Hammer & Scorecard- Whistleblower details efforts of Dems & allies to steal the election

johngaltshrugged

Diamond Member
Oct 15, 2020
6,714
15,352
2,288
The claim is from a credible whistleblower who testified under oath to the FBI that Obama commandeered a computer with a program capable of compromising election results in whatever direction is desired. Hammer is the supercomputer developed by intelligence contractor Dennis Montgomery to help in the war on terror. Scorecard is the trojan horse programming designed & used to change election results.
They are using it in Arizona, Nevada, Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Georgia, Florida & Texas.
The article came out 3 days before the election.
Notice he is not "Anonymous Sources" but an actual person with first hand knowledge the govt tried to muzzle and discredit.
If this is all true, how many Dems will want them held accountable? There have to be some honest Dems left. Bueller?....



Here is another story on how this was all used against Trump before & after the election in 2016

 
The software on these machines in Democrat States takes a vote from Trump and turns it in to a fraction. Biden votes are counted as a full vote.

So lets say the fraction they used is 1/3rd. Then for Trump to match Biden he has to get 3 votes to Biden's 1.

They may have used this software by the way in 2018 mid terms to take the house back.
 
You know, if your taxes are considered on time and are accepted as long as they are postmarked by April 15th, then why in the hell can't the ballots that are postmarked Nov 3rd or before be counted? As long as the postmark says they met the deadline, the ballot should be counted.
 
The software on these machines in Democrat States takes a vote from Trump and turns it in to a fraction. Biden votes are counted as a full vote.

So lets say the fraction they used is 1/3rd. Then for Trump to match Biden he has to get 3 votes to Biden's 1.

They may have used this software by the way in 2018 mid terms to take the house back.

All that we KNOW on that is that one type of machine has s/ware where the designers chose to use fractional math rather than Integer variables.. So -- there's various theories as to WHY.. The fact that it COULD BE DONE -- is a technical term of art here..

Because unless the CUSTOMER has a control panel where this could be turned into hanky panky --access to each and EVERY machine would have to be done BY HAND by qualified technicians. And if the CUSTOMER properly SECURES their machines from "updates" and then properly RETESTS the machines after any firmware update -- this should be detected..

And it wouldn't EVER be as simple as to weight Trump by 1/3.. Because then the TOTAL vote wouldn't equal the TOTAL BALLOTS... This would EASILY caught in canvassing.. This machine is NOT the machine people vote on.. It's the TOTALIZER that merges results from all the OPTICAL scanners in a precinct..

So -- It would have to KNOW the total vote count a priori and "fractionally adjust" based on how much a shift you wanted to apply.. And to which races to apply it. And avoid boosting 3 way races or uncontested races to avoid detection..

Don't know why ANY programmer of voting software would code in anything BUT long integers, but maybe there's a valid technical reason for it...
 
You know, if your taxes are considered on time and are accepted as long as they are postmarked by April 15th, then why in the hell can't the ballots that are postmarked Nov 3rd or before be counted? As long as the postmark says they met the deadline, the ballot should be counted.

Already have whistleblowers from USPS telling folks that they were told to BACK-DATE ballots. And locally big city districts coming up with new piles of mail -- 3 days later..

In Pennsylvania and (IIRC) Nevada -- they BYPASSED the legislators and Governors and had Registrars go to court and get granted EXTENSIONS on receiving ballots.. So that ship sailed there. There was no "election date" certain. Even argued to accept ballots with NO postmark or unreadable postmarks after the 3rd..
 
You know, if your taxes are considered on time and are accepted as long as they are postmarked by April 15th, then why in the hell can't the ballots that are postmarked Nov 3rd or before be counted? As long as the postmark says they met the deadline, the ballot should be counted.

Already have whistleblowers from USPS telling folks that they were told to BACK-DATE ballots. And locally big city districts coming up with new piles of mail -- 3 days later..

In Pennsylvania and (IIRC) Nevada -- they BYPASSED the legislators and Governors and had Registrars go to court and get granted EXTENSIONS on receiving ballots.. So that ship sailed there. There was no "election date" certain. Even argued to accept ballots with NO postmark or unreadable postmarks after the 3rd..

Got links to back up that claim?
 
You know, if your taxes are considered on time and are accepted as long as they are postmarked by April 15th, then why in the hell can't the ballots that are postmarked Nov 3rd or before be counted? As long as the postmark says they met the deadline, the ballot should be counted.

Already have whistleblowers from USPS telling folks that they were told to BACK-DATE ballots. And locally big city districts coming up with new piles of mail -- 3 days later..

In Pennsylvania and (IIRC) Nevada -- they BYPASSED the legislators and Governors and had Registrars go to court and get granted EXTENSIONS on receiving ballots.. So that ship sailed there. There was no "election date" certain. Even argued to accept ballots with NO postmark or unreadable postmarks after the 3rd..

Got links to back up that claim?

There's other pieces to those assertions. But key one is - the Penn SupCt INVENTED new law against what's ACTUALLY the law and bypassed the Gov and the Legislature..


Threads on USMB about this.. Own some research...
 
Nice theory -- but busting into 2500 different precincts in the USA to download trojan ANYTHING into 10s of 1000s of machines -- not normally connected to the WWWeb -- is conspiracy stuff...
Who said anything about busting into anything?...The software had to be supplied by someone.....It's not any problem whatsoever to program the "glitch" into it.
 
Nice theory -- but busting into 2500 different precincts in the USA to download trojan ANYTHING into 10s of 1000s of machines -- not normally connected to the WWWeb -- is conspiracy stuff...
Who said anything about busting into anything?...The software had to be supplied by someone.....It's not any problem whatsoever to program the "glitch" into it.

Can't be operating all the time.. It's not in the MACHINES -- it's in the "memory cards" that carry from the voting kiosks to the tabulator..

Those are prepared and VALIDATED and locked away until election day.. So they would have to have the cooperation of MANY people -- INCLUDING the manufacturer to carry it out.
 
Nice theory -- but busting into 2500 different precincts in the USA to download trojan ANYTHING into 10s of 1000s of machines -- not normally connected to the WWWeb -- is conspiracy stuff...
Who said anything about busting into anything?...The software had to be supplied by someone.....It's not any problem whatsoever to program the "glitch" into it.

Can't be operating all the time.. It's not in the MACHINES -- it's in the "memory cards" that carry from the voting kiosks to the tabulator..

Those are prepared and VALIDATED and locked away until election day.. So they would have to have the cooperation of MANY people -- INCLUDING the manufacturer to carry it out.
Who said anything about them operating al the time?...The sotware isn't the machine.....You know the difference....The memory cards can be programmed with anything.
 
Nice theory -- but busting into 2500 different precincts in the USA to download trojan ANYTHING into 10s of 1000s of machines -- not normally connected to the WWWeb -- is conspiracy stuff...
Who said anything about busting into anything?...The software had to be supplied by someone.....It's not any problem whatsoever to program the "glitch" into it.

Can't be operating all the time.. It's not in the MACHINES -- it's in the "memory cards" that carry from the voting kiosks to the tabulator..

Those are prepared and VALIDATED and locked away until election day.. So they would have to have the cooperation of MANY people -- INCLUDING the manufacturer to carry it out.
Who said anything about them operating al the time?...The sotware isn't the machine.....You know the difference....The memory cards can be programmed with anything.

Every update or "election set-up" has a VALIDATION procedure.. Which tests the cards AND the machines.. Maybe the tests are not comprehensive enough.. It's WORTH exploring !! But I think, under scrutiny what might be POSSIBLE -- is not actually gonna be found...
 
My bet is the validation procedure comes directly from the manufacturer. So to pull this off --- THAT TOO would have to be hosed in the opposite direction from whatever malignant algorithms are afoot..
 
Nice theory -- but busting into 2500 different precincts in the USA to download trojan ANYTHING into 10s of 1000s of machines -- not normally connected to the WWWeb -- is conspiracy stuff...
Who said anything about busting into anything?...The software had to be supplied by someone.....It's not any problem whatsoever to program the "glitch" into it.

Can't be operating all the time.. It's not in the MACHINES -- it's in the "memory cards" that carry from the voting kiosks to the tabulator..

Those are prepared and VALIDATED and locked away until election day.. So they would have to have the cooperation of MANY people -- INCLUDING the manufacturer to carry it out.
Who said anything about them operating al the time?...The sotware isn't the machine.....You know the difference....The memory cards can be programmed with anything.

Every update or "election set-up" has a VALIDATION procedure.. Which tests the cards AND the machines.. Maybe the tests are not comprehensive enough.. It's WORTH exploring !! But I think, under scrutiny what might be POSSIBLE -- is not actually gonna be found...
Almost anything can be stashed in the source code...While above my pay grade, it's not brain surgery.....The validators and testers are only following the procedures that they're told.

This is CIA level shit here...They're not going to leave the game to chance or needing to "bust into" individual precincts.
 
Nice theory -- but busting into 2500 different precincts in the USA to download trojan ANYTHING into 10s of 1000s of machines -- not normally connected to the WWWeb -- is conspiracy stuff...
Who said anything about busting into anything?...The software had to be supplied by someone.....It's not any problem whatsoever to program the "glitch" into it.

Can't be operating all the time.. It's not in the MACHINES -- it's in the "memory cards" that carry from the voting kiosks to the tabulator..

Those are prepared and VALIDATED and locked away until election day.. So they would have to have the cooperation of MANY people -- INCLUDING the manufacturer to carry it out.
Who said anything about them operating al the time?...The sotware isn't the machine.....You know the difference....The memory cards can be programmed with anything.

Every update or "election set-up" has a VALIDATION procedure.. Which tests the cards AND the machines.. Maybe the tests are not comprehensive enough.. It's WORTH exploring !! But I think, under scrutiny what might be POSSIBLE -- is not actually gonna be found...
Almost anything can be stashed in the source code...While above my pay grade, it's not brain surgery.....The validators and testers are only following the procedures that they're told.

This is CIA level shit here...They're not going to leave the game to chance or needing to "bust into" individual precincts.

Your Federal Govt APPROVED the source code and the machines. Doesn't that COUNT for anything? :stir:

To do "real time" vote adjusting -- these "tabulators" in every precinct would need to have access to REAL TIME "state wide" vote totals. Or access to the Internet. There's not a precinct in this COUNTRY that would allow ANY voting equipment access to communications during an election..
 
What I DO know here is that folks are quoting conspiracy sites claiming that Hammer and Scorecard are related.. And that Hammer was used to DO EVERY nefarious deed under the sun.. Including the spying on Trump personally, the sting operation on General Flynn and a dozen other claims..

What Hammer apparently REALLY IS -- is a competitive spinoff of the NSA 702 domestic surveillance system.. It was RIPPED from NSA and given to CIA for use ABROAD to enhance the CIA world operations. THEN -- allegedly, the Obama Admin ripped it from CIA and moved it to DOD control OUTSIDE of CIA..

Big difference being -- to get the keys to drive the NSA "World's Greatest Domestic Spy Machine" -- you NEED A FISA COURT WARRANT.. And not every Joe can GET one of those.. So it was "inconvenient" for Congress and Exec branch who lusted to use it on their favorite targets..

You don't need no stinkin warrant to drive "the hammer".

IF this history and story IS correct -- The ONLY connection to mangling votes is the ABILITY to INTERCEPT communications. MAYBE the modem that sends the precinct tally to the state registrar via phone lines. But it is NOT MALWARE ON VOTING MACHINES.. It;s worse than that..
 
Nice theory -- but busting into 2500 different precincts in the USA to download trojan ANYTHING into 10s of 1000s of machines -- not normally connected to the WWWeb -- is conspiracy stuff...
Who said anything about busting into anything?...The software had to be supplied by someone.....It's not any problem whatsoever to program the "glitch" into it.

Can't be operating all the time.. It's not in the MACHINES -- it's in the "memory cards" that carry from the voting kiosks to the tabulator..

Those are prepared and VALIDATED and locked away until election day.. So they would have to have the cooperation of MANY people -- INCLUDING the manufacturer to carry it out.
Who said anything about them operating al the time?...The sotware isn't the machine.....You know the difference....The memory cards can be programmed with anything.

Every update or "election set-up" has a VALIDATION procedure.. Which tests the cards AND the machines.. Maybe the tests are not comprehensive enough.. It's WORTH exploring !! But I think, under scrutiny what might be POSSIBLE -- is not actually gonna be found...
Almost anything can be stashed in the source code...While above my pay grade, it's not brain surgery.....The validators and testers are only following the procedures that they're told.

This is CIA level shit here...They're not going to leave the game to chance or needing to "bust into" individual precincts.

Your Federal Govt APPROVED the source code and the machines. Doesn't that COUNT for anything? :stir:

To do "real time" vote adjusting -- these "tabulators" in every precinct would need to have access to REAL TIME "state wide" vote totals. Or access to the Internet. There's not a precinct in this COUNTRY that would allow ANY voting equipment access to communications during an election..
WHO approved the source code?...Yeah, thought so.

Nobody said anything about real time adjusting (why do you keep building these strawmen?)...In fact, the lack of it is one of the factors that got this scam busted in Michigan to begin with.
 
The claim is from a credible whistleblower who testified under oath to the FBI that Obama commandeered a computer with a program capable of compromising election results in whatever direction is desired. Hammer is the supercomputer developed by intelligence contractor Dennis Montgomery to help in the war on terror. Scorecard is the trojan horse programming designed & used to change election results.
They are using it in Arizona, Nevada, Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Georgia, Florida & Texas.
The article came out 3 days before the election.
Notice he is not "Anonymous Sources" but an actual person with first hand knowledge the govt tried to muzzle and discredit.
If this is all true, how many Dems will want them held accountable? There have to be some honest Dems left. Bueller?....



Here is another story on how this was all used against Trump before & after the election in 2016

Not only is there no honest democRat. There is no democrat with a double digit IQ or not having a drooling and soiling himself problem
 

Forum List

Back
Top