Haha ... Trump Sends Strike Force to the Wrong Address

This administration couldn't deliver a pizza on time if their lives depended on it.

WASHINGTON — As worries deepened last week about whether North Korea would conduct a missile test, the White House declared that ordering an American aircraft carrier into the Sea of Japan would send a powerful deterrent signal and give President Trump more options in responding to the North’s provocative behavior.

The problem was, the carrier, the Carl Vinson, and the four other warships in its strike force were at that very moment sailing in the opposite direction, to take part in joint exercises with the Australian Navy in the Indian Ocean, 3,500 miles southwest of the Korean Peninsula.

White House officials said on Tuesday they were relying on guidance from the Defense Department. Officials there described a glitch-ridden sequence of events, from a premature announcement of the deployment by the military’s Pacific Command to an erroneous explanation by Defense Secretary Jim Mattis — all of which perpetuated the false narrative that an American armada was racing toward the waters off North Korea.

By the time the White House was asked about the Carl Vinson on April 11, its imminent arrival had been emblazoned on front pages across East Asia, fanning fears that Mr. Trump was considering a pre-emptive military strike on North Korea. It was portrayed as further evidence of the president’s muscular style two days after he ordered a missile strike on Syria while he and President Xi Jinping of China were finishing dessert during a meeting in Florida.

The saga of the wayward carrier might never have come to light, had the Navy not posted a photograph on Monday of the Carl Vinson sailing through the Sunda Strait, which separates the Indonesian islands of Java and Sumatra. The picture was taken on Saturday, four days after the White House press secretary, Sean Spicer, described its mission in the Sea of Japan.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/18/...ontentID=65177131&pgtype=Homepage&mtrref=t.co
So the ship was heading somewhere else before changing it's route. I'm sure that's never happened before in the history of the military.
Well, you know....to RussianWrs who pretend to know about our military....it takes a loooooooong time to turn a carrier around....:lol:
 
Yeah exactly don't you know about the FACTS, you and the leakers fell for the oldest trick in the book, Letting false info fall into a treasonist's hands to ferret them out, There are a couple of carriers headed to the area BUT not those, They never were ordered to change directions, and were never included in the task force except for a leak search. Some oshitass placed employees bit and were outed as treasonist. BOOHOOOBOOGER-EATIN-HOO there liberals some more of you scum have been found out Hopefully they will hang in public execution.
You ok? :itsok:
 
Yeah exactly don't you know about the FACTS, you and the leakers fell for the oldest trick in the book, Letting false info fall into a treasonist's hands to ferret them out, There are a couple of carriers headed to the area BUT not those, They never were ordered to change directions, and were never included in the task force except for a leak search. Some oshitass placed employees bit and were outed as treasonist. BOOHOOOBOOGER-EATIN-HOO there liberals some more of you scum have been found out Hopefully they will hang in public execution.

Yeah, ...

... that's what happened.

[chuckle]
 
Haha ... Trump Sends Strike Force to the Wrong Address

Well, that's an easy mistake to make - considering how close they are on the map. And, Singapore does sound a lot like North Korea.

wKoreaShipMap.jpg


Despite talk of a military strike, Trump’s ‘armada’ actually sailed away from Korea
 
Clowns laugh, it's what they do.

Trump fucks up. It's what he does. 7 bankruptcies and counting.
How? The carrier was heading to one place when circumstances changed and it needed to head somewhere else. How is that a fuck up?
It's sometimes best to allow these clowns a moment of feeling victory. ;)

It doesn't matter if it's real or not, they'll take anything they can get.
Sadly for them I get my moments of feeling victory by stomping all over their pipe dreams and false realities.
 
This administration couldn't deliver a pizza on time if their lives depended on it.

WASHINGTON — As worries deepened last week about whether North Korea would conduct a missile test, the White House declared that ordering an American aircraft carrier into the Sea of Japan would send a powerful deterrent signal and give President Trump more options in responding to the North’s provocative behavior.

The problem was, the carrier, the Carl Vinson, and the four other warships in its strike force were at that very moment sailing in the opposite direction, to take part in joint exercises with the Australian Navy in the Indian Ocean, 3,500 miles southwest of the Korean Peninsula.

White House officials said on Tuesday they were relying on guidance from the Defense Department. Officials there described a glitch-ridden sequence of events, from a premature announcement of the deployment by the military’s Pacific Command to an erroneous explanation by Defense Secretary Jim Mattis — all of which perpetuated the false narrative that an American armada was racing toward the waters off North Korea.

By the time the White House was asked about the Carl Vinson on April 11, its imminent arrival had been emblazoned on front pages across East Asia, fanning fears that Mr. Trump was considering a pre-emptive military strike on North Korea. It was portrayed as further evidence of the president’s muscular style two days after he ordered a missile strike on Syria while he and President Xi Jinping of China were finishing dessert during a meeting in Florida.

The saga of the wayward carrier might never have come to light, had the Navy not posted a photograph on Monday of the Carl Vinson sailing through the Sunda Strait, which separates the Indonesian islands of Java and Sumatra. The picture was taken on Saturday, four days after the White House press secretary, Sean Spicer, described its mission in the Sea of Japan.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/18/...ontentID=65177131&pgtype=Homepage&mtrref=t.co
So the ship was heading somewhere else before changing it's route. I'm sure that's never happened before in the history of the military.
Well, you know....to RussianWrs who pretend to know about our military....it takes a loooooooong time to turn a carrier around....:lol:
And obviously you think it takes weeks or months. Or are you just trying to hang on to this stupid nugget of something you think is a tweak on PDT?
 
Clowns laugh, it's what they do.

Trump fucks up. It's what he does. 7 bankruptcies and counting.
How? The carrier was heading to one place when circumstances changed and it needed to head somewhere else. How is that a fuck up?
It's sometimes best to allow these clowns a moment of feeling victory. ;)

It doesn't matter if it's real or not, they'll take anything they can get.
Sadly for them I get my moments of feeling victory by stomping all over their pipe dreams and false realities.
It always takes more time for libs to learn. I'm often called to deal with them at work.
 
Did Trump also misplace the nuclear submarines he was bragging about?
The fuck? What are you changing this conversation to now? Where are they and how the hell do you think they are misplaced? They may be right on the NorK border as we speak.
 
Clowns laugh, it's what they do.

Trump fucks up. It's what he does. 7 bankruptcies and counting.
How? The carrier was heading to one place when circumstances changed and it needed to head somewhere else. How is that a fuck up?
It's sometimes best to allow these clowns a moment of feeling victory. ;)

It doesn't matter if it's real or not, they'll take anything they can get.
Sadly for them I get my moments of feeling victory by stomping all over their pipe dreams and false realities.
It always takes more time for libs to learn. I'm often called to deal with them at work.
A life time of learning doesn't seem to be enough. Some people just struggle to grasp basic concepts until they die.
 
This administration couldn't deliver a pizza on time if their lives depended on it.

WASHINGTON — As worries deepened last week about whether North Korea would conduct a missile test, the White House declared that ordering an American aircraft carrier into the Sea of Japan would send a powerful deterrent signal and give President Trump more options in responding to the North’s provocative behavior.

The problem was, the carrier, the Carl Vinson, and the four other warships in its strike force were at that very moment sailing in the opposite direction, to take part in joint exercises with the Australian Navy in the Indian Ocean, 3,500 miles southwest of the Korean Peninsula.

White House officials said on Tuesday they were relying on guidance from the Defense Department. Officials there described a glitch-ridden sequence of events, from a premature announcement of the deployment by the military’s Pacific Command to an erroneous explanation by Defense Secretary Jim Mattis — all of which perpetuated the false narrative that an American armada was racing toward the waters off North Korea.

By the time the White House was asked about the Carl Vinson on April 11, its imminent arrival had been emblazoned on front pages across East Asia, fanning fears that Mr. Trump was considering a pre-emptive military strike on North Korea. It was portrayed as further evidence of the president’s muscular style two days after he ordered a missile strike on Syria while he and President Xi Jinping of China were finishing dessert during a meeting in Florida.

The saga of the wayward carrier might never have come to light, had the Navy not posted a photograph on Monday of the Carl Vinson sailing through the Sunda Strait, which separates the Indonesian islands of Java and Sumatra. The picture was taken on Saturday, four days after the White House press secretary, Sean Spicer, described its mission in the Sea of Japan.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/18/...ontentID=65177131&pgtype=Homepage&mtrref=t.co
So the ship was heading somewhere else before changing it's route. I'm sure that's never happened before in the history of the military.
Well, you know....to RussianWrs who pretend to know about our military....it takes a loooooooong time to turn a carrier around....:lol:
About two minutes.
 
Trump fucks up. It's what he does. 7 bankruptcies and counting.
How? The carrier was heading to one place when circumstances changed and it needed to head somewhere else. How is that a fuck up?
It's sometimes best to allow these clowns a moment of feeling victory. ;)

It doesn't matter if it's real or not, they'll take anything they can get.
Sadly for them I get my moments of feeling victory by stomping all over their pipe dreams and false realities.
It always takes more time for libs to learn. I'm often called to deal with them at work.
A life time of learning doesn't seem to be enough. Some people just struggle to grasp basic concepts until they die.
Those are the people who don't have common sense. I tend to ignore them because I think common sense is something we're born with.
 
Last edited:
This administration couldn't deliver a pizza on time if their lives depended on it.

WASHINGTON — As worries deepened last week about whether North Korea would conduct a missile test, the White House declared that ordering an American aircraft carrier into the Sea of Japan would send a powerful deterrent signal and give President Trump more options in responding to the North’s provocative behavior.

The problem was, the carrier, the Carl Vinson, and the four other warships in its strike force were at that very moment sailing in the opposite direction, to take part in joint exercises with the Australian Navy in the Indian Ocean, 3,500 miles southwest of the Korean Peninsula.

White House officials said on Tuesday they were relying on guidance from the Defense Department. Officials there described a glitch-ridden sequence of events, from a premature announcement of the deployment by the military’s Pacific Command to an erroneous explanation by Defense Secretary Jim Mattis — all of which perpetuated the false narrative that an American armada was racing toward the waters off North Korea.

By the time the White House was asked about the Carl Vinson on April 11, its imminent arrival had been emblazoned on front pages across East Asia, fanning fears that Mr. Trump was considering a pre-emptive military strike on North Korea. It was portrayed as further evidence of the president’s muscular style two days after he ordered a missile strike on Syria while he and President Xi Jinping of China were finishing dessert during a meeting in Florida.

The saga of the wayward carrier might never have come to light, had the Navy not posted a photograph on Monday of the Carl Vinson sailing through the Sunda Strait, which separates the Indonesian islands of Java and Sumatra. The picture was taken on Saturday, four days after the White House press secretary, Sean Spicer, described its mission in the Sea of Japan.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/18/...ontentID=65177131&pgtype=Homepage&mtrref=t.co
You clearly don't know anything about military strategy and tactics.

That particular tactic looks nuts.
 
This administration couldn't deliver a pizza on time if their lives depended on it.

WASHINGTON — As worries deepened last week about whether North Korea would conduct a missile test, the White House declared that ordering an American aircraft carrier into the Sea of Japan would send a powerful deterrent signal and give President Trump more options in responding to the North’s provocative behavior.

The problem was, the carrier, the Carl Vinson, and the four other warships in its strike force were at that very moment sailing in the opposite direction, to take part in joint exercises with the Australian Navy in the Indian Ocean, 3,500 miles southwest of the Korean Peninsula.

White House officials said on Tuesday they were relying on guidance from the Defense Department. Officials there described a glitch-ridden sequence of events, from a premature announcement of the deployment by the military’s Pacific Command to an erroneous explanation by Defense Secretary Jim Mattis — all of which perpetuated the false narrative that an American armada was racing toward the waters off North Korea.

By the time the White House was asked about the Carl Vinson on April 11, its imminent arrival had been emblazoned on front pages across East Asia, fanning fears that Mr. Trump was considering a pre-emptive military strike on North Korea. It was portrayed as further evidence of the president’s muscular style two days after he ordered a missile strike on Syria while he and President Xi Jinping of China were finishing dessert during a meeting in Florida.

The saga of the wayward carrier might never have come to light, had the Navy not posted a photograph on Monday of the Carl Vinson sailing through the Sunda Strait, which separates the Indonesian islands of Java and Sumatra. The picture was taken on Saturday, four days after the White House press secretary, Sean Spicer, described its mission in the Sea of Japan.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/18/...ontentID=65177131&pgtype=Homepage&mtrref=t.co
You clearly don't know anything about military strategy and tactics.

That particular tactic looks nuts.
Over whelming force is nuts? Please tell me more of your not sending anyone to fight battle strategy.
 
This administration couldn't deliver a pizza on time if their lives depended on it.

WASHINGTON — As worries deepened last week about whether North Korea would conduct a missile test, the White House declared that ordering an American aircraft carrier into the Sea of Japan would send a powerful deterrent signal and give President Trump more options in responding to the North’s provocative behavior.

The problem was, the carrier, the Carl Vinson, and the four other warships in its strike force were at that very moment sailing in the opposite direction, to take part in joint exercises with the Australian Navy in the Indian Ocean, 3,500 miles southwest of the Korean Peninsula.

White House officials said on Tuesday they were relying on guidance from the Defense Department. Officials there described a glitch-ridden sequence of events, from a premature announcement of the deployment by the military’s Pacific Command to an erroneous explanation by Defense Secretary Jim Mattis — all of which perpetuated the false narrative that an American armada was racing toward the waters off North Korea.

By the time the White House was asked about the Carl Vinson on April 11, its imminent arrival had been emblazoned on front pages across East Asia, fanning fears that Mr. Trump was considering a pre-emptive military strike on North Korea. It was portrayed as further evidence of the president’s muscular style two days after he ordered a missile strike on Syria while he and President Xi Jinping of China were finishing dessert during a meeting in Florida.

The saga of the wayward carrier might never have come to light, had the Navy not posted a photograph on Monday of the Carl Vinson sailing through the Sunda Strait, which separates the Indonesian islands of Java and Sumatra. The picture was taken on Saturday, four days after the White House press secretary, Sean Spicer, described its mission in the Sea of Japan.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/18/...ontentID=65177131&pgtype=Homepage&mtrref=t.co
You clearly don't know anything about military strategy and tactics.

That particular tactic looks nuts.
Over whelming force is nuts? Please tell me more of your not sending anyone to fight battle strategy.

Overwhelming force doesn't mean much if it's sailing the opposite direction.
 

Forum List

Back
Top