link but ANY amount of critical thinking should dispel this.

You need to read the book of Revelation with an open mind and heart. Towards the end of that book GOD reveals the look of the new earth. And one is hit with the realization that mountains as we now know them will no longer exist and that oceans as we now know them will be no longer exist. Now since GOD is taking those who believe and trust in HIM and returning them to a pre FALL of man condition, and that the new heaven and the new earth will be much as GOD originally created them ---- and that the FALL of Adam is what brought about the FLOOD and the environmental changes we now accept as "normal," then obviously, there were no ALPS but only rolling hills. The FLOOD was so catastrophic in nature that it contributed greatly to the landscape we presently have now. I believe as part of the FLOOD that meteors, comets, and what have you hit the earth and could have been the result of planets within the solar system being clobbered as a result of the FALL of ADAM. That fall affected the entire UNIVERSE because Satan is the chereb who was originally placed in charge of earth (and that likely means all planitiods everywhere). When Adam fell Satan could now accuse him and bring all manor of attack upon him and that included harming planet Earth. Ultimately, the buck stops with GOD; however, GOD can and does allow Satan to have his way on occasions when it suits GOD's eternal purpose.

-Open mind? What do you consider open mind? The way I read it, the only thing you are claiming is that somehow the Bible answers my questions asked. In order for your view of the world to make sense and give you your "open mind" I have to reject all what is known about science, in order to fit your biblical story that is in fact a derivative of the epic of Gilgamesh, not an early Jewish story.
Not for nothing that isn't an open mind, that is in fact the opposite. Rejecting all explanations that don't fit the religious account.
- I gave you frankly more respect then the article deserved. I sourced your article and I answered specific problems I have with the article. The only comeback you give is "read the Bible".

Sorry, but it is far more likely that the Babylonian Epic of Gilgamesh is a distortion of the factual oratory "tradition" if not a later story then the Genesis account itself. The Bible story is far more concise and plausible ------ without a lot of details that make no sense. I told you matter of factly that mountains such as are your concerned didn't exist but were a result of the FLOOD. The earth GOD created was a beautiful place without the dangers of cliffs and boulders and lack of oxygen.

The Pre-Flood World: What Was the Original Creation Like?

Here we go again. Rejecting everything that doesn't fit your belief. I've given you a few pointed questions, all of which you ignore if favor of spouting completely unsubstantiated and frankly unbelievable claims. The Bible is more plausible?????? Parting the Red Sea, a flood that covers the entire planet, etc plausible??? The epic of Gilgamesh was written 2100 BC. the book of revelation was written 65 AD. The book of Genesis was written between 1440 and 1400 BC. Somehow though Gilgamesh took it's story from those books? Nipper your "open mind" isn't working for me. If you aren't interested in backing up anything you say, but are perfectly happy with talking utter nonsense there is no point in talking. So against my better judgement one more time.
- Who was involved in this expedition that is so prestigious that you are willing to disregard the fact that no actual peer reviewed article was published. That the evidence to back up the claim is spotty at best?
(fossilization twice as fast as has ever been seen before) and that you have no problem with the expedition claiming to have found evidence of technology that wasn't seen again until modern times.