WHO approved the source code?...Yeah, thought so.Almost anything can be stashed in the source code...While above my pay grade, it's not brain surgery.....The validators and testers are only following the procedures that they're told.Who said anything about them operating al the time?...The sotware isn't the machine.....You know the difference....The memory cards can be programmed with anything.Who said anything about busting into anything?...The software had to be supplied by someone.....It's not any problem whatsoever to program the "glitch" into it.Nice theory -- but busting into 2500 different precincts in the USA to download trojan ANYTHING into 10s of 1000s of machines -- not normally connected to the WWWeb -- is conspiracy stuff...
Can't be operating all the time.. It's not in the MACHINES -- it's in the "memory cards" that carry from the voting kiosks to the tabulator..
Those are prepared and VALIDATED and locked away until election day.. So they would have to have the cooperation of MANY people -- INCLUDING the manufacturer to carry it out.
Every update or "election set-up" has a VALIDATION procedure.. Which tests the cards AND the machines.. Maybe the tests are not comprehensive enough.. It's WORTH exploring !! But I think, under scrutiny what might be POSSIBLE -- is not actually gonna be found...
This is CIA level shit here...They're not going to leave the game to chance or needing to "bust into" individual precincts.
Your Federal Govt APPROVED the source code and the machines. Doesn't that COUNT for anything?
To do "real time" vote adjusting -- these "tabulators" in every precinct would need to have access to REAL TIME "state wide" vote totals. Or access to the Internet. There's not a precinct in this COUNTRY that would allow ANY voting equipment access to communications during an election..
Nobody said anything about real time adjusting (why do you keep building these strawmen?)...In fact, the lack of it is one of the factors that got this scam busted in Michigan to begin with.
If there's no way for the algorithm to know HOW MANY votes need to be flipped -- how do you suspect this little malignant chunk of code knows WHEN TO STOP??? Or when to adjust it's "ratios"?
There are simpler explanations.. Like STOPPING the vote count in your BIGGEST CITY -- waiting for the REST of the state to be fully tallied -- withholding your count --- and PEOPLE figure out how many votes they need to manufacture or flip... FAR more easy and safe.. Especially when you take extraordinary measures to toss the poll watchers out of the rooms...